Propafenone for the treatment of refractory complex ventricular ectopic activity

Clinical course of recent-onset atrial fibrillation treated with oral propafenone

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common cardiac arrhythmias in the adult population. Propafenone is a class 1c antiarrhythmic agent that has an electrophysiologic profile suggesting that it might be potentially effective in recent-onset AF. The present study was undertaken, therefore, to examine the time course as well as the frequency of successful conversion in patients with recent-onset AF treated with propafenone administered orally. Fifty patients with recent-onset AF were recruited into 2 groups: 25 patients were given propafenone, 150 mg every 4 h, and 25 patients served as a control group and received verapamil (a drug known to slow the ventricular response but not to restore sinus rhythm) 40 mg, every 4 h and up to 48 h or until conversion to sinus rhythm occurred. Of the 50 patients, 2 refused to continue the study and another 2 were excluded because of left heart failure. Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 21 of 24 patients (87 percent) in the propafenone group as compared with 9 of 22 (41 percent) in the verapamil group (p < 0.001). In 10 patients in the propafenone group, conversion occurred within 12 h, within 24 h in another 9 patients, and between 24 and 48 h in the remaining 2 patients. There was no correlation between the duration of AF prior to entry into the study and the subsequent incidence of and time to conversion with propafenone. With respect to cause of AF, all groups showed a high incidence of conversion. Two patients developed heart failure during treatment and one patient (in the verapamil group) developed embolic stroke while still having atrial fibrillation. We conclude that in patients with AF, the prognosis for conversion to sinus rhythm within 48 h, with propafenone, is excellent (87 percent) and safe.

Short-term and long-term treatment with propafenone: determinants of arrhythmia suppression, persistence of efficacy, arrhythmogenesis, and side effects in patients with symptoms

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical criteria predicting the short and long-term efficacy of propafenone, an agent with class IC antiarrhythmic activity and a broad pharmacological profile.

DESIGNS

Prospective study of propafenone at doses of 450 to 900 mg/day during a six week dose titration period (including a placebo phase with two separate 24 Holter recordings). Responders to treatment were followed for one year.

PATIENTS

One hundred patients with frequent ventricular arrhythmias (greater than 30 extrasystoles/h) of Lown class III and IVA/B and without evidence of myocardial infarction within the past six months.

ANALYSIS

Multivariate regression analysis of spontaneous arrhythmia variability and of different clinical variables to determine the short and long-term efficacy and safety of propafenone.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Propafenone 450 mg/day was effective in 30/100 patients (30%), and at 600 mg/day another 14 responded. The efficacy of propafenone correlated with a low spontaneous arrhythmia variability and, as shown by multivariate analysis, with a lower patient age (p less than 0.05). When the dose was increased to 900 mg/day a further six (12%) patients responded. However, with increasing doses of propafenone, the one year probability of effective treatment decreased from 86% (450 mg/day) to 67% (600 mg/day) and to 44% (900 mg/day). After restudying the patients at three, six, and 12 months and after dose adjustment in 11/44 patients (25%), 31 patients (70%) remained responders. Loss of permanent antiarrhythmic efficacy was best predicted by the initial dose that achieved a response. No patient died suddenly or had arrhythmogenic effects during Holter monitoring. Side effects occurred in 36% of patients but these rarely limited long-term treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A younger age, low spontaneous arrhythmia variability, and particularly a low titration dose were the best predictors of the short and long term efficacy of propafenone. All other responders should have repeated Holter recordings during the first year of treatment.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy for suppression of ventricular arrhythmia: experience with 122 patients treated for two years

Although there are many reports of the short-term effectiveness of antiarrhythmic drugs for suppression of ventricular ectopic depolarizations, there are less data available on the long-term use of these drugs. We treated 122 patients for up to 2 years with antiarrhythmic drugs for suppression of frequent ventricular ectopic depolarizations. The percent suppression of ventricular ectopic depolarizations and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia for each drug was determined at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of therapy. Among 33 patients treated with flecainide, the mean suppression of ventricular ectopic depolarizations (average of all data during 24 months) was 93 +/- 17% and of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was 97 +/- 7%. In 27 patients treated with encainide, the mean suppression of ventricular ectopic depolarizations was 88 +/- 18% and of ventricular tachycardia was 95 +/- 16%. Among 26 patients treated with propafenone, the mean suppression of ventricular ectopic depolarizations was 77 +/- 32% and of ventricular tachycardia was 93 +/- 15%. For the 20 patients treated with moricizine, the mean suppression of ventricular ectopic depolarizations was 62 +/- 35% and of ventricular tachycardia was 90 +/- 14%. Among 16 patients treated with amiodarone, the mean suppression of ventricular ectopic depolarizations was 92 +/- 14% and of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was 99 +/- 3%. In 54 of the 122 patients (44%), the study drug was stopped during 2 years of therapy because of death (2 sudden, 2 unwitnessed and 6 noncardiac), side effects (21 patients), lack or of loss of efficacy (13 patients), and noncompliance (10 patients).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Minimal effective concentration values of propafenone and 5-hydroxy-propafenone in acute and chronic therapy

We evaluated the antiarrhythmic efficacy and the minimal effective concentrations of propafenone and its metabolite 5-hydroxy-propafenone during a) acute intravenous infusion (1.5 mg/kg in bolus followed by 45 minutes infusion), b) an acute oral single-dose test (450 mg), and c) 14-day chronic therapy (300 mg tid) followed by a washout. Oxidative metabolism was assessed by a debrisoquine oral test in every patient. Eleven patients with stable ventricular premature beats (VPBs) greater than or equal to 300/hr and Lown class greater than or equal to 3 completed the study. The main results emphasized a certain discrepancy between the clinical effect of the acute intravenous infusion (efficacy in 5 out of 11 patients) and of the acute oral test and chronic therapy (efficacy in 11/11), with a time lag of the ECG changes during the acute intravenous infusion. The minimal effective concentrations were lower after acute oral administration compared with chronic treatment both for propafenone (200 +/- 189 ng/ml vs. 492 +/- 530 ng/ml; p less than 0.05) and for 5-hydroxy-propafenone (82 +/- 40 ng/ml vs. 149 +/- 80 ng/ml; p less than 0.02). A linear correlation was demonstrated between drug/metabolite ratios of propafenone and debrisoquine, either after acute oral (r = 0.91) or after chronic administration (r = 0.84). The pharmacokinetics of propafenone was nonlinear and showed wide interindividual variations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Propafenone--a new agent for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias

Over the last several years a number of new and potent antiarrhythmic agents have been developed. One of these promising new drugs, propafenone hydrochloride (Rhythmol), will soon be available for use in this country. Although similar in some aspects to flecainide and encainide, the drug possesses some unique characteristics. The purpose of this review is to summarize the pharmacologic and physiologic effects of propafenone and to outline its clinical use.

Effects of coadministration of propafenone on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy volunteer subjects

Previous reports have suggested an interaction between propafenone and digoxin. We investigated the pharmacokinetics of IV digoxin when given alone (Phase I), after pretreatment with propafenone 150 mg every 8 hours for seven days (Phase II), and after propafenone 300 mg every 8 hours for 7 days (Phase III). The total body clearance of digoxin during Phase I was 2.45 ml/min/kg and was 2.17 ml/min/kg during Phase II (NS) and decreased to 1.92 ml/min/kg during Phase III (P less than 0.05). The renal clearance and half-life of digoxin were not significantly altered by propafenone. There was a trend towards a decrease in the volume of distribution of digoxin from 9.43 L/kg in Phase I, to 9.33 L/kg in Phase II, and 8.02 L/kg in Phase III. Similarly there was a trend towards a decreased nonrenal clearance of digoxin from 1.21 ml/min/kg during Phase I to 1.01 ml/min/kg during Phase II and to 0.75 ml/min/kg during Phase III. The changes in volume of distribution and nonrenal clearance parallel each other resulting in no change in the elimination half-life of digoxin. It is postulated that the mechanism of this interaction is due to decreases in the volume of distribution and nonrenal elimination of digoxin by propafenone. The degree of this interaction was related to the dose of propafenone. The magnitude of this interaction may be greater in patients and, thus, may require a reduction in the digoxin dose.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of propafenone and cimetidine

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the extensively metabolized antiarrhythmic agent propafenone were assessed alone and during concomitant administration of cimetidine. Twelve healthy subjects were given successively the following treatments: propafenone 225 mg q8h plus cimetidine placebo; cimetidine 400 mg q8h plus propafenone placebo; and propafenone 225 mg plus cimetidine 400 mg q8h. After a minimum of 5 days on each regimen, plasma drug concentrations and electrocardiogram conduction intervals were measured during a drug washout period. The maximum concentration of propafenone in plasma was 993 +/- 532 ng/mL when propafenone was given alone compared with 1230 +/- 591 ng/mL when propafenone was given with cimetidine (P = .0622). Differences in tmax, t1/2, and Cp ss did not approach statistical significance when propafenone alone was compared with propafenone plus cimetidine. When compared with cimetidine, propafenone significantly increased the PR interval from 161 +/- 5 msec to 192 +/- 6 msec (P less than .01) and the QRS duration from 89 +/- 3 msec to 98 +/- 4 msec (P less than .01). Combination therapy caused a modest additional increase in QRS duration to 103 +/- 3 msec (P less than .01). In conclusion, cimetidine caused small changes in propafenone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; but these changes are unlikely to be clinically important.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propafenone during acute and chronic administration

The pharmacokinetics of propafenone and 5-OH-propafenone and their relationship with the antiarrhythmic action and side effects have been studied in 10 patients with stable, frequent, premature ventricular beats (224-928 premature ventricular complexes/h). Observations were made after a single dose of propafenone 300 mg p.o., and after 1 and 3 months (only 5 out of 10 patients) of therapy with 300 mg t.d.s. After 1 month of treatment the plasma elimination half-life of propafenone (6.7 h) was almost twice as long as after a single dose (3.5 h), and the area under the plasma propafenone concentration-time curve (7620 ng.ml-1.h) was significantly larger than after single dose (3522 ng.ml-1.h); this was also true for the metabolite. The ratio of the AUCs of 5-OH-propafenone and propafenone decreased from the single dose (0.63) to 1 month (0.32). These variables remained stable up to 3 months. Eight patients had greater than or equal to 75% reduction of premature ventricular complexes after 3 days of therapy, and in 7 they were completely suppressed; the response was maintained over 1 to 3 months. Side effects were minor and in no case had the drug to be withdrawn or the dose reduced. Thus, the kinetics of propafenone were time-dependent. Its active metabolite did not accumulate greatly during chronic treatment. The lasting antiarrhythmic effect observed in some patients suggests a b.d.s. regimen instead of t.d.s. dosing in selected patients.

Propafenone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in the treatment of arrhythmias

Propafenone is a Class I antiarrhythmic agent with weak beta-adrenoceptor antagonist activity which can be given both intravenously and orally. Dosage must be individualised because of dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, a wide range of clinically effective plasma concentrations (64 to 3271 micrograms/L) after comparable doses, the presence of an active metabolite (5-hydroxy-propafenone) and genetically determined metabolic oxidation. In non-comparative studies propafenone 450 and 900 mg/day orally significantly suppressed premature ventricular complexes and couplets in 96% and 75% of patients, respectively, and abolished ventricular tachycardia in 75% of patients. Efficacy was confirmed in placebo-controlled studies in which propafenone 300 to 900mg daily suppressed premature ventricular complexes (greater than 80%) in 77% of patients; 87% of patients had significant reductions in couplets and abolition of ventricular tachycardia. In patients with ventricular arrhythmias refractory to other antiarrhythmic agents, propafenone 450 to 1200 mg/day suppressed arrhythmias in 63% of patients (in long term therapy 66%). Electrically induced arrhythmias were prevented by intravenously administered propafenone in 12 to 23% of patients. However, long term oral therapy was effective in 77% of patients selected using programmed electrical stimulation. Propafenone was also effective in suppressing atrial and AV nodal/junctional re-entrant tachycardias and Wolff-Parkinson-White tachycardias involving accessory pathways. A limited number of comparisons with other antiarrhythmic drugs indicate that the antiarrhythmic efficacy of propafenone is superior or similar to that of quinidine, disopyramide and tocainide, and comparable to that of lignocaine (lidocaine), flecainide and metoprolol against ventricular arrhythmias and a smaller number of atrial arrhythmias. Cardiovascular side effects indicate a proarrhythmic effect similar to that with other Class I drugs, occasional precipitation of congestive heart failure and conduction abnormalities; the latter two occur more often in patients with underlying ventricular dysfunction. Non-cardiovascular side effects (neurological, gastrointestinal) are well tolerated and generally resolve with continued therapy or dosage reduction. Thus, propafenone is an effective antiarrhythmic agent, and is a useful addition to currently available drugs, although further studies will be required to determine clearly its place in therapy compared with more established antiarrhythmic drugs.

Double-blind study of intravenous propafenone for paroxysmal supraventricular reentrant tachycardia

Propafenone was administered during electrophysiologic testing to determine its efficacy and safety for terminating and preventing reinduction of paroxysmal supraventricular reentrant tachycardia. Four men and 10 women (mean age 50 years, range 28 to 69) were studied. Five patients had Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with orthodromic atrioventricular (AV) reentrant tachycardia, three had a concealed accessory pathway with AV reentrant tachycardia and six had tachycardia due to reentry within the AV node. In the five patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, propafenone terminated reentrant tachycardia in three (the tachycardia was reinducible in one) and had no effect in two. In the three patients with a concealed accessory pathway, propafenone terminated reentrant tachycardia in all three and prevented reinduction of the tachycardia in two. In the six patients with tachycardia due to reentry within the AV node, propafenone terminated and prevented reinduction of reentrant tachycardia. Propafenone had no effect on blood pressure, heart rate, PA interval, AV node refractoriness or rate of reentrant tachycardia. Propafenone significantly (p less than 0.05) prolonged the AH, HV, QRS and ventriculoatrial intervals and decreased the AV node Wenckebach rate. Of the nine patients receiving long-term oral propafenone therapy, eight had a reduction of at least 90% in reentrant tachycardia during a mean follow-up period of 14.5 months (range 11 to 22); all eight patients had had noninducible reentrant tachycardia after intravenous propafenone. One patient had increased frequency of reentrant tachycardia; this patient had had inducible reentrant tachycardia after intravenous propafenone. In conclusion, intravenously administered propafenone terminated reentrant tachycardia in 85% of patients and prevented reinduction in 71%, with no adverse hemodynamic effects.