Pneumocystosis

Imaging features of renal pathology in the human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient

Renal disease in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome was described before even human immunodeficiency virus was demonstrated to be the causative agent, when the now known human immunodeficiency virus associated nephropathy was first described. Several other pathologic processes mostly relating to the immunodeficiency caused by the virus, such as atypical infections, malignancies, as well as highly active antiretroviral therapy related side affects, have been shown to affect the kidneys. The mortality and morbidity burden is high; therefore, it is paramount the radiologist be familiar with the imaging features of this wide range of diseases processes.

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) of the abdominal organs: imaging features

The liver, spleen, biliary tract, pancreas, and kidneys are commonly affected by opportunistic infection, malignancy, and inflammatory disorders during the course of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Clinical manifestations of solid abdominal visceral involvement are protean and usually nonspecific, but it is important to establish a specific diagnosis promptly in these often critically ill patients. This presentation reviews the cross-sectional imaging spectrum of HIV-associated lesions of these organs.

In vivo and in vitro testing for adverse drug reactions

The goal of providing an accurate and reliable diagnostic test for the evaluation of adverse drug reactions remains elusive. Rechallenge remains a truly conclusive method for determining the contribution of drugs to adverse effects, but there are significant disadvantages in exposing patients to drugs that may have caused serious adverse effects. Skin tests are useful for the assessment and predictive risk of serious adverse reactions for a small number of drugs, but skin tests are limited in their utility to adverse drug reactions mediated by Type 1 hypersensitivity. Skin tests must be performed with care and rigor as well. There are a number of in vitro assays that have been used for the assessment of adverse drug reactions, but many of these assays are primarily research tools and have little utility in the clinical setting. Although in vitro tests are not yet readily available for the diagnosis of adverse drug reactions, our increasing understanding of the biology of adverse drug reactions and interactions between the immune system and xenobiotics offers promise that more clinically relevant assays can be developed. At the present time, the primary diagnostic tools for the assessment of adverse drug reactions remain a careful history and physical examination and an astute, insightful physician.

Atovaquone: A Review with Emphasis on its Role in the Treatment of Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia

Objective:

To discuss the mechanism of action, in vitro and in vivo activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials, adverse effects, drug interactions, and dosage guidelines of atovaquone.

Data Sources:

Pertinent literature published since 1988 was identified via a MEDLINE search. Published proceedings of selected conferences were also used.

Study Selection:

All basic science, microbiologic, and pharmacokinetic articles were evaluated. Since only limited data regarding atovaquone are available in the literature, all clinical trials involving the use of atovaquone in the treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia were reviewed.

Data Synthesis:

Atovaquone is an antiprotozoal agent that was recently approved for the treatment of mild to moderate P. carinii pneumonia (PCP) in patients who are intolerant of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX). The exact mechanism of action of atovaquone against P. carinii has not been determined. The drug has in vitro and in vivo activity against P. carinii, Toxoplasma gondii, and Plasmodium species. The bioavailability of oral atovaquone is highly variable. The drug must be administered with food to enhance absorption. In a double-blind comparative trial in AIDS patients with mild to moderate PCP, those who were treated with atovaquone had a significantly higher mortality rate than those treated with TMP/SMX. More patients who received TMP/SMX experienced adverse effects that resulted in discontinuation of therapy.

Conclusions:

Because of concerns of increased mortality in atovaquone recipients, the drug should be reserved for the treatment of mild to moderate PCP in patients who are unable to tolerate TMP/SMX and trimethoprim-dapsone.

Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in cancer patients

Concern has been arisen about the recently reported increasing incidence of PCP in patients with cancer and the potential transmissibility of this infection. Whether or not there is an increase in the incidence of P. carinii infections, PCP should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary infiltrates in bone marrow transplant recipients, in patients with hematologic neoplasms and in patients with primary or metastatic brain neoplasms. Intensity of immunosuppression plays a crucial role, especially long-term (> 2 months) corticosteroid treatment. PCP is usually manifested clinically during augmentation or during tapering of corticosteroid dose. Thus, if the chest radiograph of a high-risk patient shows diffuse infiltrates, bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage should be done immediately. Treatment options are the same as for the AIDS population, except that TMP-SMX is tolerated better in non-AIDS patients. The role of supportive care, including mechanical ventilation in such patients should not be underestimated. Oral therapy with dapsone-trimethoprim or with atovaquone, can be as effective as conventional therapy in mild disease, permitting treatment on an outpatient basis. PCP is often preventable and our understanding has improved about when prophylaxis should be initiated. In the future, the emergence of new technologies for diagnosis and of new agents for treatment and prophylaxis, will bring us closer to the goal of controlling this serious infection.

A randomized comparison of once-monthly or twice-monthly high-dose aerosolized pentamidine prophylaxis

RESULTS

Ten of the 146 (7 percent) evaluable subjects developed PCP during the year study period, and there was no difference in the efficacy of the two regimens. Among patients receiving secondary prophylaxis, the attack rate of PCP at 1 year was 11 percent. This compares favorably with a 1-year attack rate of 19 percent in similar patients receiving standard dose (300 mg) prophylaxis and suggests, but does not prove, a dose-response effect. Concentrations of pentamidine in BAL fluid were not significantly different among the three lobes of the lung. Intrapulmonary pentamidine did not accumulate during the year of study. Aerosolized pentamidine was associated with a marginal but statistically significant increase in the residual volume, decreased flow rates, and increased airway reactivity.

OBJECTIVE

The optimal regimen of aerosolized pentamidine in unknown. Published data suggest that there is a dose-response effect and that the occurrence of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) has been associated with prolongation of the interval between doses. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and physiologic effects of two high-dose regimens of aerosolized pentamidine prophylaxis.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study of 300 mg twice monthly vs 600 mg once monthly during a 1-year observation period. Pentamidine concentrations in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid were measured and serial pulmonary function was measured.

SETTING

A large teaching hospital in San Francisco.

PATIENTS

One hundred fifty-one adult (age > 18 years) men with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Of 146 evaluable patients, prophylaxis was primary (no prior PCP) in 108 (75 percent) and secondary (one prior episode of PCP) in 38 (25 percent).

MEASUREMENTS

Date and diagnosis of PCP, occurrence of drug toxicity, pulmonary function testing, and concentrations of pentamidine in BAL and plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest, but do not prove, that a dose-response effect has been demonstrated, and that high-dose aerosolized pentamidine may further reduce the attack rate of PCP. These preliminary observations should be confirmed in a double-blind trial comparing 300 mg with 600 mg administered once monthly. The clinical relevance of the adverse pulmonary effects is unclear and requires further investigation.