[Bilateral salpingitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae in a patient without risk factors]

Clinical significance of isolation of Haemophilus no ducreyi in genital samples. Systematic review

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Currently, the microbiological diagnosis of genital infections is carried out with molecular methods, which allow the detection of less frequent etiological agents but with potential pathogenic importance, such as Haemophilus spp. The objective of this review is to analyse and highlight the clinical importance of the isolation of Haemophilus spp. in genital and rectal infections, excluding Haemophilus ducreyi.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review was carried out based on an exhaustive search of the publications included in the MEDLINE database up to August 5, 2021, on the presence of Haemophilus spp. in genital and rectal infections, excluding H. ducreyi.

RESULTS

After reviewing what was described in the literature, Haemophilus spp. (excluding H. ducreyi: HSNOD) was detected in 2397 episodes of genital infection, the most frequently isolated species being H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae. Most of the episodes (87,6%) are constituted by single isolation. There is a slight predominance in women (48,3%) where it can cause vaginitis, salpingitis, endometritis or complications during pregnancy. In men, the clinical picture usually corresponds to urethritis. Most of the samples correspond to vaginal and urethral exudates, with a minority representation at the rectal level (2.3%).

CONCLUSION

HSNOD plays a relevant pathogenic role in episodes of genital infection, so microbiological diagnostic protocols must include methods that allow their detection, as well as include them in the etiological spectrum of this type of clinical picture.