Ultrasound estimate of amniotic fluid volume: color Doppler overdiagnosis of oligohydramnios

Amniotic Fluid Volume Assessment: Eight Lessons Learned

Actual AFV can be determined by a dye-dilution technique or be directly measured at cesarean. This allows investigators to correlate estimated and actual AFVs. Lessons learned by assessing the relationship of estimated to actual AFVs. 1) Ultrasound estimates normal actual AFVs well, but abnormal AFVs poorly. 2) Quantile regression is a better statistical methodology to create a normal AFV curve across pregnancy. 3) There is no difference in the accuracy of the subjective (visualization without measurements) compared with the objective (visualization with measurements) technique in identifying normal and abnormal AFVs. 4) Color Doppler use leads to the over-diagnosis of oligohydramnios. 5) Intravenous hydration increases actual AFVs. 6) The estimation of AFV can be done with the transducer held perpendicular to the floor or perpendicular to the uterine contour. 7) The single deepest pocket should be used for identifying low AFVs. 8) The AFI should be used for identifying high AFVs.

Unconditional reference values for the amniotic fluid index measurement between 26w0d and 41w6d of gestation in low-risk pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

To establish reference values for the amniotic fluid index (AFI) measurement between 26w0d and 41w6d of gestation in a Brazilian population.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study with 1984 low-risk singleton pregnant women between 26w0d and 41w6d of gestation. AFI was measured according to the technique proposed by Phelan et al. Maternal abdomen was divided into four quadrants using the umbilicus and linea nigra as landmarks. Single vertical pocket in each quadrant was measured and the AFI was generated by the sum of these four values without umbilical cord or fetal parts. All ultrasound exams were performed by only two experienced examiners. AFI was expressed as median, interquartile range, mean and ranges in each gestational age (GA) interval. Polynomial regressions were performed to obtain the best fit with adjustment by the determination coefficient (R(2)).

RESULTS

Mean of AFI ranged from 14.0 ± 4.1 cm (range, 9.7-14.0) at 26w0d to 8.3 ± 4.7 cm (range, 1.9-16.5) at 41w6d, respectively. The best polynomial regression fit curve was a first-degree: AFI = 16.29-0.125*GA (R(2) = 0.01). According the scatterplot, AFI values practically did not vary with advancing GA.

CONCLUSION

Reference values for the AFI measurement between 26w0d and 41w6d of gestation in a low-risk Brazilian population were established.

Amniotic fluid as a vital sign for fetal wellbeing

Introduction: Amniotic fluid, once thought to merely provide protection and room for necessary movement and growth for the fetus, is now understood to be a highly complex and dynamic system that is studied as a data point to interpret fetal wellbeing. Methods: Assessment of amniotic fluid volume is now routine when performing a sonographic evaluation of fetal status and is an important consideration in the assessment and management of perinatal morbidity and mortality.1,2 In this review, we will cover the dynamics that affect amniotic fluid volume, review methods for measurement and quantification of volume, review definitions for normative data as related to neonatal outcomes, and provide evidence based guidance on the workup and management options for oligoydramnios and polyhydramnios in singleton and twin pregnancies. Conclusions: When abnormalities of fluid exist, appropriate workup to uncover the underlying etiology should be initiated as adverse fetal outcomes are sometimes associated with these variations from normalcy.

Management of oligohydramnios in pregnancy

The finding of oligohydramnios in pregnancy is problematic. The various mechanisms that control amniotic fluid, the inability to precisely measure and quantify the amount, and the relevance of a "decreased" amount of fluid make the management of this finding unclear. Given the limited amount of data, the single deepest vertical pocket may be a better method than the amniotic fluid index to define oligohydramnios. A large prospective study is needed to develop the most optimal management recommendations, especially for idiopathic oligohydramnios at or near term.

The role of amniotic fluid assessment in evaluating fetal well-being

Owing to the frequent use of bedside ultrasound, much is known about the regulation of and normative values for amniotic fluid volume and the mechanisms by which this fluid is regulated. The management protocols for conditions with extremes of amniotic fluid volume have become more exact, resulting in interventions more likely to improve outcome. Much is still unclear; there are no tools to measure amniotic fluid volume with precision, and measurement of fetal urinary output is cumbersome and error-prone.

Ultrasound abnormalities of the amniotic fluid, membranes, umbilical cord, and placenta

Prenatal ultrasound has expanded the ability to assess the umbilical cord, fetal membranes, amniotic fluid volume, and placenta. Evaluation of these structures provides information regarding the intrauterine environment. Umbilical cord abnormalities may be associated with fetal aneuploidy, structural anomalies, and fetal compromise. Estimating the amniotic fluid volume has become an integral part of a sonogram and provides immense information regarding possible fetal anomalies and perinatal outcome. Likewise, placental location or abnormalities may significantly impact obstetric management and prognosis. Early detection of several of these conditions may lead to increased vigilance that may improve perinatal outcome.

Amniotic fluid index measured with the aid of color flow Doppler

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether using color flow Doppler to identify the umbilical cord affects amniotic fluid index (AFI) measurements.

METHODS

A total of 2236 AFI measurements between 24 and 42 weeks in singleton gestations with no known or suspected fetal anomalies and < 14 days' discrepancy between menstrual and ultrasonographic dating were included. Color flow Doppler was used to identify loops of umbilical cord; these were excluded from the measurement. Polynomial regression was used to generate means and centiles. Data were grouped according to completed weeks of gestation and descriptive statistics were calculated. At each week of gestation, the number and percentage of pregnancies diagnosed as < or = 2.5th, < or = 5th, > or = 95th, and > or = 97.5th centile according to a 'standard' nomogram derived without using color flow Doppler were calculated.

RESULTS

The AFI decreased significantly over gestational age, starting at 31 weeks (p < 0.05 by ANOVA). The relationship between AFI and gestational age was best modeled by a second-degree polynomial (p < 0.001). The median and range of the proportion of AFIs that fell outside the ranges of the standard nomogram at each completed gestational age was: 6.0 (2.3-35.4)% for the < or = 2.5th centile, 9.9 (3.1-37.5)% for the < or = 5th centile, 3.8 (0-30)% for the > or = 95th centile, and 1.8 (0-20)% for the > or = 97.5th centile. The 2.5th and 5th centiles using the current data were lower than those of the 'standard', and the difference increased with advancing gestation. Upper centiles were also different.

CONCLUSION

The AFI measured using color flow Doppler overestimates oligohydramnios and may underestimate polyhydramnios when a standard AFI table obtained without color flow Doppler is used. Normal values specific for measurement method should be used for reference.