[Safety and effectiveness of acute postoperative pain treatment in a series of 3670 patients]

[Prevalence of pain in Andalusian public hospitals]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of pain in medical and surgical patients admitted to reference hospitals in Andalusia, as well as their features and the most population groups most affected.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional, multicenter epidemiological study was conducted simultaneously on the population admitted to 5 hospitals. Using a structured questionnaire the demographics, hospital area, presence of pain at the time of the interview, and pre- and post-variables related to the intensity of pain and its treatment at 24h were investigated. All patients over 18 years old were included, except those patients with difficulty in understanding the questionnaire, and psychiatric and obstetric patients. Pain intensity was assessed by simple verbal scale.

RESULTS

Of the 1,236 patients included, 54.2% were male, with 51.1% of patients aged 65 years, and 69.17% were admitted to medical areas. Pain was observed in 52.9% of patients admitted to the surgical area compared to 29.4% in the medical area. Of the 19.4% who reported having had pain in the last 24h prior to the questionnaire, 57.7% of them were surgical patients and 32% were medical, P<.005), and of the 42.2% who had pain at the time of study, 52.7% were female. The incidence of pain on movement was higher than that observed at rest. The mean resting pain was 1.8 and 1.4 for the surgical and medical patients, respectively (P<.01). The mean pain on movement was 2.2 and 1.6 for the surgical and medical patients, respectively (P<.01). More than one quarter (25.8%) of surgical patients and 16.5% of medical patients had difficulty sleeping (P<.005). Some 12.8% of all patients had no analgesic regimen, and 66.2% and 85.6% of surgical and medical patients, respectively, did not request analgesics (P<.005). The main drugs were prescribed paracetamol analgesic and metamizole, and in 54.4% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that the presence of pain in patients admitted to our study population is high and it is essential to encourage an improvement in the pain management of both acute and chronic pain processes.

[Do anesthetic techniques influence postoperative outcomes? Part I]

The influence of anesthetic technique on postoperative outcomes has opened a wide field of research in recent years. High-risk patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery are those who have higher incidence of postoperative complications and mortality. A proper definition of this group of patients should focus maximal efforts and resources to improve the results. In view of the significant reduction in postoperative mortality and morbidity in last 20 years, perioperative research should take into account new indicators to investigate the role of anesthetic techniques on postoperative outcomes. Studies focused on the evaluation of intermediate outcomes would probably discriminate better effectiveness differences between anesthetic techniques. We review some of the major controversies arising in the literature about the impact of anesthetic techniques on postoperative outcomes. We have grouped the impact of these techniques into 9 major investigation areas: mortality, cardiovascular complications, respiratory complications, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, chronic postoperative pain, cancer recurrence, postoperative nausea/vomiting, surgical outcomes and resources utilization. In this first part of the review, we discuss the basis on postoperative outcomes research, mortality, cardiovascular and respiratory complications.

[Treating acute postoperative pain: evaluation of results on the surgical ward]

OBJECTIVE

To describe management of acute postoperative pain on the surgical ward. To study the relationship between pain and a variety of surgical procedures and approaches. To determine the level of information patients received, their expectations, and their satisfaction with treatment of postoperative pain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional observational study by survey and review of patient records. We studied 234 patients, including all who were hospitalized for more than 24 hours after scheduled or emergency operations. The main variables recorded were pain intensity at rest and during movement, including on the day after surgery, and the surgical procedure and approach.

RESULTS

The prevalence of pain (>3 on a numerical scale) on the surgical ward was 33% at rest and 66% during movement. The prevalence of intense pain (>6 on the numerical scale) was 1.7% at rest and 7.3% during movement. Factors related to greater pain intensity were timing, that is, the first day after surgery, when 74.4% of patients experienced their most intense pain; type of surgery and approach (P<.004); and expecting to experience moderate or intense pain (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Recording the prevalence of postoperative pain on a surgical ward provides information about the real situation of acute postoperative pain control. Pain on movement is a principal indicator for detecting groups of patients for whom analgesic protocols could be improved. Type of surgery and approach is a fundamental factor to consider when comparing the results of analgesic protocols.