[Implementation of blood sparing programs in Spain: results of a survey of departments of anesthesiology and resuscitation]

Enhanced recovery after surgery: a narrative review on patient blood management recommendations

This review aims to analyze and document the presence of patient blood management (PBM) recommendations in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines. The aim of ERAS programs is to improve outcomes and optimize patient recovery by reducing the stress response to surgery. PBM programs pursue the objective of improving outcomes by boosting and conserving the patient's own blood. From the early development of ERAS, there was little attention paid to the three pillars of perioperative blood management. Preoperative anemia is an important risk factor in perioperative outcomes and should be diagnosed and treated. Bleeding and unnecessary transfusions should be avoided. We analyzed clinical guidelines for scheduled surgery in adults published by the ERAS Society between 2018 and 2022. The guidelines selected were searched for recommendations related to the three pillars of PBM. We selected 15 ERAS guidelines in programmed surgery in adults. Until 2018, none of the ERAS guidelines analyzed included any recommendations related to pillars I and III of PBM. In 2019, recommendations related to the three pillars of PBM were introduced in the ERAS clinical guidelines for colorectal surgery, gynecology/oncology surgery, and lung resection surgery. However, many ERAS guidelines for surgeries with a high risk of bleeding, such as cardiac surgery, contain no clear recommendations on the management of preoperative anemia. This review shows that the ERAS guidelines published to date make very few recommendations related to PBM. The authors emphasize the need to include the most efficient PBM recommendations in ERAS clinical guidelines, given improved outcomes with a good perioperative management of blood transfusion.

[Health policy strategies for Patient Blood Management implementation throughout the Spanish health systems]

Los programas de Patient Blood Management (PBM) permiten reducir intervenciones sanitarias innecesarias e incorporar prácticas clínicas de alto valor que mejoran los resultados en salud y la eficiencia. Su adopción en España es todavía limitada y con una alta variabilidad entre hospitales. Las recientes guías de la Unión Europea sobre cómo implementar el PBM, así como las recomendaciones de expertos, indican que para conseguir un avance en este campo se requiere, no solo de la implicación de los profesionales, sino también de las autoridades sanitarias y direcciones hospitalarias. Este artículo proporciona algunas propuestas en materia de gestión y política sanitaria para promover el desarrollo del PBM en los sistemas de salud en España.

Maturity Assessment model for Patient Blood Management to assist hospitals in improving patients' safety and outcomes. The MAPBM project

BACKGROUND

Patient blood management (PBM) is an evidence-based care bundle with proven ability to improve patients' outcomes by managing and preserving the patient's own blood. Since 2010, the World Health Organisation has urged member states to implement PBM. However, there has been limited progress in developing PBM programmes in hospitals due to the implicit challenges of implementing them. To address these challenges, we developed a Maturity Assessment Model (MAPBM) to assist healthcare organisations to measure, benchmark, assess in PBM, and communicate the results of their PBM programmes. We describe the MAPBM model, its benchmarking programme, and the feasibility of implementing it nationwide in Spain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MAPBM considers the three dimensions of a transformation effort (structure, process and outcomes) and grades these within a maturity scale matrix. Each dimension includes the various drivers of a PBM programme, and their corresponding measures and key performance indicators. The structure measures are qualitative, and obtained using a survey and structured self-assessment checklist. The key performance indicators for process and outcomes are quantitative, and based on clinical data from the hospitals' electronic medical records. Key performance indicators for process address major clinical recommendations in each PBM pillar, and are applied to six common procedures characterised by significant blood loss.

RESULTS

In its first 5 years, the MAPBM was deployed in 59 hospitals and used to analyse 181,826 hospital episodes, which proves the feasibility of implementing a sustainable model to measure and compare PBM clinical practice and outcomes across hospitals in Spain.

CONCLUSION

The MAPBM initiative aims to become a useful tool for healthcare organisations to implement PBM programmes and improve patients' safety and outcomes.

Assessment of the knowledge level of the professional as regards Patient Blood Management in their organisation. Results of the MAPBM project survey

INTRODUCTION

The Maturity Assessment Model in Patient Blood Management project involves the use of a matrix that evaluates the maturity of the centre as regards blood transfusion practice. This tool includes a questionnaire to be completed by physicians to determine their level of knowledge of patient blood management strategies in their centre.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty one hospitals took part in the Maturity Assessment Model in Patient Blood Management project in 2016. The questionnaire included 10 questions, 3 about the centre, specialty, and years of experience, and 7 about patient blood management protocols in the respondent's centre. The minimum responses required per centre was calculated according to the number of beds. Responses from at least 3 different specialties were required in order to be evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 1403 questionnaires were completed. The specialty with the highest completion rate was anaesthesiology (40.9%). The distribution as regards professional experience was homogeneous: <10 years, 33.4%, 10-20 years, 33%, and> 20 years 33.6%. Nearly three-quarters (74.2%) knew the patient blood management protocol used in their centre, and 60.7% knew the protocol for the treatment of pre-operative anaemia. Slightly fewer (72%) reported knowing the blood transfusion protocol (transfusion threshold) used in their centre, and 90% considered other factors besides haemoglobin in the decision to transfuse. Only 30.7% of professionals reported receiving periodic information on transfusion practices.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant lack of knowledge about preoperative anaemia and perioperative transfusion protocols used in the centres polled. Few centres provide their physicians with information on transfusion practices.

Peri-operative treatment of anaemia in major orthopaedic surgery: a practical approach from Spain

In patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery, pre-operative anaemia, peri-operative bleeding and a liberal transfusion policy are the main risk factors for requiring red blood cell transfusion (RBCT). The clinical and economic disadvantages of RBCT have led to the development and implementation of multidisciplinary, multimodal, individualised strategies, collectively termed patient blood management, which aim to reduce RBCT and improve patients' clinical outcome and safety. Within a patient blood management programme, low pre-operative haemoglobin is one of the few modifiable risk factors for RBCT. However, a survey among Anaesthesia Departments in Spain revealed that, although pre-operative assessment was performed in the vast majority of hospitals, optimisation of haemoglobin concentration was attempted in <40% of patients who may have benefitted from it, despite there being enough time prior to surgery. This indicates that haemoglobin optimisation takes planning and forethought to be implemented in an effective manner. This review, based on available clinical evidence and our experience, is intended to provide clinicians with a practical tool to optimise pre-operative haemoglobin levels, in order to minimise the risk of patients requiring RBCT. To this purpose, after reviewing the diagnostic value and limitations of available laboratory parameters, we developed an algorithm for the detection, classification and treatment of pre-operative anaemia, with a patient-tailored approach that facilitates decision-making in the pre-operative assessment. We also reviewed the efficacy of the different pharmacological options for pre-operative and post-operative management of anaemia. We consider that such an institutional pathway for anaemia management could be a viable, cost-effective strategy that is beneficial to both patients and healthcare systems.