La lévodopa modifie les seuils nociceptifs chez le patient parkinsonien

ON/OFF non-motor evaluation: a new way to evaluate non-motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

NMF are currently poorly evaluated in therapeutic decisions. A quantification of their severity would facilitate their integration. The objective of this study was to validate an autoquestionnaire evaluating the severity of non-motor fluctuations (NMF) in Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

Patients with PD were included in presurgical situation for deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nuclei. They participated in the PREDISTIM cohort (a study evaluating the predictive factors for therapeutic response of subthalamic stimulation in PD) in 17 centres in France. Our questionnaire, resulting from previous phases of development, included 11 non-motor symptoms (NMS). Their severity ranged from 0 to 10 and was assessed in OFF and then ON-Dopa to study their fluctuations.

RESULTS

310 patients were included, of whom 98.8% had NMS and 98.0% had NMF. Each NMS was significantly improved by L-Dopa (decrease in severity score ranging from 43.1% to 69.9%). Fatigue was the most frequent and most severe NMS. NMS were considered more bothersome than motor symptoms by 37.5% of patients in OFF-Dopa and 34.9% in ON-Dopa.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first questionnaire allowing a real-time quantification of the severity of NMS and their fluctuation with levodopa. It was able to confirm and measure the effect of L-dopa and show differences according to the patients and the NMS. It differs from other questionnaires by its measurement at a precise moment of the severity of the NMS, allowing its use during pretherapeutic assessments.Our questionnaire has been validated to measure the severity of NMF. It will be able to quantify the non-motor effect of anti-parkinsonian treatments and could facilitate the integration of NMF in therapeutic decisions.

Pain in Parkinson disease: mechanistic substrates, main classification systems, and how to make sense out of them

ABSTRACT

Parkinson disease (PD) affects up to 2% of the general population older than 65 years and is a major cause of functional loss. Chronic pain is a common nonmotor symptom that affects up to 80% of patients with (Pw) PD both in prodromal phases and during the subsequent stages of the disease, negatively affecting patient's quality of life and function. Pain in PwPD is rather heterogeneous and may occur because of different mechanisms. Targeting motor symptoms by dopamine replacement or with neuromodulatory approaches may only partially control PD-related pain. Pain in general has been classified in PwPD according to the motor signs, pain dimensions, or pain subtypes. Recently, a new classification framework focusing on chronic pain was introduced to group different types of PD pains according to mechanistic descriptors: nociceptive, neuropathic, or neither nociceptive nor neuropathic. This is also in line with the International Classification of Disease-11 , which acknowledges the possibility of chronic secondary musculoskeletal or nociceptive pain due to disease of the CNS. In this narrative review and opinion article, a group of basic and clinical scientists revise the mechanism of pain in PD and the challenges faced when classifying it as a stepping stone to discuss an integrative view of the current classification approaches and how clinical practice can be influenced by them. Knowledge gaps to be tackled by coming classification and therapeutic efforts are presented, as well as a potential framework to address them in a patient-oriented manner.

Idiopathic Parkinson's disease and chronic pain in the era of deep brain stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Pain is the most common nonmotor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) and is often undertreated. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) effectively mitigates the motor symptoms of this multisystem neurodegenerative disease; however, its therapeutic effect on nonmotor symptoms, especially pain, remains inconclusive. While there is a critical need to help this large PD patient population, guidelines for managing this significant disease burden are absent. Herein, the authors systematically reviewed the literature and conducted a meta-analysis to study the influence of traditional (subthalamic nucleus [STN] and globus pallidus internus [GPi]) DBS on chronic pain in patients with PD.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the levels of evidence established by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Inclusion criteria were articles written in English, published in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal, and about studies conducting an intervention for PD-related pain in no fewer than 5 subjects.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were identified and included in this meta-analysis. Significant interstudy heterogeneity was detected (Cochran's Q test p < 0.05), supporting the use of the random-effects model. The random-effects model estimated the effect size of DBS for the treatment of idiopathic pain as 1.31 (95% CI 0.84-1.79). The DBS-on intervention improved pain scores by 40% as compared to the control state (preoperative baseline or DBS off).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that traditional STN and GPi DBS can have a favorable impact on pain control and improve pain scores by 40% from baseline in PD patients experiencing chronic pain. Further trials are needed to identify the subtype of PD patients whose pain benefits from DBS and to identify the mechanisms by which DBS improves pain in PD patients.

The Parkinson disease pain classification system: results from an international mechanism-based classification approach

ABSTRACT

Pain is a common nonmotor symptom in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) but the correct diagnosis of the respective cause remains difficult because suitable tools are lacking, so far. We developed a framework to differentiate PD- from non-PD-related pain and classify PD-related pain into 3 groups based on validated mechanistic pain descriptors (nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic), which encompass all the previously described PD pain types. Severity of PD-related pain syndromes was scored by ratings of intensity, frequency, and interference with daily living activities. The PD-Pain Classification System (PD-PCS) was compared with classic pain measures (ie, brief pain inventory and McGill pain questionnaire [MPQ], PDQ-8 quality of life score, MDS-UPDRS scores, and nonmotor symptoms). 159 nondemented PD patients (disease duration 10.2 ± 7.6 years) and 37 healthy controls were recruited in 4 centers. PD-related pain was present in 122 patients (77%), with 24 (15%) suffering one or more syndromes at the same time. PD-related nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic pain was diagnosed in 87 (55%), 25 (16%), or 35 (22%), respectively. Pain unrelated to PD was present in 35 (22%) patients. Overall, PD-PCS severity score significantly correlated with pain's Brief Pain Inventory and MPQ ratings, presence of dyskinesia and motor fluctuations, PDQ-8 scores, depression, and anxiety measures. Moderate intrarater and interrater reliability was observed. The PD-PCS is a valid and reliable tool for differentiating PD-related pain from PD-unrelated pain. It detects and scores mechanistic pain subtypes in a pragmatic and treatment-oriented approach, unifying previous classifications of PD-pain.

Psychometric features of Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory in Iranian people with Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

Neuropathic pain is a type of pain reported in people with Parkinson's disease. There are various scales to evaluate the characteristics of this kind of pain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), a specific scale that measures neuropathic pain in Iranian people with Parkinson's disease.

METHOD

Four hundred forty-seven individuals with Parkinson's disease were recruited in the study. Acceptability, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) of NPSI were calculated. Dimensionality was examined through exploratory factor analysis. For convergent validity, correlations of NPSI with Douleur Neuropathic 4, Brief Pain Inventory, King's Pain Parkinson disease Scale, and Visual Analog Scale-Pain were used. Discriminative validity and sensitivity to change between On- and Off- medication states were analyzed.

RESULTS

A marked floor effect was observed for this scale (64.2%). Cronbach's alpha and ICC were 0.90 and 0.87, respectively. Items of NPSI were placed in 4 factors. A moderate to the strong association (r_s = 0.55 to 0.85) between NPSI and other scales was obtained. The results of discriminative validity and sensitivity to change indicate the ability of NPSI to show differences between medication states.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that NPSI has acceptable reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change, indicating that this scale is suitable for measuring neuropathic pain in Iranian people with Parkinson's disease.

Association between Chronic Pain and Alterations in the Mesolimbic Dopaminergic System

Chronic pain (pain lasting for >3 months) decreases patient quality of life and even occupational abilities. It can be controlled by treatment, but often persists even after management. To properly control pain, its underlying mechanisms must be determined. This review outlines the role of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system in chronic pain. The mesolimbic system, a neural circuit, delivers dopamine from the ventral tegmental area to neural structures such as the nucleus accumbens, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and amygdala. It controls executive, affective, and motivational functions. Chronic pain patients suffer from low dopamine production and delivery in this system. The volumes of structures constituting the mesolimbic system are known to be decreased in such patients. Studies on administration of dopaminergic drugs to control chronic pain, with a focus on increasing low dopamine levels in the mesolimbic system, show that it is effective in patients with Parkinson’s disease, restless legs syndrome, fibromyalgia, dry mouth syndrome, lumbar radicular pain, and chronic back pain. However, very few studies have confirmed these effects, and dopaminergic drugs are not commonly used to treat the various diseases causing chronic pain. Thus, further studies are required to determine the effectiveness of such treatment for chronic pain.

Synergistic antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic interaction between L-DOPA and celecoxib in parkinsonian rats is mediated by NO-cGMP-ATP-sensitive K+ channel

Pain is a usual and troublesome non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease, with a prevalence of 29-82%. Therefore, it's vital to find pharmacological treatments for managing PD-associated pain symptoms, to improve patients' quality of life. For this reason, we tested the possible synergy between L-DOPA and celecoxib in decreasing allodynia and hyperalgesia induced by unilateral lesioning with 6-OHDA into the SNpc in rats. We also tested whether the antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effect induced by combination of L-DOPA and celecoxib is mediated by the NO-cGMP-ATP-sensitive K⁺ channel pathway. Tactile allodynia and mechanical hyperalgesia were evaluated using von Frey filament. Isobolographic analyses were employed to define the nature of the drug interaction using a fixed dose ratio (0.5: 0.5). We found that acute and sub-acute (10-day) treatment with a single dose of L-DOPA (3-25 mg/kg, i. p.) or celecoxib (2.5-20 mg/kg, i. p.) induced a dose-dependent antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effect in parkinsonian rats. Isobolographic analysis revealed that the ED₅₀ values obtained by L-DOPA + celecoxib combination was significantly less than calculated additive values, indicating that co-administration of L-DOPA with celecoxib produces synergistic interactions in its antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effect in animals with nigrostriatal lesions. Moreover, the antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects induced by L-DOPA + celecoxib combination were blocked by intrathecal pre-treatment with L-NAME, ODQ, and glibenclamide. Taken together, the data suggest that L-DOPA + celecoxib combination produces an antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic synergistic interaction at the systemic level, and these effects are mediated, at the central level, through activation of the NO-cGMP-ATP-sensitive K⁺ channel pathway.

Effects of subthalamic deep brain stimulation with gabapentin and morphine on mechanical and thermal thresholds in 6-hydroxydopamine lesioned rats

Chronic pain is the most common non-motor symptom among Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, with 1.85 million estimated to be in debilitating pain by 2030. Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) programmed for treating PD motor symptoms has also been shown to significantly improve pain scores. However, even though most patients' pain symptoms improve or disappear, 74% of patients treated develop new pain symptoms within 8 years. Previously we have shown that duloxetine and STN high frequency stimulation (HFS) significantly increase mechanical thresholds more than either alone. The current project specifically investigates the effects of gabapentin and morphine alone and with high (150 Hz; HFS) and low (50 Hz; LFS) frequency stimulation in the 6-hydroxydopamine rat model for PD. We found that HFS, LFS, gabapentin 15 mg/kg and morphine 1 mg/kg all independently improve von Frey (VF) thresholds. Neither drug augments the HFS response significantly. Morphine at 1 mg/kg showed a trend to increasing thresholds compared to LFS alone (p = 0.062). Interestingly, gabapentin significantly reduced (p = 0.019) the improved VF thresholds and Randall Selitto thresholds seen with LFS. Thus, though neither drug augments DBS, we found effects of both compounds independently increase VF thresholds, informing use of our model of chronic pain in PD. Gabapentin's reversal of LFS effects warrants further exploration.

Parkinson disease: A systemic review of pain sensitivities and its association with clinical pain and response to dopaminergic stimulation

Patients with Parkinson disease (PD) experience hyperalgesia on evoked pain sensitivity testing, although the relationship of this with persistent pain in PD is less certain. Studies examining this have generated contradictory findings. Further, the role of dopaminergic deficiency as an underlying substrate for hyperalgesia is controversial. We report the results of meta-analyses of the PD pain sensitivity literature in an attempt to answer these questions. We identified 429 records, of which ten articles compared pain sensitivity between PD patients that experienced clinical pain (PDP) to those who did not (PDNP), and twenty studies that examined the effect of dopaminergic medications on pain sensitivity in PD patients. PDP patients experienced a moderate increase in pain sensitivity, had more severe disease, required higher dosages of medication, and were more likely to be female when compared to those PDNP patients. PD patients also had reduced pain sensitivity when tested on dopaminergic medications compared to when they were not on medications. Overall, the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis supports the hypothesis that hyperalgesia contributes to clinical pain in PD, and that the underlying mechanism may be dopaminergically driven.

The effects of a dopamine agonist (apomorphine) on experimental and spontaneous pain in patients with chronic radicular pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study

Background

Although evidence suggests that dopaminergic systems are involved in pain processing, the effects of dopaminergic interventions on pain remains questionable. This randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over study was aimed at exploring the effect of the dopamine agonist apomorphine on experimental pain evoked by cold stimulation and on spontaneous pain in patients with lumbar radicular (neuropathic) pain.

Methods

Data was collected from 35 patients with chronic lumbar radiculopathy (18 men, mean age 56.2±13 years). The following parameters were evaluated before (baseline) and 30, 75 and 120 minutes subsequent to a subcutaneous injection of 1.5 mg apomorphine or placebo: cold pain threshold and tolerance in the painful site (ice pack, affected leg) and in a remote non-painful site (12°C water bath, hand), and spontaneous (affected leg) pain intensity (NPS, 0–100).

Results

One-hundred and twenty minutes following apomorphine (but not placebo) injection, cold pain threshold and tolerance in the hand increased significantly compared to baseline (from a median of 8.0 seconds (IQR = 5.0) to 10 seconds (IQR = 9.0), p = 0.001 and from a median of 19.5 seconds (IQR = 30.2) to 27.0 seconds (IQR = 37.5), p<0.001, respectively). In addition, apomorphine prolonged cold pain tolerance but not threshold in the painful site (from a median of 43.0 seconds (IQR = 63.0) at baseline to 51.0 seconds (IQR = 78.0) at 120 min, p = 0.02). Apomorphine demonstrated no superiority over placebo in reducing spontaneous pain intensity.

Conclusion

These findings are in line with previous results in healthy subjects, showing that apomorphine increases the ability to tolerate cold pain and therefore suggesting that dopaminergic interventions can have potential clinical relevance.

Pain sensitivity in Parkinson's disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Pain is a common and disabling non-motor symptom of Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) but its underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are not well understood. There is evidence to suggest that altered pain sensitivity may contribute to the experience of pain in PD patients, but clinical studies investigating this have yielded inconsistent results.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether pain thresholds are altered in PD patients compared to normal healthy controls (HC), via the use of systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE library from 1966 to April 2015.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that compared pain thresholds in PD patients versus HC were included in the systematic review. Additionally, data comparing PD patients off dopaminergic medications (PD_Moff) to HC off medications (HC_Moff) were pooled for meta-analysis by pain modality.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Heat pain threshold, cold pain threshold, electrical pain threshold, nociceptive withdrawal reflex threshold, pressure pain threshold, and pain ratings.

RESULTS

22 studies were reviewed, comprising of 616 PD and 451 HC. In the comparison of PD_Moff versus HC_Moff, a large majority of trials (15/19) found reduced pain thresholds (increased pain sensitivity) in PD patients. Meta-analysis of these trials revealed significantly reduced pain thresholds, of moderate to large effect size, in PD patients across all pain modalities. Results were much more heterogenous when PD patients on medications were compared with HC off medications, with most trials reporting no significant difference in pain thresholds between groups. No significant differences were found in pain thresholds for trials that compared PD patients on medications and HC on medications.

CONCLUSION

PD patients are more sensitive to noxious stimuli compared to HC when tested in the off medication state. This increase in pain sensitivity is observed across all modalities, but is not as apparent when PD patients are administered Levodopa, suggesting that dopamine deficient states may contribute to hyperalgesia. However, it remains to be seen whether or not increased pain sensitivity translates clinically into increased prevalence of pain. Similarly, it is unclear if dopaminergic medications influence pain sensitivity. Performing a meta-analysis on studies comparing pain thresholds in PD patients with and without pain, and on and off dopaminergic medications, may draw more definitive conclusions in this regard.

Pharmacological therapies for pain in Parkinson's disease - a review paper

INTRODUCTION

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative movement disorder characterized by the loss of dopamine containing cells in the substantia nigra, with pain being one of the most common, yet frequently misunderstood symptoms. The prevalence of pain in PD populations ranges from 40-85% and is usually categorized under the following types: i) musculoskeletal pain ii) radicular and neuropathic pain iii) dystonia-related pain iv) akathitic pain and iv) central parkinsonian pain. Areas covered: The aim of this literature review was to document and present the common and uncommon pharmaceutical therapies that treat and/or alleviate these types of pain in PD. The PubMed database was searched with keywords: "Parkinson's disease", "Pain", and "Pharmacological Therapies". Research articles involving randomized, controlled trials were included as well as case studies and qualitative studies. Expert commentary: Given the increased prevalence of pain in PD populations, there is a need for a clear understanding of the types of pain treatments available and how they can be best combined to fit the specific needs of each patient.

Dopaminergic Therapies for Non-motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease

Apart from the typical motor symptoms, Parkinson's disease is characterized by a wide range of different non-motor symptoms, which are highly prevalent in all stages of the disease and have an incisive influence on quality of life. Moreover, their treatment continues to be challenging. In this review, we critically summarize the evidence for the impact of dopaminergic therapies on non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. We performed a PubMed search to identify relevant clinical studies that investigated the response of non-motor symptoms to dopaminergic therapy. In the domain of neuropsychiatric disturbances, there is increasing evidence that dopamine agonists can ameliorate depression or anxiety. Other neuropsychiatric symptoms such as psychosis or impulse control disorders can also be worsened or even be induced by dopaminergic agents. For the treatment of sleep disturbances, it is essential to identify different subtypes of sleep pathologies. While there is for example profound evidence for the effectiveness of dopaminergic medication for the treatment of restless legs syndrome and sleep fragmentation, evidence for an improvement of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder is lacking. With regard to the broad spectrum of autonomic disturbances, response to dopaminergic treatment seems to differ largely, with on the one hand, some evidence for an improvement of sexual function or sweating with dopaminergic treatment, while on the other hand, constipation can be worsened. Finally, the analysis of sensory deficits reveals that some forms of pain, in particular fluctuation-dependent dystonic pain, can be well addressed by adapting the dopaminergic therapy, while no effect has been seen so far for hyposmia or visual deficits. Moreover, the occurrence of non-motor fluctuations is gaining increased attention, as they can be specifically addressed by a more continuous dopaminergic intake. Taken together, there is evidence of a good response of some (but not all) non-motor symptoms to dopaminergic therapy, which must be individually adapted to the special spectrum of symptoms.

Management of pain in Parkinson's disease

Pain is a common symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD) and accounts for substantial morbidity in up to 80 % of patients. Despite contributing to disease-related discomfort and disability, pain in PD frequently goes underacknowledged and undertreated in clinical practice. Although the exact underlying neurophysiology is unclear, there is increasing understanding of the role of the basal ganglia in somatosensory processing, as well as involvement of additional brainstem structures and non-dopaminergic pathways; appreciation of these mechanisms has implications for treatment strategies. Categorizing painful symptoms based on their clinical description into musculoskeletal, dystonic, radicular-peripheral neuropathic and central pain categories provides a useful framework for management. Importantly, these symptoms should be evaluated in relation to motor symptoms and dopaminergic therapy. A multi-disciplinary approach is recommended as follows: physical therapy, liaison with pain management and consultations to rheumatological, orthopaedic and neurosurgical services should be considered.

Effect of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on pain in Parkinson's disease

Painful sensations are common in Parkinson's disease. In many patients, such sensations correspond to neuropathic pain and could be related to central alterations of pain processing. Subthalamic nuclei deep brain stimulation improves motor function in Parkinson's disease. Several structures of the basal ganglia are involved in nociceptive function, and deep brain stimulation could thus also modify pain perception in Parkinson's disease. To test this hypothesis, we compared subjective heat pain thresholds, in deep brain stimulation OFF and ON conditions in 2 groups of Parkinson's disease patients with or without neuropathic pain. We also compared pain-induced cerebral activations during experimental nociceptive stimulations using H(2)(15)O positron emission tomography in both deep brain stimulation OFF and ON conditions. Correlation analyses were performed between clinical and neuroimaging results. Deep brain stimulation significantly increased subjective heat pain threshold (from 40.3 ± 4.2 to 41.6 ± 4.3, P=.03) and reduced pain-induced cerebral activity in the somatosensory cortex (BA 40) in patients with pain, whereas it had no effect in pain-free patients. There was a significant negative correlation in the deep brain stimulation OFF condition between pain threshold and pain-induced activity in the insula of patients who were pain free but not in those who had pain. There was a significant positive correlation between deep brain stimulation-induced changes in pain threshold and in pain-induced cerebral activations in the primary somatosensory cortex and insula of painful patients only. These results suggest that subthalamic nuclei deep brain stimulation raised pain thresholds in Parkinson's disease patients with pain and restored better functioning of the lateral discriminative pain system.

Nonmotor outcomes in Parkinson's disease: is deep brain stimulation better than dopamine replacement therapy?

Nonmotor symptoms are an integral part of Parkinson's disease and cause significant morbidity. Pharmacological therapy helps alleviate the disease but produces nonmotor manifestations. While deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as the treatment of choice for motor dysfunction, the effect on nonmotor symptoms is not well known. Compared with pharmacological therapy, bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS or globus pallidum interna (GPi)-DBS has significant beneficial effects on pain, sleep, gastrointestinal and urological symptoms. STN-DBS is associated with a mild worsening in verbal fluency while GPi-DBS has no effect on cognition. STN-DBS may improve cardiovascular autonomic disturbances by reducing the dose of dopaminergic drugs. Because the motor effects of STN-DBS and GPi-DBS appear to be similar, nonmotor symptoms may determine the target choice in surgery of future patients.

Influence of deep brain stimulation and levodopa on sensory signs in Parkinson's disease

To examine the effects of levodopa (L-dopa) and deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) on sensory symptoms and signs in Parkinson's disease (PD). Seventeen patients with PD were included. (1) Presence of sensory symptoms and (2) effects of L-dopa and STN-DBS on sensory symptoms and signs [assessed by quantitative sensory testing (QST)] were examined 6 months after starting STN-DBS. In addition, in 12 of these patients, presence of sensory symptoms prior and post STN-DBS was compared. Pain was most frequently nociceptive. In about 30-40%, pain and sensory symptoms were associated with PD motor symptoms. In most of these cases, pain responded to L-dopa. Intensity of pain was reduced post STN-DBS compared to pre STN-DBS. L-Dopa had no influence on detection thresholds, whereas STN-DBS improved thermal detection thresholds. However, thermal and mechanical pain thresholds were uninfluenced by L-dopa or STN-DBS. Although some patients reported an improvement of pain with STN-DBS or L-dopa, objectively pain sensitivity as assessed by QST was not altered by STN-DBS or L-dopa suggesting that there is no evidence for a direct modulation of central pain processing by L-dopa or STN-DBS.

The pathophysiological basis of sensory disturbances in Parkinson's disease

The diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) is still based on the recognition of the cardinal motor features. However, it is now recognized that non-motor manifestations (NMM) may actually precede the emergence of motor manifestations. NMM are very frequently present in the overall population of PD patients and are a major determinant of their quality of life. In this article we discuss the origin of sensory manifestations in PD, particularly focus on pain mechanisms, which is the most frequent and better studied NMM. Analysis of experimental and clinical data reveals that the basal ganglia (BG) indeed have an anatomo-functional organization which sustains sensory functions. In addition, the dopaminergic system is also engaged in the modulation and integration of sensory information and the response to pain. In patients with PD, pain is often related with motor fluctuations and dyskinesias induced by dopaminergic treatments, which suggest some common mechanisms with the origin of motor complications in PD. Clinically, sensory manifestations are often disturbing and poorly treated and may occasionally become a major cause of disability for PD patients. Thus, more clinical and basic studies are warranted to clarify pain mechanisms in PD, with the aim of achieving better treatments.

Levodopa raises objective pain threshold in Parkinson's disease: a RIII reflex study

BACKGROUND

Patients suffering from Parkinson's disease (PD) describe painful sensations that could be related to neuropathic pain. Experimental data have indicated the involvement of basal ganglia and dopaminergic pathways in central nociceptive processing.

AIM

The objective of this study was to assess and compare the effect of levodopa on the objective pain threshold in patients with PD and healthy subjects.

METHODS

The objective pain threshold was assessed by the nociceptive flexion reflex (RIII) in 13 PD patients and 10 healthy subjects. Patients and healthy subjects were evaluated under two randomised conditions: with levodopa (ON) and without (OFF).

RESULTS

Levodopa significantly increased the RIII threshold of PD patients (6.9 (1.2) mA in the OFF condition vs 8 (1.1) mA in the ON position; p = 0.02). RIII threshold was significantly lower in PD patients than in healthy subjects in the OFF condition (6.9 (1.2) mA vs 9.7 (3.4) mA; p = 0.02). RIII threshold did not change after levodopa administration in healthy subjects.

CONCLUSION

These results provide evidence of a dopaminergic modulation of objective pain threshold in PD patients. In addition, the decrease in RIII threshold in PD patients, in the OFF condition, compared with controls, confirms the existence of an objective pain perception disturbance in PD.