The Treatment of Malignant Pleural Effusions by Partial Pleurectomy

Recommendations for uniform definitions of surgical techniques for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a consensus report of the international association for the study of lung cancer international staging committee and the international mesothelioma interest group

INTRODUCTION

Extrapleural pneumonectomy has been well defined; however, surgeons vary regarding the surgical extent and goals of "pleurectomy/decortication" (P/D). We explored mesothelioma surgeons' concepts of P/D with the aim of unifying surgical nomenclature.

METHODS

A web-based survey was administered to surgeons who operated on malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) for diagnosis, staging, palliation, or cytoreduction. One hundred thirty surgeons from 59 medical centers were included. Surgeons who did not perform surgery for MPM within the last year were excluded.

RESULTS

There were 62 (48%) respondents from 39 medical centers in 14 countries. The mean number of patients with MPM seen annually at each medical center was 46, and the mean annual number of cytoreductive procedures performed per surgeon was 8. Most (88%) agreed that the goal of cytoreductive surgery should be macroscopic complete resection of tumor. P/D was defined as resection of parietal and visceral pleura with the aim of achieving macroscopic complete resection by 72% of respondents. If the diaphragm or pericardium required resection, 64% preferred the term "radical P/D," whereas "P/D" (40%) or "total pleurectomy" (39%) was preferred if these structures were not removed. Most surgeons believed that extrapleural pneumonectomy (90%) or "radical P/D" (68%) could provide adequate cytoreduction, whereas only 23% thought that P/D could.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant variation regarding surgical nomenclature for procedures for MPM. The International Staging Committee of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the International Mesothelioma Interest Group recommend that P/D should aim to remove all macroscopic tumor involving the parietal and visceral pleura and should be termed "extended" P/D when the diaphragm or pericardium is resected.

Surgical therapy of mesothelioma

The treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma is controversial, particularly regarding the role of surgery. Though well accepted as a diagnostic modality, surgery is also frequently used to establish stage, provide palliation, and perhaps most controversially, to offer cytoreduction with the putative goal of delaying tumor progression and prolonging survival. Pleurectomy/decortication (PD) can achieve macroscopic complete resection; however, the ability to deliver effective postoperative radiation treatment is limited because of the risk of lung toxicity. Accordingly, it has been associated with higher rates of local recurrence compared to extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). Extrapleural pneumonectomy generally offers a more complete cytoreduction compared to PD but at the cost of increased morbidity and mortality. Adjuvant hemithoracic radiation is feasible following EPP and in most series local recurrence rates are lower after EPP than PD. There are no convincing data, however, to show that one procedure is superior to the other in terms of survival. Furthermore, no randomized data currently exist that demonstrate a survival benefit to any form of surgical cytoreduction over systemic treatment and supportive care. If cytoreductive surgery does have a beneficial effect on long-term survival, it will most likely be realized in patients with epithelioid tumors without nodal metastases.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma: surgical roles and novel therapies

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a uniformly fatal disease that has been recalcitrant to curative therapies. Median survivals of 8-18 months have, for the most part, led to a sense of frustration and nihilism in the medical and surgical community with regard to management of the disease, and the relatively small numbers of patients with mesothelioma have made it an orphan among other cancers with regard to research efforts and funding. This review will comment on the clinical presentation of the disease and therapeutic options that are available at this time. The role, timing, degree, and availability of cytoreductive surgery in the context of a multimodality approach for MPM will be highlighted, and various strategies that incorporate adjunctive therapies before, during, or after the operation will be discussed. Newer cytotoxic chemotherapies, either alone or in combination, are reviewed, with an emphasis on the increasing number of options with increased response rates that are becoming available for MPM patients. The results of protocols at selected centers that offer gene therapy, photodynamic therapy, hyperthermic chemotherapeutic perfusion, and intrapleural chemokines will be discussed, as well as newer preclinical approaches that base targeted therapies on novel molecular findings. In considering the newest approaches to the disease, one is encouraged to seek specialty consultation at centers that concentrate programmatic efforts on mesothelioma in order to design translational-based approaches on preclinical findings. By using such an approach, the patient and physician will find that there are considerably more options in the new century for mesothelioma.

Pleurectomy/decortication for palliation in malignant pleural mesothelioma: results of surgery

OBJECTIVE

Surgery can only offer palliation in an attempt to slow the progression of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We want to assess the effectiveness and safety of pleurectomy/decortication in establishing a tissue diagnosis, and controlling pleural fluid accumulation and symptoms in patients with MPM.

METHODS

We reviewed our pleurectomy results in 100 patients with MPM over a 19 year period. Major symptoms were chest pain, cough and dyspnea, and radiographic findings included pleural mass, pleural fluid and constriction of involved hemithorax.

RESULTS

Approximately two thirds of the patients underwent surgery prior to tissue diagnosis. Eighty-nine patients had stage I and stage II disease, 8 and 81%, respectively. The patients underwent subtotal (44%) or total pleurectomy (56%). The surgical mortality rate was 1% (1/100) and the morbidity rate was 22%. Morbidity included prolonged air leak (n = 12), empyema (n = 6), reaccumulation of pleural fluid (n = 2) and wound infection (n = 2). Palliative results included dyspnea and cough relief in all patients, chest relief in 60 (85%) and pleural fluid control in 52 (96%) patients. Median survival was 17 months in MPM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that pleurectomy/decortication safely provides both tissue diagnosis and effective of pleural effusion and symptoms and therefore excellent palliation in patients with MPM.

Comparison of pleuropneumonectomy and limited surgery for lung cancer with pleural dissemination

The role of surgery in the management of lung cancer with pleural dissemination is controversial. We performed a retrospective analysis of our patients with lung cancer and pleural dissemination who were treated surgically. Between 1973 and 1993, 1,206 patients with lung cancer underwent pulmonary resection at Kanazawa University Hospital. Among them, 40 (3.3%) had pleural dissemination without pleural effusion. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for 38 patients (except 2 patients undergoing exploratory thoracotomy alone) were 51.5%, 19.4%, and 19.4%, respectively. The 1-year survival rate in the 10 patients who underwent pleuropneumonectomy was only 20%, and 9 of these patients died within 18 months postoperatively (1 patient has survived for 25 months). In contrast, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for the 14 patients who underwent resection of the primary tumor plus parietal pleurectomy were 85.1%, 35.5%, and 35.5%, respectively, a significantly better outcome (P < 0.01). Seven patients are still alive (the longest survival time is 65 months with the disease). The average survival time in the seven fatal cases was 18 months. In patients with lung cancer accompanied by pleural dissemination, it is quite possible that local excision plus pleurectomy will be justified.

Diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusion

Pleural effusion is a common and important complication of malignancy which may at times be difficult to diagnose or treat. Its well recognized association with numerous diseases plus the limitations of our usual diagnostic tests may occasionally cause difficulty. In the oncology patient there are a number of common medical problems associated with the development of pleural effusion which frequently coexist with the malignancy. Pleural effusion may be a presenting or late sign of cancer, and when recurrent can be a vexing symptomatic problem. Fortunately, an increasing number of effective diagnostic and therapeutic modalities are available which, when judiciously applied, facilitate our approach.

Malignant pleural effusions

Recurrent malignant pleural effusion is a relatively common problem that often occurs many months before the terminal stages of a patient's malignant disease. Despite careful evaluation, it is often impossible to identify the exact physiologic cause of an effusion and difficult to identify a pragmatic course of therapy. Aggressive management including chest tube drainage, with or without instillation of inflammation-inducing drugs, and radiotherapy or surgery in selected cases is indicated for palliative treatment and probably for increased survival. In formulating a treatment plan, attention should be given to a variety of factors including pathogenic forces in the formation of malignant pleural effusion, tissue type of the metastatic malignancy, general clinical status of the patient, the presence of pleural loculations and adhesions, and the exclusion of other non-malignant causes of pleural effusion.

Indications for pleurectomy in malignant effusion

One hundred six patients with malignant pleural effusion were treated by pleurectomy; 83 of these were available for a 2-year followup. Sixteen of 83 patients were alive 2 years following the pleurectomy, with a survival range of 2-6 years. The most common neoplasms associated with the development of effusion were carcinoma of the lung in 41 cases, carcinoma of the breast in 33 cases, and mesothelioma in 14. Indications for pleurectomy were: A) failure to control the effusion by tube drainage and instillation of chemical or radioactive agents; B) presence of a trapped lung; and C) presence of malignant effusion at the time of thoracotomy for resection of an intrathoracic tumor.