Total one-stage suboccipital microsurgical removal of acoustic neuromas of all sizes: with emphasis on arachnoid planes and on saving the facial nerve

Microsurgical anatomy and pathoanatomy of the outer arachnoid membranes in the cerebellopontine angle: cadaveric and intraoperative observations

PURPOSE

The cerebellopontine angle (CPA) is a frequent region of skull base pathologies and therefore a target for neurosurgical operations. The outer arachnoid is the key structure to approach the here located lesions. The goal of our study was to describe the microsurgical anatomy of the outer arachnoid of the CPA and its pathoanatomy in case of space-occupying lesions.

METHODS

Our examinations were performed on 35 fresh human cadaveric specimens. Macroscopic dissections and microsurgical and endoscopic examinations were performed. Retrospective analysis of the video documentations of 35 CPA operations was performed to describe the pathoanatomical behavior of the outer arachnoid.

RESULTS

The outer arachnoid cover is loosely attached to the inner surface of the dura of the CPA. At the petrosal surface of the cerebellum the pia mater is strongly adhered to the outer arachnoid. At the level of the dural penetration of the cranial nerves, the outer arachnoid forms sheath-like structures around the nerves. In the midline, the outer arachnoid became detached from the pial surface and forms the base of the posterior fossa cisterns. In pathological cases, the outer arachnoid became displaced. The way of displacement depends on the origin of the lesion. The most characteristic patterns of changes of the outer arachnoid were described in case of meningiomas, vestibular schwannomas, and epidermoid cysts of the CPA.

CONCLUSION

The knowledge of the anatomy of the outer arachnoid of the cerebellopontine region is essential to safely perform microsurgical approaches as well as of dissections during resection of pathological lesions.

Arachnoid and dural reflections

The dura mater is the major gateway for accessing most extra-axial lesions and all intra-axial lesions of the central nervous system. It provides a protective barrier against external trauma, infections, and the spread of malignant cells. Knowledge of the anatomical details of dural reflections around various corners of the skull bases provides the neurosurgeon with confidence during transdural approaches. Such knowledge is indispensable for protection of neurovascular structures in the vicinity of these dural reflections. The same concept is applicable to arachnoid folds and reflections during intradural excursions to expose intra- and extra-axial lesions of the brain. Without a detailed understanding of arachnoid membranes and cisterns, the neurosurgeon cannot confidently navigate the deep corridors of the skull base while safely protecting neurovascular structures. This chapter covers the surgical anatomy of dural and arachnoid reflections applicable to microneurosurgical approaches to various regions of the skull base.

Large vestibular schwannoma resection through the suboccipital retrosigmoid keyhole approach

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to retrospectively study the outcomes of large vestibular schwannoma resection through the suboccipital retrosigmoid keyhole approach and emphasize technical details and advantages of surgical resection of large vestibular schwannomas via this approach.

METHODS

From January 2010 to September 2012, 37 consecutive patients (16 men and 21 women) with vestibular schwannoma, 4 cm or greater, received surgical resection through the suboccipital retrosigmoid keyhole approach in our department. Clinical records, radiographic findings, operative summaries, and follow-up data were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean age of these patients was 45.1 ± 11.6 years. Thirty-six patients underwent primary keyhole surgical removal, and 1 underwent surgery for residual tumor after gamma knife. Gross total tumor removal was accomplished in 35 patients (94.6%), near total resection in 1 (2.7%), and subtotal resection in 1 patient (2.7%). The facial nerve was anatomically intact in all 37 patients (100%). Facial nerve function was assessed in 6 to 12 months after operation. Good function (House-Brackmann facial nerve grade I-II) was present in 81.1% of the patients, whereas acceptable function (grade III) was present in 11.1%. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage that required surgical intervention occurred in only 5.4% of the patients, and meningitis occurred in 8.1%. In addition, 3 patients (8.1%) had hydrocephalus requiring a temporary ventricular diversion. There were no deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The suboccipital retrosigmoid keyhole approach is a valid choice for removing large vestibular schwannomas. Through this approach, cerebellopontine angle can be effectively exposed. Skills to protect facial nerve and extensive experience in microsurgical techniques can significantly improve the total resection rate and postoperative facial nerve function. The authors recommend this approach for patients with vestibular schwannomas larger than 3 to 4 cm.

Medial acoustic neuromas: clinical and surgical implications

OBJECT

Medial acoustic neuroma is a rare entity that confers a distinct clinical syndrome. It is scarcely discussed in the literature and is associated with adverse features. This study evaluates the clinical and imaging features, pertinent surgical challenges, and treatment outcome in a large series of this variant. The authors postulate that the particular pathological anatomy with its arachnoidal rearrangement has a profound implication on the surgical technique and outcome.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 52 cases involving 33 women and 19 men who underwent resection of medial acoustic neuromas performed by the senior author (O.A.) over a 20-year period (1993-2013). Clinical, radiological, and operative records were reviewed, with a specific focus on the neurological outcomes and facial nerve function and hearing preservation. Intraoperative findings were analyzed with respect to the effect of arachnoidal arrangement on the surgeon's ability to resect the lesion and the impact on postoperative function.

RESULTS

The average tumor size was 34.5 mm (maximum diameter), with over 90% of tumors being 25 mm or larger and 71% being cystic. Cerebellar, trigeminal nerve, and facial nerve dysfunction were common preoperative findings. Hydrocephalus was present in 11 patients. Distinguishing intraoperative findings included marked tumor adherence to the brainstem and frequent hypervascularity, which prompted intracapsular dissection resulting in enhancement on postoperative MRI in 18 cases, with only 3 demonstrating growth on follow-up. There was no mortality or major postoperative neurological deficit. Cerebrospinal fluid leak was encountered in 7 patients, with 4 requiring surgical repair. Among 45 patients who had intact preoperative facial function, only 1 had permanent facial nerve paralysis on extended follow-up. Of the patients with preoperative Grade I-II facial function, 87% continued to have Grade I-II function on follow-up. Of 10 patients who had Class A hearing preoperatively, 5 continued to have Class A or B hearing after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Medial acoustic neuromas represent a rare subgroup whose site of origin and growth patterns produce a distinct clinical presentation and present specific operative challenges. They reach giant size and are frequently cystic and hypervascular. Their origin and growth pattern lead to arachnoidal rearrangement with marked adherence against the brainstem, which is critical in the surgical management. Excellent surgical outcome is achievable with a high rate of facial nerve function and attainable hearing preservation. These results suggest that similar or better results may be achieved in less complex tumors.

Is an Acoustic Neuroma an Epiarachnoid or Subarachnoid Tumor?

BACKGROUND:

There are arguments about whether acoustic neuromas are epiarachnoid or subarachnoid tumors.

OBJECTIVE:

To retrospectively examine 118 consecutively operated-on patients with acoustic neuromas to clarify this point.

METHODS:

Epiarachnoid tumors are defined by the absence of an arachnoid membrane on the tumor surface after moving the arachnoid fold (double layers of the arachnoid membrane) toward the brainstem. In contrast, subarachnoid tumors are characterized by the arachnoid membrane remaining on the tumor surface after moving the arachnoid fold. Based on this hypothesis, we used intraoperative views and light and electron microscopy to confirm the existence of an arachnoid membrane after the arachnoid fold had been moved.

RESULTS:

The tumors were clearly judged to be subarachnoid tumors in 86 of 118 patients (73%), an epiarachnoid tumor in 2 patients (2%), whereas a clear judgment was difficult to make in the remaining 30 patients (25%).

CONCLUSION:

The majority of acoustic neuromas are subarachnoid tumors, with epiarachnoid tumors being considerably less common.

Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): the value of neurophysiology for evaluation and prediction of auditory function in 420 cases

OBJECTIVE

From 1978 to 1993, 1000 vestibular schwannomas were operated on at the Department of Neurosurgery at Nordstadt Hospital. The goal was to improve the chances of hearing preservation by recording auditory brain stem responses (ABRs). ABRs can be used for preoperative classification of cochlear nerve impairment and for prediction of the chances of hearing preservation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In addition to the previously described audiometric testing, the patients underwent perioperative and intraoperative bilateral ABR recording at 100-dB condensation and rarefaction click stimulation. The classification system of five types of ABRs, as presented before, is based on the presence and on the latencies of Waves I, III, and V, with a special emphasis on Wave III's representing the activity of the first brain stem nuclei within the auditory pathway. According to an analysis of 420 preoperative ABRs, in case of a preoperative Type 1 or 2, the rate of hearing preservation is 80%.

DISCUSSION

In the case of good clinical and audiometric hearing, a severely deteriorated ABR is mostly an indicator of severe nerve compression and adhesion by the tumor. In view of subsequently reported experiences with intraoperative ABR monitoring, the value of the presented system emphasizing the importance of Wave III is stressed and discussed with other views in the literature. The criteria presented here are not designed for recognition of retrocochlear disease but aim for evaluation of the state of the auditory nerve and its perspective.

CONCLUSION

By the presented classification of ABR Type B1 through B5, preoperative prediction of the likelihood of hearing preservation is improved.

Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): the value of neurophysiology for intraoperative monitoring of auditory function in 200 cases

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated the significance of the presence or absence of auditory brain stem response (ABR) Waves I, III, and V as functional representatives of the cochlea, the nucleus cochlearis, and the colliculus inferior, respectively, and attempted to identify the microsurgical maneuvers that were especially likely to cause isolated or combined component losses and subsequent hearing losses.

METHODS

Based on the previously described ABR classification system, 201 patients with preserved Waves I, III, and V or Waves I and V were investigated for the peak latencies and amplitudes of the waves at 15 defined microsurgical stages. Analysis was performed with respect to the presence or absence of ABR components during specific microsurgical actions and the related danger of deafness.

RESULTS

Temporary or permanent losses of Waves V, I, and III occurred with 21, 27, and 29% of surgical actions, respectively, leading to deafness in 65 to 78% of the patients. Wave III disappearance was identified as the earliest and most sensitive sign. Wave V loss was usually preceded by disappearances of Waves I and III. During the most dangerous actions (drilling, pulling downward, medially, or laterally, and direct nerve manipulation), special attention ws paid to deterioration of Wave-III and then Wave I; if impairment was seen, intermittent breaks or changes in the type or site of microsurgical action were used to enable wave recovery. Acute, simultaneous, and permanent loss of all waves occurred in 27.5% of postoperatively deaf patients, whereas stepwise wave deterioration and losses occurred in 72.5%.

CONCLUSION

Useful (in-time) recognition of significant waveform changes is possible and enables a change of microsurgical maneuvers to favor ABR recovery.

Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): clinical presentation

OBJECTIVE

Despite good knowledge of the key symptoms of vestibular schwannomas and their significance for surgical results, the evolution of symptoms and signs and their relation to tumor extension still need thorough investigation.

METHODS

From 1978 to 1993, operations were performed by the same surgeon (M.S.) on 1000 vestibular schwannomas at the Neurosurgical Department of Nordstadt Hospital. The vestibular schwannomas were diagnosed in 962 patients, including 522 female patients (54%) and 440 male patients (46%); the mean age was significantly higher in female patients (47.6 yr) than in men (45.2 yr). We focused our analysis on the incidence of subjective disturbances versus objective morbidity, on the sequence of symptom onset, and on symptom duration and symptomatology versus tumor size and extension.

RESULTS

The most frequent clinical symptoms were disturbances of the acoustic (95%), vestibular (61%), trigeminal (9%), and facial (6%) nerves. Symptom duration was 3.7 years for hearing loss, 1.9 years for facial paresis, and 1.3 years for trigeminal disturbances. Symptom incidence and duration did not strictly correlate with tumor size. Key symptoms of various tumor extension classes precipitated the diagnosis, such as trigeminal disturbances in large tumors with brain stem compression or tinnitus in small neuromas. In cases of trigeminal or facial nerve symptoms, the overall duration of symptomatology was much shorter. According to the subjective perception of the patients, between only one- and two-thirds of nerve disturbances were noticed. Patients with preoperative deafness had become deaf either chronically (23%) or suddenly (3%); even in cases of moderate hearing deficit that lasts a long time, deafness can occur suddenly. The rate of tinnitus was higher in hearing than in deaf patients; however, deafness does not mean relief from tinnitus, because this symptom persists in 46% of preoperatively deaf patients. Vestibular disturbances most often occur as some unsteadiness while walking or as vertigo, and the symptoms frequently are fluctuating, not constant.

CONCLUSION

Differences in tumor biology can be underestimated and are not visible on radiological scans. For example, intrameatal tumors, despite their small size, present with a duration of symptoms that is representative of the larger tumors and are most frequently associated with vestibular symptoms and with tinnitus. Large tumors with brain stem compression present with relatively shorter symptom durations and at a younger age; both factors are suggestive of especially fast tumor growth. The clinical findings presented in this study promote new consideration of the dynamics of tumor growth and of the affected neural tissues.

Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in nonsurgical ear

Several studies have reported contralateral hearing deficits following ear surgery. This study aimed to evaluate changes in micromechanical cochlear properties which could occur in the contralateral ear following ear surgery, using transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) recording. Surgery involved tympanic membrane surgery in 13 cases and middle ear surgery in 16 cases. TEOAEs were recorded and compared for contralateral ears before (day 1: D1) and after (day 2: D2) ear surgery. Two patients failed to show a TEOAE reproductibility > 75%, and were excluded from the study, thus reducing the number of patients to 27. Results were compared to those of a control group of 12 normal hearing subjects, recorded in similar conditions also on day one (D1) and day two (D2). The difference between D1 and D2 was not significant in either group. Pre/postsurgery variations in TEOAE amplitude for the patient group were negatively and significantly correlated with the corresponding preoperative levels in that the greater the presurgical TEOAE level, the larger the decrease in postoperative level. Compared to the variation confidence intervals in the control group, TEOAE amplitude remained stable in 15 patients, increased in four and decreased in eight. These three groups of patients differed only regarding preoperative TEOAE amplitude values, which were significantly greater in the group which presented a decrease in TEOAE amplitude than in the others. Increase in TEOAE amplitude was more frequent after tympanic membrane surgery. On the other hand, TEOAE amplitude decrease was more frequent after middle ear surgery, and is significant compared to the tympanic membrane surgery results. The results show that cochlear micromechanical properties may be reduced in the ear contralateral to surgery and that this decrease depends on the severity of the surgical procedures in the operated ear, such as drilling or opening of the oval window.

Preservation of hearing in surgery for acoustic neuromas

Preservation of hearing was attempted in 161 cases of histologically confirmed acoustic neuroma removed by the senior author between January 1, 1970, and September 30, 1991. There were 136 patients with unilateral tumors; 22 patients had bilateral tumors (neurofibromatosis 2) and underwent a total of 25 procedures. Hearing was initially preserved in 35% of patients with unilateral tumors and in 44% of those with bilateral tumors. Results are reported in terms of pre- and postoperative pure tone average and speech discrimination scores. Surgical access to the tumor was obtained via middle cranial fossa and suboccipital approaches. The latter has been used more often over the past 5 years because of a lower associated incidence of transient facial paresis. Persistent postoperative headaches have been the most common complication following the suboccipital approach. The results of preoperative brain-stem auditory evoked response (BAER) studies were useful in predicting the outcome of hearing preservation attempts. Patients with intact BAER waveform morphology and normal or delayed latencies had a higher probability of hearing preservation in comparison to those with abnormal preoperative BAER morphology.

Preservation of cochlear nerve function in acoustic neurinoma surgery

A total of 55 cases with unilateral acoustic neurinoma which were operated on by the lateral suboccipital approach was studied to elucidate factors which influence postoperative hearing acuity. We analyzed several factors: preoperative hearing level, tumour size, tumour consistency (cystic or solid), and anatomical location of the cochlear nerve. The size of the tumours ranged from 1.2 to 5.8 cm in diameter. Thirty of 55 cases (55%) preoperatively had remaining cochlear function. The smaller the size of tumour, the higher was the preoperative hearing level excepting those tumours with a diameter of 5 cm or greater, which had relatively good hearing and often contained large cysts. As to the consistency of the tumours, 41 were solid and 14 were cystic, where 19 (46%) and 11 (79%) cases had had preoperative hearing, respectively. Anatomical continuity of the cochlear nerve was maintained at surgery in 15 of 30 cases with preoperatively remaining hearing; cochlear function was preserved after surgery in 9 of the 15 cases. It was located counter-clockwise (caudally) to the facial nerve at an angle of 50 degrees on average when they were projected on the right side. The distance or interrelation between the two nerves had no bearing on postoperative hearing preservation. Postoperatively, hearing acuity was improved in 6 cases (20%) with a mean value of 5.6 dB, unchanged in 3 (10%), and deteriorated in 21 (70%) among the 30 cases with remaining preoperative-hearing. When the tumour was less than 2 cm or cystic, better hearing preservation was expected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acoustic neuroma surgery: results of translabyrinthine tumour removal in 300 patients. Discussion of choice of approach in relation to overall results and possibility of hearing preservation

The results from the Danish model of acoustic neuroma surgery are presented. In the period from 1976 to 1985, 300 patients with acoustic neuromas were operated upon using the translabyrinthine procedure. Only one small intrameatal tumour was encountered; 96 tumours were medium sized and 203 were larger than 25 mm. Of these 118 measured more than 40 mm. Mortality rate was 2%, CSF leaks occurred in 11%, and had to be closed surgically in 5%. Facial nerve function was postoperatively normal in 66%, slightly reduced in 17%, moderately reduced in 8% and abolished in 9%. Reconstruction, most often as a XII-VII anastomosis, was performed in only 6% of the patients. Cerebellar symptoms, which occurred in 45% preoperatively were present in only 7% after surgery. The preoperative hearing in both the tumour and non-tumour ear was analysed in 72 patients with tumours smaller than 2 cm. In the tumour ear, only four patients had a PTA of 0-20 dB and SDS of 81-100%; eight patients had a PTA of 0-40 dB and SDS of 61-100%; 14 had a PTA of 0-50 dB and SDS of 51-100%. This means that only a maximum of 5% of the patients, using the broadest criteria, could be candidates for hearing-conserving surgery. In all these patients the contralateral ear had hearing within normal limits (PTA 0-20 dB and SDS 95-100%). Since preservation of hearing would be achieved in only half of those subjected to suboccipital removal and since the hearing retained in patients with successful operations generally is poorer than the preoperative level, the number of patients obtaining serviceable hearing is so modest that preservation of hearing cannot be considered a valid argument in favour of suboccipital tumour removal. From a statistical point of view the risk of losing hearing in the opposite ear after tumour removal is negligible. The general morbidity after suboccipital surgery is higher than after translabyrinthine surgery, and hearing loss must be listed low among the other sequelae after tumour removal.

Is preservation of hearing in acoustic neuroma worthwhile?

In a series of 300 translabyrinthine removals of acoustic neuromas, comprising almost all tumours operated on in Denmark during a period of 10 years, the preoperative hearing in the tumour ear and in the contralateral ear was analysed in 72 patients with tumours smaller than 2 cm in extrameatal diameter. These patients constitute likely candidates for a hearing preserving operation via the suboccipital approach. In the tumour ear in 4 patients there was a pure-tone average (PTA) of 0-20 dB and a discrimination score (DS) of 81-100%. Applying this criterion to the whole series, 1% of the patients would be candidates for a hearing preserving procedure. Changing the criterion to a PTA of 0-40 dB and a DS of 61-100%, the number of candidates would increase to 8 patients (3%), and with a PTA of 0-50 dB and a DS of 51-100% 14 candidates (5%) would have been found. In all of these patients, contralateral hearing was normal (SRT 0-20 dB, DS 95-100%). Since preservation of hearing would be achieved in only half of those subjected to suboccipital removal and since the hearing retained in patients with successful operations is generally poorer than the preoperative level, the number of patients obtaining serviceable hearing is so modest that preservation of hearing cannot be considered an argument in favour of suboccipital tumour removal. It should be borne in mind that contralateral hearing is normal in these patients and that, according to most reports, the mortality rate is higher and paralysis of the facial nerve more frequent with the suboccipital approach than with the translabyrinthine procedure.

Hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery

This paper reviews the principal English literature on hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery. Seventeen case reports and 13 surgical series are included. In addition, we report ten cases of our own, two with successful hearing preservation. The purpose of this report is to study feasibility, success rate, and associated problems. Previous reports have been compared in terms of criteria that we have selected. A classification system similar to Silverstein's is used. The total number of cases under review is 621, with 221 reported successes. Cases limited to those having a unilateral acoustic neuroma, with valid supportive audiometry, were 394, with 131 successes. The approximate overall rate of success is 33%. There are five cases of hearing preservation with unilateral acoustic neuromas 3 cm or larger when supporting audiometric data are available, the largest being "4-5 centimeters." Problems included mixing of unilateral acoustic neuromas with other types of tumors and failure to include comprehensive data, particularly audiometry. We conclude 1) that hearing preservation is a reasonable goal in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery, although the number of available candidates is relatively small and 2) that intelligent selection of patients and high quality surgical technique are the keys to success.

Use of intraoperative auditory evoked potentials to preserve hearing in unilateral acoustic neuroma removal

Twenty-two patients with unilateral acoustic neuromas and preoperative speech discrimination scores of 35% or more had intraoperative monitoring of the electrocochleogram (ECoG) using a transtympanic electrode, and of the brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP's) using scalp electrodes. Rapid feedback was provided about the status of the cochlear microphonics from the hair cells of the inner ear (CM of the ECoG), the compound action potential of the auditory nerve (N-1 of the ECoG or Wave I of the BAEP's) and the potentials from the lower brain stem (Wave V of the BAEP's). All patients had total removal of the tumor. In 21, the cochlear nerve was anatomically preserved, and 20 had good postoperative facial nerve function. Correlation of tumor size with postoperative hearing was as follows: discrimination scores of more than 35% in three of four patients with 1-cm tumors, two of eight with 1.5-cm tumors, two of six with 2- to 2.5-cm tumors, and one of four with tumors of 3 cm or more. Two other patients with 1.5-cm tumors had discrimination scores of less than 35%, and one patient with a 2-cm tumor had only sound perception. In two patients, the discrimination scores improved. At the end of the operation, all patients with hearing had a detectable N-1, and, when recorded, CM. All but one patient with no hearing had lost N-1, and CM was absent or reduced. Unless Wave V was unchanged, it was a poor predictor of postoperative hearing, and its absence did not preclude preservation of good hearing. The electrophysiological changes during each stage of the operation were analyzed and correlated with events during surgery. Areas in which there was an increased risk of loss of the potentials were determined. In some patients monitoring was unnecessary, because either there were no significant changes or the changes were abrupt and no recovery occurred. However, in other patients, monitoring alerted the surgeon to a possible problem and the method of dissection was altered. Possible mechanisms of hearing loss were suggested from the changes in the recordings.

Technique of hearing preservation in small acoustic neuromas

The ideal operation for acoustic neurinoma would not only provide total excision without injury to the brain stem and with preservation of facial nerve function, but would also allow retention of useful hearing in those patients who come to operation with intact hearing function. Documented preservation of useful hearing in the rather extensive literature concerning acoustic neurinomas is rare. An operative technique has been developed utilizing a retromastoid approach, brain stem auditory-evoked potentials and direct auditory monitoring, facial nerve electromyography, and microsurgical techniques that have enabled us to preserve useful hearing in three and some hearing in two of six consecutive patients who had preoperative hearing. Rules regarding preservation and criteria regarding documentation of hearing preservation are outlined.

Hearing conservation in acoustic tumor surgery: pro's and con's

This article presents an overview of the points to be made both for and against the consideration of hearing conservation in acoustic tumor surgery based on current available data in the literature. Age, general health, tumor size, and hearing - in the tumor ear and in the contralateral ear as well as the interaural relationship - are the presurgical factors discussed. Either the middle fossa or posterior fossa approach may be utilized for hearing conservation. The technical factors relating to surgical anatomy, specific risks, and the probability that hearing may be preserved by these approaches have been abstracted from a review of the literature. Finally, the patient's considerations and his need for the conservation of his hearing are presented, including realistic alternatives to surgical conservation.

Facial nerve preservation during surgery for removal of acoustic nerve tumors

A series of 33 patients with 35 acoustic nerve tumors is reviewed. Tumor size was estimated from computerized tomography (CT) scans, and its influence on anatomical and functional preservation of the facial nerve was assessed. Six tumors (one invading the petrous bone, three medium and two large tumors) were not detected on CT scans. The translabyrinthine approach was used in seven instances (one small and six medium tumors) and the suboccipital transmeatal approach for 28 tumors (seven medium and 21 large tumors). Anatomical preservation of the facial nerve was achieved in 83% of operations for tumor removal, two of which were subtotal. A further two patients underwent subtotal removal, but the facial nerve was destroyed. Large tumors carried an increased risk of damage to the facial nerve, but even in this group the nerve was preserved anatomically intact in 70% of cases. Damage to the facial nerve occurred more frequently in patients with preoperative evidence of facial weakness; however, this factor did not appear to influence functional recovery of the facial nerve, provided that the nerve was intact at the end of the operation. A simple grading system for facial nerve function is described. Ony 76% of anatomically intact facial nerves showed any evidence of function 1 month after surgery. Postoperatively, facial function improved with time. At the latest review, 45% of these patients had normal facial function or mild facial weakness (Grades I and II).

Facial nerve function after suboccipital removal of acoustic neurinoma

The recovery of facial nerve function after suboccipital removal of 91 acoustic neurinomas is presented. The results after anatomical preservation of the nerve (60 cases), direct anastomosis of the nerve (7 cases), nerve grafting (16 cases), and facial hypoglossal anastomosis (8 cases) are presented after a follow-up period of 31.2 months. A simplified classification was used to describe motor function. The results are compared to those in the literature.