Myofibril size variation along the length of extraocular muscle in rabbit and rat. II: global layer

Biological organization of the extraocular muscles

Extraocular muscle is fundamentally distinct from other skeletal muscles. Here, we review the biological organization of the extraocular muscles with the intent of understanding this novel muscle group in the context of oculomotor system function. The specific objectives of this review are threefold. The first objective is to understand the anatomic arrangement of the extraocular muscles and their compartmental or layered organization in the context of a new concept of orbital mechanics, the active pulley hypothesis. The second objective is to present an integrated view of the morphologic, cellular, and molecular differences between extraocular and the more traditional skeletal muscles. The third objective is to relate recent data from functional and molecular biology studies to the established extraocular muscle fiber types. Developmental mechanisms that may be responsible for the divergence of the eye muscles from a skeletal muscle prototype also are considered. Taken together, a multidisciplinary understanding of extraocular muscle biology in health and disease provides insights into oculomotor system function and malfunction. Moreover, because the eye muscles are selectively involved or spared in a variety of neuromuscular diseases, knowledge of their biology may improve current pathogenic models of and treatments for devastating systemic diseases.

Location along the muscle's length is a determinant of myofibril size

In a previous study of myofibril size in 'Pale' (fast-twitch-glycolytic) fibers of rabbit extraocular muscle (EOM), it was found that individual long Pale fibers demonstrate a substantial increase in the size of myofibril profiles from their proximal to their distal halves (Davidowitz et al., 1996b). That finding raised the question of whether such proximal-to-distal increase of myofibril size in the Pale fibers is determined by: (1) longitudinal position within the individual muscle fibers themselves or (2) location along the length of the muscle as a whole? This question was tested in the present study by comparing the original group of long Pale fibers, which extend the full length of the muscle, with two groups of short Pale fibers, which are respectively confined to the proximal and distal halves of the muscle. It was found that (a) in the proximal half of the muscle, the short fibers and the adjacent portions of the long fibers have the same smaller size of myofibrils, and (b) in the distal half of the muscle, the short fibers and the adjacent portions of the long fibers have the same larger size of myofibrils. This finding indicates that the proximal-to-distal increase of myofibril-profile size in these EOM Pale fibers is determined by location along the length of the muscle as a whole, and is not related to longitudinal position within the individual fibers themselves.

Myofibril size variation along the length of extraocular muscle in rabbit and rat. I: orbital layer

It is generally assumed that a muscle fiber is structurally uniform along its length. That assumption is not consistent with the observed variation of myofibrillar profile size along the length of both singly innervated fibers (SIFs) and multiply innervated fibers (MIFs) in the orbital (outer) layer of extraocular muscle (EOM). Muscle fibers were reconstructed in serial sections along the orbital layer of rabbit and rat EOM. For both the SIFs and MIFs, myofibril profile size was smallest (narrowest) near the endplate. In the SIFs of rat, for example, the myofibril profiles were 28% wider at a distance of 1.5 mm from the endplate than at the endplate itself. Measures of profile size included the mean intercept length and the mean shortest path from test points within the profile to the profile boundary. The possible effect of sarcomere length variation was controlled by normalizing the myofibrillar profile size data to a constant spacing of the myosin filament lattice. This morphometric approach was also used to quantify the further increase of profile size that occurs in the end portions of the orbital MIFs where the myobrillar organization is typically ill-defined.