Sensitization to HLA by allografts is minimized by matching for HLA-A,B crossreactive groups

Assessing immunologic risk factors in transplantation

The innate and adaptive immune systems, together, represent the largest impediment to good and long-lasting graft function. Although improved immunosuppressive agents and expanded and enhanced diagnostic tools have led to better prevention and treatment of acute rejection, chronic rejection remains a serious threat to long-term graft survival. Immunologic heterogeneity among patients, variability in treatment protocols and unforeseen events following transplantation translate into different levels of risk among patients. While one cannot predict with certainty the short- and long-term outcomes of a particular transplant, it is possible to identify immunologic risk factors that can affect outcome.

An Evaluation of HLA Cross-Reactive Group Matching on Graft Survival in Deceased Donor Kidney Recipients

Since September 20, 1999, our organ procurement organization (OPO) serving an ethnically diverse local distribution area has allocated kidneys using a cross-reactive group (CREG)-based variance. This variance awards 7 points for 0-CREG,0-DR mismatches and 6 points for 0-A,B mismatches in addition to points given for waiting time (3) and panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) > or = 80% (3). Previously, we have shown that awarding points for 0-CREG,0-DR mismatches in kidney allocation improves the access to HLA-matched transplants for racial groups, especially for the black race. In this study, we evaluated if there are outcome benefits as well. One- and 3-year uncensored graft survival data and analyses for the influence of HLA mismatching on graft outcome in black and nonblack recipients were provided by Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). Overall, 1-year graft survival was 87.4% and not significantly different for blacks (86.1%, n = 467) vs nonblacks (88.8%, n = 730); 3-year graft survival was 74.6% and significantly lower P = .0001 for blacks (68.5%, n = 480) vs nonblacks (78.4%, n = 765). No significant advantage was observed for either the black or nonblack recipients in any of the HLA-mismatched categories, including the 0-CREG,0-DR mismatch group. An HLA matching effect also was not seen when data were stratified for patients nonsensitized (PRA < or = 10%) and sensitized (PRA > 10%) at the time of transplantation, except for the improved graft survival in sensitized nonblack recipients of 0- A,B,DR-mismatched grafts. Of the patients who lost their grafts and returned to the waiting list for retransplantation, the 0-A,B,DR mismatched were the least sensitized group (6%, n = 16), and there was a trend for less sensitization in the 0-CREG,0-DR-mismatched group (33%, n = 9), compared to those with other HLA mismatches (68%, n = 137). Thus, based on 1-year and 3-year follow-up data, there are no apparent graft outcome benefits for either CREG matching or conventional HLA matching in our service area, except for sensitized nonblack recipients receiving 0-A,B,DR-mismatched grafts. Such benefits may become more apparent with longer follow-up.