Induction therapy with bolus ATG increases cyclosporine sensitivity in renal transplant recipients

Effect of prophylaxis with low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin on prevention of acute kidney allograft rejection

INTRODUCTION

During kidney transplantation, the first contact between the recipient's immune system and the donor organ takes place immediately following the arterial anastomosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a single, low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) prophylaxis in the reduction of early acute rejection in renal allograft recipients.

METHODS

In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, we studied the rate of acute rejection within the first month of kidney transplantation in patients who had received their transplant at a single center between the years 2004 and 2007. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (n = 37) received cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine, and prednisolone; group 2 (n = 31) received the above-mentioned agents plus a single ATG bolus (Thymoglobulin; SangStat, Lyon, France; 4-5 mg/kg) the night before the transplantation ( approximately 12 hours before the operation). Blood urea and serum creatinine levels were measured regularly in the posttransplantation period. Acute allograft rejection was justified clinically and/or pathologically. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 13.0 using Student t test and Fisher exact test. A P value < or = .05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences regarding the age and gender ratio between the 2 groups. Acute allograft rejection was found in 32.4% (n = 12) of group 1 patients, and was reduced to 12.9% (n = 4) in group 2 (P = .05). Hence, the first-month acute rejection episodes decreased by approximately 60% with ATG prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic administration of a single and low-dose ATG the night before kidney transplantation could reduce the risk of acute allograft rejection in renal transplant recipients. However, further studies with a greater number of patients should be conducted to confirm these results.

Polyclonal Antibodies in Renal Transplantation—A Relook

Polyclonal antibodies have been used in renal transplantation for the past four decades. Increasing knowledge regarding their varied mechanisms of action have confirmed their versatility in clinical practice. They can be used for induction, reversing acute rejections (especially those resistant to steroids), and possibly conferring an element of allotolerance, thereby reducing chronic allograft nephropathy. Their recent usage as IV bolus, single-dose, preoperative infusion as induction therapy in renal transplantation is an attractive and extremely cost-effective strategy, especially in a developing country such as India.

Beneficial effect of concomitant induction with antilymphoblast globulin, cyclosporine, and steroids on long-term renal allograft outcome

BACKGROUND

The addition of induction therapy with antilymphocytic antibodies to cyclosporine (CsA) based immunosuppression, has reduced acute rejection incidence and improved short-term survivals, but has not had well-established effects on long-term renal transplant survival.

PATIENTS

We analyzed the long-term allograft outcome of patients included in a prospective randomized clinical study conducted in our center 15 years ago by comparing two strategies: (A) horse antilymphoblast globulin (ALG) given at 10 mg/kg on alternate days to a maximum of 6 doses with low-dose CsA started at 8 mg/kg per day and prednisone at 0.25 mg/kg per day, versus (B) CsA started at 15 mg/kg per day and prednisone at 0.5 mg/kg per day. Diabetic and highly sensitized patients (PRA > 70%) were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the 50 patients enrolled in each group were not different. Although patient survival was not different (88% in group A vs 77% in group B), recipients treated with ALG showed a lower incidence of acute rejection episodes (20% vs 44%, P = .01) and better death-censored renal allograft survival (57% vs 41%, P = .03). Among rejection-free patients, graft survival was 15% higher in group A (60% vs 45%, P = .12). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that an acute rejection episode (relative risk [RR]: 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-4.39; P = .0029) rather than ALG immunosuppression (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.41-1.33; P = NS) was an independent predictor of death-censored graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, we confirmed that concomitant induction therapy with ALG, CsA, and steroids improves long-term renal allograft survival.