Recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation: follow-up and treatment

Antiviral interventions for liver transplant patients with recurrent graft infection due to hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND

Antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation is controversial due to unresolved balance between benefits and harms.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the therapeutic benefits and harms of different antiviral regimens in patients with hepatitis C re-infected grafts after liver transplantation.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Issue 1, 2013), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded to February 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) comparing various antiviral therapies (alone or in combination) in the treatment of hepatitis C virus recurrence in liver transplantation for the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors collected the data independently. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the fixed-effect and the random-effects models based on available case-analysis. In the presence of only trials for a dichotomous outcome, we performed the Fisher's exact test.

MAIN RESULTS

Overall, 17 trials with 736 patients met the inclusion criteria for this review. All trials had high risk of bias. Five hundred and one patients randomised in 11 trials provided information for various comparisons in this systematic review after excluding post-randomisation drop-outs and patients from trials that did not report any of the outcomes of interest for this review. The comparisons for which outcomes were available included pegylated (peg) interferon versus control; peg interferon plus ribavirin versus control; ribavirin plus peg interferon versus peg interferon; peg interferon (1.5 μg/kg/week) plus ribavirin versus peg interferon (0.5 μg/kg/week) plus ribavirin; amantadine plus peg interferon plus ribavirin versus peg interferon plus ribavirin; interferon versus control; interferon plus ribavirin versus control; ribavirin versus interferon; and ribavirin versus placebo. Long-term follow-up was not available in these trials. There were no significant differences in mortality, retransplantation, graft rejections requiring retransplantation or medical treatment, or fibrosis worsening between the groups in any of the comparisons in which these outcomes were reported. Quality of life and liver decompensation were not reported in any of the trials. There was a significantly higher proportion of participants who developed serious adverse events in the ribavirin plus peg interferon combination therapy group than in the peg interferon monotherapy group (1 trial; 56 participants; 17/28 (60.7%) in the intervention group versus 5/28 (17.9%) in the control group; RR 3.40; 95% CI 1.46 to 7.94). There was no significant difference in proportion of participants who developed serious adverse events or in the number of serious adverse events between the intervention and control groups in the other comparisons that reported serious adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Considering the lack of clinical benefit, there is currently no evidence to recommend or refute antiviral treatment for recurrent liver graft infection with hepatitis C virus. Further randomised clinical trials with low risk of bias and low risk of random errors with adequate duration of follow-up are necessary.

Antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation

A significant proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection develop liver cirrhosis and complications of end-stage liver disease over two to three decades and require liver transplantation, however, reinfection is common and leads to further adverse events under immunosuppression. Pretransplant antiviral or preemptive therapy is limited to mildly decompensated patients due to poor tolerance. The mainstay of management represents directed antiviral therapy after evidence of recurrence of chronic hepatitis C. Combined pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy is the current standard treatment with sustained viral response rates of 25% to 45%. The rate is lower than that in the immunocompetent population, partly due to the high prevalence of intolerability. To date, there is no general consensus regarding the antiviral treatment modality, timing, or dosing for HCV in patients with advanced liver disease and after liver transplantation. New anti-HCV drugs to delay disease progression or to enhance viral clearance are necessary.

Antiviral therapy for recurrent liver graft infection with hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND

Antiviral therapy to treat recurrent hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation is controversial due to unresolved balance between benefits and harms.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the therapeutic benefits and harms of different antiviral regimens in patients with hepatitis C re-infected grafts after liver transplantation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until March 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) comparing various antiviral therapies (alone or in combination) in the treatment of hepatitis C virus recurrence in liver transplantation were considered for the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors collected the data independently. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the fixed-effect and the random-effects models based on available case-analysis. In the presence of only trial for a dichotomous outcome, we performed the Fisher's exact test.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 425 liver transplant recipients with proven hepatitis C recurrence were randomised in twelve trials to various interventions and controls. The mean proportion of genotype I was 79.9% in the nine trials that reported the genotype. All the trials were of high risk of bias. One to two trials were included under each comparison including single drug or multidrug regimens of interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine. There was no significant difference in the mortality, graft rejection, or in re-transplantation between intervention and control in any of the comparisons that reported these outcomes. None of the trials reported liver decompensation or quality of life. Life-threatening adverse effects were not reported in either group in any of the comparisons. Up to 87.5% of patients required reduction in dose and up to 42.9% of patients required cessation of treatment in the various comparisons because of adverse effects or because of patient's choice to stop treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Considering the lack of clinical benefit and the frequent adverse effects, there is currently no evidence to recommend antiviral treatment for recurrent liver graft infection with HCV. Further randomised clinical trials with adequate trial methodology and adequate duration of follow-up are necessary.

Antiviral therapy for recurrent liver graft infection with hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND

Antiviral therapy to treat recurrent hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the therapeutic efficacy and side effects of different antiviral regimens in patients with hepatitis C re-infected grafts after liver transplantation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until September 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) comparing various antiviral therapies (alone or in combination) in the treatment of hepatitis C virus recurrence in liver transplantation were considered for the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors collected the data independently. We calculated the relative risk (RR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the fixed-effect and the random-effects models based on available case-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 389 liver transplant recipients with proven hepatitis C recurrence were randomised in eleven trials to various interventions and controls. The mean proportion of genotype I was 77.8% in the seven trials that reported the genotype. Only one or two trials were included under each comparison. All the trials were of high risk of bias. There was no difference in the mortality, graft rejection, or in re-transplantation between intervention and control in any of the comparisons that reported these outcomes. None of the trials reported liver decompensation or quality of life. Life-threatening adverse effects were not reported in either group in any of the comparisons. Up to 87.5% of patients required reduction in dose and up to 42.9% of patients required cessation of treatment in the various comparisons because of adverse effects or because of patient's choice to stop treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

1. Considering the lack of clinical benefit and the frequent adverse effects, there is currently no evidence to recommend antiviral treatment for recurrent liver graft infection with HCV. 2. Further randomised clinical trials with adequate trial methodology and adequate duration of follow-up are necessary.

Factors influencing the progression of fibrosis in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation under antiviral therapy: a retrospective analysis of 939 liver biopsies in a single center

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT) is a major problem, since up to 30% of patients develop cirrhosis only 5 years after LT in the absence of antiviral therapy. The aim of this study was to examine the rate of progression of fibrosis and its associated risk factors in patients submitted to an early antiviral treatment post-LT. Included in the study were 105 patients submitted to LT between September 1990 and December 2004, 70 of whom were treated with interferon and/or ribavirin. A total of 939 liver biopsies were studied. The median fibrosis stage was 0.8 after 1 year post-LT, 1.1 after 3 years, 1.3 after 5 years, and 1.5 after 10 years. LT recipients with fibrosis >2 (13% at 10 years) had a significantly reduced survival rate (63% vs. 87% at 10 years, P = 0.03). Univariate analysis disclosed that recipient male gender, antiviral therapy before LT, LT after 1998, induction immunosuppressive regimen including tacrolimus, induction immunosuppressive regimen including mycophenolate (or without azathioprine), and short duration of prednisolone (<12 months) were significantly associated with progression of fibrosis. In a multivariate analysis, recipient male gender (P = 0.04), antiviral treatment before LT (P = 0.001), and initial immunosuppressive regimen without azathioprine (P = 0.03) were associated with progression of fibrosis. In conclusion, our study has documented that fibrosis progression is not linear over time and that occurrence of severe fibrosis is related to previously described factors related to immunosuppressive regimen or donor age and also to a past history of pre-LT antiviral therapy.

Interferon-based combination anti-viral therapy for hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation: a review and quantitative analysis

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) is universal. However, the efficacy, tolerability and safety of combination interferon and ribavirin (IFN-RIB) or peginterferon and ribavirin (PEG-RIB) anti-viral therapies post-LT are uncertain. We performed a comprehensive search of major medical databases (1980-2005) and conference proceedings (1996-2005). The main outcome measure was sustained virological response (SVR, undetectable HCV RNA) at 6 months. Summary estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Twenty-seven IFN-RIB and 21 PEG-RIB studies were included. IFN-RIB was associated with a pooled SVR rate of 24% (95% CI, 20-27%), while PEG-RIB was associated with an SVR rate of 27% (23-31%). Pooled discontinuation rates were 24% (21-27%) with IFN-RIB and 26% (20-32%) with PEG-RIB. The pooled rate of acute graft rejection was 2% (1-3%) with IFN-RIB and 5% (3-7%) with PEG-RIB. IFN-RIB and PEG-RIB therapies in HCV infection post-LT were associated with similar but overall low SVR and were poorly tolerated. The rate of acute rejection was small. The therapeutic advantage of PEG-RIB therapy observed in non-transplant chronic HCV infection appears to be attenuated post-LT. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate reasons for this post-transplant therapeutic disadvantage and to find strategies to ameliorate them.

Interferon alpha 2b and ribavirin for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: cohort study of 38 patients

AIM

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) is universal following liver transplantation. Patients are often treated with interferon and ribavirin in an attempt to eradicate the virus. We describe our experience with 38 patients with recurrent HCV from a single liver transplant program.

METHODS

Between October 2000 and November 2001, 38 patients with recurrent HCV were treated with interferon alpha 2b 3 million units three times a week and ribavirin 1000-1200 mg per day. HCV RNA and liver biopsies were performed before treatment at the end of treatment (EOT), and 6 months after EOT in patients who were HCV RNA negative at EOT.

RESULTS

There were 29 males and nine females. Median age was 49 years. In total, 34 patients were genotype 1 and two each were genotype 3 and 4. Six patients received HCV positive donors and 24 patients (63%) completed treatment. The most common indication for discontinuation of treatment was severe fatigue in 14 patients (37%). On intention to treat analysis, a sustained biochemical and virological response occurred in 10 patients (26%). Unchanged or improved fibrosis scores were present in 37% of patients, of whom 71% were non-responders to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon alpha 2b and ribavirin were poorly tolerated in this series of recurrent HCV patients, with sustained HCV eradication occurring in only 26% of patients. However, the majority of non-responders demonstrated unchanged or improved fibrosis scores, suggesting that a subset of patients may benefit from maintenance antiviral therapy to prevent the development of cirrhosis.

Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: a pilot study of peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin combination

BACKGROUND/AIMS

After liver transplantation (LT) for HCV-related cirrhosis, recurrence of HCV infection is universal and the risk of progression to cirrhosis is high. The modalities and efficacy of antiviral therapy in this indication are still controversial. We present here the results of a pilot study of a 12-month combination therapy by pegylated alfa 2b-interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin in 20 patients.

METHODS

Twenty patients entered the study (13 male and 7 female, median age 53.8 years). In 80% of patients, HCV infection was of genotype 1. The delay between LT and antiviral therapy was 28 months. The doses were progressively increased from 0.5 to 1 micro g/kg/week for PEG-IFN and from 400 to 1000-1200 mg/d for ribavirin. Follow-up was based on biochemical (ALT), virological (HCV-RNA) and histological (liver biopsy) examinations.

RESULTS

Four patients (20%) were withdrawn due to adverse effects. In 6 patients the dose of PEG-IFN had to be reduced to 0.5 micro g/kg/week. A reduction in the dose of ribavirin in 13/16 cases was due to the onset of anemia. Histological evidence of mild acute rejection increased the immunosuppressive regimen in 5/20 patients. At the end of the treatment, 75% of the patients had a biochemical response and 55% a virological response. The mean METAVIR score, according to activity and fibrosis, was A1.8 F2.2 before treatment and A0.3 F1.6 at the end of treatment. In 9/20 patients, virological response persisted 6 months after the end of the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that combination therapy by PEG-IFN and ribavirin may be well tolerated and beneficial during recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients.