High incidence of incidental hepatocellular carcinoma exists among hepatitic explanted livers

Incidental Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation: Clinicopathologic Features and Prognosis

Background: The prognostic impact and clinicopathologic features of incidental hepatocellular carcinoma (iHCC) detected in explanted livers of patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) has been a controversial issue in previous studies when compared with patients who are diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (pdHCC) before LT. We aimed to review and compare these patient groups in a high-volume LT center. Methods: The present study involves a retrospective analysis of 406 HCC patients who received LT between January 2002 and April 2022. Among these patients, demographic data, histopathologic features and prognosis for iHCC and pdHCC were evaluated. Results: In our series, 406 patients’ final diagnosis was HCC after they had received LT, nevertheless 54 patients in this HCC group were diagnosed incidentally after the pathological evaluation of the explanted livers. The etiology of the underlying liver disease between pdHCC (n = 352) and iHCC (n = 54) groups had some differences in our study population. Most of the patients in the pdHCC group had moderately differentiated tumors (45.7%). On the other hand, most of the patients in the iHCC group had well differentiated tumors (79.6%). There were 158 (44%) patients who met the Milan criteria in the pdHCC group while there were 48 (92%) patients in the iHCC group (p < 0.001). IHCC patients had statistically better 1, 3, 5 and 10 years disease-free and overall survival rates when compared with pdHCC patients. There was only 1 (1.8%) patient who had tumor recurrence in the iHCC group while 76 (21%) patients had tumor recurrence in the pdHCC group (p = 0.001). There is no disease free and overall survival difference when iHCC patients are compared with pdHCC patients who met the Milan criteria. Conclusion: It is the first study to show that iHCC patients may differ from pdHCC patients in terms of etiological features. IHCC tumors show better histopathologic features than pdHCC with low recurrence rate and iHCC patients have better survival rates than pdHCC patients.

Cancer Screening in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Focus on Screening Liver, Lung, and Kidney Recipients for Cancers Related to the Transplanted Organ

Over the last few decades, the life expectancy of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) has improved significantly. With SOTRs living longer, more recipients are dying from cancer. There is a reported 2- to 3-fold increased risk of cancer-specific mortality in SOTRs compared with the general population. Cancer in an SOTR can be de novo, recurrent, or donor-derived. Cancer screening in this population is crucial, as early detection and treatment may improve outcomes. In the absence of randomized controlled trials dedicated to SOTRs, clinicians rely on clinical practice guidelines from regional and national transplant societies; however, these may vary considerably across jurisdictions and transplanted organ. At present, no widely accepted consensus exists for cancer screening protocols in SOTRs, particularly with regard to screening for malignancy related to transplanted organ. Some SOTRs may be at higher risk of malignancies within the allograft. This is particularly the case in lung and liver recipients, though less common in kidney recipients who are at increased risk of developing renal cell cancer in their native kidneys. This increased risk has not been uniformly incorporated into screening recommendations for SOTRs. In this review, we summarize the cancer screening recommendations for SOTRs from various transplant organizations based on transplanted organ. This review also discusses the complexity and controversies surrounding screening of cancer in the allograft and future avenues to improve cancer detection in this context. More studies specific to SOTRs are required to form generalizable and evidence-based cancer screening guidelines, particularly with respect to cancer screening in the allograft.

Prognostic impact of incidentally detected hepatocellular carcinoma in explanted livers after living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The impact of incidentally detected hepatocellular carcinoma (iHCC) in explanted liver on the prognosis of the patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation remains controversial with several studies reporting survival worse than true non-hepatocellular carcinoma (non-HCC) recipients. Patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have the benefit of a shorter waiting time to transplant which in principle should reduce the frequency of new tumors developing while waiting for transplant. We aimed to evaluate the incidence, histopathological features, and impact of iHCC on short- and long-term outcomes in adult LDLT recipients.

METHODS

The present study retrospectively analyzed the patients' demographics, tumor characteristics, and outcomes of iHCC in adult patients undergoing LDLT for non-HCC indications at our center between August 2009 and March 2018.

RESULTS

Five hundred and forty-five adults underwent LDLT in our center during the study period. iHCC was detected in the explanted livers in 28 patients (5.1%) out of 545 LDLTs. Only one patient had iHCC beyond Milan criteria. No tumor recurrence was observed in the iHCC cohort after a median follow-up of 28 months. Five-year overall and recurrence-free survival was 96.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of iHCC in explanted livers after LDLT is low and most patients have very early-stage tumors with excellent recurrence-free survival. Hence, no specific post-transplant surveillance or treatment is necessary.

Incidental hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: Prevalence, histopathological features and prognostic impact

Background

Incidental hepatocellular carcinoma (iHCC) is a histological finding after liver transplantation (LT) which relevance has been scarcely studied.

Aims

to describe the histopathological features of iHCC and to determine its prognostic impact in terms of tumor recurrence and overall survival.

Methods

Observational study including 451 consecutive adult LT patients (2000–2013). Patients aged<18, retransplanted or with early postoperative death were excluded. Median follow-up after LT was 58 months. Multiple Cox’s regression was used to assess the prognostic impact of iHCC on tumor recurrence and mortality while controlling for potential confounders.

Results

141 patients had known HCC before LT (31.3%). Among the remaining 310 patients, the prevalence of iHCC was 8.7% (n = 27). In the explanted liver, 36.2% of patients with known HCC and 25.9% of patients with iHCC trespassed Milan criteria (p = 0.30). Patients with known and iHCC had similar rates of multinodular disease (50.4% vs 55.6%; p = 0.62), macrovascular invasion (6.5% vs 3.7%; p = 0.58), microvascular invasion (12.9% vs 14.8%; p = 0.76) and moderate-poor tumor differentiation (53.9% vs 70.4%; p = 0.09). In the multivariate analysis, iHCC and known HCC had identical recurrence-free survival after controlling for histological features (RR = 1.06, 95%CI 0.36–3.14; p = 0.90). Cumulative 5-year overall survival rates were similar between patients with known and iHCC (65% vs 52.8% respectively; log rank p = 0.44), but significantly inferior as compared with patients without HCC (77.8%) (p = 0.002 and p = 0.007 respectively). Indeed, in the overall cohort, iHCC was an independent predictor of mortality (RR = 3.02; 95%CI 1.62–5.65; p = 0.001).

Conclusion

The risk of tumor recurrence after LT is similar in patients with iHCC and known HCC. A close imaging surveillance is strongly recommended for patients awaiting LT in order to detect HCC prior to LT, thus allowing for an adequate selection of candidates, prioritization and indication of bridging therapies.

Incidence, Characteristics, and Prognosis of Incidentally Discovered Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation

Background. We aimed to assess incidentally discovered hepatocellular carcinoma (iHCC) over time and to compare outcome to preoperatively diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma (pdHCC) and nontumor liver transplants. Methods. We studied adults transplanted with a follow-up of at least one year. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Results. Between 1990 and 2010, 887 adults were transplanted. Among them, 121 patients (13.6%) had pdHCC and 32 patients (3.6%) had iHCC; frequency of iHCC decreased markedly over years, in parallel with significant increase in pdHCC. Between 1990 and 1995, 120 patients had liver transplants, 4 (3.3%) of them had iHCC, and only 3 (2.5%) had pdHCC, while in the last 5 years, 263 patients were transplanted, 7 (0.03%) of them had iHCC, and 66 (25.1%) had pdHCC (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups regarding patient survival; 5-year survival was 74%, 75.5%, and 77.3% in iHCC, pdHCC, and non-HCC groups, respectively (P = 0.702). Patients with iHCC had no recurrences after transplant, while pdHCC patients experienced 17 recurrences (15.3%) (P = 0.016). Conclusions. iHCC has significantly decreased despite steady increase in number of transplants for hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with iHCC had excellent outcomes with no tumor recurrence and survival comparable to pdHCC.

Screening for liver cancer during transplant waiting list: a multicenter study from South America

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Surveillance during liver transplantation (LT) waiting list has scarcely been reported in South America. We aimed to describe hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance during the LT waiting list in the daily practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective analysis in cirrhotic patients was carried out. All patients underwent an ultrasound (US) every 6 months and the last pre-LT US was compared with explanted liver findings. A false-negative case was considered when incidentally found HCC (iHCC) was detected, whereas a false-positive case was considered when HCC diagnosed before LT (cHCC) was not confirmed in the explanted liver. US performance was assessed after excluding cHCC patients referred to transplant evaluation.

RESULTS

Of 643 patients, 129 had HCC, of whom 92 had cHCC (71.3%) and 37 had iHCC (28.7%). Five patients (5.4%) had nonconfirmed cHCC (n=3 regenerative nodules, n=1 biliary hamartoma, and n=1 cholangiocarcinoma). Patients with iHCC had a higher MELD score (23±10 vs. 15±10; P<0.0001), and were more frequently Child-Pugh C (62.2 vs. 36.6%; P=0.006) compared with patients with cHCC. The number of US performed during waiting list was 1.7±1.6 (median 1.0). During transplant waiting list, the sensitivity and specificity of US were 33 and 99%, with positive and negative predictive values of 0.89 and 0.93, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the strongest variable related to iHCC finding was pre-LT Child-Pugh C status (OR 3.5; P=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Screening for liver cancer remains an important issue during transplant waiting list. However, the US screening method should be reviewed particularly for Child-Pugh C patients.

Incidental hepatocellular carcinoma: risk factors and long-term outcome after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) currently represents the treatment of choice for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Preoperatively known HCC (pkHCC) is diagnosed via imaging methods before OLT or before HCC is found postoperatively in the liver explant, denoted as incidental HCC (iHCC). The aim of this study was a comprehensive analysis of the post-transplantation survival of patients with iHCC and the identification of risk factors of iHCC occurrence in cirrhotic liver.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 33 adult cirrhotic patients with incidentally found HCC, comparing them with 606 tumor-free adult cirrhotic patients with end-stage liver disease (group Ci) who underwent OLT in our center from January 1995 to August 2012. Within the same period, a total of 84 patients underwent transplantation for pkHCC. We compared post-transplantation survivals of iHCC, Ci, and pkHCC patients. In the group of cirrhotic patients (Ci + iHCC), we searched for risk factors of iHCC occurrence.

RESULTS

There was no difference in sex, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and time spent on the waiting list in either group. In the multivariate analysis we identified age >57 years (odds ratio [OR], 3.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-8.14; P < .001), hepatitis C virus or alcoholic liver disease (OR, 3.89; 95% CI, 1.42-10.7; P < .001), and alpha-fetoprotein level >6.4 μg/L (OR, 6.65; 95% CI, 2.82-15.7; P = .002) to be independent predictors of iHCC occurrence. Both the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) and the 1-, 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) differed in iHCC patients compared with the Ci group (iHCC: OS 79%, 72%, and 68%, respectively; RFS 79%, 72%, and 63%, respectively; vs Ci: OS = RFS: 93%, 94%, and 87%, respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival of iHCC patients is worse than in tumor-free cirrhotic patients, but similar to pkHCC patients. The independent risk factors for iHCC occurrence in cirrhotic liver are age, hepatitis C virus, or alcoholic liver disease etiology of liver cirrhosis and alpha-fetoprotein level.

Incidental hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: population characteristics and outcomes

We combined data from two liver transplant centers to determine the tumor characteristics and outcomes of 51 patients transplanted with incidental hepatocellular carcinoma (iHCC) compared with 143 patients transplanted for previously known HCC (pkHCC). There were no differences in age, gender, or frequency of hepatitis C infection. Patients with iHCC were more likely to be African-American (22% vs 10%; P = .016), more likely to be screened by ultrasound (38% vs 9%; P < .001), had a lower alpha-fetoprotein (83.9 +/- 258.1 vs 572.4 +/- 2376.4 ng/mL; P = .005), and had a higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (14.3 +/- 4.1 vs 11.8 +/- 4.7; P < .001). The liver explants of patients with iHCC had smaller total tumor burden than patients with pkHCC (3.1 +/- 3.5 vs 4.1 +/- 2.6 cm; P < .001), but a similar percentage of single lesions (66% vs 65%) and tumors that met Milan criteria (76% vs 65%). Patients with iHCC had 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals of 78%, 67%, and 58%, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survivals of 90%, 87%, and 87% compared with the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals of 90%, 82%, and 70%, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year tumor-free survivals of 91%, 84%, and 78% in patients with pkHCC. We concluded that patients with iHCC were more likely to be African-American, to be screened by ultrasound, to have a lower alpha-fetoprotein, and a higher MELD score. Ultrasound is not a sensitive modality for screening patients for HCC. Patients with iHCC do not have an advantage in survival over those with pkHCC.