Cadaveric versus living donor liver transplantation--analysis of costs

Vibration Controlled Transient Elastography to Evaluate Steatosis in Candidate Living Donors for Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The ability of vibration controlled transient elastography (VCTE) to reliably exclude significant steatosis in living donor candidates could obviate the need for invasive liver biopsies, expedite the donor approval process, and reduce recipient wait time. We therefore aimed to determine whether VCTE controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) could be used to detect steatosis in potential living donors.

METHODS

Living donor candidates who presented for evaluation between 2016 and 2019 underwent standard donor workup, VCTE, and liver biopsy if indicated. CAP scores were compared with MRI-Fat Fraction and, when available, histologic fat fraction from liver biopsy. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to identify cutoffs with appropriate sensitivity and specificity for screening. Statistical analysis was conducted using R (version 3.6.0).

RESULTS

Seventy-nine candidate living donors presented during the study period, of whom 71 were included in the final analysis and of whom 20 underwent liver biopsy. There was a positive correlation between MRI-Fat Fraction and CAP scores with an observed Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.424 ( P < 0.01). A CAP score of 271.5 dB/m or less was determined to have 89.8% sensitivity and 75% specificity for detecting <5% steatosis on MRI. The correlation between CAP and steatosis of available histologic samples had a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.603 ( P = 0.005). A CAP cutoff of 276.0 dB/m demonstrated 66.7% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity for detecting <15% histopathologic steatosis and positive and negative predictive values of 71.5% and 82.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

VCTE can be integrated into living donor evaluation to accurately screen for hepatic steatosis.

Addition of adult-to-adult living donation to liver transplant programs improves survival but at an increased cost

Using outcomes data from the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study, we performed a cost-effectiveness analysis exploring the costs and benefits of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A multistage Markov decision analysis model was developed with treatment, including medical management only (strategy 1), waiting list with possible deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT; strategy 2), and waiting list with possible LDLT or DDLT (strategy 3) over 10 years. Decompensated cirrhosis with medical management offered survival of 2.0 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) while costing an average of $65,068, waiting list with possible DDLT offered 4.4-QALY survival and a mean cost of $151,613, and waiting list with possible DDLT or LDLT offered 4.9-QALY survival and a mean cost of $208,149. Strategy 2 had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $35,976 over strategy 1, whereas strategy 3 produced an ICER of $106,788 over strategy 2. On average, strategy 3 cost $47,693 more per QALY than strategy 1. Both DDLT and LDLT were cost-effective compared to medical management of cirrhosis over our 10-year study period. The addition of LDLT to a standard waiting list DDLT program is effective at improving recipient survival and preventing waiting list deaths but at a greater cost.

Living-related liver transplantation: implication for the anaesthetist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Living donor liver transplantation, originally introduced about a decade ago to overcome paediatric cadaveric organ shortage, has rapidly gained acceptance within the transplant community and is nowadays almost routinely applied to the growing number of adult and paediatric patients awaiting a live-saving liver transplantation. In fact its introduction has contributed to a continuing decrease of waiting list deaths.

RECENT FINDINGS

The risk of potential complications and even death for the donor increases with the extent of liver tissue resected. Better preoperative evaluation of suitability, refinement of surgical technique and smarter anaesthetic management, based on extended knowledge of underlying pathophysiology, have made the procedure safer for donors, with low morbidity and even lower mortality rates, tending towards zero in experienced centres. Despite these improvements, a certain risk is inherent. Yet from an ethical point of view it has to remain unacceptable especially because donors are otherwise healthy people and their only motives are altruistic. The procedure of living donor liver transplantation like conventional liver transplantation involves various disciplines, each of which contributes in a specific manner. There is a broad scope of issues that anaesthetists are responsible for and these largely depend on the department and hospital requirements. These issues may range from perioperative anaesthetic management and pain relief, to--and there are definite continental differences--the coordination of donor evaluation, intensive care management, postoperative complication management, as well as psychological support for donors, recipients and their relatives.

SUMMARY

In this paper we review and summarize the potential impact of findings and advances made in this particular field as described by the most important articles published during the past year.