Results of kidney transplantation in recipients over 70 years of age: experience at a single center

Immunosuppression Considerations for Older Kidney Transplant Recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

While kidney transplantation improves the long-term survival of the majority of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), age-related immune dysfunction and associated comorbidities make older transplant recipients more susceptible to complications related to immunosuppression. In this review, we discuss appropriate management of immunosuppressive agents in older adults to minimize adverse events, avoid acute rejection, and maximize patient and graft survival.

RECENT FINDINGS

Physiological changes associated with senescence can impact drug metabolism and increase the risk of posttransplant infection and malignancy. Clinical trials assessing the safety and efficacy of immunosuppressive agents in older adults are lacking. Recent findings from U.S. transplant registry-based studies suggest that risk-adjusted death-censored graft failure is higher among older patients who received antimetabolite avoidance, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi)-based, and cyclosporine-based regimens. Observational data suggest that risk-adjusted mortality may be increased in older patients who receive mTORi-based and cyclosporine-based regimens but lower in those managed with T-cell induction and maintenance steroid avoidance/withdrawal.

SUMMARY

Tailored immunosuppression management to improve patient and graft survival in older transplant recipients is an important goal of personalized medicine. Lower intensity immunosuppression, such as steroid-sparing regimens, appear beneficial whereas mTORi- and cyclosporine-based maintenance are associated with greater potential for adverse effects. Prospective clinical trials to assess the safety and efficacy of immunosuppression agents in older recipients are urgently needed.

Kidney transplantation in the extremely elderly from extremely aged deceased donors: a kidney for each age

BACKGROUND

Advances in life expectancy have led to an increase in the number of elderly people with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Scarce information is available on the outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT) in extremely elderly patients based on an allocation policy prioritizing donor-recipient age matching.

METHODS

We included recipients ≥75 years that underwent KT from similarly aged deceased donors at our institution between 2002 and 2015. Determinants of death-censored graft and patient survival were assessed by Cox regression.

RESULTS

We included 138 recipients with a median follow-up of 38.8 months. Median (interquartile range) age of recipients and donors was 77.5 (76.3-79.7) and 77.0 years (74.7-79.0), with 22.5% of donors ≥80 years. Primary graft non-function occurred in 8.0% (11/138) of patients. Cumulative incidence rates for post-transplant infection and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) were 70.3% (97/138) and 15.2% (21/138), respectively. One- and 5-year patient survival were 82.1 and 60.1%, respectively, whereas the corresponding rates for death-censored graft survival were 95.6 and 93.1%. Infection was the leading cause of death (46.0% of fatal cases). The occurrence of BPAR was associated with lower 1-year patient survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.64-10.82; P = 0.003]. Diabetic nephropathy was the only factor predicting 5-year death-censored graft survival (HR = 4.82, 95% CI 1.08-21.56; P = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

ESRD patients ≥75 years can access KT and remain dialysis free for their remaining lifespan by using grafts from extremely aged deceased donors, yielding encouraging results in terms of recipient and graft survival.

Influence of Deceased Donor and Pretransplant Recipient Parameters on Early Overall Kidney Graft-Survival in Germany

Background. Scarcity of grafts for kidney transplantation (KTX) caused an increased consideration of deceased donors with substantial risk factors. There is no agreement on which ones are detrimental for overall graft-survival. Therefore, we investigated in a nationwide multicentre study the impact of donor and recipient related risks known before KTX on graft-survival based on the original data used for allocation and graft acceptance. Methods. A nationwide deidentified multicenter study-database was created of data concerning kidneys donated and transplanted in Germany between 2006 and 2008 as provided by the national organ procurement organization (Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation) and BQS Institute. Multiple Cox regression (significance level 5%, hazard ratio [95% CI]) was conducted (n = 4411, isolated KTX). Results. Risk factors associated with graft-survival were donor age (1.020 [1.013-1.027] per year), donor size (0.985 [0.977-0.993] per cm), donor's creatinine at admission (1.002 [1.001-1.004] per µmol/L), donor treatment with catecholamine (0.757 [0.635-0.901]), and reduced graft-quality at procurement (1.549 [1.217-1.973]), as well as recipient age (1.012 [1.003-1.021] per year), actual panel reactive antibodies (1.007 [1.002-1.011] per percent), retransplantation (1.850 [1.484-2.306]), recipient's cardiovascular comorbidity (1.436 [1.212-1.701]), and use of IL2-receptor antibodies for induction (0.741 [0.619-0.887]). Conclusion. Some donor characteristics persist to impact graft-survival (e.g., age) while the effect of others could be mitigated by elaborate donor-recipient match and care.

Renal transplantation is also an option for patients over 70

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is generally regarded as the best treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease. Because of an increase in the elderly population, the number of elderly patients with end-stage renal disease is expected to increase. The scope of this paper is to present existing knowledge about the survival after kidney transplantation of patients over 70 years of age at the time of transplantation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The paper is based on existing literature retrieved through a systematic search in MEDLINE as well as on the authors' own experience and research.

RESULTS

Among patients who fulfill the established medical criteria, kidney transplantation results in better survival than lifelong dialysis treatment. The best prognosis is achieved if time on dialysis prior to transplantation is reduced and acute rejection episodes are avoided after transplantation.

INTERPRETATION

Kidney transplantation is a safe treatment for selected elderly patients with end-stage renal disease. Given a sufficient supply of organs, selected patients over 70 years of age with end-stage renal disease should be offered kidney transplantation following a standard medical assessment.

Renal transplantation in recipients over 65 years old

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Older patients on hemodialysis have become candidates for renal transplantation, particularly in the period of increasing numbers of marginal donors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate short-term and long-term results of renal transplantation among recipients ≥65 years old for comparison with these in younger patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 1,796 renal transplantations performed between June 1991 and May 2010, dividing the sample into 2 groups: ≥65 years old (n = 89) versus <65 years old (n = 1,707).

RESULTS

The mean ages were 42.17 and 67.45 years for the younger and older groups, respectively. Time of pretransplantation dialysis was significantly greater among the older group (52.76 vs 47.69 mo). There were no differences between the 2 groups regarding donor age, donor renal function, or cold ischemia times. After a mean follow-up of 73.37 versus 39.73 months for the younger versus older groups, respectively, we observed differences in initial graft function, with a greater rate of delayed graft function in the ≥65 group (28.1% vs 17.8%), and in acute rejection rate, which was higher among the younger group (19.4% vs 10.1%). Initial creatinine was better for the older group (1.71 vs 2.10 mg/dL), but similar between the groups at 10 years. Graft and patient survivals at 1, 5, and 10 years were lower among the older group. When analyzing graft survival censored for death with a functioning kidney, there were no differences between the younger and older groups: It was at 1, 5, and 10 years, namely 93.6% versus 90.6%, 87% versus 80.8%, and 76.7% versus 70.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Selected recipients ≥65 years of age show good outcomes of transplantation.

Immunosuppression of the elderly kidney transplant recipient

The growing number of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease awaiting transplantation has resulted in a corresponding rise in the number of elderly transplant recipients. In this paper, we review existing literature on age-related changes, transplant outcomes, and complications in the elderly in an attempt to propose a tailored approach to immunosuppression management in this group of patients. Despite the fact that the benefit of transplantation in the elderly is well established, clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of immunosuppression regimens are lacking. Until such data exists, immunosuppression of the elderly transplant recipient should be based on the traditional principles which guide all transplant protocols and consideration of factors that are unique to the elderly. There are limited data regarding age-related changes in immune function and metabolism of immunosuppression agents in this population. Results of registry data analyses suggest that the risk of acute rejection decreases with age; however, the impact of acute rejection on long-term allograft function is greater in this population. There is also an increased risk of infection and adverse events posttransplantation among these patients. Elderly patients are more likely to receive organs from extended criteria donors and the impact of donor factors on transplant outcomes must therefore be considered. Taking these factors into consideration, we propose an approach to immunosuppression in the elderly based on individual risk stratification of treatment failure and the potential for adverse events.

Cancer incidence after immunosuppressive treatment following kidney transplantation

Cancer incidence is increased in renal transplant recipients due to immunosuppressant treatment that should be maintained to prevent and treat acute rejection. Use of new and very potent immunosuppressants has made it possible to reduce acute rejection incidence and improve renal graft survival, although increase of infections and post-transplant neoplasms have become clearer. On the other hand, renal transplant candidates who remain on dialysis have a greater prevalence of neoplasms than the age-matched general population, either because the neoplasm was the cause of their renal failure (multiple myeloma or kidney or urinary tract cancers) or because their renal disease entails a risk for cancer development (acquired cystic disease or analgesic nephropathy). Practically, all de novo neoplasms have a greater incidence in renal transplant patients. Cutaneous neoplasms are the most prevalent in renal transplant recipients and their incidence increases with transplant time. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases are more frequent in patients who receive greater immunosuppression (antithymocyte/antilymphocyte globulin or OKT3) or are infected de novo by Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) through the transplanted kidney. Kaposi's sarcoma has a high incidence in the renal transplanted population, does not appear in the general population, and is related with Human Herpes Virus 8 (HHV-8) infections. The incidence of tumors in non-functioning native kidneys is especially high in renal transplant due to the presence of acquired cystic disease or analgesic nephropathy. Gold standards of post-transplant de novo renal neoplasm prevention are modulating immunosuppression and avoiding exposure to sunlight and to different oncogenic viruses (EBV, cytomegalovirus, hepatitis B and C viruses).