Beneficial effect of lamivudine pre- and post-liver transplantation for hepatitis B infection

Nucleoside analogues and other antivirals for treatment of hepatitis B in the peritransplant period

Chronic HBV infection is a common cause of advanced liver disease that is associated with substantial mortality. Furthermore, chronic hepatitis B was historically a controversial indication for liver transplantation because of a low post-transplant survival, with graft infection being the major contributor to adverse outcomes. The initial use of hepatitis B immune globulin as prophylaxis, followed later by combined therapy with lamivudine, markedly reduced viral recurrence and improved the survival of patients transplanted for acute or chronic hepatitis B with liver failure. Lamivudine alone can also be used for long-term prophylaxis against de novo HBV infection that can be transmitted by organs from donors positive for anti-HBc or anti-HBs. When used in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B with cirrhosis, lamivudine has been shown to improve clinical manifestations, prolong pretransplant survival, and defer, or even obviate, the need for transplantation. Despite prophylaxis, viral mutations with breakthrough reinfection may occur and lead to liver failure. The recently approved adefovir dipivoxil, which is active against lamivudine-resistant mutation, and other nucleoside analogs that are in various phases of development, offer hope as rescue therapy for viral recurrence. Other therapeutic alternatives in the future may include gene therapy and immune interventions.

Generation of stable cell lines expressing Lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus for antiviral-compound screening

Lamivudine [beta-L-(-)-2',3'-dideoxy-3'-thiacytidine] is a potent inhibitor of hepadnavirus replication and is used both to treat chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections and to prevent reinfection of transplanted livers. Unfortunately, lamivudine-resistant HBV variants do arise during prolonged therapy, indicating a need for additional antiviral drugs. Replication-competent HBV constructs containing the reverse transcriptase domain L180M/M204V and M204I (rtL180M/M204V and rtM204I) mutations associated with lamivudine resistance were used to produce stable cell lines that express the resistant virus. These cell lines contain stable integrations of HBV sequences and produce both intracellular and extracellular virus. HBV produced by these cell lines was shown to have a marked decrease in sensitivity to lamivudine, with 450- and 3,000-fold shifts in the 50% inhibitory concentrations for the rtM204I and rtL180M/M204V viruses, respectively, compared to that for the wild-type virus. Drug assays indicated that the lamivudine-resistant virus exhibited reduced sensitivity to penciclovir [9-(4-hydroxy-3-hydroxymethyl-but-1-yl) guanine] but was still inhibited by the nucleoside analogues CDG (carbocyclic 2'-deoxyguanosine) and abacavir ([1S,4R]-4-[2-amino-6-(cyclopropylamino)-9H-purin-9-yl]-2-cyclopentene-1-methanol). Screening for antiviral compounds active against the lamivudine-resistant HBV can now be done with relative ease.

Increasing applicability of liver transplantation for patients with hepatitis B-related liver disease

Liver transplantation in patients with hepatitis B has been under discussion for 20 years because of inferior results without reinfection prophylaxis; therefore, we analyzed our overall experience with liver transplantation in hepatitis B patients with immunoprophylaxis, particularly the influence of the available antiviral treatment in different periods. From 1988 to 2000, 228 liver transplants in 206 hepatitis B patients were performed. Indications were acute liver failure (10%), hepatitis B virus (HBV) cirrhosis alone (67%) or with hepatitis D virus (HDV) (13%), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection (7%). All patients received long-term immunoprophylaxis (anti-HBs > 100 U/L). HBV DNA-positive patients were treated before and after surgery with famciclovir or lamivudine since 1993 and 1996, respectively. Since 1993, antivirals also were used for HBV reinfection. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were 91%, 81%, and 73%. In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (60% 5-year survival, P <.01) or HBV reinfection (69% 5-year survival, P <.01) survival was significantly impaired. Those with HDV or HCV coinfection had a slightly better survival than with HBV monoinfection (P >.05, not significant). Preoperative positive HBV DNA (hybridization-assay) test results were associated with a slightly impaired patient survival (78% 5-year survival, P >.05, not significant versus DNA-negative). Preoperative positive hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) predicted significantly worse survival (P <.05 versus negative HBeAg). Graft loss caused by reinfection was most frequent before the availability of antiviral drugs. Two-year patient survival increased from 85% in era I (1988-1993) to 94% in era III (1997-2000, P <.05). The 2-year recurrence rates in these 2 periods were 42% and 8% (P <.05). In conclusion, excellent long-term results can be achieved in hepatitis B patients after liver transplantation with modern strategies, and survival rates are similar to other indications. Based on our experience, hepatitis B patients, including those with active viral replication, should not be excluded from liver transplantation.

Prophylactic measures in the solid-organ recipient before transplantation

Pretransplant screening affords an important opportunity to detect and treat preexisting active infection in the solid-organ transplant recipient. In this article, pretransplant strategies for preventing infections after solid-organ transplantation are reviewed. In addition to the search for active preexisting infection in the transplant candidate, immunization remains a cornerstone of preventive practice. Because there is a suboptimal response to vaccinations in patients who are receiving immunosuppressive therapy, as well as in patients with end-stage organ dysfunction, standard immunization of the transplant candidate should be updated as early as possible in the course of the illness, including pneumococcal, influenza, and hepatitis B vaccines. Liver transplant candidates should receive hepatitis A vaccine, and children should receive Haemophilus influenzae type B conjugate vaccine. All nonimmune pretransplant patients should be considered candidates for the varicella vaccine. The management of special risk groups is discussed in detail.

Current treatment strategies for chronic hepatitis B and C

For chronic hepatitis B, treatment with a 4-month course of interferon alfa-2b can achieve hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion, normalization of aminotransferase levels, reduced hepatic inflammation, and possibly reduced progression to cirrhosis and improvement in survival in 20%-30% of patients. Similar results can be achieved with a 12-month course of lamivudine, with response rates increasing to 40%-65% after 3 years of therapy. Interferon can also be used in early cirrhotic patients, and lamivudine can be used in advanced cirrhotics and immunosuppressed patients. Combination interferon and lamivudine therapy does not confer additional benefits. For chronic hepatitis C, the combination of interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin is the treatment of choice, offering superior sustained response rates (40%) compared with interferon alone (15%). Therapy should be administered for 12 months to patients with genotype 1 virus but for only 6 months to patients with genotypes 2 and 3. Patients experiencing relapse after 6 months of interferon monotherapy can be re-treated with interferon and ribavirin or high-dose interferon, with 45%-56% sustained response rates. However, relatively few patients who are prior nonresponders to interferon monotherapy will have sustained response to further interferon-based treatments, including combination therapy with ribavirin. Successful therapy not only leads to the eradication of viral RNA but also may delay progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Interferon combined with polyethylene glycol (PEG), shows promise as an improved formulation of interferon with yet higher sustained response rates.

Hepatic decompensation associated with lamivudine: a case report and review of lamivudine-induced hepatotoxicity

We report a case of a 62-yr-old man with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis who developed hepatic decompensation after being started on lamivudine requiring liver transplantation. Decompensated liver disease while on lamivudine has been previously reported on two occasions, both HIV coinfected patients on a combination of nucleoside analogues. Our patient is alive and well nearly 2 yr after successful liver transplantation.

Extension of transplantation free time by lamivudine in patients with hepatitis B-induced decompensated cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-induced cirrhosis carries a high risk of graft reinfection and poor prognosis. Active viral replication is considered a contraindication for transplantation in most centers. Lamivudine, a new nucleoside analog, is a potent inhibitor of HBV replication that has been used safely for pretransplantation suppression of HBV replication.

METHODS

We report the pattern of response to lamivudine treatment in three consecutive patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to the replicative phase of chronic HBV infection.

RESULTS

In addition to virological and biochemical response, impressive clinical improvement was noted in all three patients, with disappearance of the ascites and marked improvement of synthetic liver function tests. One patient converted to anti-hepatitis B surface and is free of symptoms 20 months after initiation of treatment. The other two patients experienced significant clinical improvement for 8 to 9 months and were removed from the waiting list for transplantation. However, progressive liver disease recurred in both patients--one underwent liver transplantation and the other is a candidate for the procedure.

CONCLUSION

The administration of lamivudine for pretransplantation HBV suppression was associated with impressive clinical and biochemical improvement. Lamivudine may extend the transplantation free time in such patients. The mechanism of this desirable effect should be explored.

Lamivudine for hepatitis B in liver transplantation: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been associated with a high rate of reinfection and graft failure. Lamivudine, a potent inhibitor of HBV replication, has been shown to prevent viral recurrence after transplantation.

METHODS

The effectiveness of lamivudine monotherapy for the management of HBV recurrence after liver transplantation was assessed. Lamivudine was used in three patient groups: (1) patients started before transplantation and continued after transplantation (n = 13); (2) patients treated after transplantation (n = 15); and (3) patients with de novo hepatitis B after transplantation (n = 4).

RESULTS

Median follow-up on lamivudine was 24 months. Active viral replication (HBV-DNA+) was seen in 17 (53%) of 32 at treatment initiation. All lost HBV-DNA at a mean of 2.4+/-1.6 months after lamivudine initiation. Twenty-six (81%) patients remain free of viral recurrence. Six (19%) patients have evidence of breakthrough infection with the YMDD mutant of HBV, two of whom progressed to graft failure. All four patients in group 1 who developed breakthrough had evidence of hepatitis B surface antigen expression in the explanted liver by immunohistochemistry despite being serum HBV-DNA negative before transplantation. No difference was observed among the three groups in DNA clearance or breakthrough rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Lamivudine achieves viral DNA clearance in almost all patients. Expression of viral antigens in the liver seems to identify patients at risk of developing HBV-DNA recurrence. Disease-free survival of 81% at 22 months is similar to data with hepatitis B immunoglobulin therapy. Given the safe clinical profile and high efficacy in the prevention of disease recurrence, lamivudine will favorably change the outlook of liver transplantation for HBV.

Hepatitis B

The management of acute HBV infection is supportive. Specific treatment is not indicated for HBV carriers because they often have no evidence of liver injury, and, further, do not respond to currently available therapies. Interferon monotherapy is best indicated for patients with chronic replicating HBV infection and evidence of chronic hepatitis. There is an increased likelihood of clearing HBsAg with interferon monotherapy as compared to lamivudine. Lamivudine is an oral nucleoside analog that is better tolerated than interferon. The clinical situations for its use are far more than interferon monotherapy. Lamivudine should be used in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and also in transplantation, both before and after transplantation. The post-transplant use of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and lamivudine combination therapy may be better for recipients who are identified in a replicative phase prior to transplantation. Hepatitis B coinfection with one or more viruses, HCV, HDV, or HIV, may occur. Both interferon and lamivudine have been useful in these patients. However, the data are sparse and heterogeneous. Therapy with one or both drugs will have to be tailored to the clinical situation. Combination therapy with immunomodulatory and/or antiviral drugs are what we will be looking toward in the future.

Use of the hepatitis B virus recombinant baculovirus-HepG2 system to study the effects of (-)-beta-2',3'-dideoxy-3'-thiacytidine on replication of hepatitis B virus and accumulation of covalently closed circular DNA

(-)-Beta-2',3'-Dideoxy-3'-thiacytidine (lamivudine [3TC]) is a nucleoside analog which effectively interferes with the replication of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in vitro and in vivo. We have investigated the antiviral properties of 3TC in vitro in HepG2 cells infected with recombinant HBV baculovirus. Different types of information can be obtained with the HBV baculovirus-HepG2 system because (i) experiments can be carried out at various levels of HBV replication including levels significantly higher than those that can be obtained from conventional HBV-expressing cell lines, (ii) cultures can be manipulated and/or treated prior to or during the initiation of HBV expression, and (iii) high levels of HBV replication allow the rapid detection of HBV products including covalently closed circular (CCC) HBV DNA from low numbers of HepG2 cells. The treatment of HBV baculovirus-infected HepG2 cells with 3TC resulted in an inhibition of HBV replication, evidenced by reductions in the levels of both extracellular HBV DNA and intracellular replicative intermediates. The effect of 3TC on HBV replication was both dose and time dependent, and the reductions in extracellular HBV DNA that we observed agreed well with the previously reported efficacy of 3TC in vitro. As expected, levels of HBV transcripts and extracellular hepatitis B surface antigen and e antigen were not affected by 3TC. Importantly, the HBV baculovirus-HepG2 system made it possible to observe for the first time that CCC HBV DNA levels are lower in cells treated with 3TC than in control cells. We also observed that the treatment of HepG2 cells prior to HBV baculovirus infection resulted in a slight increase in the efficacy of 3TC compared to treatments starting 24 h postinfection. The treatment of HepG2 cells with the highest concentration of 3TC tested in this study (2 microM) prior to the initiation of HBV replication markedly inhibited the accumulation of CCC DNA, whereas treatment with the same concentration of 3TC at a time when CCC HBV DNA pools were established within the cells was considerably less effective. In addition, our results suggest that in HepG2 cells, non-protein-associated relaxed circular HBV DNA and particularly CCC HBV DNA are considerably more resistant to 3TC treatment than other forms of HBV DNA, including replicative intermediates and extracellular DNA. We conclude from these studies that the HBV baculovirus-HepG2 system has specific advantages for drug studies and can be used to complement other in vitro model systems currently used for testing antiviral compounds.

Lamivudine. A review of its therapeutic potential in chronic hepatitis B

Lamivudine is a deoxycytidine analogue that is active against hepatitis B virus (HBV). In patients with chronic hepatitis B, lamivudine profoundly suppresses HBV replication. Clinically significant improvements in liver histology and biochemical parameters were obtained with lamivudine in double-blind, randomised, trials in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B and compensated liver disease. After 52 weeks of treatment, relative to placebo (< or = 25%), significantly more Chinese (56%) or Western patients (52%) treated with lamivudine 100 mg/day had reductions of > or = 2 or more points in Knodell necro-inflammatory scores. Moreover, significantly fewer lamivudine 100 mg/day than placebo recipients had progressive fibrosis in liver biopsies (< or = 5 vs > or = 15%) and fewer lamivudine- than placebo-treated patients progressed to cirrhosis (1.8 vs 7.1%). More lamivudine 100 mg/day than placebo recipients acquired antibodies to HBeAg after 52 weeks (16 vs 4% in Chinese patients and 17 vs 6% in Western patients). ALT levels normalised in significantly more lamivudine than placebo recipients enrolled in these trials. In HBeAg-negative, HBV DNA positive patients with compensated liver disease enrolled in a double-blind, randomised study, HBV DNA levels were suppressed to below the limit of detection (< 2.5 pg/ml) and ALT levels normalised in 63% and 6% of patients treated with lamivudine 100 mg/day or placebo for 24 weeks. Clinically significant improvements in liver histology were obtained in 60% of patients treated with lamivudine for 52 weeks in this study. Lamivudine 100 mg/day for 52 weeks produced similar or significantly greater improvements in liver histology and ALT levels than 24 weeks' treatment with lamivudine plus interferon-alpha. In liver transplant candidates with chronic hepatitis B and end-stage liver disease, lamivudine 100 mg/day alone, or in combination with hepatitis B immune globulin, generally suppressed HBV replication and appeared to protect the grafted liver from reinfection. Lamivudine 100 mg/day suppressed viral replication and improved liver histology in liver transplant recipients with recurrent or de novo chronic hepatitis B. Lamivudine 300 or 600 mg/day reduced HBV replication in HIV-positive patients. The incidence of adverse events in patients with chronic hepatitis B and compensated liver disease treated with lamivudine 100 mg/day or placebo for 52 to 68 weeks was similar. 3.1- to 10-fold increases in ALT over baseline occurred in 13% of patients during treatment with lamivudine 100 mg/day or placebo for 52 weeks. Post-treatment ALT elevations were more common in lamivudine than placebo recipients; however, these generally resolved spontaneously; < or = 1.5% of lamivudine- or placebo-treated patients experienced hepatic decompensation.

CONCLUSION

Lamivudine inhibits HBV replication, reduces hepatic necro-inflammatory activity and the progression of fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B, ongoing viral replication and compensated liver disease including HBeAg-negative patients. The drug also suppresses viral replication in liver transplant recipients and HIV-positive patients. Thus, lamivudine is potentially useful in a wide range of patients with chronic hepatitis B and ongoing viral replication.