Long-term experience with Sandimmun Neoral: results in de novo and stable renal transplant patients after 24-month treatment. The German Neoral Study Group

The Utility of the Population Approach Applied to Bioequivalence in Patients

Mixed-effect modeling was used to compare the population pharmacokinetics of 2 formulations of cyclosporine in patients. An open-label, multicenter, conversion study in stable, 6-month post-renal allograft recipients was conducted to compare the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral Pliva Cyclosporine Soft Gelatin Capsules (USP Modified) with Neoral (cyclosporine soft gelatin capsules, USP Modified) in stable post-renal transplant patients. Blood samples were collected predose and for 12 hours postdose on days 1, 14, 15, 28, and 29. Whole-blood samples were analyzed for cyclosporine using high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectroscopy. Estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters were generated using noncompartmental and population compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. Moreover, the effects of demographic factors on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine were evaluated using the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling program NONMEM. The rate and extent of bioavailability of cyclosporine did not differ between Pliva Cyclosporine Soft Gelatin Capsules and Neoral. In the final model, gender and actual body weight significantly affected the central and peripheral volumes of distribution. In addition, the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine was defined robustly in this patient population using population pharmacokinetic approaches. Results indicate that the Pliva Cyclosporine Soft Gelatin Capsules and Neoral are bioequivalent when administered to renal transplant patients. Pliva Cyclosporine Soft Gelatin Capsules can then be substituted for Neoral in stabilized patients without anticipating dose adjustments.

Impact of cyclosporine on the development of immunosuppressive therapy

With the advent of cyclosporine (CsA) 20 years ago, graft survival increased considerably to more than 80% at 2 years posttransplant. The early formulation of CsA, Sandimmun, is effective in preventing organ rejection, although its absorption profile means it is subject to a high degree of variability. The development of a microemulsion formulation, Neoral, provided a therapy with superior efficacy in kidney, liver, and heart transplantation with an improved pharmacokinetic profile. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), including CsA, have a narrow therapeutic range, so frequent blood measurements to control drug levels are required. Recent research has demonstrated that the measurement of blood CsA concentration at 2 hours postdosing--C2 monitoring--has the potential to optimize efficacy and reduce the side effects associated with CNI use. In heart and de novo kidney transplantation, C2 monitoring may help to further reduce the incidence of acute rejection, while in maintenance renal transplant recipients, C2 monitoring can help to detect overexposure and thus allows safe dose reduction, which may improve blood pressure and renal function. C2 monitoring thus facilitates a better balance between effective Neoral immunosuppression and unwanted side effects. Today, CsA remains the cornerstone of immunosuppression, and ongoing studies aim to further optimize patient management strategies with Neoral. With other trials evaluating the impact of Neoral in combination with newer therapies such as Certican, myfortic, and FTY720, the use of CsA in transplant recipients looks set to continue.

Overview of the clinical experience with Neoral in transplantation

The microemulsion preparation of cyclosporine, Neoral, was introduced to improve the limited and sometimes unpredictable absorption of cyclosporine from the gut. Preclinical studies proved a superior bioavailability measured by the AUC and a definitively better predictability of the pharmacokinetic properties. Large-scale randomized and open-labeled studies have been carried out to prove and establish the safety, tolerability, and equal or superior efficacy of NEO if compared with SIM. There is broad evidence that NEO is safe and well tolerated in de novo and stable renal allografts. There are some arguments that NEO has favorable properties in poor absorbers, in patients in need for high dosage per kg body weight. Benefits for some populations such as children, African Americans, and diabetics have been detected. In combined kidney-pancreas transplantation a significant improvement of absorption has been proven. NEO has also been investigated in nonrenal transplants such as heart, lung, and liver transplantation. There are proven dose reduction in heart transplants; significant better absorption in lung transplants, in particular in patients with cystic fibrosis; and no further or even a diminished need for intravenously given CsA in liver transplantation. Studies are now reported for the use of NEO in differing indications of autoimmune disease. No characteristic profile of adverse events has been recognized, nor has an increase of nephrotoxicity if carefully monitoring in the first weeks after conversion was provided.