Type I non-heart-beating donors: policy and results

Expression of adhesion molecules and RANTES in kidney transplant from nonheart-beating donors

The main difference between cadaveric kidneys from donors with a heartbeat (HBD) and kidneys from nonheart-beating donors (NHBD) is related to warm ischemia/reperfusion time which constitutes an acute inflammatory process. On the contrary, brain death induces in HBD expression of pro-inflammatory adhesion molecules, making it important to evaluate this kind of molecules in both types of donors. Human renal biopsies from NHBD, HBD and normal kidneys (ischemia time = 0) were taken and frozen just before transplant. A semi-quantitative RT-PCR method was used to determine intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), lymphocyte function associated antigen (LFA-1), LFA-3, CD40, CD40 ligand (CD40L) and RANTES (regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted) gene expression. We have detected an elevated relative gene expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and RANTES in NHBD biopsies compared with normal kidneys. In the case of RANTES, the gene expression from NHBD biopsies was higher than observed in HBD biopsies. The rest of genes were not augmented in any group. Preliminary data about early outcome of transplants indicates a correlation between pretransplant RANTES high gene expression levels and early post-transplant acute rejection. The gene expression of pro-inflammatory molecules like adhesion molecules and RANTES is augmented in kidneys from cadaveric NBD just before transplant. The expression is higher probably because of the prolonged warm ischemia period. A larger clinical study is necessary to clarify the effects of these variable expressions on the transplant outcome.

Kidney transplantation from non heart-beating donors

The use of non heart-beating donor (NHBD) kidneys to expand transplant programmes offers an answer to the problem of donor shortage. This source of kidneys is utilised by very few renal transplant units despite longstanding and growing evidence of equivalent graft function and survival, compared with cadaveric donor organs. This article reviews the selection criteria, technical approaches and logistical organisation involved in NHBD kidney retrieval and transplantation and outlines the evidence for graft function and survival, and patient outcome. The ethical and legal implications of running a NHBD programme are discussed, and some areas of current and likely future research are covered.

Ethical issues in transplantation: living related donation in the setting of severe neurological damage without brain death

The waiting list for renal transplantation has grown at an alarming rate over the last 2 decades, resulting in increased waiting times and deaths on the waiting list. To increase the number of available organs for transplantation, aggressive public education programs have been developed. The federal government has strengthened hospital regulations ensuring referral of all potential donors to organ recovery agencies, and living donor programs no longer limit donation to genetically related donors and recipients. We present a case that illustrates the complex ethical issues that are integral to the field of transplantation and the allocation of a scarce resource: a 50-year-old man who has a daughter with end-stage renal disease has suffered a severe cerebral vascular accident but is neither brain-dead nor a candidate for "non-heart-beating" donation. Given his poor prognosis, should the father be able to donate his kidney to the daughter in his compromised condition?

Non-heart-beating donors from the streets: an increasing donor pool source

BACKGROUND

Non-heart-beating donors have become a source for organ donation, especially kidneys. The emergency room and the critical care unit are the two sources for this kind of donor. Three years ago, our hospital began a policy of obtaining organs and tissues successfully from subjects who died in the streets.

METHODS

We consider as potential organ donors people who die out-of-hospital, are less than 50 years old, with less than 15 min of asystolia without cardiac massage, with a known etiology of death, and without general contraindications for donating. After death diagnosis, the cadaver is taken to the hospital where an emergency room doctor certifies the death. Afterward, the cadaver is transferred to the operating room where a cardiopulmonary bypass is performed to preserve the organs while the legal aspects of donation go on.

RESULTS

Up to now, 111 cadavers have been taken as non-heart-beating donors; 53 of them have been actual donors. The average time before arrival to the hospital was 68+/-2.64 min, and the average interval between cardiac arrest and the beginning of cardiopulmonary bypass was 111.33+/-7.09 min. We have obtained 105 kidneys, 12 livers, 84 corneas, and 31 pancreata for islets isolation as well as 49 long bones. Seventy-two kidneys were transplanted, with a probability of survival of 83% at 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience indicates that it is possible to obtain organs for transplant from donors who die in the streets and are brought to the hospital under strict selection criteria.

Renal transplantation from non-heart beating donors: a promising alternative to enlarge the donor pool

The aim of this study was to compare the survival and midterm function of kidneys from non-heart beating donors (NHBD) with those of kidneys from heart beating donors (HBD). From 1989 to 1998, 144 kidneys were procured from NHBD at the Hospital Clínico San Carlos in Madrid, of which 95 were transplanted. The kidney grafts were maintained from the moment of the diagnosis of cardiac arrest until the time of procurement by cardiopulmonary bypass. There was no significant difference in renal function and the number of rejection episodes between the NHBD and HBD transplants. The NHBD kidneys showed a 5.73-fold increase in the incidence of delayed graft function (adjusted relative risk 95% confidence interval, 2.82 to 11.62). One- and five-year survival rates for NHBD grafts were 84.6 and 82.7%, respectively, compared with 87.5 and 83.9% for HBD (P = 0.5767). Cox analysis showed that the predictive factors for worse NHBD graft survival were type of NHBD donor and the occurrence of corticoresistant rejection. Ninety of the NHBD organs were procured from subjects suffering irreversible cardiac arrest on the street who were transferred to our center for the sole purpose of donation. Fifty-four of these kidneys were transplanted and all showed primary function. When a strict protocol is adhered to, the outcome of renal transplant from NHBD compares well with that from HBD. It is believed that the high number of organs obtained from subjects undergoing irreversible cardiac arrest on the street might encourage the adoption of new criteria for the management of this type of pathology with the ultimate goal of kidney donation.