Evaluation of HLA-class I alloantibodies using PRA-STAT and complement-dependent cytotoxicity techniques

Sensitive solid-phase detection of donor-specific antibodies as an aid highly relevant to improving allograft outcomes

Transplant recipients who have had sensitizing events such as pregnancies, blood transfusions and previous transplants often develop antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-molecules of the donor tissue. These pre-formed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) represent a high risk of organ failure as a consequence of antibody-mediated hyper-acute or acute allograft rejection. As a first assay to detect DSA, the complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity assay (CDC) was established more than 40 years ago. However, this assay is characterized by several drawbacks such as a low sensitivity and a high susceptibility to various artificial factors generally not leading to valid and reliable outcomes under several circumstances that are reviewed in this article. Furthermore, only those antibodies that exert complement-fixing activity are detected. As a consequence, novel procedures that act independently of the complement system and that do not represent functional assays were generated in the format of solid phase assays (SPAs) (bead- or ELISA-based). In this article, we review the pros and cons of these sensitive SPA in comparison with the detection of DSA through the use of the traditional methods such as CDC and flow cytometric analyses. Potential drawbacks of the alternative methodological approaches comprising high background reactivity, susceptibility to environmental factors and the possible influence of subjective operators' errors concerning the interpretation of the results are summarized and critically discussed for each method. We provide a forecast on the future role of SPAs reliably excluding highly deleterious DSA, thus leading to an improved graft survival.

Novel solid phase-based ELISA assays contribute to an improved detection of anti-HLA antibodies and to an increased reliability of pre- and post-transplant crossmatching

Antibodies directed against HLA antigens of a given organ donor represent the dominating reason for hyper-acute or acute allograft rejections. In order to select recipients without donor-specific antibodies, a standard crossmatch (CM) procedure, the complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay (CDC), was developed. This functional assay strongly depends on the availability of isolated vital lymphocytes of a given donor. However, the requirements of the donor’s material may often not be fulfilled, so that the detection of the antibodies directed against HLA molecules is either impaired or becomes completely impossible. To circumvent the disadvantages of the CDC procedure, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based and other solid phase-based ELISA-related techniques have been designed to reliably detect anti-HLA antibodies in recipients. Due to the obvious advantages of these novel technologies, when compared with the classical CDC assay, there is an urgent need to implement them as complementary methods or even as a substitution for the conventional CDC crossmatch that is currently being applied by all tissue typing laboratories.

Assignment of HLA-antigens in CREGs facilitates the detection of acceptable mismatches in highly sensitized patients

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether in highly sensitized patients (HSPs) the acceptable HLA-A and -B mismatches (AMs) can be predicted on the basis of patients' HLA-phenotype. To this affect, 1000 historical serum samples obtained from 50 HSPs (PRA > 60%), panel reactive antibodies (PRA) value and the specificity of class I anti-HLA-antibodies were detected by two techniques in parallel: An anti-human globulin augmented cytotoxicity (AHG-CDC) and an Elisa technique. Thereafter, class I HLA-antigens of the nonreactive cells in the screening panel and class I HLA-antigens of the patients were assigned to CREGs. The AMs for each one of the patients were detected using a separate cell panel, which was prepared in a way to include almost all the HLA-antigens belonging to the CREGs of the patients as well as to those of the nonreactive cells in the screening panel. It was found that the AMs in HSPs, detected with this protocol were more, compared to those we usually detect using only the HLA-antigens of the nonreactive cells in the screening panel (up to 8 versus 2-5). Both, the definitively detected AMs, and the HLA-specificities of the nonreactive cells of the screening panel belonged to the same CREGs. These CREGs were equivalent to the CREGs of class I HLA-phenotypes of each patient. The data presented in this paper introduce a new, rapid and easier way for the detection of AMs in HSPs. According to this proposed protocol, the assignment of patients' standard class I private HLA-phenotypes in CREGs, not only greatly facilitates the detection of AMs, but the detected AMs are also in fact significantly more than those determined by the conventional methodology. We have also confirmed that the majority of antibodies induced by HLA alloimmunization are directed against mismatched shared or public group epitopes CREGs. Moreover, we have confirmed that prospective matching for major CREGs would be feasible on a national level and would not significantly prolong waiting time, which could result in a significant augmentation of the potential donor pool.