Rod-cone interaction in human scotopic vision--II. Cones influence rod increment thresholds

Increase in cortisol concentration due to standardized bright and blue light exposure on saliva cortisol in the morning following sleep laboratory

Research studies on LED light exposure and cortisol are inconsistent and not comparable due to different types of light, exposure times, and sample sizes. Therefore, one hour of standardized exposure LED light at different intensities and the spectral composition during the post-awakening phase at 7:30 were compared. A sample of 23 (Study 1) and 26 (Study 2) healthy males were randomly assigned to: 1) bright white light (414 lux) and 2) dim darkened light (<2 lux) as well as 3) red light (235 lux) and 4) blue light (201 lux) exposure conditions. Results from repeated measures ANOVA confirm that light exposure affects the cortisol concentration. Study 1 revealed an increase in the saliva cortisol concentration after bright light exposure compared to dim light. An increase in the cortisol concentration of blue light compared to red light (Study 2) and dim light was found. This study shows that bright light and blue light affect the cortisol response in contrast to dim light and red light conditions. The HPA axis showed a stimulatory effect by bright versus dim light and different wavelengths of light exposure.Lay summaryThe effects of LED light exposure on the stress hormone cortisol were investigated. The light exposure took place during the hours people would start working at the office. The results showed that after one hour of exposure to bright light or blue light the stress hormones increase in contrast to dim light and red light conditions. Thus, stress hormones can be altered by the types of light people are exposed to.

Parallel Processing of Rod and Cone Signals: Retinal Function and Human Perception

We know a good deal about the operation of the retina when either rod or cone photoreceptors provide the dominant input (i.e., under very dim or very bright conditions). However, we know much less about how the retina operates when rods and cones are coactive (i.e., under intermediate lighting conditions, such as dusk). Such mesopic conditions span 20-30% of the light levels over which vision operates and encompass many situations in which vision is essential (e.g., driving at night). These lighting conditions are challenging because rod and cone signals differ substantially: Rod responses are nearing saturation, while cone responses are weak and noisy. A rich history of perceptual studies guides our investigation of how the retina operates under mesopic conditions and in doing so provides a powerful opportunity to link general issues about parallel processing in neural circuits with computation and perception. We review some of the successes and challenges in understanding the retinal basis of perceptual rod-cone interactions.

Increased visual sensitivity following periods of dim illumination

PURPOSE

We measured changes in the sensitivity of the human rod pathway by testing visual reaction times before and after light adaptation. We targeted a specific range of conditioning light intensities to see if a physiological adaptation recently discovered in mouse rods is observable at the perceptual level in humans. We also measured the noise spectrum of single mouse rods due to the importance of the signal-to-noise ratio in rod to rod bipolar cell signal transfer.

METHODS

Using the well-defined relationship between stimulus intensity and reaction time (Piéron's law), we measured the reaction times of eight human subjects (ages 24-66) to scotopic test flashes of a single intensity before and after the presentation of a 3-minute background. We also made recordings from single mouse rods and processed the cellular noise spectrum before and after similar conditioning exposures.

RESULTS

Subject reaction times to a fixed-strength stimulus were fastest 5 seconds after conditioning background exposure (79% ± 1% of the preconditioning mean, in darkness) and were significantly faster for the first 12 seconds after background exposure (P < 0.01). During the period of increased rod sensitivity, the continuous noise spectrum of individual mouse rods was not significantly increased.

CONCLUSIONS

A decrease in human reaction times to a dim flash after conditioning background exposure may originate in rod photoreceptors through a transient increase in the sensitivity of the phototransduction cascade. There is no accompanying increase in rod cellular noise, allowing for reliable transmission of larger rod signals after conditioning exposures and the observed increase in perceptual sensitivity.

Determining consequences of retinal membrane guanylyl cyclase (RetGC1) deficiency in human Leber congenital amaurosis en route to therapy: residual cone-photoreceptor vision correlates with biochemical properties of the mutants

The GUCY2D gene encodes retinal membrane guanylyl cyclase (RetGC1), a key component of the phototransduction machinery in photoreceptors. Mutations in GUCY2D cause Leber congenital amaurosis type 1 (LCA1), an autosomal recessive human retinal blinding disease. The effects of RetGC1 deficiency on human rod and cone photoreceptor structure and function are currently unknown. To move LCA1 closer to clinical trials, we characterized a cohort of patients (ages 6 months-37 years) with GUCY2D mutations. In vivo analyses of retinal architecture indicated intact rod photoreceptors in all patients but abnormalities in foveal cones. By functional phenotype, there were patients with and those without detectable cone vision. Rod vision could be retained and did not correlate with the extent of cone vision or age. In patients without cone vision, rod vision functioned unsaturated under bright ambient illumination. In vitro analyses of the mutant alleles showed that in addition to the major truncation of the essential catalytic domain in RetGC1, some missense mutations in LCA1 patients result in a severe loss of function by inactivating its catalytic activity and/or ability to interact with the activator proteins, GCAPs. The differences in rod sensitivities among patients were not explained by the biochemical properties of the mutants. However, the RetGC1 mutant alleles with remaining biochemical activity in vitro were associated with retained cone vision in vivo. We postulate a relationship between the level of RetGC1 activity and the degree of cone vision abnormality, and argue for cone function being the efficacy outcome in clinical trials of gene augmentation therapy in LCA1.

Rod and S-cone driven ERG signals at high retinal illuminances

The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether L- and M-cone driven responses can be influenced by concomitant modulation in the rods or the S-cones. In addition, it was studied whether a change in the state of adaptation in L- or M-cones can have a different influence on ERG data when simultaneously the mean number of photoisomerizations in either rods or S-cones is altered. It was found that rods and/or S-cones cannot be neglected when measuring L- or M-cone driven ERGs.

Into the twilight zone: the complexities of mesopic vision and luminous efficiency

Of all the functions that define visual performance, the mesopic luminous efficiency function is probably the most complex and hardest to standardise or model. Complexities arise because of the substantial and often rapid visual changes that accompany the transition from scotopic to photopic vision. These are caused not only by the switch from rod to cone photoreceptors, but also by switches between different post-receptoral pathways through which the rod and cone signals are transmitted. In this review, we list several of the complexities of mesopic vision, such as rod-cone interactions, rod saturation, mixed photoreceptor spectral sensitivities, different rod and cone retinal distributions, and the changes in the spatial properties of the visual system as it changes from rod- to cone-mediated. Our main focus, however, is the enormous and often neglected temporal changes that occur in the mesopic range and their effect on luminous efficiency. Even before the transition from rod to cone vision is complete, a transition occurs within the rod system itself from a sluggish, sensitive post-receptoral pathway to a faster, less sensitive pathway. As a consequence of these complexities, any measure of mesopic performance will depend not only on the illumination level, but also on the spectral content of the stimuli used to probe performance, their retinal location, their spatial frequency content, and their temporal frequency content. All these should be considered when attempting to derive (or to apply) a luminous efficiency function for mesopic vision.

Summation of rod and S cone signals at threshold in human observers

We examined whether signals from rods and S cones can combine to produce a threshold response. Test flashes of specific wavelengths superposed on a long wavelength adapting field were used to isolate threshold responses from the two receptor systems, simultaneously and at the same retinal location. Dark adaptation experiments and spectral sensitivity determinations indicated that, in the adaptational range from about 1.6 to 2.8 log scot td, 530 nm and 440 nm flashes were detected by rod and S cone photoreceptors, respectively. The intensities of the 530 nm and 440 nm flashes were mixed in various ratios and the increment threshold was then measured with these mixture flashes using the method of constant stimuli. The effects of rod and S cone excitation were found to summate linearly at threshold, under these experimental conditions. Summation occurred presumably at an early stage of the visual process.

Partial additivity of rod signals with M- and L-cone signals in increment detection

Test additivity experiments revealed the combination rules for increment detection by rods and either M- or L-cone-dominated mechanisms isolated by means of chromatic adaptation (Stiles' pi 4 and pi 5, respectively). Increment thresholds were measured for single test wavelengths detected by each mechanism. Pairs of test wavelengths were then superimposed, and increment thresholds were measured for simultaneous detection by both rod and cone mechanisms. The observed degree of additivity was corrected (reduced) to compensate for the partial detection by each mechanism of both test wavelengths in the combined stimuli. We find that subthreshold rod signals are partially additive with subthreshold signals from both M- and L-cones. The degree of additivity is high and similar for both M- and L-cones: less than the ideal prediction of linear addition, but greater than that predicted by either probability summation of independent mechanisms or orthogonal vector addition.

The spectral properties of the two rod pathways

Psychophysical and electroretinographic observations in normal and achromat observers suggest that rod flicker signals have access to at least two retinal pathways: one (pi 0), slow and sensitive, predominating at scotopic luminance levels; the other (pi'0), fast and insensitive, predominating at mesopic ones. We have measured steady-state flicker detection sensitivities on background fields ranging from 430 to 640 nm in normal observers. Our results suggest that cone signals can reduce the sensitivity of pi'0, but have comparatively little effect on pi 0. The pi'0 field sensitivities derived from these measurements have been fitted with linear combinations of the scotopic luminosity function, V' lambda, the M-cone spectral sensitivity function, M lambda, and the L-cone function, L lambda. These fits demonstrate a clear cone influence on pi'0, but they cannot tell us unequivocally whether the influence is from the M-cones, from the L-cones or from both. Accordingly, we made similar measurements in dichromats, who lack one of the two longer wavelength cone types. These measurements revealed an L-cone influence on pi'0 in the deuteranope and an M-cone influence in the protanope. This suggests that both cone types can affect the sensitivity of pi'0. The finding that the steady-state cone signals reduce the sensitivity of pi'0 but have little effect on pi 0 could suggest that pi'0 signals travel through a faster cone pathway (with its own gain control at which both rod and cone signals can reduce rod threshold), while pi 0 signals travel through a separate rod pathway. However, it could simply reflect the fact that pi'0 predominates at higher luminances than pi 0 where the cone excitation level is inevitably greater. To examine the influence of the cones on pi 0 more closely, we: (i) produced transient cone excitation by alternating rod-equated 480 and 679 nm fields; and (ii) extended our steady-state measurements to include deep-red backgrounds of 650 and 680 nm. Both experiments revealed a small, but measurable influence of the cones on pi 0.

Cone pathways and the pi 0 and pi 0' rod mechanisms

The field-adaptation properties of two scotopic (rod) mechanisms, pi 0 and pi 0', were measured to test a two-pathway model that associates the fast temporal properties of pi 0' with the processing of rod signals by early cone pathways, possibly including cone photoreceptors, and the sluggish temporal properties of pi 0 with processing of rod signals by classical rod pathways. This model predicts that cone stimulation will differentially affect the flicker sensitivity of pi 0' compared to pi 0. Both rod mechanisms are seen in double-branched flicker-threshold-vs-intensity (FTVI) curves measured with a 15-Hz, square-wave-modulated, rod-detected test stimulus. We show that the position of the upper branch (pi 0') shifts relative to the lower branch in response to changes of background wavelength, indicating that different receptor types regulate sensitivity of pi 0 and pi 0'. Field spectral sensitivity (FSS) functions for pi 0 closely match the scotopic spectral sensitivity function, indicating that only rods adapt pi 0 under these conditions. In contrast, fitting of FSS functions for pi 0' required a combination of cone and rod spectral sensitivity functions. The relative adaptational effect of cone stimulation compared to rod stimulation increases with background light level: at highest levels, cone stimulation has more influence than rod stimulation. Test additivity experiments assessed the degree of additivity between cones and rods to ensure that the pi 0' branch did not result from sub-threshold summation between receptor mechanisms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Rod-cone interaction in form detection

Using a Wright colorimeter, absolute threshold, absolute form threshold and specific form threshold were measured during long-term dark adaptation in the extrafoveal retina. The specific form threshold was found to fall markedly at about the cone-rod break but thereafter rose steeply. Furthermore, during the rod phase of the dark adaptation the form percept of the small, slender rectangular test field changed qualitatively from a line or rectangle to a circular field at all mesopic intensities. The results indicate that light signals from rods may both facilitate and suppress cone-mediated information about form, and that the rod system may completely dominate the perception of form several log units above the absolute dark-adapted cone threshold when the eye is dark adapted.

The field adaptation of the human rod visual system

1. Incremental thresholds were measured in a retinal region 12 deg temporal from the fovea with a target of 200 ms in duration and 6 deg in diameter superimposed on background fields of various intensities and wavelengths. Measurements were made under rod-isolation conditions in five normal observers and in a typical, complete achromat observer who had no cone function. 2. The rise in threshold with background intensity changes with background wavelength in the normal trichromat observers. On 450, 520 and 560 nm backgrounds the average slope in logarithmic co-ordinates (0.78 +/- 0.04, S.D.) is similar to that found for the achromat--whose slope is independent of background wavelength (0.79 +/- 0.03)--but on a 640 nm background it more nearly approaches Weber's law (0.91 +/- 0.02). This indicates that the sensitivity of the rods to an incremental target is not determined by quantal absorptions in the rods alone but by quantal absorptions in both the rods and the cones. 3. Rod incremental thresholds were also measured in various colour-blind observers lacking one or more of the cone classes: a blue-cone monochromat, four deuteranopes and a protanope. For the blue-cone monochromat, like the achromat, the slope of the increment threshold curve is constant with background wavelength. For the deuteranopes and the protanope, like the normal, the slope increases with wavelength. The protanope, however, shows a smaller increase in slope, consistent with the lower sensitivity of his cones to long-wavelength light. 4. The dependence of the field adaptation of the rods on the cones was confirmed by field-mixture experiments, in which the incremental threshold was measured against bichromatic backgrounds, and in silent substitution experiments, in which backgrounds equated for their effects on either the cones or the rods but not both were instantaneously substituted for one another.

LWS cone effects on rod threshold and saturation in achromats with residual cone function

Rod saturation on flashed and steady red backgrounds was investigated in normals and three achromats, two of whom were found to have some residual cone function. LWS cones selectively reduce the background level at which rod saturation occurs and elevate rod thresholds at flashed background levels well below saturation. Both of these LWS cone actions are also present in eyes with greatly reduced LWS cone function. In normal eyes LWS cones also elevate rod thresholds on steady backgrounds. We thus conclude that LWS cones influence rods through different mechanisms under transient (flashed) and steady-state background stimulation and that the increase in rod visual sensitivity observed during prolonged presentation of a background is due to a time-dependent reduction of LWS cone influence on rods. Finally, the finding that rod-cone interactions of the same magnitude found in normals can be seen in individuals where the cones' ability to mediate vision is severely reduced suggests the rod saturation paradigm as a sensitive technique for revealing residual LWS cone function.

The incremental threshold of the rod visual system and Weber's law

The incremental threshold of the isolated rod visual system is believed, under certain conditions, to obey Weber's law (that is, to increase in direct proportion to the intensity of the background). This relation was tested at several background wavelengths, over an intensity range for which the target was seen only by the rods. Although the slope on long-wavelength background approximates unity (that is, Weber's law on log-log coordinates), it averages less than 0.8 on short- and middle-wavelength backgrounds. This is the same value as that found for the thresholds of a typical, complete achromat--who lacks cone vision--regardless of background wavelength. These results force the conclusion that Weber's law for incremental threshold detection is achieved not by the rods alone but only by the rods acting together with the cones.

Variable contributions of rods and cones to saccadic eye-movement latency in a non-foveating task

Latencies were measured for anti saccades away from a small lit cue that steps +/- 10 deg in complete darkness. Cue luminance and wavelength were varied. Additional measurements were made during dark-adaptation or on backgrounds or at different retinal eccentricities. Luminance matched cues and Palmer's equivalent luminance transformation were also used. Latencies for pure rod and pure cone inputs obey Piéron's law in much the same manner as foveating saccades, except that latencies are somewhat longer. However, as judged by saccadic latency, interaction between rods and cones is quite variable in the anti task. The rod-cone transition either occurs at cue luminances well above the cone threshold and is from pure rod input to primarily cone, or occurs at the cone threshold and is from rods to rods-plus-cones. Direction errors, or reflex foveating saccades, are particularly increased for mesopic cues. The variable behaviour of subjects at the anti task is discussed in relation to temporal multiplexing of rod and cone signals from dark-adapted retinal ganglion cells, the delaying nature of the task, and attentional mechanisms.

The role of spatial filtering in sensitivity regulation

The role of spatial filtering in controlling sensitivity to increments is hard to evaluate under normal viewing conditions because eye movements lead to a confounding of spatial and temporal transients. We measured sensitivity to increments on different sized backgrounds in photopic and scotopic vision when the backgrounds were stabilized on the retina, thus eliminating temporal transients. The saturating effect of small fields on photopic thresholds was preserved under these conditions indicating that spatial filtering by retinal cells is critical in maintaining photopic sensitivity. Some effect of spatial pattern on sensitivity in stabilized vision was also observed in scotopic vision, although it was much smaller than was observed in photopic vision. The interaction effects between rod and cone systems that are observed with small backgrounds were also preserved in stabilized vision, implicating a very peripheral site for the generation of these interactions.

Rod-cone dependence of saccadic eye-movement latency in a foveating task

This study examines the relations between some well known oculomotor functions (saccades) and well known retinal physiology (dark adaptation): it deals with the overall latency versus target luminance functions, with the underlying rod and cone latency-luminance functions, and with the synergistic interaction between these latency functions for mesopic targets. Saccadic latency was measured to small lit targets presented at 10 deg retinal eccentricity in complete darkness. Target luminance and wavelength were varied. Additional measurements were made during dark adaptation or on backgrounds, or at different retinal eccentricities. Luminance matched stimuli and Palmer's (1968) equivalent luminance transformation were also used. Latency is determined by an achromatic luminance mechanism that receives substantial rod inputs above the cone threshold. Latencies for pure rod or pure cone inputs increase rapidly as target luminance decreases. For the rods this latency increase appears to represent the waiting time for the 140 or so photons (lambda = 507 nm) that are required for a saccade. Errors in direction occur at scotopic luminances, or at low photopic luminances when only cones are functioning.

Rod-cone interaction in monocular but not binocular pathways

Photopic background stimulation elevates scotopic increment thresholds (rod-cone interaction) at moderate background levels when both test and concentric disk-background stimuli enter the same eye (monocular condition) but not when they enter different eyes (dichoptic condition). Only when background levels are made extremely high is there any measurable dichoptic interaction, and this interaction does not resemble that observed monocularly. Rod-cone interaction, as usually studied, is a property of monocular pathways in human vision.

Background size and saturation of the rod system

To determine the effect of background size on saturation of the human rod system, we measured threshold-vs-intensity (tvi) functions for a 24'-diameter, middle-wavelength test stimulus against long-wavelength background fields that were either 2 degrees or 8 degrees in diameter. When thresholds were measured against a series of background intensities presented during a single experimental session (a standard tvi procedure), rod increment thresholds were higher against the smaller background and eventually disappeared above cone increment thresholds at moderate background intensities. This result suggests that background diameter does influence rod system saturation. However, when adaptation to the smaller background was limited to a 5 min exposure to a single background intensity per experimental session, then thresholds against that background were rod- rather than cone-mediated and were comparable to rod thresholds against an 8 degrees background. Therefore, under these stimulus conditions, background size apparently does not influence rod system saturation unless adaptation to the smaller background is prolonged. Based on previous studies, we suggest that the rod-desensitizing effect of small backgrounds under conditions of prolonged adaptation is due to a post-retinal mechanism.

The influence of cone adaptation upon rod mediated flicker

The influence of annular fields on sensitivity to sinusoidal flicker was assessed in the dark adapted parafoveal retina. Test stimuli were 2 degrees 20' in diameter; annuli had a 2 degrees 20' inner and 7 degrees 30' outer diameter. Rod flicker was studied with a "green" stimulus too dim to influence cones. Selective cone flicker was obtained using red and green flicker in counterphase and yoked together in modulation depth and scotopic illuminance. Results showed the following. (1) Annular stimulation of rods slightly facilitated rod-mediated flicker sensitivity to frequencies less than 10 Hz. In contrast, annular stimulation of cones greatly facilitated rod-mediated sensitivity, particularly for flicker frequencies greater than 7 Hz. We designate this effect, cone-rod interaction. (2) Annular stimulation of cones has a negligible influence upon sensitivity to cone-mediated flicker frequencies less than 15 Hz. In contrast, annular stimulation of rods has a large influence upon sensitivity to cone-mediated flicker, an effect we designate rod-cone interaction. (3) Within limits, both rod-cone and cone-rod interaction increase as the annular illuminance increases and as flicker frequency increases; the limiting frequency and illuminance values, however, are different for the two forms of interaction. Results are compared with prior evidence that rod and cone signals summate to produce an absolute threshold or flicker sensation. We suggest that there are at least three mechanisms for interaction between rod- and cone-related signals.

Cone-rod interaction over time and space

Scotopic background stimulation can elevate photopic increment thresholds by more than 2 log units. This cone-rod interaction is greatest on small backgrounds (less than 1 degree diameter), but is found consistently on large backgrounds as well. Interaction develops and disappears quickly as backgrounds are turned on or off, respectively. The onset, and in some cases the offset, of a background stimulus can produce an additional, transitory interaction that augments the interaction that is maintained by continued presentation of the same background. The majority of the present findings lend support to a simple center-surround model of cone-rod interaction: nearby scotopic excitation raises photopic thresholds and more distant scotopic stimulation primarily antagonizes this interaction.

The time-course of rod-cone interaction

The time-course of rod-cone interaction (change of scotopic sensitivity caused by photopic background stimulation) was measured in the presence of briskly exchanged, scotopically matched, 490- and 630-nm background disks. In all conditions, interaction rose and fell quickly with changes of photopic stimulation. When the background was a small 0.6 degree-diameter disk, photopic stimulation produced relatively constant maintained interaction of about 0.6 log units. When the background was a large 7.8 degree-dia disk, photopic stimulation produced larger initial (0.6-1.0 log unit) than maintained (0.2 log unit) interaction. When a 0.6 degree by 7.8 degree annulus was used instead of a background, photopic stimulation produced substantial interaction only at offset, a transitory interaction. Thus, the spatial dependence of transitory interactions differs from that of maintained interaction: transitory interactions can be large even when maintained interaction is small or absent. The results are discussed in terms of a simple center-surround model of rod-cone interaction that unifies both maintained and transient interaction.

The signal-to-noise characteristics of rod-cone interaction

1. The influence of rods on cone-mediated vision was assessed in eight human observers. To this end, increment threshold functions were obtained by determining thresholds of a cone-detected test flash (25 ms duration, 655 nm wave-length, 13' diameter) as a function of the illuminance of larger, 500 ms duration, rod-detected masking flashes. The type of photoreceptor influenced by each stimulus was carefully checked by means of a series of control procedures involving action spectra and selective rod adaptation.2. When the rod mask was 512 nm in wave-length, 40' in diameter, and less than one scotopic td in illuminance, increment threshold functions show that [Formula: see text], where I(Cth) is cone test threshold, I(R) is rod mask illuminance, and D is a dark noise term similar to that used by Barlow (1956). Further increases in I(R) have no additional influences on cone test threshold until threshold is influenced by the combined action of the mask on both rods and cones. If I(R) is expressed in terms of scotopic flux rather than illuminance, the functional relationship obtained with all rod masks </= 40' diameter and </= 580 nm wave-length is identical.3. Over the range of illuminance where a square-root relationship is obtained, probability of seeing functions show that a signal-to-noise mechanism limits the detectability of the cone test flash. These findings suggests a quantitative model in which cones produce a signal in a detector which is proportional to the illuminance of the cone test flash. Within a neural locus designated E (excitatory spatial summator), a response is produced which over at least a 40' diameter area, is proportional to the scotopic flux of the rod mask. E, however, feeds into a gain box, S, which saturates at illuminance levels at least 3 log(10) units less than usual estimates of rod saturation. Other than saturation, S behaves in a linear fashion.4. As diameter increases beyond 60', rod masks of equal scotopic illuminance have progressively less influence on cone test threshold; rod masks > 2 degrees have negligible influence on cone test threshold. We propose that I (inhibitory spatial summator), a neural locus which responds to scotopic flux provided over a very large area, attenuates the activity of E. The combined action of E and I is designated a rod channel. The response of cones and the rod channel summate at a detector. Within the detector, cone signals are distinguished from rod-related activity and intrinsic dark noise on the basis of signal-to-noise discriminations.5. The neural substrate for this rod channel most probably involves the combined action of several neurones which synapse within the inner plexiform layer of the retina. The relationship of this rod channel to other perceptual phenomena is discussed.

Interactions between rod and cone channels above threshold: a test of various models

Brightness-matching and magnitude estimation data were obtained to test alternative explanations of the rod-cone interaction above threshold. Steady adapting fields were selected such that 500 and 640 nm test flashes presented in the parafovea stimulated largely the rod and cone systems, respectively. In the brightness-matching experiment stimuli of combined 500 and 640 nm light were matched to a white foveal standard flash set at various levels above threshold. Similarly, in the magnitude estimation experiment, brightness estimates were obtained for single 500 and 640 nm flashes as well as for super-imposed combination flashes. Combination stimuli appeared brighter than their individual components. Overall, the results suggest that rod and cone signals elicited by a single flash combine in an excitatory fashion; there is no evidence for rod-cone inhibition in this study. Further, the results for the suprathreshold and threshold conditions are qualitatively similar. The signals from the rod and cone systems combine less well than signals within a system but to a greater degree than predicted by probability summations or vector addition models.

Receptor interactions and visual persistence

Two experiments are described that provide evidence for an interaction between the cone and rod systems following the offset of a stimulus. Experiment 1 employs a visual persistence task in which the observer is required to integrate two brief flashes separated by a variable ISI. Threshold luminance as a function of ISI is determined for several conditions of target wavelength. Striking differences between short and long wavelength targets are found which indicate the possible exclusion of rod participation at the brief ISIs. Experiment 2 employs a forward-masking task to demonstrate that the stimulus conditions of the first experiment result in a transient reduction in rod system activity following stimulus offset while the cone system is still active. Results support this proposal. Implications for the locus of persistence within the visual system are discussed.

Rod-cone interrelationships at light onset and offset

The spatial constraints needed to obtain rod-cone interaction under steady adaptation levels apply to transient conditions of adaptation. The influence of cones upon rod threshold, however, is qualitatively different at light onset as opposed to light offset.