Hemiretinal contribution to the timing of the full-field PVEP as determined with the motor reaction time

Response characteristics of the normal retino-cortical pathways as determined with simultaneous recordings of pattern visual evoked potentials and simple motor reaction times

PURPOSE

In an attempt to explain the existing discrepancies regarding the relationship between electrophysiological and psychophysical measurements of visual transmission time we compared, in humans, the response characteristics of the normal retino-cortical pathways with simultaneously obtained pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) and simple motor reaction times (RT).

METHODS

PVEPs and manual RTs were recorded simultaneously using a reversing checkerboard with different spatial frequency and contrast combinations chosen to elicit responses favoring the magnocellular or parvocellular pathways. The amplitude and peak time of the P1 wave of the PVEP were compared to the mean RT. Other parameters of the RT, such as mode and standard deviation were also considered.

RESULTS

The RT is not modified in the same fashion as the peak time of the P1 wave of the PVEP, the peak time of the PVEP demonstrating a spatial frequency selectivity, while the RT does not. Further comparative analysis of the PVEP and RT shows that the RT is faster for stimuli of lower contrast and spatial frequency, while the PVEP amplitude is larger and its peak time shorter for higher contrast and spatial frequency stimuli.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that PVEP and RT measures recruit distinct physiological characteristics and appear to be differently modulated while travelling along the retino-cortical pathway. Our results also show the importance of obtaining electrophysiological and psychophysical measures concomitantly to insure elimination of combined inter-stimulus and inter-session variability.