Rod-cone-interactions in deuteranopic observers: models and dynamics

Melanopsin photoreception differentially modulates rod-mediated and cone-mediated human temporal vision

To evaluate the nature of interactions between visual pathways transmitting the slower melanopsin and faster rod and cone signals, we implement a temporal phase summation paradigm in human observers using photoreceptor-directed stimuli. We show that melanopsin stimulation interacts with and alters both rod-mediated and cone-mediated vision regardless of whether it is perceptually visible or not. Melanopsin-rod interactions result in either inhibitory or facilitatory summation depending on the temporal frequency and photoreceptor pathway contrast sensitivity. Moreover, by isolating rod vision, we reveal a bipartite intensity response property of the rod pathway in photopic lighting that extends its operational range at lower frequencies to beyond its classic saturation limits but at the expense of attenuating sensitivity at higher frequencies. In comparison, melanopsin-cone interactions always lead to facilitation. These interactions can be described by linear or probability summations and potentially involve multiple intraretinal and visual cortical pathways to set human visual contrast sensitivity.

•

Melanopsin ipRGCs support vision independent of the rod and cone signals

•

Rod pathways mediate robust visual responses in daylight

•

Temporal contrast sensitivity is contingent on the melanopsin excitation level

•

Visual performance is collectively regulated by melanopsin, rod and cone pathways

Electrodiagnosis of dichromacy

Retinal and cortical signals initiated by a single cone type can be recorded using the spectral compensation (or silent substitution) paradigm. Moreover, responses to instantaneous excitation increments combined with gradual excitation decreases are dominated by the response to the excitation increment. Similarly, the response to a sudden excitation decrement dominates the overall response when combined with a gradual excitation increase. Here ERGs and VEPs were recorded from 34 volunteers [25.9 ± 10.4 years old (mean ± 1 SD); 25 males, 9 females] to sawtooth flicker (4 Hz) stimuli that elicited L- or M-cone responses using triple silent substitution. The mean luminance (284 cd/m²) and the mean chromaticity (x = 0.5686, y = 0.3716; CIE 1931 color space) remained constant and thus the state of adaptation was the same in all conditions. Color discrimination thresholds along protan, deutan, and tritan axes were obtained from all participants. Dichromatic subjects were genetically characterized by molecular analysis of their opsin genes. ERG responses to L-cone stimuli were absent in protanopes whereas ERG responses to M-cone stimuli were strongly reduced in deuteranopes. Dichromats showed generally reduced VEP amplitudes. Responses to cone-specific stimuli obtained with standard electrophysiological methods may give the same classification as that obtained with the Cambridge Colour Test and in some cases with the genetic analysis of the L- and M-opsin genes. Therefore, cone-specific ERGs and VEPs may be reliable methods to detect cone dysfunction. The present data confirm and emphasize the potential use of cone-specific stimulation, combined with standard visual electrodiagnostic protocols.

Perifoveal S-cone and rod-driven temporal contrast sensitivities at different retinal illuminances

We evaluated a technique for measuring temporal contrast sensitivities to sine-wave modulation driven by S-cones and rods in the perifovea using triple silent substitution. Isolating stimuli for S-cones and rods were created using an eight-channel, four-primary LED stimulator that has been validated before. Sensitivities were measured at 10 different temporal frequencies between 1 and 28 Hz in three normal observers at 14 different retinal illuminances between 0.07 and 587 photopic troland (phot Td) and at three different retinal illuminances over the same range in one S-cone monochromat. The technique was further validated by measuring bleaching adaptation in two normal subjects, demonstrating sufficient isolation in rods. Good isolation was apparent from the differences in the temporal contrast sensitivity functions and the sensitivity-versus-retinal illuminance functions between S-cones and rods, and also from the results in the S-cone monochromats and the delayed recovery of rod sensitivities after bleaching. The results will help to determine optimal stimulus conditions in future studies. The results in the S-cone monochromat demonstrate the potential clinical value of our protocol.

Selective Automated Perimetry Under Photopic, Mesopic, and Scotopic Conditions: Detection Mechanisms and Testing Strategies

PURPOSE

Automated scotopic, mesopic, and photopic perimetry are likely to be important paradigms in the assessment of emerging treatments of retinal diseases, yet our knowledge of the photoreceptor mechanisms detecting targets under these conditions remains largely dependent on simian data. We therefore aimed to establish the photoreceptor/postreceptoral mechanisms detecting perimetric targets in humans under photopic, mesopic, and scotopic conditions and to make recommendations for suitable clinical testing strategies for selective perimetry.

METHODS

Perimetric sensitivities within 30° of fixation were determined for eight wavelengths (410, 440, 480, 520, 560, 600, 640, and 680 nm) under scotopic, mesopic (1.3 cd.m^-2) and photopic (10 cd.m^-2) conditions. Data were fitted with vector combinations of rod, S-cone, nonopponent M+L-cone mechanism, and opponent M- versus L-cone mechanism templates.

RESULTS

Scotopicperimetric sensitivity was determined by rods peripherally and by a combination of rods and cones at, and immediately around, fixation. Mesopic perimetric sensitivity was mediated by M+L-cones and S-cones centrally and by M+L-cones and rods more peripherally. Photopic perimetric sensitivity was determined by an opponent M- versus L-cone, a nonopponent M+L-cone, and an S-cone mechanism centrally and by a combination of an S-cone and an M+L-cone mechanism peripherally.

CONCLUSIONS

Under scotopic conditions, a 480-nm stimulus provides adequate isolation (≥28 dB) of the rod mechanism. Several mechanisms contribute to mesopic sensitivity: this redundancy in detection may cause both insensitivity to broadband white targets and ambiguity in determining which mechanism is being probed with short-wavelength stimuli. M- and L-cone-derived mechanisms are well isolated at 10 cd.m^-2: these may be selectively probed by a stimulus at 640 nm (≥ 20 dB isolation).

TRANSLATION RELEVANCE

In human observers, multiple mechanisms contribute to the detection of Goldmann size III and size V perimetric targets under scotopic, mesopic, and photopic conditions. The relative contribution of these mechanisms appears to differ from those found previously for macaques. Our results furthermore suggest that caution must be exercised when using microperimetric techniques, which are typically conducted under mesopic conditions and which are likely to be important in the assessment of emerging treatments for retinal disease. This is because mesopic background conditions maximize the redundancy of target detection. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that spectral manipulation of the stimulus alone cannot be used to reliably separate rod from cone responses under these conditions.

Vision under mesopic and scotopic illumination

Evidence has accumulated that rod activation under mesopic and scotopic light levels alters visual perception and performance. Here we review the most recent developments in the measurement of rod and cone contributions to mesopic color perception and temporal processing, with a focus on data measured using a four-primary photostimulator method that independently controls rod and cone excitations. We discuss the findings in the context of rod inputs to the three primary retinogeniculate pathways to understand rod contributions to mesopic vision. Additionally, we present evidence that hue perception is possible under scotopic, pure rod-mediated conditions that involves cortical mechanisms.

Effect of rod-cone interactions on mesopic visual performance mediated by chromatic and luminance pathways

We studied the effect of rod-cone interactions on mesopic visual reaction time (RT). Rod and cone photoreceptor excitations were independently controlled using a four-primary photostimulator. It was observed that (1) lateral rod-cone interactions increase the cone-mediated RTs; (2) the rod-cone interactions are strongest when rod sensitivity is maximal in a dark surround, but weaker with increased rod activity in a light surround; and (3) the presence of a dark surround nonselectively increased the mean and variability of chromatic (+L-M, S-cone) and luminance (L+M+S) RTs independent of the level of rod activity. The results demonstrate that lateral rod-cone interactions must be considered when deriving mesopic luminous efficiency using RT.

Simultaneous chromatic and luminance human electroretinogram responses

The parallel processing of information forms an important organisational principle of the primate visual system. Here we describe experiments which use a novel chromatic–achromatic temporal compound stimulus to simultaneously identify colour and luminance specific signals in the human electroretinogram (ERG). Luminance and chromatic components are separated in the stimulus; the luminance modulation has twice the temporal frequency of the chromatic modulation. ERGs were recorded from four trichromatic and two dichromatic subjects (1 deuteranope and 1 protanope). At isoluminance, the fundamental (first harmonic) response was elicited by the chromatic component in the stimulus. The trichromatic ERGs possessed low-pass temporal tuning characteristics, reflecting the activity of parvocellular post-receptoral mechanisms. There was very little first harmonic response in the dichromats' ERGs. The second harmonic response was elicited by the luminance modulation in the compound stimulus and showed, in all subjects, band-pass temporal tuning characteristic of magnocellular activity. Thus it is possible to concurrently elicit ERG responses from the human retina which reflect processing in both chromatic and luminance pathways. As well as providing a clear demonstration of the parallel nature of chromatic and luminance processing in the human retina, the differences that exist between ERGs from trichromatic and dichromatic subjects point to the existence of interactions between afferent post-receptoral pathways that are in operation from the earliest stages of visual processing.

Mesopic rod and S-cone interactions revealed by modulation thresholds

We analyzed mesopic rod and S-cone interactions in terms of their contributions to the blue-yellow opponent pathway. Stimuli were generated using a four-primary colorimeter. Mixed rod and S-cone modulation thresholds (constant L-, M-cone excitation) were measured as a function of their phase difference. Modulation amplitude was equated using threshold units and contrast ratios. This study identified three interaction types: (1) a linear and antagonistic rod:S-cone interaction, (2) probability summation, and (3) a previously unidentified mutual nonlinear reinforcement. Linear rod:S-cone interactions occur within the blue-yellow opponent pathway. Probability summation involves signaling by different postreceptoral pathways. The origin of the nonlinear reinforcement is possibly at the photoreceptors.

Isolated mesopic rod and cone electroretinograms realized with a four-primary method

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of measuring rod and cone electroretinograms (ERGs) at a single mesopic adaptation level. To accomplish this, a four-primary photostimulator was implemented using a commercially available ERG system (Diagnosys ColorDome) to generate three types of stimuli that temporally modulated rods alone, cones alone, and rods and cones simultaneously. For each stimulus type, ERGs were recorded as a function of temporal frequency (2, 4, 8, or 16 Hz) and mesopic light levels (0.02, 0.16, or 1.26 cd/m(2)) in normal observers and patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) or cone-rod degeneration. The normal observers ERG waveforms showed a clear periodic pattern, mirroring the sinusoidal stimuli. At all light levels, rod responses were always higher than cone responses for temporal frequencies between 2 and 8 Hz, suggesting that rods dominated the responses. Cone responses were minimal at the lowest light level and increased with increases in light level. The amplitude of the response to the combined stimuli was intermediate between that of the isolated cone and the isolated rod stimuli for all light levels. Good receptoral isolation was confirmed by the results showing (1) minimal or no rod ERGs but recordable cone ERGs in the patients and (2) high correlation between the ERG amplitudes obtained from the four-primary method and those from the ISCEV standard clinical protocol in normal observers.

Combination of rod and cone inputs in parasol ganglion cells of the magnocellular pathway

This study investigates how rod and cone inputs are combined in the magnocellular (MC) pathway in the mesopic luminance range, when both rods and cones are active. Responses of parafoveal MC ganglion cells from macaque retina were measured as a function of temporal frequency (0.62-20 Hz) or contrast (0.05-0.55) at mesopic light levels (0.2, 2, 20, and 200 td). Stimuli were of three modulation types: (1) isolated rod stimuli (only rod signals were modulated), (2) isolated cone stimuli (only cone luminance signals from long- and middle-wavelength sensitive cones were modulated), and (3) combined rod and cone stimuli (both rod and cone luminance signals were modulated in phase, as with conventional stimuli). The results showed that under mesopic conditions, the relative rod and cone inputs to the MC cells varied with light level and they are combined linearly prior to saturation. Further, rod contrast gain is relatively stable over the mesopic range while cone contrast gain increased with light level. Finally, the measured rod and cone inputs are consistent with the measured human temporal contrast sensitivity functions under comparable stimulation conditions.

Rod-cone interactions and the temporal impulse response of the cone pathway

Dark-adapted rods suppress cone-mediated flicker detection. This study evaluates the effect that rod activity has on cone temporal processing by investigating whether rod mediated suppression changes the cone pathway impulse response function, regardless of the form of the temporal signal. Stimuli were generated with a 2-channel photostimulator that has four primaries for the central field and four primaries for the surround. Cone pathway temporal impulse response functions were derived from temporal contrast sensitivity data with periodic stimuli, and from two-pulse discrimination data in which pairs of briefly pulsed stimuli were presented successively at a series of stimulus onset asynchronies. Dark-adapted rods altered the amplitude and timing of cone pathway temporal impulse response functions, irrespective of whether they were derived from measurements with temporally periodic stimuli or in a brief presentation temporal resolution task with pulsed stimuli. Rod-cone interactions are a fundamental operation in visual temporal processing under mesopic light levels, acting to decrease the temporal bandwidth of the visual system.

Interactions between rod and L-cone signals in deuteranopes: gains and phases

The dynamics of interactions between rod and L-cone driven signals were studied psychophysically in two deuteranopic observers. Flicker detection thresholds for different ratios of rod to L-cone modulation were measured at temporal frequencies between 1 and 15 Hz. A model, which assumes that rod and L-cone driven signals are vector added, can describe the threshold data adequately. We found that up to about 8-10 Hz temporal frequency, rod and L-cone signals interact additively, whereas at higher frequencies the interaction is subtractive. Rod and L-cone signal strengths depend similarly on temporal frequency and are maximal between 3 and 5 Hz. The phase difference between rod and L-cone signals increases linearly with temporal frequency, indicating that their responses have a delay difference of about 20 to 30 ms, consistent with involvement of the faster rod pathway. The data would suggest a nearly complete additivity of the rod and cone driven signals when using flashed stimuli. But, literature data showed only partial additivity of the two, suggesting that different postreceptoral mechanisms are involved in the two tasks.

Flicker VEPs reflecting multiple rod and cone pathways

In an attempt to determine whether the relative contributions of magno-mediated and parvo-mediated inputs to the cortex are significantly altered in the transition from cone to rod vision, VEPs were recorded at different luminance levels (photopic to scotopic) for 2Hz square-wave, isochromatic flicker. The VEP mass response appears capable of reflecting major parvo-mediated contributions even at luminance levels for which responses from individual cells in the parvocellular pathway are reported to be weak. Our findings suggest that parvo-mediated responses are the dominant source of high-contrast isochromatic flicker VEPs at all light levels.

Photoreceptor topography and cone-specific electroretinograms

It is implicit in many cone-specific ERG studies that the amplitude is proportional to the numbers of cones stimulated. The objective of these experiments was to test this idea by comparing ERGs obtained from different areas of the retina with histological data on cone-density distributions. The histology (Curcio et al., 1990) shows that the cumulative number of cones in the human retina increases exponentially with stimulus diameter between 0- and 40-deg eccentricity. L-, M-, and (L+M) cone-driven 30-Hz ERGs were obtained from a series of stimuli with one of the following configurations: (1) Circular stimuli of different angular subtense up to 70-deg diameter. (2) Annuli with 70-deg outer diameter but variable inner diameter. (3) Annuli of constant area but increasing eccentricity. Cone contrasts were equalized for each stimulus condition. The modulated and nonmodulated regions of the screen had the same mean hue and luminance. The data suggest that the L+M cone ERG amplitude increases with stimulus diameter in direct proportion to the estimated number of cones stimulated. Furthermore, the total L+M responses appear to be predicted from individual L and M responses by simple linear summation for both the disc and annular stimuli.

The assessment of L- and M-cone specific electroretinographical signals in the normal and abnormal human retina

Electroretinography (ERG) is a non-invasive method that can contribute to a description of the functional organization of the human retina under normal and pathological circumstances. The physiological and pathophysiological processes leading to an ERG signal can be better understood when the cellular origins of the ERG are identified. The ERG signal recorded at the cornea is initiated by light absorption in the photoreceptors which leads to activity in the photoreceptors and in their post-receptoral pathways. Light absorption in distinct photoreceptor types may lead to different ERG responses caused either by differences between the photoreceptors or between their post-receptoral pathways. The description of contributions of the different photoreceptor types to the ERG may therefore give more detailed insight in the origins of the ERG. Such a description can be obtained by isolating the responses of a single photoreceptor type. Nowadays, careful control of differently colored light sources together with the relatively well-known cone and rod fundamentals enables a precise description and control of photoreceptor excitation. Theoretically, any desired combination of photoreceptor excitation modulation can be achieved, including conditions in which the activity in only one photoreceptor type is modulated (silent substitution). In this manner the response of one photoreceptor type is isolated without changing the state of adaptation. This stimulus technique has been used to study the contribution of signals originating in the different photoreceptor types to the human ERG. Furthermore, by stimulating two or more photoreceptor types simultaneously, the interaction between the different signals can be studied. With these new techniques results of measurements in healthy subjects and patients with retinal diseases can be compared. This approach should ultimately help to develop better diagnostic tools and result in a fuller description of the changes and the pathophysiological mechanisms in retinal disorder. Finally, data obtained with cone and rod specific stimuli may lead to a reinterpretation of the standard ERG used in a clinical setting.