Late-onset, seropositive, erosive rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid Arthritis Onset from Shoulder Monoarthritis

Purpose

To investigate the incidence and clinical characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) presenting with shoulder monoarthritis.

Patients and Methods

Our study included 113 patients (77 females; mean age, 63.0 ± 13.1 years) whom we newly diagnosed with RA in 2012-2016. We investigated cases with onset from shoulder monoarthritis. Specifically, we examined physical findings, blood test results, radiographic findings, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and duration from initial visit to diagnosis. RA was diagnosed based on the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria.

Results

Overall, mean 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria score was 6.8 ± 1.8, and median duration to diagnosis was 3 days (interquartile range: 0-14). Two patients (1.8%) were identified as having RA with onset from shoulder monoarthritis. Both were late middle-aged women with MRI findings of rotator cuff tear and remarkable synovial proliferation. However, neither patient fulfilled the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria. It took 85 and 98 days to make a definitive diagnosis, respectively.

Conclusion

Early diagnosis is difficult when RA synovitis develops from shoulder monoarthritis, especially, in elderly patients who have a rotator cuff tear. In addition to MRI, culture-based and pathological examinations may be helpful for early diagnosis of RA.

Morning Stiffness in Elderly Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: What is Known About the Effect of Biological and Targeted Agents?

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects all age groups, but the prevalence appears to increase with age. Elderly-onset RA (after the age of 60 years) has distinct clinical patterns. Treatment of RA in older individuals is confounded by the presence of medical comorbidities, concurrent medications, drug interactions, and the altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics related to aging and organ dysfunction. Patients with RA commonly experience morning stiffness, which is associated with reduced quality of life and work disability. However, despite its importance, morning stiffness is seldom assessed in clinical practice and usually only its duration is measured in the research setting. Whether the intensity, timing, location and impact of this symptom should be assessed in future clinical trials requires further evaluation. The biologic and newer targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have been shown to be effective in reducing the duration of morning stiffness in patients with RA. Glucocorticoids are a double-edged sword in RA. Although they can effectively reduce inflammation and retard radiological damage (disease modifying), the long-term use of glucocorticoids is associated with numerous adverse effects. Thus, glucocorticoids should be used for short-term treatment of RA only. Night-time administration of glucocorticoids has been shown to alleviate morning stiffness and should be considered in patients with serious morning joint stiffness symptoms.

An autumn tale: geriatric rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by erosive arthritis and systemic organ involvement. The disease may affect all ages and both sexes; usually it is seen in young women aged 25-45. Recent studies have shown that RA is among the most common inflammatory disease in older age groups. While elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) is still discussed in the literature, it is generally accepted as a disease beginning after 65 years of age. Compared with young-onset rheumatoid arthritis (YORA), it was found that EORA had different characteristics. EORA is characterized by more equal gender distribution, higher frequency of acute onset with constitutional symptoms, more frequent involvement of large joints, and lower frequency of rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity. Earlier diagnosis, less erosive disease and less disease-modifying antirheumatic drug usage were reported as distinguishing EORA from YORA patients. These various clinical presentations may cause difficulties in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of EORA. However, different clinical and treatment approaches may be needed in these patients. In this article, the clinical and laboratory characteristics, prognosis and treatment principles of EORA will be discussed in light of recent literature data.

Is radiographic progression of late-onset rheumatoid arthritis different from young-onset rheumatoid arthritis? Results from the Swiss prospective observational cohort

OBJECTIVE

RA can be categorized into late-onset RA (LORA, >60-65 years) and young-onset RA (YORA, 30-55 years), depending on the patient's age at disease onset. Since the average age of the population is continuously increasing, LORA will most probably gain in importance in the future. Despite this growing importance, LORA has not been the focus of much interest in the past. The aim of this study was to analyse radiographic damage progression of early disease in LORA compared with YORA patients.

METHODS

We included all patients from the Swiss RA registry, Swiss Clinical Quality Management in RA, with recent-onset arthritis, either RA (disease duration ≤1 year) or undifferentiated arthritis, as diagnosed by the data-entering physician. Patients were followed for 5 years. The cut-off between YORA and LORA was operationally set at 60 years of age. The primary outcome of this study was disease progression and activity, which was assessed based on the 28-joint DAS (DAS28) and the progression of joint erosions using a validated scoring system (Ratingen score).

RESULTS

A total of 592 patients with early disease were analysed. The age at disease onset had a Gaussian distribution, with a single peak at 54 years of age; 366 patients were categorized as YORA and 226 as LORA at disease onset. DAS28 scores were significantly higher among LORA as compared with YORA patients (4.8 vs 4.5, P = 0.049). Corticosteroids were used in 68% of LORA patients as a first-line treatment, compared with 25.4% in YORA patients (χ(2) test: 54.58; P < 0.0001). In contrast, DMARDs were used in 100% of the YORA patients as first-line treatment, compared with 91.2% of the LORA patients. During follow-up, new glucocorticoids, synthetic DMARDs or biologic DMARDs were initiated in 32.8%, 61.1% and 14.1% of all YORA patients and 17.5%, 54.6% and 6.6% of LORA patients, respectively (χ(2) test: 7.08, 22.53, 54.4; all P < 0.01). The DAS28 scores decreased in both groups during the observed time period, and the initial differences in disease activity vanished after 6 months and during the subsequent follow-up. The Ratingen score was higher in LORA than in YORA patients at inclusion (12.7 vs 5.6, P < 0.0001). The rate of radiographic progression at 5 years was similar when comparing LORA and YORA (3.3 vs 2.6, respectively, P = 0.64). The Ratingen scores at onset and during follow-up over 5 years did not clearly separate LORA and YORA into two groups, but rather, increased linearly when comparing the patients in groups per decade from 20 to 92 years of age.

CONCLUSION

Our results did not show LORA as a separate subgroup of RA with a different prognosis with regard to radiographic progression.

Rheumatoid arthritis in the elderly

Rheumatoid arthritis of late onset (LORA) referred as the subset of rheumatoid arthritis with age of onset over 60 years old, seems to differ from young onset disease (YORA) by a more equal sex distribution, a higher frequency of abrupt disease onset, more large joint complaints and less extraarticular features. Different immunogenetic associations are also reported between the two age groups. The percentages of rheumatoid factor (RF) and C-reactive protein (CRP) positivity differ in various surveys in both groups examined. Favorable prognostic factors could be considered the absence of rheumatoid factor activity and the presence of pitting edema of the hands. Greek patients with LORAS appear not to have differences in comparison to their younger counterparts. Disease modifying drugs and low doses of prednisone are the mainstream of therapy with need for further caution in the aged group.