Dihydrofolate reductase from Thermotoga maritima

Electric Field Measurements Reveal the Pivotal Role of Cofactor-Substrate Interaction in Dihydrofolate Reductase Catalysis

The contribution of ligand–ligand electrostatic interaction to transition state formation during enzyme catalysis has remained unexplored, even though electrostatic forces are known to play a major role in protein functions and have been investigated by the vibrational Stark effect (VSE). To monitor electrostatic changes along important steps during catalysis, we used a nitrile probe (T46C-CN) inserted proximal to the reaction center of three dihydrofolate reductases (DHFRs) with different biophysical properties, Escherichia coli DHFR (EcDHFR), its conformationally impaired variant (EcDHFR-S148P), and Geobacillus stearothermophilus DHFR (BsDHFR). Our combined experimental and computational approach revealed that the electric field projected by the substrate toward the probe negates those exerted by the cofactor when both are bound within the enzymes. This indicates that compared to previous models that focus exclusively on subdomain reorganization and protein–ligand contacts, ligand–ligand interactions are the key driving force to generate electrostatic environments conducive for catalysis.

Molecular dynamics simulation of thermal unfolding of Thermatoga maritima DHFR

Molecular dynamics simulations of the temperature-induced unfolding reaction of native dimeric dihydrofolate reductase from the hyperthermophile Thermatoga maritima (TmDHFR) and the experimentally inaccessible TmDHFR monomer were carried out at 400 K, 450 K and 500 K. The results revealed that the unfolding of TmDHFR subunits followed a similar path to that of the monomeric DHFR from the mesophile E. coli (EcDHFR). An initial collapse of the adenosine-binding domain (ABD) was followed by the loss of the N-terminal and loop domains (NDLD). Interestingly, the elements of the secondary structure of the isolated TmDHFR monomer were maintained for significantly longer periods of time for the hyperthermophilic enzyme, suggesting that subunit stability contributes to the enhanced resistance of TmDHFR to temperature-induced unfolding. The interactions between the subunits of the TmDHFR dimer led to a stabilisation of the NDLD. The hydrogen bonds between residues 140-143 in betaG of one subunit and residues 125-127 in betaF of the other subunit were retained for significant parts of the simulations at all temperatures. These intermolecular hydrogen bonds were lost after the unfolding of the individual subunits. The high stability of the dimer mediated by strong intersubunit contacts together with an intrinsically enhanced stability of the subunits compared to EcDHFR provides a molecular rational for the higher stability of the thermophilic enzyme. The computed unfolding pathways suggest that the partly folded dimer may be a genuine folding intermediate.

Hydride transfer during catalysis by dihydrofolate reductase from Thermotoga maritima

DHFR (dihydrofolate reductase) catalyses the metabolically important reduction of 7,8-dihydrofolate by NADPH. DHFR from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima (TmDHFR), which shares similarity with DHFR from Escherichia coli, has previously been characterized structurally. Its tertiary structure is similar to that of DHFR from E. coli but it is the only DHFR characterized so far that relies on dimerization for stability. The midpoint of the thermal unfolding of TmDHFR was at approx. 83 degrees C, which was 30 degrees C higher than the melting temperature of DHFR from E. coli. The turnover and the hydride-transfer rates in the kinetic scheme of TmDHFR were derived from measurements of the steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetics using absorbance and stopped-flow fluorescence spectroscopy. The rate constant for hydride transfer was found to depend strongly on the temperature and the pH of the solution. Hydride transfer was slow (0.14 s(-1) at 25 degrees C) and at least partially rate limiting at low temperatures but increased dramatically with temperature. At 80 degrees C the hydride-transfer rate of TmDHFR was 20 times lower than that observed for the E. coli enzyme at its physiological temperature. Hydride transfer depended on ionization of a single group in the active site with a p K(a) of 6.0. While at 30 degrees C, turnover of substrate by TmDHFR was almost two orders of magnitude slower than by DHFR from E. coli; the steady-state rates of the two enzymes differed only 8-fold at their respective working temperatures.