Escherichia coli proteins eluted from mono Q chromatography, a final step during RNA polymerase purification procedure

Structural basis of bacterial σ28 -mediated transcription reveals roles of the RNA polymerase zinc-binding domain

In bacteria, σ²⁸ is the flagella-specific sigma factor that targets RNA polymerase (RNAP) to control the expression of flagella-related genes involving bacterial motility and chemotaxis. However, the structural mechanism of σ²⁸ -dependent promoter recognition remains uncharacterized. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of E. coli σ²⁸ -dependent transcribing complexes on a complete flagella-specific promoter. These structures reveal how σ²⁸ -RNAP recognizes promoter DNA through strong interactions with the -10 element, but weak contacts with the -35 element, to initiate transcription. In addition, we observed a distinct architecture in which the β' zinc-binding domain (ZBD) of RNAP stretches out from its canonical position to interact with the upstream non-template strand. Further in vitro and in vivo assays demonstrate that this interaction has the overall effect of facilitating closed-to-open isomerization of the RNAP-promoter complex by compensating for the weak interaction between σ4 and -35 element. This suggests that ZBD relocation may be a general mechanism employed by σ⁷⁰ family factors to enhance transcription from promoters with weak σ4/-35 element interactions.

Crystal structures of the E. coli transcription initiation complexes with a complete bubble

During transcription initiation, RNA polymerase binds to promoter DNA to form an initiation complex containing a DNA bubble and enters into abortive cycles of RNA synthesis before escaping the promoter to transit into the elongation phase for processive RNA synthesis. Here we present the crystal structures of E. coli transcription initiation complexes containing a complete transcription bubble and de novo synthesized RNA oligonucleotides at about 6-Å resolution. The structures show how RNA polymerase recognizes DNA promoters that contain spacers of different lengths and reveal a bridging interaction between the 5'-triphosphate of the nascent RNA and the σ factor that may function to stabilize the short RNA-DNA hybrids during the early stage of transcription initiation. The conformation of the RNA oligonucleotides and the paths of the DNA strands in the complete initiation complexes provide insights into the mechanism that controls both the abortive and productive RNA synthesis.

Polyadenylation of RNA in E. coli: RNA polymerase-associated (rA)n-synthetic activities

In Escherichia coli, Poly(A) polymerase (PAP) and polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNP) are key enzymes thought to be responsible for polyadenylation of the bulk of cellular RNA. In this chapter we describe enzymatic in vitro assays for monitoring (rA)n-synthetic activity among fractionated E. coli proteins obtained after affinity chromatography on immobilized DNA. The enzymatic activities of PAP and PNP can be independently monitored among fractionated proteins due to the utilization of different nucleoside substrates (respectively, ATP and ADP) by the two enzymes. We describe two different methods for monitoring the synthesis of polyadenylate: a method based on utilization of a nucleic acid-specific fluorescent dye (RiboGreen(®)) and an alternative method based on utilization of P(32)-labeled nucleoside phosphates.

Polyadenylation in bacteria and organelles

Polyadenylation is a posttranscriptional modification present throughout all the kingdoms of life with important roles in regulation of RNA stability, translation, and quality control. Functions of polyadenylation in prokaryotic and organellar RNA metabolism are still not fully characterized, and poly(A) tails appear to play contrasting roles in different systems. Here we present a general overview of the polyadenylation process and the factors involved in its regulation, with an emphasis on the diverse functions of 3' end modification in the control of gene expression in different biological systems.

Indirect read-out of the promoter DNA by RNA polymerase in the closed complex

Transcription is initiated when RNA polymerase recognizes the duplex promoter DNA in the closed complex. Due to its transient nature, the closed complex has not been well characterized. How the initial promoter recognition occurs may offer important clues to regulation of transcription initiation. In this article, we have carried out single-base pair substitution experiments on two Escherichia coli promoters belonging to two different classes, the -35 and the extended -10, under conditions which stabilize the closed complex. Single-base pair substitution experiments indicate modest base-specific effects on the stability of the closed complex of both promoters. Mutations of base pairs in the -10 region affect the closed complexes of two promoters differently, suggesting different modes of interaction of the RNA polymerase and the promoter in the two closed complexes. Two residues on σ(70) which have been suggested to play important role in promoter recognition, Q437 and R436, were mutated and found to have different effects on the closed-complex stability. DNA circular dichroism (CD) and FRET suggest that the promoter DNA in the closed complex is distorted. Modeling suggests two different orientations of the recognition helix of the RNA polymerase in the closed complex. We propose that the RNA polymerase recognizes the sequence dependent conformation of the promoter DNA in the closed complex.

Structure and function of RapA: a bacterial Swi2/Snf2 protein required for RNA polymerase recycling in transcription

One of the hallmarks of the Swi2/Snf2 family members is their ability to modify the interaction between DNA-binding protein and DNA in controlling gene expression. The studies of Swi2/Snf2 have been mostly focused on their roles in chromatin and/or nucleosome remodeling in eukaryotes. A bacterial Swi2/Snf2 protein named RapA from Escherichia coli is a unique addition to these studies. RapA is an RNA polymerase (RNAP)-associated protein and an ATPase. It binds nucleic acids including RNA and DNA. The ATPase activity of RapA is stimulated by its interaction with RNAP, but not with nucleic acids. RapA and the major sigma factor σ70 compete for binding to core RNAP. After one transcription cycle in vitro, RNAP is immobilized in an undefined posttranscription/posttermination complex (PTC), thus becoming unavailable for reuse. RapA stimulates RNAP recycling by ATPase-dependent remodeling of PTC, leading to the release of sequestered RNAP, which then becomes available for reuse in another cycle of transcription. Recently, the crystal structure of RapA that is also the first full-length structure for the entire Swi2/Snf2 family was determined. The structure provides a framework for future studies of the mechanism of RNAP recycling in transcription. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Snf2/Swi2 ATPase structure and function.

Structure of RapA, a Swi2/Snf2 protein that recycles RNA polymerase during transcription

RapA, as abundant as sigma70 in the cell, is an RNA polymerase (RNAP)-associated Swi2/Snf2 protein with ATPase activity. It stimulates RNAP recycling during transcription. We report a structure of RapA that is also a full-length structure for the entire Swi2/Snf2 family. RapA contains seven domains, two of which exhibit novel protein folds. Our model of RapA in complex with ATP and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) suggests that RapA may bind to and translocate on dsDNA. Our kinetic template-switching assay shows that RapA facilitates the release of sequestered RNAP from a posttranscrption/posttermination complex for transcription reinitiation. Our in vitro competition experiment indicates that RapA binds to core RNAP only but is readily displaceable by sigma70. RapA is likely another general transcription factor, the structure of which provides a framework for future studies of this bacterial Swi2/Snf2 protein and its important roles in RNAP recycling during transcription.

Transcription activation by the DNA-binding domain of the AraC family protein RhaS in the absence of its effector-binding domain

The Escherichia coli L-rhamnose-responsive transcription activators RhaS and RhaR both consist of two domains, a C-terminal DNA-binding domain and an N-terminal dimerization domain. Both function as dimers and only activate transcription in the presence of L-rhamnose. Here, we examined the ability of the DNA-binding domains of RhaS (RhaS-CTD) and RhaR (RhaR-CTD) to bind to DNA and activate transcription. RhaS-CTD and RhaR-CTD were both shown by DNase I footprinting to be capable of binding specifically to the appropriate DNA sites. In vivo as well as in vitro transcription assays showed that RhaS-CTD could activate transcription to high levels, whereas RhaR-CTD was capable of only very low levels of transcription activation. As expected, RhaS-CTD did not require the presence of L-rhamnose to activate transcription. The upstream half-site at rhaBAD and the downstream half-site at rhaT were found to be the strongest of the known RhaS half-sites, and a new putative RhaS half-site with comparable strength to known sites was identified. Given that cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP), the second activator required for full rhaBAD expression, cannot activate rhaBAD expression in a DeltarhaS strain, it was of interest to test whether CRP could activate transcription in combination with RhaS-CTD. We found that RhaS-CTD allowed significant activation by CRP, both in vivo and in vitro, although full-length RhaS allowed somewhat greater CRP activation. We conclude that RhaS-CTD contains all of the determinants necessary for transcription activation by RhaS.