Cardiovascular medication use after coronary bypass surgery in patients with renal dysfunction: A National Veterans Administration study[1]

Longer Predialysis ACEi/ARB Utilization Is Associated With Reduced Postdialysis Mortality

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB) improve predialysis outcomes; however, ACEi/ARB are underused in patients transitioning to dialysis. We examined the association of different patterns of predialysis ACEi/ARB use with postdialysis survival and whether potentially modifiable adverse events are associated with lower predialysis ACEi/ARB use.

METHODS

This was a historic cohort study of 34,676 US veterans with, and 10,690 without, ACEi/ARB exposure in the 3-year predialysis period who subsequently transitioned to dialysis between 2007 and 2014. Associations of different patterns of predialysis ACEi/ARB use with postdialysis all-cause mortality and with predialysis acute kidney injury and hyperkalemia events were examined using multivariable adjusted regression analyses.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 70 years, 98% were males and 27% were African Americans. Compared to ACEi/ARB nonuse, continuous ACEi/ARB use was associated with lower postdialysis all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.87; 0.83-0.92). In analyses modeling the duration of predialysis ACEi/ARB use, ACEi/ARB use of 50%-74% and ≥75% were associated with lower mortality compared to nonuse (adjusted hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval 0.96, 0.92-0.99 and 0.91; 0.88-0.94, respectively), whereas no increase in postdialysis survival was observed with shorter predialysis ACEi/ARB use. Predialysis acute kidney injury was associated with shorter duration (<50%) of ACEi/ARB use and hyperkalemia was associated with interrupted and ACEi/ARB use of <75%.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer predialysis ACEi/ARB exposure was associated with lower postdialysis mortality. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of strategies enabling uninterrupted predialysis ACEi/ARB use.

Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Medications in Dialysis Patients: Do We Need to Change Strategies?

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is frequently performed in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) together with severe coronary artery disease, after which, patients with ESRD have higher surgical risk and poorer long-term outcomes. We report our experience in patients with ESRD who survived in CABG and identify predictors of long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 93 consecutive patients with ESRD who survived to discharge after isolated CABG between January 2005 and December 2016 at our institution. Long-term outcomes, including all-cause mortality after discharge, readmission due to major adverse cardiac events, and reintervention, were evaluated. Predictors affecting long-term outcomes were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The rates of freedom from all-cause mortality after discharge in 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 92.1, 81.3, 71.9, and 34.9%, respectively. The rates of freedom from readmission due to major adverse cardiac events in 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 90.7, 79.1, 69.9, and 55.6%, respectively. The rates of freedom from reintervention in 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 95.3, 86.5, 79.0, and 66.6%, respectively. Postoperative β-blocker and statin use significantly improved overall long-term survival (β-blocker, p = 0.013; statin, p = 0.009). After case-control matching, patients who received statins showed better long-term survival than those without statins. The comparison of long-term survival between patients with and without β-blockers showed no significant difference after matching.

CONCLUSIONS

After CABG, dialysis patients who survived to discharge had acceptable long-term overall survival. Post-CABG statin use in dialysis patients is a predictor of better long-term survival.

Treatments and Mortality Trends in Cases With and Without Dialysis Who Have an Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background:

Patients on dialysis who have an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have an exceedingly poor prognosis, but it is unknown to what extent guideline-recommended interventions and treatments are used and to which benefit. We aimed to assess temporal changes in the use of treatments and survival rates in dialysis patients with an AMI.

Methods and Results:

All consecutive AMI cases from 1996 to 2013 enrolled in the SWEDEHEART registry (Swedish Web–System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) were included. The Swedish Renal Registry identified all chronic dialysis cases. Multivariable adjusted standardized 1-year mortality was estimated. An age-sex-calendar year–matched dialysis background population from the Swedish Renal Registry was used to obtain a standardized incidence ratio. All analyses were performed in 2-year blocks, where each individual could be included several times but in different time blocks; hence the term AMI cases and not patients is used. Of 289 699 cases with AMI, 1398 (0.5%) were on dialysis (73.6% hemodialysis; 26.4% peritoneal dialysis). Among dialysis cases, 29.4% were women, and 21.0% had ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Through 1996 to 2013, dialysis cases had similar age (median, 70 years [interquartile range, 62–77]; P for trend, 0.14), but the proportion with diabetes mellitus increased (36.0%–55.3%; P for trend, 0.005). Dialysis cases admitted with AMI were treated more invasively and received more discharge medications in the later years. From 1995 to 2013, in-hospital and 1-year mortality decreased from 25.4% to 9.4% and from 59.6% to 41.2%, respectively. The standardized in-hospital and 1-year mortality decreased from 25.7% to 9.4% and from 54.6% to 41.2%. Yet, compared with the matched dialysis population, the odds of death remained as high in 2012/2013 as in 1996/1997 (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.62–2.58 and odds ratio, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.52–2.60, respectively; P for trend, 0.34).

Conclusions:

Over the last 18 years, more patients on dialysis with AMI have been treated with evidence-based therapies. Overall, dialysis cases with AMI have an improved in-hospital and 1-year survival in the more recent years compared with earlier years. However, this appears largely to be because of improved survival in the general dialysis population.

Compliance With Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Contemporary Coronary Revascularization Trials

BACKGROUND

Despite the well-established benefits of secondary cardiovascular prevention, the importance of concurrent medical therapy in clinical trials of coronary revascularization is often overlooked.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to assess compliance with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in clinical trials and its potential impact on the comparison between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and MEDLINE were searched from 2005 to August 2017. Clinical trial registries and reference lists of relevant studies were also searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing PCI with drug-eluting stents versus CABG and reporting medical therapy after revascularization were included. The study outcome was compliance with GDMT, defined as the following: 1) any antiplatelet agent plus beta-blocker plus statin (GDMT1); and 2) any antiplatelet agent plus beta-blocker plus statin plus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (GDMT2). Data collection and analysis were performed according to the methodological recommendations of The Cochrane Collaboration.

RESULTS

From a total of 439 references, 5 trials were included based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Overall, compliance with GDMT1 was low and decreased over time from 67% at 1 year to 53% at 5 years. Compliance with GDMT2 was even lower and decreased from 40% at 1 year to 38% at 5 years. Compliance with both GDMT1 and GDMT2 was higher in PCI than in CABG at all time points. Meta-regression suggested an association between lower use of GDMT1 and adverse clinical outcomes in PCI versus CABG at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance with GDMT in contemporary clinical trials remains suboptimal and is significantly lower after CABG than after PCI, which may influence the comparison of clinical trial endpoints between those study groups.

Beta blockers in patients with end-stage renal disease-Evidence-based recommendations

For patients who require hemodialysis, beta blockers offer a simultaneous opportunity and challenge in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Beta blockers are well supported by data from nondialysis populations and directly mitigate the sympathetic overactivity that links chronic kidney disease with cardiovascular sequelae. However, the evidence supporting their use in patients receiving hemodialysis is sparse and the heterogeneity of the beta blocker class makes it difficult to prescribe these medications with confidence. Despite these limitations, both trial and observational data exist that can help guide the use of these medications. In this review, we outline the reasons to consider beta blockers for patients receiving hemodialysis, discuss the barriers to their use, and provide specific evidence-based recommendations for beta blocker use in patients with heart failure, hypertension, ischemic heart disease and arrhythmia.

Treatment effects of renin-angiotensin aldosterone system blockade on kidney failure and mortality in chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a leading cause of death before and after onset of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Knowing treatments that can delay disease progression will lead to reduced mortality. We therefore aimed to estimate the effectiveness of renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade on CKD progression.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective CKD cohort at Ubon Ratchathani province, Thailand from 1997 to 2011. ESRD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15 ml/min/1.73 m2, dialysis, or kidney transplantation. All-cause mortality was verified until December 31, 2011. A counterfactual-framework was applied to estimate the effectiveness of RAAS blockade on outcomes, i.e., ESRD, death before and after ESRD. RAAS blockade was categorized according to duration of use <0.25 year, 0.25-1 year (RAAS1), and >1 year (RAAS2). An augmented inverse-probability weighting (AIPW) method was used to estimate potential-outcome mean (POM) and average treatment-effect (ATE). Multi-logit and Poisson regressions were used for treatment and outcome models, respectively. Analyses were stratified by ESRD, death before/after ESRD for diabetic and non-diabetic groups. STATA 14.0 was used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Among 15,032 diabetic patients, 2346 (15.6%), 2351 (18.5%), and 1607 (68.5%) developed ESRD, died before ESRD, and died after ESRD, respectively. Only RAAS2 effect was significant on ESRD, death before and after ESRD. The ESRD rates were 12.9%, versus 20.0% for RAAS2 and non-RAAS, respectively, resulted in significant risk differences (RD) of -7.2% (95% CI: -8.8%, -5.5%), and a numbers needed-to-treat (NNT) of 14. Death rates before ESRD for these corresponding groups were 14.4% (12.9%, 15.9%) and 19.6% (18.7%, 20.4%) with a NNT of 19. Death rates after ESRD in RAAS2 was lower than non-RASS group (i.e., 62.8% (55.5%, 68.9%) versus 68.1% (65.9%, 70.4%)) but this was not significant. RAAS2 effects on ESRD and death before ESRD were persistently significant in non-diabetic patients (n = 17,074) but not for death after ESRD with the NNT of about 15 and 16 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Receiving RAAS blockade for 1 year or longer could prevent both CKD progression to ESRD and premature mortality.

The association of chronic kidney disease with the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor use after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a quality indicator, but there may also be reasons not to use this therapy. We sought to determine how chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) affected RAS inhibitor prescription after AMI in patients with and without decreased ejection fraction (EF).

METHODS

Participants from the TRIUMPH registry were categorized by admission estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR in mL/min per 1.73 m(2); severe [<30], moderate [30-59], mild [60-89], and no [≥90] CKD) and occurrence of AKI (an increase in creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL or ≥50%). Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor prescriptions at discharge were compared across categories of CKD, AKI, and decreased EF (<40% vs ≥40%) using a hierarchical modified Poisson model.

RESULTS

Among 4,223 AMI patients (mean age 59.0 years, 67.0% male, 67.3% white), RAS inhibitor use decreased significantly with lower eGFR (P < .001), but there was no effect of decreased EF on this relationship (interaction P = .40). Without AKI, severe and moderate CKD were associated with significantly less RAS inhibitor use: relative risks (RRs) 0.67 (95% CIs, 0.58-0.78) and 0.94 (0.90-0.99), respectively. When AKI occurred, CKD was associated with less RAS inhibitor use: RRs 0.84 (0.76-0.93) for mild CKD, 0.78 (0.68-0.88) for moderate CKD, and 0.50 (0.42-0.61) for severe CKD. Ejection fraction <40% was associated with use (RR 1.11, 1.03-1.18), independent of renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic kidney disease and AKI are associated with fewer RAS inhibitor prescriptions at discharge, but in both AKI and non-AKI patients, eGFR was more strongly associated with use than EF.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker use, and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVES

The study objective was to assess the association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

BACKGROUND

There is insufficient evidence about the association of ACEI or ARBs with mortality in patients with CKD.

METHODS

A logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the propensity of ACEI/ARB initiation in 141,413 U.S. veterans with nondialysis CKD who were previously unexposed to ACEI/ARB treatment. We examined the association of ACEI/ARB administration with all-cause mortality in patients matched by propensity scores using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models in "intention-to-treat" analyses and in generalized linear models with binary outcomes and inverse probability of treatment weights in "as-treated" analyses.

RESULTS

The age of the patients at baseline was 75 ± 10 years, 8% of patients were black, and 22% were diabetic. ACEI/ARB administration was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality both in the intention-to-treat analysis (hazard ratio: 0.81, 95% confidence interval: 0.78 to 0.84; p < 0.001) and the as-treated analysis with inverse probability of treatment weights (odds ratio: 0.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.34 to 0.41; p < 0.001). The association of ACEI/ARB treatment with lower risk of mortality was present in all examined subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large contemporary cohort of nondialysis-dependent patients with CKD, ACEI/ARB administration was associated with greater survival.

Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate as a significant predictor of long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting in Japanese patients

PURPOSES

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the effect of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and to determine whether preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) can be a predictor of long-term outcomes after CABG.

METHODS

486 Japanese patients who underwent isolated CABG between December 2000 and August 2010 were evaluated. Preoperative eGFR was estimated by the Japanese equation according to guidelines from the Japanese Society of Nephrology. We defined CKD as a preoperative eGFR of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). 203 patients had CKD (CK group) and 283 patients did not (N group).

RESULTS

During a mean observation time of 53 months, the overall survival rate was significantly lower in the CK group than in the N group (p = 0.0044). Similarly, the CK group had significantly more unfavorable results with regard to freedom from cardiac death, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and hemodialysis. Using multivariate analyses, preoperative eGFR was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 0.983; p = 0.026), cardiac mortality (HR 0.963; p = 0.006), and incidence of MACCE (HR 0.983; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The CK group had significantly more unfavorable outcomes than the N group. Preoperative eGFR was an independent predictor of long-term outcomes after CABG in Japanese patients.

Chronic kidney disease is associated with adverse outcomes among elderly patients taking clopidogrel after hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with worse outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Less is known about the impact of CKD on longitudinal outcomes among clopidogrel treated patients following ACS.

METHODS

Using a retrospective cohort design, we identified patients hospitalized with ACS between 10/1/2005 and 1/10/10 at Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities and who were discharged on clopidogrel. Using outpatient serum creatinine values, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR (1.73 ml/min/m2)] was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation. The association between eGFR and mortality, hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and major bleeding were examined using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among 7413 patients hospitalized with ACS and discharged taking clopidogrel, 34.5% had eGFR 30-60 and 11.6% had eGFR < 30. During 1-year follow-up after hospital discharge, 10% of the cohort died, 18% were hospitalized for AMI, and 4% had a major bleeding event. Compared to those with eGFR > =60, individuals with eGFR 30-60 (HR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.18-1.76) and < 30 (HR 2.48; 95% CI: 1.97-3.13) had a significantly higher risk of death. A progressive increased risk of AMI hospitalization was associated with declining eGFR: HR 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04-1.37 for eGFR 30-60 and HR 1.47; 95% CI: 1.22-1.78 for eGFR < 30. eGFR < 30 was independently associated with over a 2-fold increased risk in major bleeding (HR 2.09; 95% CI: 1.40-3.12) compared with eGFR > = 60.

CONCLUSION

Lower levels of kidney function were associated with higher rates of death, AMI hospitalization, and major bleeding among patients taking clopidogrel after hospitalization for ACS.

Patterns of use of perioperative angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: effects on in-hospital morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND

Despite proven benefit in ambulatory patients with ischemic heart disease, the pattern of use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in coronary artery bypass graft surgery has been erratic and controversial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a prospective observational study of 4224 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The cohort included 1838 patients receiving ACEI therapy before surgery and 2386 (56.5%) without ACEI exposure. Postoperatively, the pattern of ACEI use yielded 4 groups: continuation, 915 (21.7%); withdrawal, 923 (21.8%); addition, 343 (8.1%); and no ACEI, 2043 (48.4%). Continuous treatment with ACEI versus no ACEI was associated with substantive reductions of risk of nonfatal events (adjusted odds ratio for the composite outcome, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.91; P=0.009) and a cardiovascular event (odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.88; P=0.006). Addition of ACEI de novo postoperatively compared with no ACEI therapy was also associated with a significant reduction of risk of composite outcome (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.84; P=0.004) and a cardiovascular event (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.97; P=0.04). On the other hand, continuous treatment of ACEI versus withdrawal of ACEI was associated with decreased risk of the composite outcome (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.66; P<0.001), as well as a decrease in cardiac and renal events (P<0.001 and P=0.005, respectively). No differences in in-hospital mortality and cerebral events were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that withdrawal of ACEI treatment after coronary artery bypass graft surgery is associated with nonfatal in-hospital ischemic events. Furthermore, continuation of ACEI or de novo ACEI therapy early after cardiac surgery is associated with improved in-hospital outcomes.

Use of evidence-based therapies in short-term outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network registry

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for myocardial infarction (MI) and death. Our goal was to characterize the association between CKD severity and short-term outcomes and the use of in-hospital evidence-based therapies among patients with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study sample was drawn from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network registry, a nationwide sample of STEMI (n=19 029) and NSTEMI (n=30 462) patients. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation in relation to use of immediate (first 24 hours) therapies and early (first 48 hours) cardiac catheterization as well as in-hospital major bleeding events and death. Overall, 30.5% and 42.9% of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI, respectively, had CKD. Regardless of MI type, patients with progressively more severe CKD had higher rates of death. For STEMI, the odds ratio for stage 3a, 3b, 4, and 5 CKD compared with patients with no CKD was 2.49, 3.72, 4.82, and 7.97, respectively (P(trend)<0.0001). For NSTEMI, the analogous odds ratios were 1.81, 2.41, 3.50, and 4.09 (P for trend <0.0001). In addition, patients with progressively more severe CKD were less likely to receive immediate evidence-based therapies including aspirin, beta-blockers, or clopidogrel, were less likely to undergo any reperfusion (STEMI) or revascularization (NSTEMI), and had higher rates of bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Reports over the past decade have highlighted the importance of CKD among patients with MI. Data from this contemporary cohort suggest that patients with CKD still receive fewer evidence-based therapies and have substantially higher mortality rates.

β-Blockers improve outcomes in kidney disease patients having noncardiac vascular surgery

Beta-blockers are known to improve postoperative outcome after major vascular surgery. We studied the effects of beta-blockers in 2126 vascular surgery patients with and without kidney disease followed for 14 years. Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault equation, and kidney function was categorized as Stage 1 for a reference group of 550 patients, Stage 2 with 808 patients, Stage 3 with 627 patients, and combined Stages 4 and 5 with 141 patients. Outcome measures were 30-day and long-term all-cause mortality with a mean follow-up of 6 years. Cox proportional hazards models were used to control cardiovascular risk factors, including propensity for beta-blocker use. In all, 129 (6%) and 1190 (56%) patients died respectively. Mortality rates were three- and two-fold higher, respectively, for patients at Stages 3-5 compared to the reference group for the two outcomes. beta-Blocker use was significantly associated with a lower risk of mortality after surgery. The overall adjusted hazard ratio was 0.35 and 0.62, respectively, for individuals at Stages 3-5 compared to the reference group for 30-day and long-term mortality. This study shows that kidney function is a predictor of all-cause mortality and beta-blocker use is associated with a lower risk of death in kidney disease patients undergoing elective vascular surgery.

Statin therapy is associated with improved outcomes in vascular surgery patients with renal impairment

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the association between baseline kidney function, statin therapy, and outcome after vascular surgery in patients with and without chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

A total of 2126 patients underwent elective major vascular surgery and were divided into 2 categories based on baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl), calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault equation: CrCl > or = 60 mL/min (n = 1358, reference) and CrCl < 60 mL/min (n = 768). Outcome measures were 30-day and long-term all-cause, cardiac, and cerebrocardiovascular mortality. Mean follow-up was 6.0 +/- 3.7 years. Multivariate Cox regression analysis, including potential confounders and propensity score for statin use, was applied. Data are presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI.

RESULTS

Thirty-day all-cause, cardiac, and cerebrocardiovascular mortality rates were 3.8% versus 10.2%, 1.3% versus 4.2%, and 2.7% versus 7.8%, respectively, according to the 2 categories of kidney function. In addition, long-term all-cause, cardiac, and cerebrocardiovascular mortality rates were 46.6% versus 72.5%, 14.6% versus 26.4%, and 23.0% versus 40.6%, respectively. Statin therapy was associated with an overall significant improved 30-day and long-term all-cause mortality, independent of other important confounders. However, in patients with a CrCl > or = 60 mL/min, the long-term cardiac and cerebrocardiovascular beneficial effects did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.61-1.41 and HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.63-1.24, respectively) when compared with patients with a CrCl of < 60 mL/min (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.96 and HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.94, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The level of kidney function is an independent predictor of short- and long-term outcome after major noncardiac surgery. In addition, perioperative statin use in patients with kidney disease is associated with a reduction in the short- and long-term all-cause, cardiac, and cerebrocardiovascular mortality.

Global approach to cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease: reality and opportunities for intervention

The current implementation into nephrology clinical practice of guidelines on treatment of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown. We designed a cross-sectional analysis to evaluate the prevalence and treatment of eight modifiable CV risk factors in 1058 predialysis CKD patients (stage 3: n=486; stage 4: n=430, stage 5: n=142) followed for at least 1 year in 26 Italian renal clinics. The median nephrology follow-up was 37 months (range: 12-391 months). From stages 3 to 5, hypertension was the main complication (89, 87, and 87%), whereas smoking, high calcium-phosphate product and malnutrition were uncommon. The prevalence of proteinuria (25, 38, and 58%), anemia (16, 32, and 51%) and left ventricular hypertrophy (51, 55, and 64%) significantly increased, while hypercholesterolemia was less frequent in stage 5 (49%) than in stages 4 and 3 (59%). The vast majority of patients received multidrug antihypertensive therapy including inhibitors of renin-angiotensin system; conversely, diuretic treatment was consistently inadequate for both frequency and dose despite scarce implementation of low salt diet (19%). Statins were not prescribed in most hypercholesterolemics (78%), and epoietin treatment was largely overlooked in anemics (78%). The adjusted risk for having a higher number of uncontrolled risk factors rose in the presence of diabetes (odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.66), history of CV disease (odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.15-1.90) and CKD stages 4 and 5 (odds ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.37-2.22 and odds ratio 2.85, 95% confidence interval 2.01-4.04, respectively). In the tertiary care of CKD, treatment of hypertension is largely inadequate, whereas therapy of anemia and dyslipidemia is frequently omitted. The risk of not achieving therapeutic targets is higher in patients with diabetes, CV disease and more advanced CKD.