Anterior screw fixation of odontoid fractures

Combined Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation and C1-C2 Jefferson Fracture Anterior Fixation: A Step-by-Step Technical Note

BACKGROUND

Combined triple atlas (C1)-axis (C2) fixation has been described in previous literature as a safe, effective, and minimally invasive procedure for complex atlas and odontoid fractures that allows for a greater range of motion compared with posterior approaches and atlanto-occipital fusion. However, it is rarely performed due to the occipital-cervical diastasis resulting from often-fractured C1 joint masses. No evidence-based consensus has been reached regarding the treatment of complex atlantoaxial fractures, and the choice of surgical strategy is based only on clinical experience.

METHODS

We report the combined triple C1-C2 fixation technique with manual reduction of the joint masses during patient positioning on the operating table, which allowed for effective stabilization during a single surgical session. We describe our experience in the management of a 75-year-old patient presenting with an acute complex type II fracture of C1, which also involved 1 lateral mass, combined with a type II odontoid fracture and occipital-cervical diastasis.

RESULTS

We provide a step-by-step guide for combined triple C1-C2 anterior fixation with manual fracture reduction and describe the clinical case of an acute complex type II fracture of C1, which also involved 1 lateral mass, combined with a type II odontoid fracture and occipital-cervical diastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined triple C1-C2 fixation represents a safe and efficient minimally invasive anterior approach for complex type II fractures of C1 with type II odontoid fractures. Manual reduction of the joint masses during patient positioning allows for effective stabilization in a single surgical session.

The Decision-Making Process in Traumatic Lesions of the Craniovertebral Junction: An Evidence-Based Approach? Part II

This paper is Part II of a two-part report. Part I of the report covered atlanto-occipital dislocation or dissociation, and isolated condylar fractures. This part of the report covers isolated and combination fractures of the atlas and axis.

Odontoid balloon kyphoplasty associated with screw fixation for Type II fracture in 2 elderly patients

Anterior screw fixation is a well-recognized technique that is used to stabilize Type IIB fractures of the odontoid process in the elderly. However, advanced age and osteoporosis are 2 risk factors for pseudarthrosis. Kyphoplasty has been described in the treatment of lytic lesions in C-2. The authors decided to combine these 2 techniques in the treatment of unstable fractures of the odontoid. Two approximately 90-year-old patients were treated for this type of fracture. Instability was demonstrated on dynamic radiography in one patient, and the fracture was seen on static radiography in the other. Clinical parameters, pain, range of motion, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score (for the first patient), and radiological examinations (CT scans and dynamic radiographs) were studied both before and after surgery. After inflating the balloon both above and below the fracture line, the authors applied a high-viscosity polymethylmethacrylate cement. Some minor leakage of cement was noted in both cases but proved to be harmless. The screws were correctly positioned. The clinical result was excellent, both in terms of pain relief and in the fact that there was no reduction in the SF-36 score. The range of motion remained the same. A follow-up CT scan obtained 1 year later in one of the patients showed no evidence of change in the materials used, and the dynamic radiographs showed no instability. This combination of kyphoplasty and anterior screw fixation of the odontoid seems to be an interesting technique in osteoporotic Type IIB fractures of the odontoid process in the elderly, with good results both clinically and radiologically.

Pooled analysis of non-union, re-operation, infection, and approach related complications after anterior odontoid screw fixation

Background

Anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) has been one of the most popular treatments for odontoid fractures. However, the true efficacy of AOSF remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to provide the pooled rates of non-union, reoperation, infection, and approach related complications after AOSF for odontoid fractures.

Methods

We searched studies that discussed complications after AOSF for type II or type III odontoid fractures. A proportion meta-analysis was done and potential sources of heterogeneity were explored by meta-regression analysis.

Results

Of 972 references initially identified, 63 were eligible for inclusion. 54 studies provided data regarding non-union. The pooled non-union rate was 10% (95% CI: 7%–3%). 48 citations provided re-operation information with a pooled proportion of 5% (95% CI: 3%–7%). Infection was described in 20 studies with an overall rate of 0.2% (95% CI: 0%–1.2%). The main approach related complication is postoperative dysphagia with a pooled rate of 10% (95% CI: 4%–17%). Proportions for the other approach related complications such as postoperative hoarseness (1.2%, 95% CI: 0%–3.7%), esophageal/retropharyngeal injury (0%, 95% CI: 0%–1.1%), wound hematomas (0.2%, 95% CI: 0%–1.8%), and spinal cord injury (0%, 95% CI: 0%–0.2%) were very low. Significant heterogeneities were detected when we combined the rates of non-union, re-operation, and dysphagia. Multivariate meta-regression analysis showed that old age was significantly predictive of non-union. Subgroup comparisons showed significant higher non-union rates in age ≥70 than that in age ≤40 and in age 40 to <50. Meta-regression analysis did not reveal any examined variables influencing the re-operation rate. Meta-regression analysis showed age had a significant effect on the dysphagia rate.

Conclusions/Significances

This study summarized the rates of non-union, reoperation, infection, and approach related complications after AOSF for odontoid factures. Elderly patients were more likely to experience non-union and dysphagia.

Preliminary biomechanical proof of concept for a hybrid locking plate/variable pitch screw construct for anterior fixation of type II odontoid fractures

STUDY DESIGN

A human cadaveric biomechanical proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether adding a locking plate to the anterior surface of C2 attaching directly to the interfragmentary screw may reduce potential for anterior screw cutout and improve construct strength.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The most common mode of failure for screw fixation of dens fractures is via cutout at the anterior body of C2.

METHODS

A human, cadaveric model of type II dens fractures was created and fixed using either a headless, fully threaded variable pitch screw (FTVPS) or a screw with an attachable locking plate construct (LPC). Following quasistatic loading to failure, stiffness and load to failure were compared using t tests. Mode of failure was determined from radiographical and gross inspection.

RESULTS

Load to failure was greater for the LPC than for the FTVPS alone (498 N vs. 362 N, P = 0.04). The LPC consistently failed via compression of cancellous bone posterior to the lag screw, whereas the FTVPS constructs failed via cutout of the screw from the anterior C2 body.

CONCLUSION

Locking plate supplementation of anterior screw fixation of type II odontoid fractures improves construct strength and changes the failure mechanism from anterior screw cutout to posterior displacement of the screw. An attachable locking plate/interfragmentary screw construct may improve clinical outcomes for these fractures.

Anterior screw fixation of type IIB odontoid fractures in octogenarians

PURPOSE

Type IIB odontoid fractures (OF) in elderly patients are life-threatening conditions. Optimal treatment of these fractures is still controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcome of surgically treated type IIB OF by anterior screw fixation in octogenarians.

METHODS

Eleven octogenarians with type IIB OF were operated using anterior screw fixation. Follow-up assessment included operative mortality and morbidity rates, long-term functional outcome and fracture union and stability.

RESULTS

There was neither operative mortality nor morbidity. Five patients had excellent clinical outcome, two good outcome, one fair and three poor. Two patients died of unrelated causes 2 months after surgery. Radiographs showed stable bone union in four patients and stable fibrous union in five patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the results in this short series, we suggest that anterior screw fixation of Type IIB OF may be offered as primary treatment in octogenarians.

Axis fractures

BACKGROUND

Traumatic fractures of the second cervical vertebra are common, representing nearly 20% of all acute cervical spinal fracture-dislocation injuries. They are divided into 3 distinct injury patterns: odontoid fractures, hangman's fracture injuries, and fractures of the axis body, involving all other fracture injuries to the C2 vertebra.

OBJECTIVE

An evidence-based overview of the medical and surgical treatment strategies for each axis fracture injury sub-type.

RESULTS

Current medical and surgical management of traumatic fractures of the axis.

Operative versus nonoperative management of acute odontoid Type II fractures: a meta-analysis

Object

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the criteria described in the literature as the indications for surgery for acute Type II odontoid fractures.

Methods

The authors searched the PubMed database for studies in which the fusion rate of acute Type II odontoid fractures following external immobilization (halo vest or collar) or surgery (posterior C1–2 fusion or anterior screw fixation) was reported. The only studies included reported the fusion rate for either 1) groups of patients whose age was either more or less than a certain age range (45–55 years); or 2) groups of patients with a fracture displacement of either more or less than a certain odontoid fracture displacement (4–6 mm) or the direction of displacement (see Methods section of text for more details). A meta-analysis in which the random effect model was used was conducted to analyze the data.

Results

There was a statistically significantly higher fusion rate for operative management compared with external immobilization (85 vs 60%, p = 0.01) for the patients > 45–55 years. However, the overall fusion rate was > 80% for the patients whose age was < 45–55 years, regardless of treatment modality, and no significant differences were observed between surgically and nonsurgically treated patients (89 and 81%, respectively; p = 0.29). The result of operation (overall fusion rate 89%) was superior to external immobilization (44%) when the fracture was posteriorly displaced (p < 0.001), but for anteriorly displaced fractures, the results of operative and nonoperative management were identical (p = 0.15). The overall fusion rate of operative management of both anteriorly and posteriorly displaced fractures proved to be > 85%, and no statistically significant difference was observed (p = 0.50). For all degrees of displacement (either > or < 4–6 mm) the operation proved to provide significantly better results than conservative treatment. The fusion rate of conservatively treated fractures with < 4–6 mm displacement was significantly better than in fractures with > 4–6 mm displacement (76 vs 41%, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Operative treatment (posterior C1–2 fixation or anterior screw fixation) provides a better fusion rate than external immobilization for acute odontoid Type II fractures, although in certain situations, such as anterior displacement of the fracture and for younger (< 45–55 years of age) patients, conservative management (halo vest or collar immobilization) can be as effective as surgery. Operative management is recommended in older patients, in cases of posterior displacement of the fracture, and when there is displacement of > 4–6 mm.

Biomechanical comparison of a fully threaded, variable pitch screw and a partially threaded lag screw for internal fixation of Type II dens fractures

STUDY DESIGN

Stiffness and load to failure were studied in a human cadaver model of Type II odontoid fractures stabilized with either a single partially threaded lag screw and washer or a headless fully threaded variable pitch screw.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a headless fully threaded variable pitch screw provides biomechanically superior fixation of Type II odontoid fractures in comparison with a partially threaded, cannulated lag screw and washer.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical treatment of Anderson and D'Alonzo Type II odontoid fractures is often performed using a partially threaded cannulated screw and washer. Reported clinical failure rates of this construct are as high as 20%. This technique requires perforation of the cortex of the tip of the dens, placing the brainstem and vertebrobasilar circulation at risk. A headless fully threaded variable pitch screw has not been described for this application.

METHODS

A transverse osteotomy was created at the base of the dens in 16 human cadaver C2 specimens and stabilized using either a headless fully threaded variable pitch screw or a partially threaded cannulated lag screw and washer. Specimens were loaded to failure under a static, posteriorly directed force applied to the surface of the dens. Stiffness and load to failure were measured and the mode of failure for each specimen was determined.

RESULTS

Stiffness and load to failure were greater for the headless, fully threaded variable pitch screw compared with the partially threaded lag screw and washer. The mode of failure for all specimens was via anterior screw cut-out at the C2 vertebral body.

CONCLUSION

A headless, fully threaded variable pitch screw was biomechanically favorable in comparison with a partially threaded lag screw and washer in this cadaver model of Type II dens fractures. The mode of failure at the C2 vertebral body may have important implications for further improvements in construct strength.

Anterior odontoid fixation using a 4.5-mm Herbert screw: the first report of 20 consecutive cases with odontoid fracture

BACKGROUND

Anterior screw fixation provides the best anatomical and functional results for odontoid process fracture (type II and "shallow" type III) with intact transverse ligament. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of the 4.5-mm-diameter cannulated Herbert screw in the anterior odontoid fixation.

METHODS

From May 2003 to November 2005, 20 consecutive cases of types II and III odontoid process fractures were treated with anterior screw fixation using a 4.5-mm Herbert screw. The Herbert screw has double threads, with different pitches on the distal and proximal ends. It has no head, so it can be inserted through articular cartilage and buried below bone surface.

RESULTS

There were 16 male and 4 female patients whose ages ranged from 15 to 76 years (mean, 43.7 years). The fracture type was type II-A in 4 patients, II-N in 9 patients, II-P in 5 patients, and III in 2 patients. The range of follow-up was 3 to 36 months (mean, 18.6 months). There were an overall bone fusion rate in 17 cases (85%), fibrous union in 1 (5%), and nonunion in 2 (10%). Overall, complication unrelated to hardware occurred in the one (postoperative dysphagia) without complication-related hardware failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The Herbert screw is very useful in anterior fixation for types II and III odontoid process fractures. This series showed successful clinical results comparable with that of the 3.5-mm cannulated cancellous screw and distinct advantages over conventional screws in the aspect of biomechanical properties and less invasiveness.

Intraoperative adverse events and related postoperative complications in spine surgery: implications for enhancing patient safety founded on evidence-based protocols

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the incidence and clinical consequence of intraoperative adverse events from a wide variety of spinal surgical procedures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In this study, adverse events were defined as any unexpected or undesirable event(s) occurring as a result of spinal surgery. A complication was defined as a disease or disorder, which, as a consequence of a surgical procedure, will negatively affect the outcome of the patient. We hypothesized that most adverse events would not result in complications that would be normally flagged through traditional practice audit approaches. By defining the incidence and types of adverse events seen in a spine surgical practice, we hope to develop preventative approaches to enhance patient safety.

METHODS

All postoperative clinical sequelae (i.e., complications) were prospectively identified, classified as to type, and graded (0 [none] to IV [death]) in 700 consecutive patients who underwent spine surgery (excluding > 300-day surgery microdiscectomies) at a university center from January 2002 to June 2003. To confirm data accuracy and assess the clinical sequelae of any adverse events, the medical records of these 700 patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of intraoperative adverse events was 14% (98/700). A total of 23 adverse events led to postoperative clinical sequelae for an overall intraoperative complication incidence of 3.2% (23/700). Specific adverse events included dural tears (n = 58), spinal instrumentation-related events (n = 12), blood loss exceeding 5000 mL (n = 10), anesthesia/medical (n = 4), suspected or actual vertebral artery injury (n = 3), approach-related events (n = 3), esophageal/pharyngeal injury (n = 2), and miscellaneous (n = 6).

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse events can frequently occur (14%) during spinal surgery, however, the majority (76.5%) are not associated with complications. Improved patient safety can only be maximized by independent practice audit and the development of prospective methods to record adverse event data so that enhanced, evidence-based, clinical protocols can be developed.

Surgical Treatment of Acute Type II and Rostral Type III Odontoid Fractures Managed by Anterior Screw Fixation

OBJECTIVES

In the present study, the authors comment on their experience with anterior odontoid screw fixation in the management of odontoid fractures, in an attempt to further assess the safety and the efficacy of this procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive patients with reducible type II or rostral type III odontoid fractures, operated at our hospital with anterior odontoid screw fixation. Radiographic bony fusion, complications, and clinical outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

Solid bony fusion was evident in 38 (90.5%) of the patients. One mechanical instrumentation-related complication occurred, without clinical significance. No other major complications related to the procedure were noted. A satisfactory range of motion in the cervical spine was observed in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior odontoid screw fixation is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of type II and rostral type III odontoid fractures. Compliance to the specific indications and contraindications of this operation is crucial for optimal outcome.

Results of long-term follow-up in patients undergoing anterior screw fixation for type II and rostral type III odontoid fractures

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of the fusion rate of a group of 38 patients having undergone anterior screw fixation for type II and "shallow" type III odontoid fractures. OBJECTIVE.: To determine primarily the long-term fusion rate after anterior screw fixation and to study the clinical characteristics of patients that have a statistically significant or nonsignificant influence on successful outcome.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Long-term outcome of anterior screw fixation for odontoid fractures has been evaluated in very few studies. This information should be critical for further establishing this technique as a major therapeutic strategy for these cases.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients, 25 males and 13 females (with mean age 48.4 +/- 0.4 years), with type II and rostral type III odontoid fractures, underwent anterior cannulated screw fixation during a 62-month period. Radiologic examination of the cervical spine with plain radiographs was performed at 6 weeks, and 2, 6, 12, and 24 months, while computerized tomography of the upper cervical spine (C1-C3) was obtained at 6 months after surgery. Follow-up was available for 31 patients, and the follow-up time ranged from 39 to 87 months (mean 58.4).

RESULTS

Radiographic evaluation of the follow-up group showed satisfactory bony fusion and no evidence of abnormal movement at the fracture site in 27 (87.1%) patients. Pseudarthrosis developed in 4 (12.9%) patients; however, 3 (9.6%) of them without instability and 1 (3.2%) with instability. One (3.2%) patient had an instrumentation failure without instability.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, anterior odontoid screw fixation comprised a safe therapeutic modality with high stability and low mechanical failure rates during short-term and long-term follow-up.

Posterior Instrumentation Surgery for Craniocervical Junction Instabilities: an Update

The surgical treatment of craniocervical junction (CCJ) instability has recently undergone significant development and change. Posterior instrumentation surgery has been the mainstay of treatment of CCJ instability, and is the focus of this review. For the treatment of atlantoaxial instability, C1-2 transarticular screw fixation has shown good stability, and has been regarded as the "gold standard" procedure. Because of potentially hazardous complications including vertebral artery injury, however, C-1 lateral mass-C-2 pedicle screw fixation is gaining popularity. For treatment of atlantooccipital instability, occipitocervical fixation using screw constructs (combined with either rods or plates) has shown more stability than sublaminar wiring techniques, and has been utilized more frequently. Both innovation in material engineering and in vitro biomechanical studies have contributed significantly to the development of more rigid internal fixation devices, and as a result, many patients who would have been treated conservatively with external orthosis are treated nowadays with instrumentation surgery, resulting in earlier ambulation, shortened hospital stay, and earlier recovery into social activities. New surgical techniques and instruments, however, need to stand the test of time to see whether they are free from long-term adverse events. The rapid turnover of new surgical techniques and hardware has made it difficult for less experienced surgeons to keep up with the latest developments. Conventional techniques can be safer and less technically demanding than newer techniques for those who are not familiar with them.

Tratamento cirúrgico das fraturas do odontóide tipo II com parafuso anterior: análise de 15 casos

Apresentamos estudo retrospectivo dos resultados de 15 pacientes consecutivos, com fratura do odontóide tipo II P (fratura com traço oblíquo e deslocamento posterior) e II N (fratura com traço horizontal na base do odontóide), segundo a classificação de Roy-Camille , que foram submetidos a fixação anterior direta do odontóide com parafuso. A série é composta por 13 homens e 2 mulheres, com idade variando entre 14 a 74 anos e período de acompanhamento de 6 a 36 meses (média 20 meses). Tivemos apenas uma complicação relacionada com a técnica cirúrgica: um parafuso mal posicionado necessitando de uma reoperação para ser reposicionado. Não houve óbito. Não houve saída nem quebra de parafuso. Obteve-se 94% de fusão óssea. Propomos que seja utilizada a classificação de Roy-Camille na seleção dos casos cirúrgicos de fraturas do odontóide, pois ela fornece uma abordagem cirúrgica específica para cada tipo de fratura.

Isolated fractures of the axis in adults

FRACTURES OF THE ODONTOID:

STANDARDS

There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards.

GUIDELINES

Type II odontoid fractures in patients 50 years and older should be considered for surgical stabilization and fusion.

OPTIONS

Type I, Type II, and Type III fractures may be managed initially with external cervical immobilization. Type II and Type III odontoid fractures should be considered for surgical fixation in cases of dens displacement of 5 mm or more, comminution of the odontoid fracture (Type IIA), and/or inability to achieve or maintain fracture alignment with external immobilization. TRAUMATIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS OF THE AXIS (HANGMAN'S FRACTURE):

STANDARDS

There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards.

GUIDELINES

There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines.

OPTIONS

Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis may be managed initially with external immobilization in most cases. Surgical stabilization should be considered in cases of severe angulation of C2 on C3 (Francis Grade II and IV, Effendi Type II), disruption of the C2--C3 disc space (Francis Grade V, Effendi Type III), or inability to establish or maintain alignment with external immobilization. FRACTURES OF THE AXIS BODY (MISCELLANEOUS FRACTURES):

STANDARDS

There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards.

GUIDELINES

There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines.

OPTIONS

External immobilization is recommended for treatment of isolated fractures of the axis body.

Management of combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults

STANDARDS

There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards.

GUIDELINES

There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines.

OPTIONS

Treatment of atlas-axis combination fractures based primarily on the specific characteristics of the axis fracture is recommended. External immobilization of most C1--C2 combination fractures is recommended. C1--Type II odontoid combination fractures with an atlantodens interval of 5 mm or more and C1--hangman's combination fractures with C2--C3 angulation of 11 degrees or more should be considered for surgical stabilization and fusion. In some cases, the surgical technique must be modified as a result of loss of the integrity of the ring of the atlas.

Experimental investigation of failure load and fracture patterns of C2 (axis)

The injury mechanism and magnitude of failure load of C2 fractures are important in the clinical treatment of its fixation. The magnitudes of the failure load of C2 and the mechanism of injury in vivo are uncertain. Accordingly, nine C2 vertebrae obtained from cadaver spines, ranging in age from 51 to 80 years, were used for the study. Special restraint conditions were applied to yield specific fracture of C2. With the posterior element potted postero-anteriorly up to one-quarter of the inferior facet, posterior shear force ranging from 840 to 1220N was required to cause fracture across the pars interarticularis. For odontoid fracture study, a special rig was fabricated to encapsulate the body of C2 in a cell using ISOPON, and a thin layer of ISOPON sandwiched between the inferior facets and two lateral plates. The assembled rig permits slight sagittal movement of C2 about the cup lateral pivot supports. Failure load of between 900 and 1500N was recorded for odontoid fracture. These values are in agreement with published data. The experiment carried out under these two different restraint conditions had specifically resulted in different fractures of C2. In reality, depending on factors such as the inclination of this force vector applied to the head, the precise posture at the time of trauma, the spinal geometry, and the physical properties, different types of fracture patterns of C2 may be produced. This additional data will be useful in the biomechanical study of C2 vertebra using analytical approaches, and in surgical anterior/posterior fixation using screws.

Validation and use of a finite element model of C-2 for determination of stress and fracture patterns of anterior odontoid loads

OBJECT

The finite element (FE) method is a powerful tool for the analysis of stress patterns of anatomical structures. In this study a highly refined FE model of C-2 was created and validated. The model was then used to characterize stress patterns, predicted fracture patterns, and transitions between Type II and Type III odontoid fractures.

METHODS

An anatomically accurate three-dimensional model of C-2 was created from computerized tomography data obtained from the Visible Human Project. The C-2 model was broken down into an FE mesh consisting of 32,815 elements and 40,969 nodes. For validation, the FE model was constrained and loaded to simulate that used in previous biomechanical studies. The validated model was then loaded in an iterative fashion, varying the orientation of the load within the validated range. A matrix of stress plots was created for comparative analysis. Results of the validation testing closely correlated with those obtained in previous biomechanical testing. Pure extension loading produced a Type III stress pattern with maximum stress of 134 MPa. Loading at 45 degrees produced a Type II stress distribution with a maximum stress of 123 MPa. These stresses are within 3% and 11%, respectively, of the reported yield stress of cortical bone (138 MPa). In the second portion of the study, systematic variation in the orientation of the load vector revealed that higher stresses were associated with increased lateral angulation and increasing upward inclination of the load vectors. A transition from a Type III to Type II pattern occurred with lateral orientations greater than 15 degrees and with compressive loads of 45 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

The validated C-2 FE model described in this study both qualitatively and quantitatively was able to simulate the behavior of the C-2 vertebra in biomechanical testing. In this study the authors demonstrate the utility of the FE method when used in conjunction with traditional biomechanical testing.