Dual stent placement for the treatment of a persistent urine leak after partial nephrectomy

Systematic review on active treatment for urinary fistula after partial nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Urinary fistula is expected to become more frequent in urological practice as a result of expanding indication of partial nephrectomy given it's oncological results equivalent to those of radical nephrectomy but at a lower risk of progression to chronic kidney disease, lower cardiovascular morbidity, and overall mortality.

OBJECTIVES

Review and compare different techniques of contemporary active management for urinary fistula after partial nephrectomy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search on the MEDLINE database was conducted in March 2020, combining the terms: "urine leak", "urine leakage", "urinary leak" and "urinary fistula", with: "partial nephrectomy", "nephron sparing surgery" and "renal sparing surgery". This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Only articles related to active treatment were eligible. Abstracts in English and Spanish from the last two decades were screened. No restriction based on study design nor the length of follow-up.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

1) Leak resolution rate 2) Time course of leak resolution and 3) Number of interventions needed for resolution.

RESULTS

Multiple studies were found. There were no randomized controlled trials. Urinary fistula can be solved in many ways with active treatment, with a high success rate (97.5%), an average of 1.4 intervention-per-patients and a mean time for leak resolution of 11 days (median of 3 days).

CONCLUSION

There is a high risk of bias due to the study's methodology. There is a broad range of effective alternatives and various approaches to solve urinary fistula in an appropriate timing.

Isolated calyx mistaken for a cyst: inappropriately performed catheter-directed sclerotherapy and safe removal of the catheter after selective embolization

We present a case of isolated calyx that was mistaken for a large cyst. A 47-year-old woman was referred for sclerotherapy of a large cystic lesion on her left kidney. Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound showed that the cystic lesion was a large cyst. We noticed that the cystic lesion was not a typical simple cyst, even after two sessions of catheter-mediated sclerotherapy. Isolated calyx was presumed by medical history review and was confirmed by aspirated fluid analysis and far delayed-phase CT after intravenous contrast injection. We performed meticulous selective arterial embolization for an isolated calyx and inserted a catheter that could be removed without complication.

Tandem ureteral stents for the decompression of malignant and benign obstructive uropathy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utility of two ipsilateral ureteral stents placed for benign and malignant ureteral obstruction.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all cases of tandem ureteral stent (TUS) insertion at our institution from July 2007 through January 2013. Student t, Fisher exact, and log-rank test were used.

RESULTS

TUS insertion or exchange was performed in 187 cases. There were 66 patients (75 renal units) who underwent successful TUS insertion. Malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) was the cause for obstruction in 39 renal units (34 patients) vs benign ureteral obstruction (BUO) in 36 renal units (32 patients). Four patients with BUO and 15 patients with MUO underwent stent exchanges at a mean 145 and 128 days, respectively. Serum creatinine levels were stable poststent placement (P=0.4). Degree of hydronephrosis improved (paired t test P<0.03) after stent placement for both benign and malignant cohorts. TUS placement was noted to fail (flank pain with worsening hydronephrosis or increasing creatinine level) in five renal units with MUO (12.8%) and none with BUO. Stent failure (either conventional or TUS) suggested worsening survival in those with MUO. Median survival for those with MUO and a history of stent failure (10 of 14 died, 71%) was 66 days compared with 432 days for those without a history of stent failure (8 of 20 died, 40%) (log-rank test P=0.007).

CONCLUSION

Our experience with the TUS, the largest to date, demonstrated that they are highly successful in both benign and malignant causes of obstruction, comparing favorably with metallic ureteral stents. Stent failure may be predictive for shorter survival.