Quality of semen obtained by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injuries: observations and predictors

Sexual dysfunction in patients with spinal cord lesions

Many aspects of sexuality can be disrupted following a spinal cord lesion (SCL). It can alter an individual's self-esteem and body image, interfere with positioning and mobility, introduce unexpected problems with incontinence and spasticity, decrease pleasure, and delay orgasm. Sexual concerns in men can involve erectile function, essential for intercourse, ejaculation function, necessary for fertility, and the ability to reach orgasm. In women they can involve concerns with vaginal lubrication, genital congestion, and vaginal infections, which can all go unnoticed, and orgasm, which may be lost. All of these concerns must be addressed during rehabilitation as individuals with SCL continue to live an active sexual life, and consider sexuality among their top priority for quality of life. This chapter describes the impact of SCL on various phases of men's and women's sexual responses and on various aspects of sexuality. Treatments are described in terms of what is currently available and what is specific to the SCL population. New approaches in particular for women are described, along with tips from sexual counseling which consider an overall approach, taking into account the primary, secondary, and tertiary consequences of the SCL on the individual's sexuality. Throughout the chapter, attempts are made to integrate neurophysiologic knowledge, findings from the literature on SCL, and clinical experience in sexual rehabilitation.

Blessé médullaire: prise en charge en andrologie

Les réactions sexuelles sont sous contrôle neurologique. Le traumatisme vertébromédullaire altère l’organisation neurologique et génère un dysfonctionnement sexuel. Les substances pharmacologiques actuelles permettent de rétablir la fonction érectile du blessé médullaire, première étape essentielle à la réorganisation d’une vie sexuelle. Le déclenchement de l’éjaculation est souvent difficile. Les techniques de stimulation périnéale isolées ou associées au traitement pharmacologique favorisent la réalisation d’éjaculation et permettent un recueil et une conservation du sperme. La possibilité d’obtenir une éjaculation au cours des rapports sexuels, chez le blessé médullaire, reste rare et sans véritable solution thérapeutique. Malgré l’altération de la qualité du sperme, les blessés médullaires conservent une possibilité de procréation pour 40 à 60 % des couples. Le recours à des techniques d’assistance médicale à la procréation est souvent nécessaire. La prise en charge des dysfonctionnements sexuels des blessés médullaires doit être intégrée dans un programme de rééducation et de réinsertion.

Perceived physiological and orgasmic sensations at ejaculation in spinal cord injured men

INTRODUCTION

With the advances in penile vibrator stimulation (PVS), most spinal cord injured (SCI) men can self-ejaculate. Oral midodrine may further increase ejaculation success, while maintaining autonomy. Since most SCI men attempt ejaculation for sexual rather than reproductive purposes, self-ejaculation should be emphasized and sensations explored.

AIMS

Explore (i) self-ejaculation success rate in SCI men; (ii) vascular parameters indicative of autonomic dysreflexia (AD) during sexual stimulation and ejaculation; and (iii) sensations associated with ejaculation.

METHODS

Ejaculation was assessed on 81 SCI men with complete ASIA A (49%) and incomplete B to D lesions (51%), subdivided into tetraplegics (C2-T2), paraplegics sensitive to AD (T3-T6), paraplegics not sensitive to AD (T7-T10), paraplegics with lesions to the emission pathway (T11-L2), and paraplegics with lesions interrupting the emission-ejaculation pathways (L3-below). Natural stimulation was attempted first followed, if negative, by PVS followed, if again negative, by PVS combined with oral midodrine (5-25 mg).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Ejaculation success, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and perceived physiological and orgasmic sensations.

RESULTS

Overall 91% reached ejaculation, 30% with natural stimulation, 49% with PVS and 12% with midodrine plus PVS. Midodrine salvaged up to 27% depending upon the lesion. Physiological and orgasmic sensations were perceived significantly more at ejaculation than sexual stimulation. Tetraplegics did not differ from paraplegics sensitive to AD on perceived cardiovascular and muscular sensations, but perceived significantly more autonomic sensations, and generally more physiological sensations than lower lesions unsensitive to AD.

CONCLUSION

Most SCI men can self-ejaculate and perceive physiological and orgasmic sensations. The climactic experience of ejaculation seems related to AD, few sensations being reported when AD is not reached, pleasurable climactic sensations being reported when mild to moderate AD is reached, and unpleasant or painful sensations reported with severe AD. Sexual rehabilitation should emphasize self-ejaculation and self-exploration and consider cognitive reframing to maximize sexual perceptions.

Transcutaneous Mechanical Nerve Stimulation Using Perineal Vibration: A Novel Method for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

PURPOSE

We defined basic guidelines for transcutaneous mechanical nerve stimulation in modifying pelvic floor responses in women and determined the efficacy of transcutaneous mechanical nerve stimulation in treating stress urinary incontinence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Perineal and clitoral transcutaneous mechanical nerve stimulation was performed in healthy volunteers while measuring changes in peak urethral pressure to determine optimal vibration amplitude and site of stimulation. Perineal transcutaneous mechanical nerve stimulation was then performed weekly for 6 weeks in a cohort of women with stress urinary incontinence (33). Reduction in incontinence episodes and pad use on voiding diary were compared from baseline to 6 weeks. Global efficacy was determined at 6 weeks and 3 months after the completion of the program.

RESULTS

In healthy subjects a vibration amplitude of 2.0 mm resulted in the highest urethral pressure increase. Although the increase with perineal transcutaneous mechanical nerve stimulation was lower than that seen with clitoral stimulation (80 vs 115 cm H(2)O), perineal transcutaneous mechanical nerve stimulation was more acceptable to the patient and resulted in a better subjective response. Urethral pressure increases with transcutaneous mechanical nerve stimulation at either site were greater than with voluntary contraction (60 cm H(2)O). After 6 weeks of transcutaneous mechanical nerve stimulation in the subjects with stress urinary incontinence, there was a significant reduction in daily incontinence episodes (2.6 +/- 1.1 vs 0.5 +/- 1.1, paired t test p <0.001) and pad use (3.5 +/- 0.9 vs 0.6 +/- 1.3, paired t test p <0.001). At 6 weeks the cure rate (no incontinence episodes) was 73%, with durability through 3 months with 67% still reporting persistent resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Perineal transcutaneous mechanical nerve stimulation has promise as a noninvasive and well tolerated method of treating stress urinary incontinence.

Effects of repeated ejaculations on semen characteristics following spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomised controlled study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of repeated ejaculation on semen characteristics following spinal cord injury (SCI) in a prospective randomised controlled study.

SETTING

Spinal Research Centre, Stanmore, UK and Institute of Urology and Nephrology, London, UK.

METHODS

A total of 74 patients with SCI above T10 were tested by vibro-ejaculation using a Ferticare penile vibrator (Multicept A/S Horsholm, Denmark) using a standardised technique. The ejaculate was examined according to WHO protocol. The successfully vibro-ejaculated subjects (n = 32) were randomised into a study group (n = 18) and a control group (n = 14). The patients in the study group vibro-ejaculated weekly for 3 months with semen analysis performed at baseline and then monthly. The control group vibro-ejaculated at baseline and at the end of the 3-month period. Two experienced observers performed the semen analysis independently. All measures were compared for statistical significance across the two groups at the beginning and at the end of the 3-month period using a two-tailed student t-test. Significance was determined at the 95% confidence interval (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

In total, 10 patients in the study group and nine in the control group have completed the study so far. Six patients have dropped out of the study group and three from the control group for varied reasons. Two patients are currently enrolled in the study and control groups. The morphology and forward progression of sperm shows a statistically significant increase in the study group. The motility improves but is not statistically significant in the study group. No significant adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown in this unique randomised controlled study that repeated ejaculation does improve the sperm characteristics in SCI patients. It is suggested that SCI men should undergo repeated ejaculation for at least 3 months before trying intravaginal or intrauterine insemination techniques. If this fails then in vitro fertilisation can be used. This method promotes natural conception, is intimate and cost effective.

Penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation in the treatment of ejaculatory dysfunction

The purpose of this review is to present the current understanding of penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) and electroejaculation (EEJ) procedures and its clinical use in men with ejaculatory dysfunction. Unfortunately, the record of treating such individuals has been quite poor, but within recent years development and refinement of PVS and EEJ in men with spinal cord injury (SCI) has significantly enhanced the prospects for treatment of ejaculatory dysfunction. The majority of spinal cord injured men are not able to produce antegrade ejaculation by masturbation or sexual stimulation. However, approximately 80% of all spinal cord injured men with an intact ejaculatory reflex arc (above T10) can obtain antegrade ejaculation with PVS. Electroejaculation may be successful in obtaining ejaculate from men with all types of SCI, including men who do not have major components of the ejaculatory reflex arc. Because vibratory stimulation is very simple in use, non-invasive, it does not require anaesthesia and is preferred by the patients when compared with EEJ, PVS is recommended to be the first choice of treatment in spinal cord injured men. Furthermore, EEJ has been successfully used to induce ejaculation in men with multiple sclerosis and diabetic neuropathy. Any other conditions which affect the ejaculatory mechanism of the central and/or peripheral nervous system including surgical nerve injury may be treated successfully with EEJ. Finally, for sperm retrieval and sperm cryopreservation before intensive anticancer therapy in pubertal boys, PVS and EEJ have been successfully performed in patients who failed to obtain ejaculation by masturbation. Nearly all data concerning semen characteristics in men with ejaculatory dysfuntion originate from spinal cord injured men. Semen analyses demonstrate low sperm motility rates in the majority of spinal cord injured men. The data give evidence of a decline in spermatogenesis and motility of ejaculated spermatozoa shortly after (few weeks) an acute SCI. Furthermore, it is suggested that some factors in the seminal plasma and/or disordered storage of spermatozoa in the seminal vesicles are mainly responsible for the impaired semen profiles in men with chronic SCI. Home insemination with semen obtained by penile vibratory and introduced intravaginally in order to achieve successful pregnancies may be an option for some spinal cord injured men and their partners. The majority of men will further enhance their fertility potential when using either penile vibratory or EEJ combined with assisted reproduction techniques such as intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Diagnosis and treatment of ejaculatory dysfunction

The normal ejaculatory process requires complex coordination and integration of neurologic, physiologic, anatomic, and psychologic events. An understanding of these processes is critical to evaluate properly and manage patients with ejaculatory dysfunction. With the advent of improved techniques to treat patients, some men with ejaculatory dysfunction are being offered the opportunity to reproduce. Further research on the ejaculatory process and associated dysfunctional states should continue to improve treatment for patients presenting with ejaculatory disorders.

Reflexes and somatic responses as predictors of ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors in addition to level of injury (LOI) that may predict ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) in spinal cord injured males.

SETTING

Major urban medical school and teaching hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Presence of a bulbocavernosus response (BCR) and a hip flexor response (HR) before PVS (n=123 patients), and somatic responses during PVS (n=204 trials performed on a subset of 44 patients) were evaluated for their frequency of occurrence on trials with and without ejaculation.

RESULTS

Overall ejaculation success rates for cervical, T1-T6, and T7-T12 LOI were 71%, 73%, and 35%, respectively. Eighty per cent of patients who were positive for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS, while only 8% of patients who were negative for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS. For cervical injuries, BCR and HR were no more predictive of ejaculation by PVS than LOI alone. T1-T6 patients were more likely to ejaculate when at least one reflex was present. T7-T12 patients with no BCR were unlikely to ejaculate by PVS. Except for abdominal contractions, somatic responses were not present in the majority of PVS trials. When they were present, however, they occurred in a high percentage of ejaculation trials: withdrawal response (hip flexion, knee flexion and thigh adduction) (90%), piloerection (84%), extremity spasms (83%), thigh abduction (80%), and thigh adduction (72%).

CONCLUSION

We recommend that patients with cervical injuries initially undergo PVS. Patients with T1-T6 LOI with at least one reflex present, and patients with T7-T12 LOI with both reflexes, or only BCR present, may undergo PVS. Certain somatic/autonomic responses, when seen, may help in deciding whether to continue with a given trial, or give a repeat trial, of PVS.

SPONSORSHIP

The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and the State of Florida Specific Appropriations.

Sexual function in spinal cord lesioned men

STUDY DESIGN

Review of literature.

OBJECTIVE

To review the physical aspects related to penile erection, ejaculatory dysfunction, semen characteristics, and techniques for enhancement of fertility in spinal cord lesioned (SCL) men.

SETTING

Worldwide: individuals with traumatic as well as non-traumatic SCL.

RESULTS

Recommendations for management of erectile dysfunction in SCL men: If it is possible to obtain a satisfactory erection but of insufficient duration, then try to use a venous constrictor band to find out if this is sufficient to maintain the erection. Otherwise we recommend Sildenafil. If Sildenafil is not satisfactory then use intracavernous injection with prostaglandin E(1) (some SCL men may prefer cutaneous or intraurethral application). We discourage the implantation of penile prosthesis for the sole purpose of erection. Recommendations for management of ejaculatory dysfunction in SCL men: Penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) to induce ejaculation is recommended as first treatment choice. If PVS fails, SCL men should be referred for electroejaculation (EEJ). Semen characteristics: Impaired semen profiles with low motility rates are seen in the majority of SCL men. Recently reported data gives evidence of a decline in spermatogenesis and motility of ejaculated spermatozoa shortly after (few weeks) an acute SCL. It is suggested that some factors in the seminal plasma and/or disordered storage of spermatozoa in the seminal vesicles are mainly responsible for the impaired semen profiles in men with chronic SCL. Fertility: Home insemination with semen obtained by PVS and introduced intravaginally in order to achieve successful pregnancies may be an option for some SCL men and their partners. The majority of SCL men will further enhance their fertility potential when using either PVS or EEJ combined with assisted reproduction techniques such as intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Seminal vesicle aspiration in spinal cord injured men: insight into poor sperm quality

PURPOSE

In men with spinal cord injury poor quality semen is seen when performing electroejaculation and penile vibratory stimulation. We determined whether sperm stasis within the seminal vesicles is a potential cause of this problem.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seminal vesicle aspiration was performed immediately before electroejaculation or penile vibratory stimulation in men with aspermia secondary to spinal cord injury. Sperm count and quality of seminal vesicle aspiration and subsequent ejaculation were compared with historical ejaculated counts, ultrasound findings and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Mean total number of right plus left seminal vesicle sperm plus or minus standard deviation was 511 +/- 960 x 10(6). Mean total number of sperm obtained by seminal vesicle plus electroejaculation or penile vibratory stimulation was 918 +/- 1,261 x 10(6). Average motility and viability of the seminal vesicle aspirated sperm were 1.3 and 3.2%, respectively. Average motility of the ejaculated sperm was 26.4% after seminal vesicle aspiration versus 16.3% in previous ejaculation induction procedures performed in the same patients. Seminal vesicle aspirated sperm represented 66% of the total number of sperm obtained during the session and was equal to 49% of the sperm obtained at previous electroejaculation or penile vibratory stimulation sessions. The period of abstinence correlated only with ejaculate count (simple regression p = 0.009). No other clinical characteristics had any effect on sperm count or quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Large numbers of poor quality sperm are present within the seminal vesicles of spinal cord injured men and these sperm comprise a large portion of the specimens collected by electroejaculation or penile vibratory stimulation. This phenomenon is independent of the period of abstinence, implicating disordered storage of sperm due to spinal cord injury rather than infrequent ejaculation. The large number of senescent sperm within the seminal vesicles appears to be a primary cause of poor sperm quality in spinal cord injured men.

Experience with vasal sperm aspiration

PURPOSE

We describe our experience with vasal aspiration of sperm in patients with azoospermia secondary to neurogenic anejaculation or obstruction of the vas deferens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed 15 vasal sperm aspirations on 11 patients with neurogenic anejaculation or vasal obstruction.

RESULTS

Adequate sperm was obtained from all 15 aspirations with an average sperm count of 42 x 10[6] (range 0.5 to 252 x 10[6]) and an average motility of 73.4% (range 16 to 100%). Aspirations were performed for use with assisted reproductive techniques in 12 cases and for cryopreservation alone in 3. Following assisted reproductive techniques 6 of the 12 aspirations (50%) resulted in pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Vasal aspiration of sperm should be considered when electroejaculation fails, is not available or is contraindicated. Although the overall sperm quality and pregnancy rate are higher with vasal aspiration and in vitro fertilization than electroejaculation and intrauterine insemination, vasal aspiration is a more technically demanding and costly approach to conception.

Pregnancy after assisted ejaculation procedures in men with spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE

To present the results of fertility treatment in 28 men with spinal cord injury (SCI) and their partners.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

University hospital outpatient clinic and home.

PATIENTS

Twenty-eight anejaculatory men with SCI and their partners seeking treatment for infertility.

INTERVENTION

Penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation as semen retrieval methods. Assisted reproductive techniques used: vaginal self-insemination at home, intrauterine insemination, in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Ejaculation rate; sperm count and motility; pregnancy rates.

RESULTS

All of the men were able to ejaculate either by penile vibratory stimulation (79%) or electroejaculation (21%). Median total sperm count was 65 million (range, 0.1 to 480) with a median motility of 13% (range, 1% to 60%). Overall, 9 of 28 couples (32%) achieved 10 pregnancies (4 self-insemination, 3 intrauterine insemination, 1 in vitro fertilization, and 2 intracytoplasmic sperm injection).

CONCLUSIONS

An ejaculation rate of 100% was achieved using penile vibratory stimulation as a first treatment option with electroejaculation as a second option. Motivated couples with adequate semen quality may be offered penile vibratory stimulation combined with self-insemination at home. Together with intrauterine insemination or fertilization techniques used in vitro, the pregnancy rate per treatment cycle for SCI couples may approach that of natural procreation in healthy and fertile couples.