Lymphatic mapping and intraoperative lymphoscintigraphy for identifying the sentinel node in penile tumors

Systematic Review of Surgical Treatment and Outcomes After Local Surgery of Primary Cutaneous Melanomas of the Penis and Scrotum

BACKGROUND

Few data exist to guide surgical management and counseling about local recurrence after surgery of primary male genital melanoma.

OBJECTIVE

To compile all available data on local recurrence rates after surgery of primary cutaneous melanoma of the penis and scrotum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), and Web of Science identified all surgically treated penile and scrotal melanomas that reported local recurrence status and follow-up time.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-seven melanomas from 74 manuscripts were included. Eighty-six percent of melanomas were located on the penis, and 14% were located on the scrotum. Average follow-up time was 35.7 months. Scrotal melanomas were predominantly treated with organ-sparing surgeries (16/18, 88.9%), whereas penile melanomas were treated more often with amputation (61/109, 56.0%). Overall, local recurrence rate was 15.7% (20/127). Local recurrence rates for penile cases were 18.8% (9/48) after organ-sparing surgery versus 13.1% (8/61) for amputative surgery. Local recurrence rates were 66.7% (4/6) after positive surgical margins versus 10.2% (5/49) after negative surgical margins.

CONCLUSION

Local recurrence rates are high after both organ-sparing and amputative surgery of primary cutaneous melanoma of the penis and scrotum. There is a need to standardize reporting for this rare tumor, as more complete data are necessary to develop consensus guidelines for surgical management of male genital melanoma.

Prepubic Sentinel Node Location in Penile Carcinoma

An unusual sentinel node location in a patient with penile carcinoma is described. The preoperative lymphoscintigram showed a prepubic sentinel node. The node could be harvested during surgery. This case illustrates one of the advantages of lymphatic mapping in penile carcinoma: preoperative lymphoscintigraphy can identify lymph nodes outside the usual nodal basins.

Penile Carcinoma (pT1 G2): Surveillance or Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection?

BACKGROUND

Due to the low incidence of squamous cell penile cancer and lack of well-designed studies, controversies persist over the therapeutic approach in patients with pT1 G2 carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1992 and 2003, 16 patients with T1 squamous penile cancer were treated in our institution either by surveillance or by inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND).

RESULTS

A total of 8 primary lesions were classified as pT1 G2 carcinoma with 4 tumors developing early or delayed inguinal metastatic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The natural behavior of pT1 G2 squamous penile carcinoma and its metastatic potential has been underestimated in recent literature. Since morbidity after early ILND has markedly decreased and its superiority over delayed ILND has been shown, we advocate the early modified inguinal lymph node dissection until strong prognostic factors for positive inguinal lymph nodes have been validated.

Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma: evaluation of 10 years experience

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of 10 years dynamic sentinel node biopsy experience in penile carcinoma at our institute.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

140 patients with clinically node-negative groins were prospectively included. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed after injection of 99mTechnetium-nanocolloid around the primary tumour. The sentinel node was intraoperatively identified with the aid of patent blue dye and a gamma ray detection probe. Lymph node dissection was performed only if sentinel node metastasis was found. Median follow-up was 52 months (range 5-129).

RESULTS

Lymphoscintigraphy visualized at least 1 sentinel node in 138 patients. Sentinel node metastasis was found in 37 inguinal regions of 31 patients. The sentinel node was the only tumour-positive node in 78% (29/37) of the dissection specimens. Complications occurred in 8% (17/206) of the operated groins. False-negative results were encountered in 6 patients resulting in a false-negative rate of 16% (6/37 patients). 5-year disease-specific survival was 96% and 66% for patients with a tumour-negative sentinel node and tumour-positive sentinel node, respectively (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma is of important diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic value at the cost of only minor morbidity.

Advanced penile carcinoma

PURPOSE

In the United States penile carcinoma is an uncommon malignancy that represents only 0.4% of all male malignancies and 2% to 4% of genitourinary malignancies. Of penile cancer cases 30% are diagnosed with advanced disease. Improved understanding of the natural history, appropriate and accurate staging, and tailored, less morbid lymphadenectomy have led to improved survival and decreased the adverse effects of therapy. However, the management of advanced penile carcinoma remains a challenge to urological, medical and radiation oncologists. The rarity and paucity of well designed clinical studies of medical and/or surgical therapy for advanced penile cancer have hampered progress in the treatment of this disease. However, there is clear evidence that identifies active chemotherapy and radiation treatments. This review aims to provide the treating physician with an overview of available data for surgical, chemotherapeutic and radiation treatments, and provide guidelines for appropriate patient selection for these therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a detailed review of the available literature regarding advanced penile carcinoma to include its etiology, epidemiology, natural history, staging classification and treatment.

RESULTS

Penile carcinoma typically spreads along an echelon of nodal pathways that permits fairly accurate staging. Prognosis correlates well with clinical nodal status and grade, and the TNM classification developed by the UICC should be uniformly used by clinicians. Treatment recommendations are tightly associated with disease stage. Although tailored lymphadenectomy as currently recommended has greatly decreased morbidity, improved staging accuracy and improved treatment results, controversies still exist regarding the need for lymphadenectomy in patients with impalpable lymph node (cN0) disease, and the role and timing of pelvic lymphadenectomy. There is evidence of modest activity for chemotherapy in advanced penile carcinoma. Active agents include cisplatin, bleomycin and methotrexate. Combination chemotherapy regimens with promising activity and toxicity profiles include cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, and vincristine, bleomycin and methotrexate. Radiation in combination with surgery and/or chemotherapy in advanced disease have also demonstrated activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The natural history of penile carcinoma and its proclivity to spread via regional lymphatics has been well defined. This understanding has led to the development of effective locoregional treatment strategies. Penile carcinoma is sensitive to radiation and certain chemotherapeutic agents. A threshold volume of nodal metastases is associated with significant mortality. The optimal application of these strategies remains to be determined. Improvements in survival and quality of life likely require the incorporation of multiple modalities into the treatment of advanced penile carcinoma. A multi-institutional, international effort is essential to perform appropriately powered clinical trials to advance the standard of care in this rare disease.

Dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer: reliability of a staging technique

PURPOSE

We determine the value of dynamic sentinel node biopsy for staging squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 90 patients with clinically node negative penile cancer were prospectively entered in this study. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed after intradermal injection of 99mtechnetium nanocolloid around the primary tumor. The sentinel node was intraoperatively identified with the aid of intradermal administered patent blue dye and a gamma ray detection probe. Histopathological examination of sentinel nodes included serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining. Regional lymph node dissection was performed only if metastasis was found in a sentinel node. Median followup was 36 months (range 5 to 95).

RESULTS

Lymphoscintigraphy visualized 217 sentinel nodes in 159 inguinal regions of 88 patients. A total of 208 sentinel nodes were intraoperatively identified in 149 inguinal regions of 88 patients. Sentinel node metastasis was found in 19 inguinal regions of 18 patients. Four of 8 patients with unilateral clinical stage N1 disease had a tumor positive sentinel node on the opposite site. Regional recurrence after excision of a tumor negative sentinel node or after nonvisualization was seen in 5 patients, resulting in a false-negative rate of 22% (5 of 23). The 3-year disease specific survival was 98% and 71% for patients with a tumor negative or tumor positive sentinel node, respectively (p = 0.0018).

CONCLUSIONS

Occult lymph node metastases in penile cancer can be detected with a sensitivity of about 80% by dynamic sentinel node biopsy, including preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, vital dye and a gamma ray detection probe.

Dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer: reliability of a staging technique

PURPOSE

We determine the value of dynamic sentinel node biopsy for staging squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 90 patients with clinically node negative penile cancer were prospectively entered in this study. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed after intradermal injection of 99mtechnetium nanocolloid around the primary tumor. The sentinel node was intraoperatively identified with the aid of intradermal administered patent blue dye and a gamma ray detection probe. Histopathological examination of sentinel nodes included serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining. Regional lymph node dissection was performed only if metastasis was found in a sentinel node. Median followup was 36 months (range 5 to 95).

RESULTS

Lymphoscintigraphy visualized 217 sentinel nodes in 159 inguinal regions of 88 patients. A total of 208 sentinel nodes were intraoperatively identified in 149 inguinal regions of 88 patients. Sentinel node metastasis was found in 19 inguinal regions of 18 patients. Four of 8 patients with unilateral clinical stage N1 disease had a tumor positive sentinel node on the opposite site. Regional recurrence after excision of a tumor negative sentinel node or after nonvisualization was seen in 5 patients, resulting in a false-negative rate of 22% (5 of 23). The 3-year disease specific survival was 98% and 71% for patients with a tumor negative or tumor positive sentinel node, respectively (p = 0.0018).

CONCLUSIONS

Occult lymph node metastases in penile cancer can be detected with a sensitivity of about 80% by dynamic sentinel node biopsy, including preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, vital dye and a gamma ray detection probe.

[Usefulness of the dynamic sentinel node technique in patients with penile carcinoma]

OBJECTIVE

To explain and analyse when and how to use the new staging technique used in patients with squamous carcinoma of the penis, through the procedure of dynamic biopsy of the sentinel lymph node.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We demonstrate the technical application of the dynamic biopsy of the sentinel lymph node, in a 40-year-old patient, diagnosed as suffering from squamous carcinoma of the penis. We use preoperative lymphatic visualization through lymphogammagraphy, together with intraoperative detection through gamma scanning, in order to detect and identify the sentinel lymph node.

CONCLUSIONS

We consider the dynamic biopsy of the sentinel node by the individual pattern of the lymphatic drainage as a new applicable Nuclear Medicina technique. It is an extremely useful technique in order to achieve early dissemination, by allowing us to identify patients with sub-clinic lymphatic spread, who will be candidates to regional lymphatic dissection.