A case of ovarian cancer with remote metastases, with emphasis on changes in tumor marker values

The Combination of CA125 and NSE Is Useful for Predicting Liver Metastasis of Lung Cancer

Purpose

Liver metastasis is the final stage of cancer progression and is associated with poor prognosis. Although numerous indicators have been identified as having prognostic value for lung cancer and liver metastasis, liver metastases are still not diagnosed by imaging in many patients. To provide a more accurate method for clinical prediction of liver metastasis, we analyzed multiple factors to identify potential predictive factors for liver metastasis of lung cancer.

Methods

Patients first diagnosed with lung cancer between 2002 and 2016 (n = 1746) were divided into two groups, with and without liver metastasis. Serum concentrations of calcium, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen-125 (CA125), cancer antigen-153 (CA153), carbohydrate antigen-199 (CA199), cytokeratin fraction 21-1 (CYFRA21-1), total prostate-specific antigen (TPSA), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were analyzed in both patient groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in age or sex between the two groups. CA125 and NSE were significantly associated with liver metastasis. Compared with CA125, NSE was more specific, while it was less sensitive (P < 0.001). Further analysis of NSE concentrations was conducted in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and indicated that NSE concentration differed significantly between those with and without liver metastasis (P = 0.023). We conducted analysis with NSE and CA125 combined, resulting in acceptable sensitivity (51.2%), specificity (72.6%), and area under the curve (0.64) values; sensitivity and area under the curve values were higher than those for individual factors, while specificity was higher than that for CA125.

Conclusions

The combination of CA125 and NSE can assist prediction of liver metastasis of lung cancer, providing improved diagnostic accuracy.

Rare Distant Metastatic Disease of Ovarian and Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Review of the Literature

Background: Although metastases of ovarian and peritoneal carcinomatosis are most commonly found within the peritoneal cavity, there is a number of other rare distant sites that have been reported. Our goal is to provide an evidence-based summary of the available literature considering the rare distant metastatic sites of ovarian and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted, with Medline/PubMed being searched for cases of rare metastatic disease originated from primary ovarian and peritoneal cancer with related articles up to 2019 including terms such as "ovarian cancer", "metastases", "peritoneal" and others. Results: The most common mechanism of ovarian cancer metastases consists of primarily dissemination within the peritoneal cavity, while, rare and distant sites can either occur at the beginning or during the course of the disease and they are usually associated with hematogenous route and lymphatic invasion, having poor prognosis, with the least common sites being skin, bone, CNS, eye, placenta, central airways, rare lymph nodes, intra-abdominal organs, heart and breast. Conclusions: The occurrence of metastatic sites described in this review represents the most common rare distant metastatic sites, and even though their patterns of metastases are still not fully clarified due to the rarity of the reports, they offer valuable information considering the pathophysiology of the disease.

Brain metastases of epithelial ovarian carcinoma responding to cisplatin and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Brain represents a rare site of metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC).

CASE REPORT

We observed a case of multiple brain metastases in an EOC patient after complete response of a pelvic recurrence to platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy. Complete response of brain metastases was observed after whole brain radiotherapy and subsequent chemotherapy by combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine. Three subsequent recurrences of brain metastases were controlled by re-treatment by the combination of 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and gemcitabine.

METHODS

Because of limited information on the outcome of EOC brain metastases in reported case series, a pooled analysis of the published reports in patients with EOC brain metastases was performed. Data were extracted from 46 reports that contained sufficient details on 189 individual patients. The survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by the log-rank test and Cox method, respectively.

RESULTS

The most favorable outcome was observed in patients treated by surgery combined with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. The survival was significantly better in reports describing only one or two cases, in patients diagnosed after 1992, in patients who received therapy in addition to symptomatic treatment, in patients treated by radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery, in patients without extracranial metastases and with single brain metastases. On multivariate analysis, the absence of extracranial metastases, treatment by chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy were independent positive predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

EOC brain metastases are responsive to chemotherapy. An aggressive multidisciplinary therapeutic approach including chemotherapy may lead to prolonged survival.