1
|
Pombo Antunes AR, Scheyltjens I, Lodi F, Messiaen J, Antoranz A, Duerinck J, Kancheva D, Martens L, De Vlaminck K, Van Hove H, Kjølner Hansen SS, Bosisio FM, Van der Borght K, De Vleeschouwer S, Sciot R, Bouwens L, Verfaillie M, Vandamme N, Vandenbroucke RE, De Wever O, Saeys Y, Guilliams M, Gysemans C, Neyns B, De Smet F, Lambrechts D, Van Ginderachter JA, Movahedi K. Single-cell profiling of myeloid cells in glioblastoma across species and disease stage reveals macrophage competition and specialization. Nat Neurosci 2021; 24:595-610. [PMID: 33782623 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-020-00789-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 266] [Impact Index Per Article: 88.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Glioblastomas are aggressive primary brain cancers that recur as therapy-resistant tumors. Myeloid cells control glioblastoma malignancy, but their dynamics during disease progression remain poorly understood. Here, we employed single-cell RNA sequencing and CITE-seq to map the glioblastoma immune landscape in mouse tumors and in patients with newly diagnosed disease or recurrence. This revealed a large and diverse myeloid compartment, with dendritic cell and macrophage populations that were conserved across species and dynamic across disease stages. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) consisted of microglia- or monocyte-derived populations, with both exhibiting additional heterogeneity, including subsets with conserved lipid and hypoxic signatures. Microglia- and monocyte-derived TAMs were self-renewing populations that competed for space and could be depleted via CSF1R blockade. Microglia-derived TAMs were predominant in newly diagnosed tumors, but were outnumbered by monocyte-derived TAMs following recurrence, especially in hypoxic tumor environments. Our results unravel the glioblastoma myeloid landscape and provide a framework for future therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Rita Pombo Antunes
- Myeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.,Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Scheyltjens
- Myeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.,Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Francesca Lodi
- Laboratory of Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,VIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Julie Messiaen
- Laboratory for Precision Cancer Medicine, Translational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Asier Antoranz
- Laboratory for Precision Cancer Medicine, Translational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Liesbet Martens
- Laboratory of Myeloid Cell Ontogeny and Functional Specialization, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Laboratory of Myeloid Cell Heterogeneity and Function, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Karen De Vlaminck
- Myeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.,Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hannah Van Hove
- Myeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.,Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Signe Schmidt Kjølner Hansen
- Myeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.,Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Francesca Maria Bosisio
- Translational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Steven De Vleeschouwer
- Department of Neurosurgery, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory for Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, Department of Neurosciences and Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raf Sciot
- Translational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Luc Bouwens
- Cell Differentiation Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michiel Verfaillie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Europe Hospitals Saint Elisabeth, Ukkel, Belgium
| | - Niels Vandamme
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Roosmarijn E Vandenbroucke
- VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Gent, Belgium.,Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Olivier De Wever
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Laboratory for Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Yvan Saeys
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Martin Guilliams
- Laboratory of Myeloid Cell Ontogeny and Functional Specialization, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Conny Gysemans
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology (CEE), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frederik De Smet
- Laboratory for Precision Cancer Medicine, Translational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Laboratory of Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,VIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jo A Van Ginderachter
- Myeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.,Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kiavash Movahedi
- Myeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium. .,Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marschallinger J, Iram T, Zardeneta M, Lee SE, Lehallier B, Haney MS, Pluvinage JV, Mathur V, Hahn O, Morgens DW, Kim J, Tevini J, Felder TK, Wolinski H, Bertozzi CR, Bassik MC, Aigner L, Wyss-Coray T. Lipid-droplet-accumulating microglia represent a dysfunctional and proinflammatory state in the aging brain. Nat Neurosci 2020; 23:194-208. [PMID: 31959936 PMCID: PMC7595134 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0566-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 482] [Impact Index Per Article: 120.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Microglia become progressively activated and seemingly dysfunctional with age, and genetic studies have linked these cells to the pathogenesis of a growing number of neurodegenerative diseases. Here we report a striking buildup of lipid droplets in microglia with aging in mouse and human brains. These cells, which we call 'lipid-droplet-accumulating microglia' (LDAM), are defective in phagocytosis, produce high levels of reactive oxygen species and secrete proinflammatory cytokines. RNA-sequencing analysis of LDAM revealed a transcriptional profile driven by innate inflammation that is distinct from previously reported microglial states. An unbiased CRISPR-Cas9 screen identified genetic modifiers of lipid droplet formation; surprisingly, variants of several of these genes, including progranulin (GRN), are causes of autosomal-dominant forms of human neurodegenerative diseases. We therefore propose that LDAM contribute to age-related and genetic forms of neurodegeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Marschallinger
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Institute of Molecular Regenerative Medicine, Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center Salzburg (SCI-TReCS), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Tal Iram
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Macy Zardeneta
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Song E Lee
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Benoit Lehallier
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael S Haney
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, and Chemistry, Engineering, and Medicine for Human Health (ChEM-H), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - John V Pluvinage
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Medical Scientist Training Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Vidhu Mathur
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Oliver Hahn
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Paul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - David W Morgens
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, and Chemistry, Engineering, and Medicine for Human Health (ChEM-H), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Justin Kim
- Department of Chemistry, Stanford ChEM-H and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Julia Tevini
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Thomas K Felder
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.,Obesity Research Unit, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Heimo Wolinski
- Institute of Molecular Biosciences, BioTechMed-Graz, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Carolyn R Bertozzi
- Department of Chemistry, Stanford ChEM-H and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael C Bassik
- Institute of Molecular Regenerative Medicine, Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center Salzburg (SCI-TReCS), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.,Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, and Chemistry, Engineering, and Medicine for Human Health (ChEM-H), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ludwig Aigner
- Institute of Molecular Regenerative Medicine, Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center Salzburg (SCI-TReCS), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Tony Wyss-Coray
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. .,Paul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. .,Stanford Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. .,Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ruben FL. Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccines in Children. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38:678-88. [PMID: 14986252 DOI: 10.1086/382883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2003] [Accepted: 12/06/2003] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Healthy children aged < or =2 years have hospitalization rates during influenza periods 12 times those of older children and comparable to rates in the elderly population. In 2003, killed influenza vaccines were "recommended" for children with high-risk conditions and were "encouraged" for children aged 6-23 months. Studies involving several thousand children show that split-virus vaccines are safe and immunogenic in healthy children aged > or =6 months and in high-risk children. In children aged < or =9 years, 2 doses of vaccine are required initially to achieve maximum protection. Studies of children aged 6 months to 15 years show vaccine efficacies of 31%-91% against influenza A and 45% against influenza B. Among children attending day care, a reduction in the rate of acute otitis media of 32%-36% was demonstrated. Studies suggest that use of killed vaccines among children is cost-saving. In conclusion, the data show that killed influenza vaccines in children are safe, immunogenic, effective, and potentially cost-saving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederick L Ruben
- Scientific and Medical Affairs, Aventis Pasteur, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania 18370, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deliyannis G, Jackson DC, Dyer W, Bates J, Coulter A, Harling-McNabb L, Brown LE. Immunopotentiation of humoral and cellular responses to inactivated influenza vaccines by two different adjuvants with potential for human use. Vaccine 1998; 16:2058-68. [PMID: 9796065 DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(98)00080-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Two quite different adjuvants, currently under development for use in humans, have been examined for their effects on the magnitude and type of immunity elicited in response to inactivated influenza vaccine. Immunostimulating complexes (ISCOM adjuvant) contain the saponin ISCOPREP 703, and SPT is an oil-in-water emulsion of squalane, non-ionic block copolymer (L121) and Tween 80. Influenza virus vaccines formulated in either adjuvant were far superior to the non-adjuvanted aqueous vaccine in eliciting antibody and T-cell responses in mice, particularly at lower doses of antigen. In addition, the vaccines containing adjuvant were superior in eliciting protective immunity. One of the shortcomings of the unadjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine was its inability to elicit a primary proliferative T-cell response. However, after one dose of either adjuvanted vaccine, strong proliferative responses were achieved. We also show that subcutaneous vaccination with inactivated vaccines is capable of modulating the isotype profile of antibody secreting cells generated in the lungs of mice in response to intranasal challenge with live virus. In this system, the isotype of antibody elicited after challenge of mice that had received ISCOM vaccine more closely mimicked that of animals vaccinated with live virus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Deliyannis
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Admon D, Engelhard D, Strauss N, Goldman N, Zakay-Rones Z. Antibody response to influenza immunization in patients after heart transplantation. Vaccine 1997; 15:1518-22. [PMID: 9330462 DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(97)00193-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate post-heart transplantation (Htx) response to two-dose and three-dose influenza vaccine. Hemagglutination inhibition antibodies were monitored in HTx recipients immunized twice (n = 25) or three times (n = 17), and non-HTx controls (n = 8) once, with inactivated influenza vaccine. Post-first dose protective antibody titers (> or = 1:40) were demonstrated in 9/25 (36%) for A/Singapore/ (H1N1), 5/25 (20%) for A/Shanghai/(H3N2) and 2/25 (8%) for B/Yamagata compared with 4/8 (50%), 6/8 (75%) and 2/8 (25%), respectively, for controls. Post-second dose protective titers remained low, increasing following the third dose to 71%, 65% and 29%, respectively. The abnormally low antibody responses of HTx recipients to one-dose and two-dose influenza vaccine can be overcome by a third dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Admon
- Department of Cardiology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Potter CW, Jennings R, Ali MJ, Wood JM, Dunleavy U, Tyrrell DA. Sequential infection or immunization of ferrets with a series of influenza A (H3N2) strains (report to the Medical Research Council's Sub-Committee on influenza Vaccines (CDVIP/IV)). Epidemiol Infect 1987; 99:501-15. [PMID: 3315713 PMCID: PMC2249279 DOI: 10.1017/s095026880006800x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Previous studies of boys at Christ's Hospital school have indicated that annual immunization with influenza virus vaccines did not significantly reduce the total incidence of influenza infection compared to unimmunized subjects. In view of the implications of this result, a similar study was conducted in ferrets to clarify these findings. Groups of ferrets were immunized or infected with a series of influenza A (H3N2) viruses over an 18-month period, and the immunity to subsequent live virus challenge was measured after each virus or vaccine exposure. The results indicated that live virus infection gave a more solid immunity than immunization with inactivated vaccine; and the serum haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody response was greater following immunization than following infection. In addition, differences in immunity could not be explained by measurements of cross-reacting and specific antibody, since the incidence of these antibodies was similar in both infected and immunized animals. The results do not suggest an explanation for the different levels of immunity induced following infection or immunization or the results obtained from the Christ's Hospital study. However, the relative contribution of various immune responses to virus or virus antigen is discussed, and it is suggested that the difference in immunity may lie in the ability of live virus infection to stimulate local antibody.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mancini DA, do Nascimento EM, Tavares VR, Lucchiari MA, Prado JA, Soares MA. [Inactivated vaccine against trivalent influenza. Comparative study of the immune response by hemagglutination inhibition and simple radial hemolysis methods]. Rev Saude Publica 1985; 19:438-43. [PMID: 3915399 DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89101985000500007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
A vacina inativada contra gripe, trivalente, preparada no Instituto Butantan, contendo 200 unidades hemaglutinantes de cada uma das cepas de virus Influenza A/SP/1/80 (H3N2), A/SP/1/78 (H1N1) e B/England/847/73, foi administrada em 110 voluntários humanos adultos, sendo que 62 receberam uma dose de vacina e 48 duas doses, com intervalo de 21 dias. A resposta de anticorpos específicos para influenza foi analisada comparativamente pelos testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação (IH) e Hemólise Radial Simples (HRS). Ocorreu aumento significativo do teor de anticorpos nos indivíduos vacinados, correspondente a um aumento de 4 vezes ou mais nos títulos obtidos pelo teste IH e a um aumento de 3,0 mm ou maior no diâmetro das zonas de hemólise pelo teste HRS. Os métodos demonstraram correlação satisfatória entre si.
Collapse
|