POSTOPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT FOR PEDIATRIC UROLOGIC SURGERY

Epidural insertion height for ureteric reimplant surgery; does location matter?

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of vesicoureteric reflux through ureteric reimplantation is a common, highly successful treatment. Postoperative pain can be severe and may relate to somatic wound pain from the lower abdominal incision or from visceral bladder spasm pain.

AIM

To conduct a prospective quality improvement audit to compare four perioperative analgesic techniques.

METHODS

Observational data were collected on 217 patients following open ureteroneocystostomy over 5 days. The patients were split into four groups: (i) 'morphine' infusion; (ii) 'caudal'-single-shot caudal; (iii) 'epidural'-epidural catheter inserted at T10-L2 given a bolus, followed by an infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 μg·ml(-1) ; (iv) 'caudal catheter'-caudal placed epidural catheter was treated similar to the epidural catheter. Data regarding postoperative analgesic interventions were recorded. Intravesical pethidine was used for bladder spasm pain and i.v. morphine for wound pain.

RESULTS

Over the study period, the caudal catheter technique (mean interventions/patient = 1.8 ± 2.6) and the single-shot caudal (6.1 ± 4) needed significantly less bladder spasm interventions than morphine (9.2 ± 4) and epidural (8.0 ± 4.4) patients. For wound pain, the caudal catheter (8.8 ± 3.3) and epidural groups (11.4 ± 3.2) needed significantly less interventions than morphine (16.1 ± 3) and caudal (15.3 ± 3.3) patients. Overall, caudal catheter patients on average required about half the number of pain interventions and were associated with less high nursing workload.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite some limitations in data collection and study design, the caudal catheter technique was superior at reducing pain interventions, particularly bladder spasm interventions. Overall epidural analgesia was not superior to a single-shot caudal followed by opioid infusion. The issue of bladder spasm may be similar to the phenomenon of sacral sparing in obstetric epidural anesthesia. Thus, regional techniques, such as caudal epidural, targeting a better balance between sacral and lumber nerves are required.

Additional to caudal bupivacaine preemptive oral ibuprofen does not improve postoperative pain, nausea or vomiting, and resumption of normal activities in children after ambulatory pediatric urologic surgery

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the possible advantage of administration of preemptive oral ibuprofen in children after ambulatory pediatric urologic surgery such as penile surgery (circumcision and hypospadias repair) and inguinal surgery (communicating hydrocele and orchidopexy), a study was performed on the experience of postoperative pain, nausea or vomiting, and resumption of normal activities such as normal sleep and play activity. In addition, this study has validated a method of measurement of pain and resumption of normal activities in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 66 prepubertal boys (0-12 years) underwent an ambulatory pediatric urological intervention. One hour prior to surgery, the experimental group received 10 mg/kg oral ibuprofen along with their usual premedication (<8 years midazolam 0.5 mg/kg PO or rectal; >8 years or >30 kg alprazolam 0.5 mg, 0.25-0.5 mg PO), whereas the children of the control group received only the usual premedication. Anesthesia was achieved with Sevorane (Sevoflurane) inhalation induction (Sevoflurane 8% in 50% N(2)O/50% O(2)) and a locoregional caudal block (0.5-1.0 ml/kg levobupivacaine 0.25% with a maximum of 30 ml). Immediate postoperative pain was assessed by the child, the parents and a single observer using the Faces Pain Scale and the CHEOPS behavioral scale (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale). Vomiting and nausea were also assessed. On the first and second postoperative day the same variables were evaluated by the child and the parents, as well as quality of sleep and play, and need for pain medication.

RESULTS

No difference in the experience of pain was found at any point after the operation between the experimental and control groups; moreover, the consumption of pain medication postoperatively did not differ between the two groups. There was also no difference in the incidence of vomiting and nausea in the hospital or at home (p>0.05). The method for measuring pain and normal activities was validated as the assessments of the parents, children and the investigators were concordant throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Children who received preoperative oral ibuprofen (10 mg/kg) did not experience less pain or less nausea and vomiting, and did not show a better pattern of sleep and play up to 2 days after ambulatory pediatric urologic surgery than children who did not receive this medication.

Pain management in the pediatric intensive care unit

Control of pain in the pediatric intensive care unit has become increasingly important to intensivists. Improved understanding of the pharmacology of analgesics and the development of new techniques for analgesic administration have greatly enhanced the ability of intensivists to successfully manage patients in pain. The appropriate selection, use, and techniques for administration of analgesics in the treatment of pain in pediatric patients are discussed.