Abdominal Wall Complications

Abdominal wall complications: An unknown aspect of morbidity in phalloplasty. A comprehensive analysis and clinical implications

BACKGROUND

Phalloplasty is a complex reconstructive procedure with complications broadly categorized as urinary, vascular, or donor-site related. This study investigates abdominal wall complications, such as bulging and lateral hernias, associated with the use of the inferior epigastric artery as the recipient vessel in microsurgical phalloplasty-a rare and underreported complication.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on 37 patients who underwent microsurgical phalloplasty at a university hospital from January 2016 to February 2020. The most commonly employed technique was forearm flap phalloplasty, followed by the MSLD flap technique. The inferior epigastric artery was accessed via a 7cm oblique incision. Data collected included demographic details, BMI, smoking status, surgical technique, recipient vessel used, and postoperative complications. Follow-up evaluations were performed at 15 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of the 37 patients, the mean age was 33 years, with 84% undergoing phalloplasty for gender affirmation. Abdominal wall complications occurred in 11% of patients (n=4). Three patients developed parietal complications (hernia or bulging), all requiring surgical revision. All three were smokers, one had a BMI>28, and none had prior abdominal surgeries. Contributing factors included musculoaponeurotic disruption, relative denervation from vessel exposure, and smoking-related wound healing impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the inferior epigastric artery in microsurgical phalloplasty may increase the risk of abdominal wall complications, particularly in smokers and patients with elevated BMI. Optimizing preoperative risk factors, including smoking cessation and careful vessel selection, is essential for reducing these complications. To reduce the occurrence of these complications, the choice of the recipient vessel should be considered alongside the surgical technique during operative planning. Further studies should explore technical refinements to minimize abdominal wall morbidity.

Prevention of Abdominal Bulging Using Onlay Dermal Autografts from Discarded Zone IV TRAM Flap Tissue

While the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap is a popular option for abdominal-based breast reconstruction, abdominal wall morbidities such as bulging or hernia remain a concern. Here, we introduced a surgical technique for reinforcing the abdominal wall using an onlay autograft obtained from discarded zone IV tissue following a primary closure. We compared abdominal wall morbidities between patients receiving an onlay graft and those receiving primary closure only. We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of patients who underwent breast reconstruction using a TRAM flap between December 2018 and May 2021. Additionally, we assessed donor-site morbidities based on physical examination. Of the 79 patients included, 38 had received a dermal graft and 41 had not. Donor-site morbidities occurred in 10 (24.5%) and 1 (2.6%) patients, and bulging occurred in 8 (19.5%) and 1 (2.6%) patients in the primary closure and dermal autograft groups, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the incidence of bulging was observed between the groups (p = 0.030). In conclusion, the introduction of a dermal autograft after primary closure can successfully ameliorate morbidities at the TRAM flap site.

Muscle-sparing pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction: Combining benefits of both worlds

Background:

Breast reconstruction plays a vital role in the restoration of form post-mastectomy. Autologous breast reconstructions using both free as well as pedicled flaps form the bulk of the breast reconstruction in our centre.

Objective:

This study seeks to evaluate the muscle-sparing modification of the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps against conventional transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps, in an attempt to marry the benefits of both and minimise the drawbacks of each technique.

Patients and methods:

A retrospective analysis of 20 women, 10 of whom had undergone unilateral immediate breast reconstruction with pedicled MS-TRAM flaps after skin-sparing mastectomy (MS group), and 10 who had undergone the conventional pedicled TRAM flap (control group) by the same surgeon (S. Ho) over a two-year period from 2013 to 2015 was performed. Patients’ records were reviewed, assessing patient demographics including age, smoking status and evaluating the operative time, time to ambulation, length of hospital stay, pain scores and abdominal bulge rates.

Results:

Mean operative time was not significantly longer in the MS group. Pain scores were lower in the MS group. The length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the two groups. Abdominal bulge rates at 24 months postoperatively were 0% in the MS group patients and 10% in the control group.

Conclusion

The pedicled MS-TRAM flap is an excellent breast reconstruction option that is comparable to the conventional TRAM flap. It preserves innervated muscle in the donor site that reduces time to ambulation and postoperative pain. It does not add significantly to surgical time and does not require microvascular anastomosis.

Donor-Site Complications and Remnant of Rectus Abdominis Muscle Status after Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Reconstruction

Background:

Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction after mastectomy in breast cancer patients has become one of the milestones in breast reconstruction. There are several techniques that have been used in an attempt to minimize untoward complications. We present the whole muscle with partial sheath-sparing technique that focuses on the anatomy of arcuate line and the closure of the anterior abdominal wall techniques with mesh and determine factors associated with its complications and outcomes.

Methods:

We retrospectively and prospectively review the results of 30 pedicled TRAM flaps that were performed between November 2013 and March 2016, focusing on outcomes and complications.

Results:

Among the 30 pedicled TRAM flap procedures in 30 patients, there were complications in 5 patients (17%). Most common complications were surgical-site infection (7%). After a median follow-up time of 15 months, no patient developed abdominal wall hernia or bulging in daily activities in our study, but 6 patients (20%) had asymptomatic abdominal wall bulging when exercised. Significant factors related to asymptomatic exercised abdominal wall bulging included having a body mass index of more than 23 kg/m².

Conclusion:

Pedicled TRAM flap by using the technique of the whole muscle with partial sheath-sparing technique combined with reinforcement above the arcuate line with mesh can reduce the occurrence of abdominal bulging and hernia.

Technique for Minimizing Donor-site Morbidity after Pedicled TRAM-Flap Breast Reconstruction: Outcomes by a Single Surgeon's Experience

Background:

Breast reconstruction with pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap can result in significant abdominal wall donor-site morbidity. We present our technique of transversely dividing the anterior fascia and rectus abdominis combined with reinforcement above the arcuate line for closure of the anterior abdominal wall defect to prevent contour deformities performed by a single senior surgeon and compare these results with those of our prior series.

Methods:

We described our new technique of closure of the abdominal wall defect and retrospectively performed the comparison between the results of pedicled TRAM flaps using the new closure technique and those of 420 pedicled TRAM flaps from our 2003 publication in terms of abdominal bulging and hernia.

Results:

Sixty-seven pedicled TRAM flaps in 65 patients were compared with 420 pedicled TRAM flaps of the 2003 series. The new technique was associated with 5 partial TRAM flap necroses (8%). There was no total flap loss with the new technique. The median follow-up period was 13 months (range, 4–36 months). There were no instances of abdominal hernia and bulge during follow-up in the new series. Compared with the previous 2003 series, the new technique was superior in terms of occurrence of abdominal wall hernia or bulging.

Conclusions:

We are still performing pedicled TRAM flap for autologous breast reconstruction. Using the technique of transversely dividing the anterior fascia and rectus abdominis combined with reinforcement above the arcuate line can reduce the occurrence of abdominal bulging and hernia.

Histology of the rectus abdominis muscle in rats subjected to cranial and caudal devascularization

PURPOSE: To investigate the microscopic changes in the rectus abdominis muscle in rats subjected to five delay procedure. METHODS: 30 male holtzmann rats, weighting between 250 and 350 grams, were used. The animals were divided into five groups (n=6): A - cranial section of the right muscle; B - caudal section of the right muscle; C - craniocaudal section of the right muscle; D - cranial section reflecting the right muscle in the craniocaudal direction; E - caudal section reflecting the right muscle in the caudocranial direction. On the seventh day after surgery, a resection of the cranial and caudal fragments of the right and left muscles, respectively, was performed for microscopic analysis. Histological alterations were quantified and the right and left (control) muscle fragments compared. Fisher's exact test was used for statistical purposes with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: The comparison between right and left muscles showed statistically significant differences in group A - inflammatory infiltrate in the cranial fragment (p=0.015); in group C - inflammatory infiltrate (p=0.000) and necrosis (p=0.015) in the caudal fragment; and in group E - edema in the caudal fragment (p=0.000). No significant alterations were noted in groups B and D. CONCLUSIONS: Irrigation exclusively through the perforating muscle vessels is inappropriate; irrigation exclusively through the cranial pedicle causes milder, insignificant histological alterations, when compared with irrigation exclusively through the caudal pedicle; irrigation exclusively through the caudal pedicle causes more pronounced, but still insignificant, histological alterations when compared with other forms of devascularization.

Extended mesh repair with external oblique muscle reinforcement for abdominal wall contour abnormalities following TRAM flap

Many patients undergoing reconstructive surgery after mastectomy opt for reconstruction with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap. Among the morbidities related to TRAM flap reconstruction is the development of abdominal wall contour abnormalities, including bulges or hernias. Several repair techniques at the flap abdominal wall donor site have been described for use at the time of flap harvest in an attempt to reduce the risk of such abdominal wall complications. For patients that develop abdominal wall contour abnormalities, numerous reconstructive options have been reported, with mixed results. Ten patients were identified as having abdominal wall contour abnormalities after a TRAM flap and underwent an extended mesh repair with external oblique muscle reinforcement. The mesh was secured to the bony landmarks of the lower abdomen and the abdominal wall fascia. All patients achieved complete resolution of abdominal wall bulging. In the follow-up period, no recurrences, infections, or seromas were noted. One patient, who failed an earlier repair at the inferior abdominal wall, reported symptoms consistent with a scar neuroma. Symptoms were treated successfully with gabapentin and a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. We propose a novel and reliable method of lower abdominal wall reconstruction for patients with post-TRAM flap abdominal wall contour abnormalities. This technique incorporates the use of a large Marlex mesh reinforced with bilateral external oblique muscle flaps. We report a series of 10 patients who have achieved resolution of their symptoms and have regained a natural, flat-appearing abdominal wall contour.

MOC-PS(SM) CME article: lower extremity reconstruction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the evaluation of a patient with a lower extremity wound. 2. Determine when an attempt at wound salvage is likely to be successful. 3. Select an appropriate technique for wound management. 4. Anticipate and identify wound complications.

SUMMARY

Successful management of a patient's wound at or distal to the knee includes accurate site assessment, meticulous debridement, planning, and execution of a reasonable operative procedure. Outlining a reconstructive plan requires consideration of alternatives from basic to most complex, then selection of the simplest technique likely to achieve wound closure with minimal donor-site morbidity. Healing by secondary intention, with or without vacuum-assisted closure, demands few surgical resources. A skin graft may close a well-vascularized wound. A local skin, fasciocutaneus, or muscle flap can provide vascularized tissue to an otherwise ischemic area. A plastic surgeon may use free tissue transfer in the more difficult anatomic regions, particularly for defects of the distal one-third of the lower leg. Other issues demand consideration when treating a patient with a lower extremity wound. Anesthetic options range from none in the case of secondary intention healing, through prolonged general anesthesia in the circumstance of free tissue transfer. Early recognition of a complication makes successful treatment of that problem more rapid and more likely to be successful. Accurate CPT coding ensures appropriate reimbursement for the reconstructive surgeon and fairness to the payer. Finally, some wounds are so extensive and patients so ill from related or unrelated pathologic processes that attempts at reconstruction are ill advised. These patients are better served by early amputation and prompt rehabilitation.

Secondary Operations of the Anterior Abdominal Wall following Microvascular Breast Reconstruction with the TRAM and DIEP Flaps

BACKGROUND

Secondary operations of the anterior abdominal wall following breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps are sometimes performed to improve outcome. The purpose of this study was to review a single surgeon's experience with secondary abdominal wall operations following breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps.

METHODS

Over a 7-year period, 330 women had microvascular breast reconstruction using abdominal flaps. Indications for secondary abdominal operations that were considered necessary included bulge, abdominal skin necrosis (wound), hematoma, neuroma, and seroma. Indications that were considered elective included lateral dog-ear scars and lipodystrophy. Mean follow-up time was 40 months (range, 3 to 84 months).

RESULTS

Secondary abdominal operations were performed in 59 women (17.9 percent). The cumulative number of indications was 64. The indications were considered necessary in 33 women (10 percent) and elective in 31 women (9.4 percent). Lower abdominal bulge was the most common necessary indication and was repaired in 9.3 percent of free TRAM flaps and 4.7 percent of DIEP flaps. Dog-ear scars were the most common elective indication and were revised in 29 women (8.8 percent). Neuromas of the anterior abdominal wall were diagnosed in three women (0.9 percent). Secondary procedures for indications with a low frequency included skin necrosis (n = 3), hematoma (n = 3), seroma (n = 1), and lipodystrophy (n = 2).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of secondary procedures of the abdominal wall following microvascular breast reconstruction using abdominal flaps approximates 20 percent, with an equal distribution between necessary and elective procedures. Women considering breast reconstruction using a free TRAM or DIEP flap should be advised of these statistics.

The Efficacy of Bilateral Lower Abdominal Free Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

In large-breasted women, those with midline abdominal scars, or those with scant abdominal tissue, a unipedicled lower abdominal flap may be insufficient for breast reconstruction. In these circumstances, bipedicled flaps may best satisfy the reconstructive requirements, but outcomes with bilateral free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction are generally lacking.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients in whom two vascular pedicles/flaps were used to simultaneously reconstruct a single breast was used to assess operative outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty patients (80 flaps) for whom two free tissue transfers were used to simultaneously reconstruct a single breast were identified. The majority of patients had a native breast cup size of C or larger. The flaps used included the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap (n = 29; 36 percent), the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap (n = 9; 11 percent), the muscle-sparing TRAM flap (n = 15; 19 percent), and the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap (n = 27; 34 percent). Flaps were paired in a variety of configurations, most commonly using a muscle-sparing TRAM flap in conjunction with a DIEP flap or an SIEA flap. Recipient vessels included a combination of the internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels and the pedicles of combined flaps (turbocharged). There were no flap losses. Two flaps required reexploration for microsurgical anastomotic revision, and both were successfully salvaged. Isolated fat necrosis was encountered in only three of 80 flaps.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that bilateral, bipedicled, abdominal free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction can be used safely with a high degree of success. These combined flaps provide for enhanced vascular perfusion of the lower abdominal flap territory, allowing for harvest of larger volumes of tissue for reconstruction.

The pedicled TRAM flap in breast reconstruction

The pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap remains a viable option in breast reconstruction. This article documents the history of the TRAM flap and puts in context the vascular anatomy through a discussion of the vascular zones. Options for flap delay are discussed and an algorithm is presented for patient selection. Finally, the issue of unipedicle versus bipedicle flap harvest is discussed and complications are examined.

Vaginal reconstruction: An algorithm approach to defect classification and flap reconstruction

Vaginal defects from oncologic resection present a complex array of reconstructive challenges. Increased use of adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy demands uncomplicated wound healing. As patients are being diagnosed at earlier stages of disease and at younger ages, maintenance of sexual function and body image are fundamental goals. This review provides an algorithm approach to defect classification and flap reconstruction. Carefully appreciation of the specific defect facilitates flap choice. There are two basic defect types partial (Type I) and circumferential defects (Type II) 1. These defect types can be further subclassified. Type IA defects are partial and involve the anterior and/or lateral wall. Type IB defects are also partial, but involve the posterior vaginal wall. Type IIA defects are circumferential, involving the upper two-thirds of the vagina. Type IIB defects represent circumferential, total vaginal resection, most commonly following pelvic exenteration. Using this method of defect classification, three pedicled flaps can be used to successfully reconstruct the majority of defects: the Singapore (or pudendal thigh) flap, the rectus flap, and the gracilis flap. With appropriate flap choice and a multidisciplinary approach to patient care, rapid wound healing, restoration of the pelvic floor, and re-establishment of sexual function may be most reliably achieved.

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction

This study examined 758 deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction, with respect to risk factors and associated complications. Risk factors that demonstrated significant association with any breast or abdominal complication included smoking (p = 0.0000), postreconstruction radiotherapy (p = 0.0000), and hypertension (p = 0.0370). Ninety-eight flaps (12.9 percent) developed fat necrosis. Associated risk factors were smoking (p = 0.0226) and postreconstruction radiotherapy (p = 0.0000). Interestingly, as the number of perforators increased, so did the incidence of fat necrosis. There were only 19 cases (2.5 percent) of partial flap loss and four cases (0.5 percent) of total flap loss. Patients with 45 flaps (5.9 percent) were returned to the operating room before the second-stage procedure. Patients with 29 flaps (3.8 percent) were returned to the operating room because of venous congestion. Venous congestion and any complication were observed to be statistically unrelated to the number of venous anastomoses. Overall, postoperative abdominal hernia or bulge occurred after only five reconstructions (0.7 percent). Complication rates in this large series were comparable to those in retrospective reviews of pedicle and free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps. Previous studies of the free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap described breast complication rates ranging from 8 to 13 percent and abdominal complication rates ranging from 0 to 82 percent. It was noted that, with experience in microsurgical techniques and perforator selection, the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap offers distinct advantages to patients, in terms of decreased donor-site morbidity and shorter recovery periods. Mastery of this flap provides reconstructive surgeons with more extensive options for the treatment of postmastectomy patients.

Drains and seromas in TRAM flap breast reconstruction

Surgeons who perform transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps have differing opinions about how many drains are required in the breast and abdomen to prevent seroma. The authors therefore decided to review their experience to determine whether the number of drains influenced the incidence of seroma. All patients who underwent breast reconstruction using TRAM or deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from January 1, 1995 to June 20, 2000 and whose charts could be retrieved were included in the study. The number of drains used was correlated with the presence or absence of seroma and wound infection in both the abdomen and the breast. Significance was analyzed using the Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. There were 608 patients and 768 reconstructive procedures in this series (160 reconstructions were bilateral). Of patients who had only one drain in the abdomen, seroma developed in 9 patients (7.1%), whereas of those having two drains in the abdomen, seroma developed in only 10 patients (2.1%) (p = 0.006). Also, of patients who had only one drain in the breast, seroma developed in the breast in 47 patients (9.1%), and in those with two drains, seroma developed in only 11 patients (4.3%) (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in the infection rate in either the breast or the abdomen, although the trends favored a lower infection risk when two drains were used. The authors found that using two drains in both the abdomen and the breast can reduce the risk for seroma without increasing the risk for infection. This study supports the use of two drains in both the breast (one each beneath the TRAM flap and in the axilla) and abdomen (beneath the abdominoplasty flap) for patients undergoing breast reconstruction using the TRAM flap.

Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction: a multifactorial analysis

Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction occur with all methods of flap elevation and include lower and upper abdominal laxity, epigastric fullness, and hernia. This study is a retrospective analysis of 101 women comparing the many variables that may contribute to an abnormal contour. Statistical analysis comparing the free, pedicled, unilateral, bilateral, muscle-sparing, and non-muscle-sparing flaps was completed using logistic regression. Associated factors, including diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, use of mesh, and prior abdominal operations, were incorporated. Abnormal abdominal contour was present in 13 of 101 women and included 16 specific abnormalities. These included upper abdominal bulge in three women, lower abdominal bulge in eight, and epigastric fullness in five. No woman developed a hernia. Bifactorial analysis demonstrated a significant increase in abnormal contour for the pedicled, bilateral, and non-muscle-sparing TRAM groups when compared with their countervariable groups (free, unilateral, and muscle-sparing TRAM, respectively; p < 0.05). Multifactorial analysis demonstrated a significant increase in abnormal contour in two subgroups (p < 0.05). An analysis of associated factors demonstrated a significant increase in abnormal contour for the bilateral TRAM in the presence of a prior lower midline incision (p < 0.05).

Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: the role of muscle preservation

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps are related to the harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle. Abdominal contour was analyzed in 155 women who had breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps; 108 women had free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flaps, 37 had pedicled TRAM flaps, and 10 had deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. The reconstruction was unilateral in 110 women and bilateral in 45 women. Three methods of muscle-sparing were used; they are classified as preservation of the lateral muscle, preservation of the medial and lateral muscle, or preservation of the entire muscle. One of these three methods of muscle-sparing was used in 91 women (59 percent) and no muscle-sparing was used in 64 women (41 percent). Postoperative contour abnormalities occurred in 15 woman and included epigastric fullness in five, upper bulge in three, and lower bulge in 10. One woman experienced two abnormalities, one woman experienced three, and no woman developed a hernia. Of these abnormalities, 11 occurred after the free TRAM flap, seven after the pedicled TRAM flap, and none after the DIEP flap. Bilateral reconstruction resulted in 11 abnormalities in nine women, and unilateral reconstruction resulted in seven abnormalities in six women. chi2 analysis of the free and pedicled TRAM flaps demonstrates that muscle-sparing explains the observed differences in upper bulge and upper fullness (p = 0.02), with a trend toward significance for lower bulge (p = 0.06). chi2 analysis of the free TRAM and DIEP flaps does not explain the observed difference in abnormal abdominal contour. Analysis of muscle-sparing and non-muscle-sparing methods demonstrates that the observed difference between the techniques is only explained for a lower bulge after the bilateral free TRAM flap (p = 0.04).