Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns.
Dent Mater 2005;
21:445-53. [PMID:
15826701 DOI:
10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.009]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2003] [Revised: 06/01/2004] [Accepted: 07/13/2004] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate microleakage and marginal gaps in full cast crown restorations bonded with six different types of cementing agents.
METHODS
Sixty non-carious human premolars and molars were prepared in a standardized manner for full cast crown restorations. The mesial and distal margins were located in dentin, while the vestibular and palatal/lingual margins were located in enamel. Crowns were made from a high-gold alloy using a standardized technique. The specimens were randomized to six groups of cementing agents: one zinc-phosphate cement (Harvard cement), one conventional glass-ionomer cement (Fuji I), one resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (Fuji Plus), two standard resin cements (RelyX ARC, Panavia F), and one self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem). After 4 weeks of storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C, the specimens were subjected to 5000 thermocycles ranging from 5 to 55 degrees C. Then, they were placed in a silver nitrate solution, embedded in resin blocks, and vertically cut in buccolingual and mesiodistal direction. Subsequently, the objects were evaluated for microleakage and marginal gap using a high-resolution digital microscope camera.
RESULTS
A number of inter-group differences were statistically significant. RelyX Unicem showed the smallest degree of microleakage both in enamel and in dentin. Panavia F und RelyX Unicem were associated with significantly larger marginal gaps than all other cementing agents. No association was observed between microleakage and marginal gap other than a weak direct correlation when using Harvard cement on enamel.
SIGNIFICANCE
The cementing agents investigated revealed different sealing abilities. These differences were not associated with specific types of materials.
Collapse