Nomenclature for COX-2 inhibitors

"Azole" as privileged heterocycle for targeting the inducible cyclooxygenase enzyme

An over-expression of COX-2 isoenzyme belonging to the Cyclooxygenase Enzyme Family triggers the overproduction of pro-inflammatory prostaglandins that instigate the development of chronic inflammation and related disorders. Hence, the rationally designed drugs for mitigating over-activity of COX-2 isoenzyme play a regulatory role toward the alleviation of the progression of these disorders. However, a selective COX-2 inhibition chemotherapy prompts several side effects that necessitate the identification of novel molecular scaffolds for deliberating state-of-the-art drug designing strategies. The heterocyclic "azole" scaffold, being polar and hydrophilic, possesses remarkable physicochemical advantages for designing physiologically active molecules capable of interacting with a wide range of biological components, including enzymes, peptides, and metabolites. The substituted derivatives of azole nuclei enable a comprehensive SAR analysis for the appraisal of bioactive profile of the deliberated molecules for obtaining the rationally designed compounds with prominent activities. The comprehensive SAR analysis readily prompted the identification of Y-shaped molecules and the eminence of bulkier group for COX-2 selective inhibition. This review presents an epigrammatic collation of the pharmacophore-profile of the chemotherapeutics based on azole motif for a selective targeting of the COX-2 isoenzyme.

Virtual Screening of Novel Hybrid Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs): Exploring Multiple Targeted Cancer Therapy by an In Silico Approach

Background:

Dual-targeting/Multi-targeting of oncoproteins by a single drug molecule represents an efficient, logical and alternative approach to drug combinations. In silico methods are useful tool for the search and design of selective multi-target agents.

Objective:

The objective of the present study was to design new hybrid compounds by linking the main structural unit of the NSAIDs with the benzothiazole and thiadiazole ring and to discover new hybrid NSAIDs as multi targeted anticancer agents through in silico approach.

Method:

Structure-based virtual screening was performed by applying ADMET filtration and Glide docking using Virtual screening Workflow. The docking studies were performed on three different types of receptors TNF-α, COX-II and protein kinase. Bioactivity prediction of screened compounds were done using Molinspiration online software tool.

Results:

Out of 54 designed compounds eighteen were screened on the basis of binding affinity on various receptors and ADMET filtration. Bioactivity prediction reveals that screened compounds may act through kinase inhibition or enzyme inhibition. Compounds 2sa, 5sa, 6sa and 7sa shows higher binding affinity with all three receptors.

Conclusion:

The study concluded that compound 2sa, 5sa, 6sa, and 7sa could be further explored for multiple targeted cancer therapy.

The Promise of Prostaglandins: Have They Fulfilled Their Potential as Therapeutic Targets for the Delay of Preterm Birth?

OBJECTIVE

The elucidation some 30 years ago by Sir Mont Liggins that the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-placental axis in fetal sheep led to elevated maternal prostaglandin (PG) concentrations and the initiation of labor provided hope that targeting PG synthesis or action would lead to effective tocolysis and lowering of the human preterm birth rate. This was the "promise of PGs."

METHODS AND RESULTS

Although early trials showed that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which inhibit PG H synthase (PGHS), delayed preterm birth by 48 hours, other trials revealed an association between NSAIDs and adverse fetal effects, including oligohydramnios, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). Hope was revived when studies in the mid 1990s demonstrated that much of the PGs synthesized by intrauterine tissues at preterm labor were derived from the inducible isoenzyme PGHS-2. Unfortunately, administration of specific PGHS-2 inhibitors led to the same adverse fetal effects displayed by the mixed PGHS-1 and -2 NSAIDs, causing interest in the promise of PGs to wane. This led to the development of new strategies for specific PG inhibition or antagonism. One of these is the application of a specific PGF2alpha receptor blocker, Theratechnologies (THG)113.31. THG113.31 decreases the in vitro contractile activity of mouse, sheep, and human myometrium in response to exogenous PGF2alpha, delays lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced preterm birth in mice, and lowers uterine electromyographic activity and delays preterm birth in sheep administered RU486. There have been no observable maternal or fetal side effects with its use.

CONCLUSION

By developing new strategies based on other therapeutic targets, the promise of PGs may once again offer hope for delaying preterm birth.

Lectin from Abelmoschus esculentus reduces zymosan-induced temporomandibular joint inflammatory hypernociception in rats via heme oxygenase-1 pathway integrity and tnf-α and il-1β suppression

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders show inflammatory components, heavily impacting on quality of life. Abelmoschus esculentus is largely cultivated in Northeastern Brazil for medicinal purposes, having it shown anti-inflammatory activity. We evaluated A. esculentus lectin (AEL) efficacy in reducing zymosan-induced temporomandibular joint inflammatory hypernociception in rats along with the mechanism of action through which it exerts anti-inflammatory activity. Animals were pre-treated with AEL (0.01, 0.1 or 1mg/kg) before zymosan (Zy) injection in the TMJ to determine anti-inflammatory activity. To analyse the possible effect of the hemeoxygenase-1 (HO-1) and the nitric oxide (NO) pathways on AEL efficacy, animals were pre-treated with ZnPP-IX (3mg/kg), a specific HO-1 inhibitor, or aminoguanidine (30mg/kg), a selective iNOS inhibitor, before AEL administration. Von Frey test evaluated inflammatory hypernociception, synovial fluid collection was performed to determine leukocyte counting and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity 6h after Zy injection, and Evans Blue extravasation determined vascular permeability. TMJ tissue was collected for histopathological analysis (H&E) and immunohistochemistry (TNF-α, IL-1β, HO-1). In addition, TMJ tissue and trigeminal ganglion collection was performed for TNF-α and IL-1β dosage (ELISA). AEL increased inflammatory nociceptive threshold, reduced leukocyte influx along with MPO activity, leukocyte influx into the synovial membrane, and Evans Blue extravasation. It promoted HO-1 overexpression whilst decreased TNF-α and IL-1β expression in the TMJ tissue. AEL reduced TNF-α and IL-1β levels in TMJ tissue and trigeminal ganglion. AEL effects, however, were not observed in the presence of ZnPP-IX. These findings suggest that AEL efficacy depends on TNF-α/IL-1β inhibition and HO-1 pathway integrity.

Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide-biliverdin pathway may be involved in the antinociceptive activity of etoricoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor

The aim of this study was to assess the interaction between the heme oxygenase-1/ biliverdin/carbon monoxide (HO-1/BVD/CO) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) pathways in the writhing test. Mice were pretreated with 0.1, 1 or 10 mg/kg, ip etoricoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, or with one of the following HO-1/BVD/CO pathway modulators: 1, 3 or 9 mg/kg, sc ZnPP IX, a specific HO-1 inhibitor, 0.3, 1 or 3 mg/kg, sc hemin, a substrate of the HO-1/BVD/CO pathway; or 0.00025, 0.025 or 2.5 μmol/kg, sc DMDC, a CO donor. Mice pretreated with etoricoxib or one of the HO-1/BVD/CO pathway modulators received an injection of acetic acid (ip) after 30 and 60 min, respectively. Next, the number of writhes was quantified between 0 and 30 min after stimulus injection. In another series of experiments, ineffective doses of etoricoxib were co-administered with hemin or DMDC and an effective dose of etoricoxib with ZnPP IX, followed by an acetic acid injection. Four hours after the acetic acid injection, levels of bilirubin, which is a product of BVD conversion by the BVD reductase enzyme, in the peritoneal lavage were determined. Hemin or DMDC reduced (p<0.05) the number of writhes, but ZnPP IX potentiated (p<0.05) the effect of acetic acid by increasing (p < 0.05) the number of writhes. The co-administration of etoricoxib with hemin or DMDC reduced (p<0.05) the number of writhes. However, the analgesic effect of etoricoxib was not observed in the presence of ZnPP IX. Pretreatment with ZnPP IX reduced bilirubin levels, but etoricoxib pretreatment significantly increased the bilirubin concentration in peritoneal exudates. The data obtained from these experiments showed that the HO-1/BVD/CO pathway was activated in the acetic acid-induced abdominal writhing model. The analgesic effect of etoricoxib was at least partially dependent on the participation of the HO-1/BVD/CO pathway.

Prescriber adoption of newly approved selective COX-2 inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

There is no consistent definition of prescribers who adopt new drug treatments early. This study examines if COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) were prescribed by subsets of practitioners and describes GP adoption patterns of coxibs and existing NSAIDs over time.

METHODS

A population-based drug utilisation study using a Dutch medication claims database. Prescribers of patients (18+yrs) prescribed an NSAID January 1999-December 2003 were identified. Four NSAID categories were chosen reflecting selectivity (coxibs, preferential COX-2 inhibitors and non-selective (ns) NSAIDs (sub-categorised as first or second line treatment)). The characteristics of prescribers issuing>10 prescriptions examined were: Type (GP, Specialist, Other); GP NSAID prescribing preference ratio (nsNSAIDs/coxib first prescription); coxib (ratio<3); prescriber proportion responsible for 100%, 80% and 50% of initiations. Odds Ratios (95%CI) were calculated (first-line nsNSAIDs as reference). Plots of prescribing proportions by quarter year were examined.

RESULTS

NSAID cohorts comprised: first-line ns (N=38783); second-line ns (N=1459); COX-2 preferential (N=3107); coxib (N=4202) patients. For all four cohorts, GPs were the most common prescriber type (>67%); the most frequent prescribing preference was for first-line nsNSAIDs; 50% percentile prescribing proportions were low (<9%). GPs were equally as likely to prescribe coxibs as first-line nsNSAIDs [OR 1.0 (0.9, 1.1)]. Plots of 100% prescriber proportion for first-line nsNSAIDs and coxibs showed convergence; 50th percentile prescriber proportions plots were constant.

CONCLUSIONS

Small subsets of prescribers accounted for the majority of initiations regardless of NSAID type. Further studies are needed on such prescribers to inform healthcare policies and encourage participation in post-marketing safety studies.

Comparative inhibitory activity of etoricoxib, celecoxib, and diclofenac on COX-2 versus COX-1 in healthy subjects

We determined cyclo-oxygenase-1 and cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibition in healthy middle-aged subjects (41-65 years) randomly assigned to four 7-day treatment sequences of etoricoxib 90 mg every day, celecoxib 200 mg twice a day, diclofenac 75 mg twice a day, or placebo in a double-blind, randomized, 4-period crossover study. Maximum inhibition of thromboxane B(2) (cyclo-oxygenase-1 activity) in clotting whole blood on day 7 (0-24 hours postdose) was the primary endpoint. Inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-induced prostaglandin E(2) in whole blood (cyclo-oxygenase-2 activity) was assessed on day 7 (0-24 hours postdose) as a secondary endpoint. Diclofenac had significantly greater maximum inhibition of thromboxane B(2) versus each comparator (P < .001); placebo 2.4% (95% confidence interval: -8.7% to 12.3%), diclofenac 92.2% (91.4% to 92.9%), etoricoxib 15.5% (6.6% to 23.5%), and celecoxib 20.2% (11.5% to 28.1%). Prostaglandin E(2) synthesis was inhibited with a rank order of potency of diclofenac > etoricoxib > celecoxib. In summary, at doses commonly used in rheumatoid arthritis, diclofenac significantly inhibits both cyclo-oxygenase-1 and cyclo-oxygenase-2, whereas etoricoxib and celecoxib significantly inhibit cyclo-oxygenase-2 and do not substantially inhibit cyclo-oxygenase-1.

COX isoforms in the cardiovascular system: understanding the activities of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit the formation of prostanoids by the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX). Work in the past 15 years has shown that COX exists in two forms: COX1, which is largely associated with physiological functions, and COX2, which is largely associated with pathological functions. Heated debate followed the introduction of selective COX2 inhibitors around 5 years ago: do these drugs offer any advantages over the traditional NSAIDs theywere meant to replace, particularly in regard to gastrointestinal and cardiovascular side effects? Here we discuss the evidence and the latest recommendations for the use of selective inhibitors of COX2 as well as the traditional NSAIDs.

Non-COX-2 targets and cancer: Expanding the molecular target repertoire of chemoprevention

Chemoprevention represents a highly promising approach for the control of cancer. That nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) prevent colon and other cancers has led to novel approaches to cancer prevention. The known inhibitory effect of NSAIDs on the eicosanoid pathway prompted mechanistic and drug development work focusing on cyclooxygenase (COX), culminating in clinical trials of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors for cancer prevention or treatment. However, two COX-2 inhibitors have been withdrawn due to side effects. Here we review several pathways of the eicosanoid cascade that are relevant to cancer; summarize the evidence regarding the role of COX-2 as a target for cancer prevention; and discuss several of the molecular targets that may mediate the chemopreventive effect of NSAIDs. The clinically modest results obtained to date with COX-2 specific inhibitors used in cancer prevention; the multiple COX-2-independent targets of both NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors; and the limitations of some COX-2 inhibitors indicate that exploiting these (non-COX-2) molecular targets will likely yield effective new approaches for cancer chemoprevention.

An overview of the recent developments in analytical methodologies for determination of COX-2 inhibitors in bulk drugs, pharmaceuticals and biological matrices

An extensive survey of the literature published in various analytical and pharmaceutical chemistry related journals has been conducted and the instrumental analytical methods which were developed and used for determination of COX-2 inhibitors in bulk drugs, formulations and biological fluids have been reviewed. This review covers the time period from 1995 to 2004 during which 138 analytical methods including all types of spectrophotometric and chromatographic techniques were reported. HPLC with UV detection was found to be the technique of choice for many workers and more than 100 methods were based on LC and UV. A critical analysis of the reported data has been carried out and the present state-of-art of the analytical techniques for determination of celecoxib, rofecoxib, etoricoxib, etodolac, nimesulide and meloxicam has been discussed.

Cancer prevention: a new era beyond cyclooxygenase-2

The seminal epidemiological observation that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) prevent colon and possibly other cancers has spurred novel approaches to cancer prevention. The known inhibitory effect of NSAIDs on the eicosanoid pathway prompted studies focusing on cyclooxygenase (COX) and its products. The increased prostaglandin E2 levels and the overexpression of COX-2 in colon and many other cancers provided the rationale for clinical trials with COX-2 inhibitors for cancer prevention or treatment. Their efficacy in the prevention of sporadic colon and other cancers remains unknown; one COX-2 inhibitor has been withdrawn because of side effects, and there are concerns about whether these effects are class-specific. There is evidence to suggest that COX-2 may not be the only or ideal eicosanoid pathway target for cancer prevention. Six sets of observations support this notion: the relatively late induction of COX-2 during carcinogenesis; the finding that NSAIDs may not require inhibition of COX-2 for their effect; the modest effect of coxibs in cancer prevention; that currently available coxibs have multiple non-COX-2 effects that may account for at least some of their efficacy; the possibility that concurrent inhibition of COX-2 in non-neoplastic cells may be harmful; and the possibility that COX-2 inhibition may modulate alternative eicosanoid pathways in a way that promotes carcinogenesis. Given the limitations of COX-2-specific inhibitors and the biological evidence mentioned above, we suggest that targets other than COX-2 should be pursued as alternative or complementary approaches to cancer prevention.

[Pharmacology and classification of cyclooxygenase inhibitors]

The discovery of at least two cyclooxygenase (COX) isoenzymes had two major consequences: i) to give a new impetus to the research on lipid metabolism, giving rise to the crystallization of these peculiar membrane enzymes, the characterization of their active sites and their gene regulation, and the identification of new metabolic pathways; ii) the development of new NSAIDs aimed to have an improved safety profile, the coxibs. These drugs are defined by their COX-2 selectivity which is supported by a negligible inhibitory potency on platelet COX-1 in vitro and ex vivo after oral intake of maximal therapeutic doses. However, the coxibs marketed in France (celecoxib, rofecoxib, parecoxib) are not equivalent in terms of selectivity and some drugs developed by pharmaceutical companies (etoricoxib, lumiracoxib) will be even more selective for COX-2. These "new" coxibs are the final step in the theory of COX-2 selectivity and they will probably be helpful to better define the limitations of the therapeutic concept based on a selective inhibition of this iso-enzyme.

Prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthase inhibitors and other tocolytics in preterm labour

Preterm delivery (<37 weeks of gestation) is the major obstetrical complication in developed countries, yet attempts to delay labour and prolong pregnancy have largely been unsuccessful. One of the many reasons it is so difficult to prevent preterm birth is that the nature of preterm labour changes as a function of gestational age, maternal lifestyle factors or infection, to list a few of the reasons. The inhibitors of prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthase (PGHS), known as the Non-steroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs, have been viewed with interest as tocolytics with promising effectiveness under most conditions of preterm labour. Three isoforms of PGHS exist; the first two, PGHS-1 and -2, have been studied for their catalytic activity, X-ray crystallographic structure, and physiological roles in the adult and the foetus. Mixed inhibitors and isoform-specific inhibitors of PGHS have been developed, and their roles in delaying preterm labour are examined and compared to other tocolytics.

The second generation of COX-2 inhibitors: what advantages do the newest offer?

The discovery of two cyclooxygenase (COX)-isoenzymes, a constitutive COX-1, serving homeostatic prostanoid synthesis, and an inducible COX-2, responsible for proinflammatory prostanoid production, led to the development of new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), the selective COX-2 inhibitors, promising minimal NSAID-typical toxicity with full anti-inflammatory efficacy. So far, the strategy of selective COX-2 inhibition has been successful. Selective COX-2 inhibitors have significantly less gastrotoxicity and no effects on platelet aggregation. However, with regard to renal adverse events, selective COX-2 inhibitors do not offer a clinically relevant advantage over non-selective inhibitors. Moreover, concerns over the cardiovascular risk of selective COX-2 inhibitors have recently been raised. The second generation of COX-2 inhibitors with higher COX-2 selectivity was developed with the promise of further reduction of NSAID-typical adverse effects. The leading compounds are valdecoxib, parecoxib, etoricoxib and lumaricoxib. At the present time they have proven efficacy for the treatment of pain and inflammation. Parecoxib as a parenteral, highly selective COX-2 inhibitor has the potential to become the NSAID of choice for treatment of postoperative pain. In clinical trials, valdecoxib, parecoxib, etoricoxib and lumaricoxib have caused no more endoscopic ulcers than placebo. However, to date, no data on the clinically relevant endpoints perforation, symptomatic ulcer and bleeding are available. Furthermore, no definite conclusions on renal and cardiovascular safety are possible. Current evidence points to a marginal, if any, gain of safety compared with the first generation of COX-2 inhibitors. However, trials with the new COX-2 inhibitors offer the chance to address these open questions of highly selective COX-2 inhibition; that is, thrombogenic risk, sodium and water retention, and interference with tissue repair, in particular, healing of mucosal damage.

The development of COX2 inhibitors

Aspirin, arguably the world's favourite drug, has been around since the late nineteenth century, but it wasn't until the late 1970s that its ability to inhibit prostaglandin production by the cyclooxygenase enzyme was identified as the basis of its therapeutic action. Early hints of a second form of the cyclooxygenase that was differentially sensitive to other aspirin-like drugs ultimately ushered in an exciting era of drug discovery, culminating in the introduction of an entirely new generation of anti-inflammatories. This article reviews the story of this discovery and looks at the future of cyclooxygenase pharmacology.

A Randomised, Double-Blind, Clinical Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Nimesulide, Celecoxib and Rofecoxib in Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Joint pain is the main complaint in patients affected by osteoarthritis (OA), and NSAIDs are commonly used to treat pain associated with OA. Over the past few years, cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2-selective inhibitors have been proved to have certain advantages over non-selective NSAIDs and have been increasingly used for pain management in patients with OA.

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this randomised, double-blind, within-patient study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of three COX-2 inhibitors in 30 patients affected by symptomatic OA of the knee. We evaluated the effects of oral nimesulide (100mg), celecoxib (200mg) and rofecoxib (25mg). Each drug was administered for 7 days.

METHODS

Analgesic efficacy was determined using the patient's assessment of pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and by total pain relief over 3 hours (TOPAR3) on the first and last days of treatment. In addition, the overall analgesic efficacy and tolerability were determined by a global assessment by the patient at the end of each week of treatment, using 5-point categorical scales. At the end of the study, each patient was asked about which of the three forms of treatment they would choose as a continuation of the pain therapy.

RESULTS

Taking all the results into consideration, nimesulide proved to be significantly more effective in providing symptomatic relief than did celecoxib and rofecoxib. Furthermore, nimesulide provided more rapid relief of pain associated with walking than did the other two drugs tested. Patients expressed similar preference for nimesulide and rofecoxib, but a lesser preference for celecoxib treatment. No patient withdrew from the study because of adverse events and the three different forms of treatment were generally safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The present data confirm our previous observations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, further suggesting that nimesulide represents an effective agent for the treatment of joint pain, with particular reference to the rapid onset of its analgesic effect.

Effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on cyclo-oxygenase and lipoxygenase activity in whole blood from aspirin-sensitive asthmatics vs healthy donors

1. Cyclo-oxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase (LO) share a common substrate, arachidonic acid. Aspirin and related drugs inhibit COX activity. In a subset of patients with asthma aspirin induces clinical symptoms associated with increased levels of certain LO products, a phenomenon known as aspirin-sensitive asthma. The pharmacological pathways regulating such responses are not known. 2. Here COX-1 and LO activity were measured respectively by the formation of thromboxane B(2) (TXB(2)) or leukotrienes (LT) C(4), D(4) and E(4) in whole blood stimulated with A23187. COX-2 activity was measured by the formation of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) in blood stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 18 h. 3. No differences in the levels of COX-1, COX-2 or LO products or the potency of drugs were found in blood from aspirin sensitive vs aspirin tolerant patients. Aspirin, indomethacin and nimesulide inhibited COX-1 activity, without altering LO activity. Indomethacin, nimesulide and the COX-2 selective inhibitor DFP [5,5-dimethyl-3-(2-isopropoxy)-4-(4-methanesulfonylphenyl)-2(5H)-furanone] inhibited COX-2 activity. NO-aspirin, like aspirin inhibited COX-1 activity in blood from both groups. However, NO-aspirin also reduced LO activity in the blood from both patient groups. Sodium salicylate was an ineffective inhibitor of COX-1, COX-2 or LO activity in blood from both aspirin-sensitive and tolerant patients. 4. Thus, when COX activity in the blood of aspirin-sensitive asthmatics is blocked there is no associated increase in LO products. Moreover, NO-aspirin, unlike other NSAIDs tested, inhibited LO activity in the blood from both aspirin sensitive and aspirin tolerant individuals. This suggests that NO-aspirin may be better tolerated than aspirin by aspirin-sensitive asthmatics.

Prescription and Tolerability of Meloxicam in Day-to-Day Practice

The goal of this study was to obtain data for prescription habits, tolerability for patients at high risk, and clinical effectiveness of meloxicam administered at 7.5 mg and 15 mg for various rheumatic diseases under real world prescribing conditions. This was a 3-month large-scale prospective observational cohort study in 4000 medical practices throughout Germany shortly after the introduction of meloxicam. To be eligible, patients had to have a diagnosis of acute or chronic active rheumatic disease for which nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy was required according to the prescribing information. In this study, 13,307 patients receiving meloxicam prescriptions (7.5 mg in 65% and 15 mg in 33%) were observed. The diagnoses of these patients included osteoarthritis (61%), rheumatoid arthritis (24%), ankylosing spondylitis (1.6%), and other rheumatic conditions (28%). A substantial proportion of high risk patients were enrolled: 12% with a previous history of a perforation, ulceration, and bleeding (PUB), 24% with at least one concomitant cardiovascular disorder, and 26% receiving concomitant antihypertensive medication. Many of the patients (58%) had received NSAIDs before meloxicam, including patients with insufficient prior treatment effectiveness (43%) and those with NSAID-related adverse drug reactions (21%). In 85% and 94% of the patients, respectively, effectiveness and tolerability were rated as good or very good. Quality of life and daily functions improved in 64% to 84% of the patients. Only 0.8% of the patients reported gastrointestinal (GI) adverse drug reactions. Four uncomplicated cases of gastric ulceration, one serious perforated gastric ulcer, and one serious ileus complication were reported after incorrect use or overdosing of meloxicam. Treatment with the selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor meloxicam in doses of 7.5 mg and 15 mg resulted in meaningful treatment responses under real life conditions, despite inclusion of a substantial number of patients with insufficient effectiveness of previous use of non-COX-2 selective NSAIDs. All major GI toxicity (PUB) observed was owing to the fact that prescribing conditions were not respected appropriately. Despite a selection of high risk patients overall, GI, cardiovascular, and renal tolerability was favorable.

Oxidation of celecoxib by polymorphic cytochrome P450 2C9 and alcohol dehydrogenase

AIMS

Celecoxib is a novel selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, which is subject to extensive hepatic metabolism. The aims of the present in vitro investigation were 1) to compare the rate of celecoxib hydroxylation by different genetic variants of cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9), and 2) to identify the enzyme(s) involved in the formation of the major metabolite carboxycelecoxib.

METHODS

Hydroxycelecoxib formation was studied in human liver microsomes from 35 genotyped livers, as well as in yeast microsomes with recombinant expression of different P450 variants. Carboxycelecoxib formation was studied in liver microsomes incubated in the absence or presence of liver cytosol. The metabolites were identified and quantified by h.p.l.c. In addition, hydroxycelecoxib oxidation by different variants of recombinant human alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH1-3) was analysed by spectrophotometric monitoring of NADH generation from NAD+.

RESULTS

The intrinsic clearance of celecoxib hydroxylation was significantly lower for yeast-expressed CYP2C9.3 (0.14 ml min-1 nmol-1 enzyme) compared with CYP2C9.1 (0.44 ml min-1 nmol-1 enzyme). In human liver microsomes, a significant 2-fold decrease in the rate of hydroxycelecoxib formation was evident in CYP2C9*1/*3 samples compared with CYP2C9*1/*1 samples. There was also a marked reduction (up to 5.3 times) of hydroxycelecoxib formation in a liver sample genotyped as CYP2C9*3/*3. However, the CYP2C9*2 samples did not differ significantly from CYP2C9*1 in any of the systems studied. Inhibition experiments with sulphaphenazole (SPZ) or triacetyloleandomycin indicated that celecoxib hydroxylation in human liver microsomes was mainly dependent on CYP2C9 and not CYP3A4. The further oxidation of hydroxycelecoxib to carboxycelecoxib was completely dependent on liver cytosol and NAD+. Additional experiments showed that ADH1 and ADH2 catalysed this reaction in vitro with apparent K m values of 42 micro m and 10 micro m, respectively, whereas ADH3 showed no activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm that CYP2C9 is the major enzyme for celecoxib hydroxylation in vitro and further indicate that the CYP2C9*3 allelic variant is associated with markedly slower metabolism. Furthermore, it was shown for the first time that carboxycelecoxib formation is dependent on cytosolic alcohol dehydrogenase, presumably ADH1 and/or ADH2.

Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors: after the smoke has cleared

An enormous amount of fanfare and marketing preceded the introduction of selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 to the marketplace. These drugs were purported to offer equivalent anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects to conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs without causing gastrointestinal injury. Now that there is considerable clinical experience with four drugs of this class having been available for at least two years, it is worthwhile re-visiting some of the original claims to determine whether selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have thus far lived up to their promise. In short, selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have proven to be somewhat safer in terms of gastrointestinal toxicity, than some (but not all) conventional non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. However their efficacy of the selective cyclooxygenase inhibitors has not always matched that of the conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and there are significant safety concerns with some of the new drugs that deserve very careful consideration.

COX-2 inhibitors compared and contrasted

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the principal drug treatments for inflammation, pain and fever. They act primarily by inhibiting prostaglandin (PG) synthesis but this can cause adverse events (AEs). Since the discovery of two PG synthesising enzymes, COX-1 and COX-2, and the substantial evidence that sparing COX-1 is advantageous for gastric safety, great interest has focused on selective COX-2 inhibitors. Much of the impetus has come from the most recently developed compounds celecoxib and rofecoxib, which have shown spectacular sales growth. However, the older drugs etodolac, nimesulide and meloxicam, made before COX-2 was discovered, are also COX-1-sparing and have good GI safety and therapeutic activities. These five compounds show similarities and differences that are discussed in relation to aspects that include their uses, efficacy, actions and safety.

Therapeutic potential of COX-2 inhibitors in arthritis

Arthritis and related musculoskeletal conditions occur with great frequency in the population world wide, causing significant morbidity and, in some instances, increased mortality. Affecting both the young and the old, 15% of the population in the US was estimated in 1995 to have some form of arthritis with an increase to 18% projected by the year 2020 [1]. The economic impact of arthritis and related disorders in the US alone was estimated to be 194.4 billion US dollars in 1992 and future costs are virtually certain to increase given the chronic nature of these diseases, their expanding prevalence and the considerable expense associated with newer therapies [2]. With no cure presently available, the aim of current treatment is to reduce inflammation, ameliorate symptoms and improve functional capacity. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which suppress the formation of pro-inflammatory prostaglandins by antagonising the action of cyclooxygenase (COX), have been the mainstay of arthritis treatment for hundreds, if not, thousands of years. The clinical use of NSAIDs, however, has long been associated with significant toxicity. The recognition of two COX isoforms, cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), both suppressed by traditional NSAIDs, has led to an expanded hypothesis of NSAID action which consists of two postulates, namely, the efficacy of NSAIDs in the treatment of arthritis is due to the suppression of COX-2, while much of the toxicity associated with non-selective NSAIDs is the consequence of COX-1 suppression. The emergence of agents which selectively inhibit COX-2 has made it possible to clinically evaluate the validity of each of these postulates. In this report, the published experience with selective COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of mechanical and inflammatory arthropathies is reviewed to examine the premise that isolated COX-2 suppression is comparable in efficacy to the dual COX-1/COX-2 suppression produced by non-selective NSAIDs.

Anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenases and other factors

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which for so many years have played major roles in treating inflammation, pain and fever, have had major recent boosts to various therapeutic aspects. These include the impetus generated by the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors celecoxib and rofecoxib, a greater understanding of NSAID non-prostaglandin modes of action and the use of NSAIDs in cancer and Alzheimer's disease. Many of these aspects are covered in articles in this issue of Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy.