Discontinuation of Vioxx

Sex difference in coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the sex difference in the prevalence of COVID-19 confirmed cases.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched for related information. The authors developed a data extraction form on an Excel sheet and the following data from eligible studies were extracted: author, country, sample size, number of female patients and number of male patients. Using STATA V.14 for analysis, the authors pooled the overall prevalence of men and/or women using a random-effect meta-analysis model. The authors examined the heterogeneity in effect size using Q statistics and I2 statistics. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Publication bias was also checked.

PARTICIPANTS

Studies on COVID-19 confirmed cases were included.

INTERVENTION

Sex (male/female) of COVID-19 confirmed cases was considered.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was prevalence of COVID-19 among men and women.

RESULTS

A total of 57 studies with 221 195 participants were used in the analysis. The pooled prevalence of COVID-19 among men was found to be 55.00 (51.43-56.58, I2=99.5%, p<0.001). Sensitivity analysis showed the findings were not dependent on a single study. Moreover, a funnel plot showed symmetrical distribution. Egger's regression test p value was not significant, which indicates absence of publication bias in both outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of symptomatic COVID-19 was found to be higher in men than in women. The high prevalence of smoking and alcohol consumption contributed to the high prevalence of COVID-19 among men. Additional studies on the discrepancies in severity and mortality rate due to COVID-19 among men and women and the associated factors are recommended.

Vaccines based on virus-like nano-particles for use against Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) coronavirus

Recent advances in virus-like nanoparticles against Middle East respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (MERS-CoV) can initiate vaccine production faster for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), while ensuring the safety, easy administration, and long-term effects. Patients with this viral pathogen suffer from excess mortality. MERS-CoV can spread through bioaerosol transmission from animal or human sources. The appearance of an outbreak in South Korea sparked off a strong urge to design strategies for developing an effective vaccine since the emergence of MERS-CoV in 2012. Well unfortunately, this is an important fact in virus risk management. The studies showed that virus-like nanoparticles (VLPs) could be effective in its goal of stopping the symptoms of MERS-CoV infection. Besides, due to the genetic similarities in the DNA sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 with MERS-CoV and the first identified severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV) in China since 2002/2003, strategic approaches could be used to manage SARS-CoV 2. Gathering the vital piece of information obtained so far could lead to a breakthrough in the development of an effective vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, which is prioritized and focussed by the World Health Organization (WHO). This review focuses on the virus-like nanoparticle that got successful results in animal models of MERS-CoV.

Role of acetaminophen in acute myocardial infarction

Acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol, is a widely used drug that is well known for its analgesic and antipyretic properties. Acetaminophen is a commonly used alternative to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which have recently been demonstrated to increase mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The safety and potential cardioprotective properties of acetaminophen in the setting of AMI have recently been investigated; however, the results from these studies have been inconclusive. Using both large (ovine) and small (rabbit) collateral-deficient animal models, we studied the effects of acetaminophen in the setting of reperfused AMI. In both species we studied the effects of acetaminophen on myocardial salvage and ventricular function. Additionally, we studied the effects of acetaminophen on myocardial perfusion in sheep and on myocyte apoptosis in rabbits. Sixteen sheep and twenty-two rabbits were divided into two groups and administered acetaminophen or a vehicle before undergoing ischemia and reperfusion. The ischemic period was 60 min in sheep and 30 min in rabbits. All animals were reperfused for 3 h. There were no significant differences observed in myocardial perfusion, myocyte apoptosis, or infarct size in acetaminophen-treated animals. Acetaminophen increased cardiac output and mean arterial pressure before ischemia in sheep but had no effect on any other hemodynamic parameter. In rabbits, no effect on cardiac output or blood pressure was detected. These results support the role of acetaminophen as a safe drug in the postmyocardial infarction setting; however, no significant cardioprotective effect of the drug could be demonstrated.