Buccal midazolam for seizures

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of novel midazolam gel formulations following buccal administration to healthy dogs

OBJECTIVE To determine the physiochemical properties and pharmacokinetics of 3 midazolam gel formulations following buccal administration to dogs. ANIMALS 5 healthy adult hounds. PROCEDURES In phase 1 of a 2-phase study, 2 gel formulations were developed that contained 1% midazolam in a poloxamer 407 (P1) or hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (H1) base and underwent rheological and in vitro release analyses. Each formulation was buccally administered to 5 dogs such that 0.3 mg of midazolam/kg was delivered. Each dog also received midazolam hydrochloride (0.3 mg/kg, IV). There was a 3-day interval between treatments. Blood samples were collected immediately before and at predetermined times for 8 hours after drug administration for determination of plasma midazolam concentration and pharmacokinetic analysis. During phase 2, a gel containing 2% midazolam in a hydroxypropyl methylcellulose base (H2) was developed on the basis of phase 1 results. That gel was buccally administered such that midazolam doses of 0.3 and 0.6 mg/kg were delivered. Each dog also received midazolam (0.3 mg/kg, IV). All posttreatment procedures were the same as those for phase 1. RESULTS The H1 and H2 formulations had lower viscosity, greater bioavailability, and peak plasma midazolam concentrations that were approximately 2-fold as high, compared with those for the P1 formulation. The mean peak plasma midazolam concentration for the H2 formulation was 187.0 and 106.3 ng/mL when the midazolam dose administered was 0.6 and 0.3 mg/kg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results indicated that buccal administration of gel formulations might be a viable alternative for midazolam administration to dogs.

Status epilepticus: evidence and controversy

Status Epilepticus (SE) is a potential and relatively common complication of epileptic seizures. Traditionally, SE was defined as 30 minutes of continuous seizure activity or a series of seizures without return to full consciousness between the seizures. As a practical rule, it is admitted that all patients arriving at the emergency room suffering from epileptic seizures could have SE and should be treated accordingly. It is well known that the longer an attack has lasted, the more difficult it is to control in the next 5 to 10 minutes. On the other hand, once an attack has lasted for over 5 to 10 minutes, it is unlikely to cease spontaneously. Ambulatory intervention should focus on this "therapeutic interval" in acute attacks with the use of first-line drugs such as the intramuscular, rectal, oral, and/or intranasal application of benzodiazepines (BZD). Treatment of SE is a medical emergency, which should include 3 priority objectives: (1) to stop the seizures; (2) to maintain internal homeostasis; and (3) to treat possible complications. Current consensus is that a BZD, notably lorazepam or diazepam, is the initial class of drug for the treatment of SE. Phenytoin, fosphenytoin, or valproate generally is agreed upon as the next drugs to be administered. Failure to respond to optimal BZD and phenytoin loading operationally defines refractory SE.

Update on the acute management of status epilepticus in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Status epilepticus is the most common neurologic emergency in children. The understanding of its less recognizable forms, its pharmacologic management, the role of electroencephalography and the long-term morbidity and mortality as a result of status epilepticus are consistently evolving. This review frames the current understanding of several issues as they apply to acute management in the emergency department.

RECENT FINDINGS

Researchers are working to define less recognizable forms of status epilepticus such as nonconvulsive, autonomic and psychogenic. Buccal and intranasal forms of midazolam are emerging as suitable alternatives to rectal diazepam in the initial treatment of status epilepticus. Valproic acid, chloral hydrate and newer-generation antiepileptics are being proposed as safe and effective alternatives to the traditional drugs used to treat status epilepticus. The role of electroencephalography in diagnosis is being elucidated. Risk factors for neurologic sequelae and mortality after status epilepticus remain an area of research with conflicting findings and no real consensus.

SUMMARY

The understanding of different types of status epilepticus, the options for pharmacologic treatment, the tools for diagnosis and the morbidity and mortality of the disease are still evolving. As a result, several areas for further research remain that will help clinicians in their approach to this complex condition.