Chlorpropamide and chloramphenicol

Clinical pharmacokinetics of chloramphenicol and chloramphenicol succinate

In recent years there has been a renewal of interest in chloramphenicol, predominantly because of the emergence of ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae, the leading cause of bacterial meningitis in infants and children. Three preparations of chloramphenicol are most commonly used in clinical practice: a crystalline powder for oral administration, a palmitate ester for oral administration as a suspension, and a succinate ester for parenteral administration. Both esters are inactive, requiring hydrolysis to chloramphenicol for anti-bacterial activity. The palmitate ester is hydrolysed in the small intestine to active chloramphenicol prior to absorption. Chloramphenicol succinate acts as a prodrug, being converted to active chloramphenicol while it is circulating in the body. Various assays have been developed to determine the concentration of chloramphenicol in biological fluids. Of these, high-performance liquid chromatographic and radioenzymatic assays are accurate, precise, specific, and have excellent sensitivities for chloramphenicol. They are rapid and have made therapeutic drug monitoring practical for chloramphenicol. The bioavailability of oral crystalline chloramphenicol and chloramphenicol palmitate is approximately 80%. The time for peak plasma concentrations is dependent on particle size and correlates with in vitro dissolution and deaggregation rates. The bioavailability of chloramphenicol after intravenous administration of the succinate ester averages approximately 70%, but the range is quite variable. Incomplete bioavailability is the result of renal excretion of unchanged chloramphenicol succinate prior to it being hydrolysed to active chloramphenicol. Plasma protein binding of chloramphenicol is approximately 60% in healthy adults. The drug is extensively distributed to many tissues and body fluids, including cerebrospinal fluid and breast milk, and it crosses the placenta. Reported mean values for the apparent volume of distribution range from 0.6 to 1.0 L/kg. Most of a chloramphenicol dose is metabolised by the liver to inactive products, the chief metabolite being a glucuronide conjugate; only 5 to 15% of chloramphenicol is excreted unchanged in the urine. The elimination half-life is approximately 4 hours. Inaccurate determinations of the pharmacokinetic parameters may result by incorrectly assuming rapid and complete hydrolysis of chloramphenicol succinate. The pharmacokinetics of chloramphenicol succinate have been described by a 2-compartment model. The reported values for the apparent volume of distribution range from 0.2 to 3.1 L/kg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Chloramphenicol: new perspectives on an old drug

Chloramphenicol is an old antibiotic being used with increasing frequency in serious childhood infections largely due to the emergence of ampicillin-resistant Hemophilus influenzae type b. Because of this renewed popularity and the recent availability of accurate analytical techniques for measurement of chloramphenicol, there have been many recent articles examining the pharmacokinetics of chloramphenicol and its two major prodrug esters, chloramphenicol succinate and chloramphenicol palmitate. New data from these studies include the incomplete bioavailability of chloramphenicol succinate, the possible superior bioavailability of chloramphenicol palmitate vs. chloramphenicol succinate, and the wide interpatient variability in chloramphenicol clearance. These observations, coupled with the known serious hematologic toxicity (reversible bone marrow suppression or irreversible aplastic anemia) and metabolic toxicity (gray baby syndrome) associated with chloramphenicol use, require that initial antibiotic doses be selected by age and be carefully individualized by measurement of peak serum chloramphenicol concentrations.

Drug interactions and clinical pharmacokinetics

Some drugs influence the gastro-intestinal absorption, distribution , metabolism or renal excretion of other drugs, i.e., processes involved in pharmacokinetic interactions. The clinical consequences of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions will be either an increase or a decrease in known therapeutic or toxic effects of the interacting drug. In order to evaluate the importance of drug interaction affecting gastro-intestinal absorption, it is necessary to distinguish between interactions which alter the rate of absorption of another drug and those which alter the amount of drug absorbed. Many drugs displace other drugs from their protein binding sites in vitro. This may cause an increase in the pharmacological effect of the displaced drug. However, much discrepancy exists between in vitro findings. In some cases, the enhanced effect only seems to be a temporary phenomenon. The degree of protein binding and the size of apparent volume of distribution (Vd) must also be taken into consideration. Perhaps the importance of interaction involving protein binding has been overemphasized. Barbiturates, glutethimide, rifampicin and phenytoin increase the rate of drug metabolism in man. The most important interactions reported are between oral anti-coagulants and barbiturates. After withdrawal of these hepatic microsomal enzyme inducing drugs, it takes 2 to 3 weeks before the rate of drug metabolism reaches the pretreatment level. In this period, risk of haemorrhage exists. Induction seems to be dose-dependent, but not all persons are inducible. Many drugs compete for the drug metabolising enzyme system in the liver and consequently some drugs inhibit the biotransformation of other drugs. The time course of these interactions depends on the pharmacokinetic properties of the drug involved, and these interactions also seem to be dose-dependent. The most important of such interactions, clinically involved the oral sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic drugs and the antiepilepic drug phenytoin. Drugs are eliminated by urinary excretion through three mechanisms: glomerular filtration, tubular reabsorption, and active tubular secretion. The most important interactions seem to be those involving competition for tubular secretion.