Early intravenous atenolol treatment in suspected acute myocardial infarction. Preliminary report of a randomised trial

Negative findings but positive contributions in cardiovascular research

Researchers have always concluded that results that do not support the hypothesis as unimportant, unworthy, or simply not good enough for publication. However, negative findings are essential for the progress of science and its self-correcting nature. We also believe in the importance and indispensability of negative results. Therefore, in this review, we discussed the factors contributing to the publication bias of negative results and the problems to assess the factuality and validity of negative results. Moreover, we emphasized the importance of reporting negative results in cardiovascular research, including treatments, and suggest that the negative results could clarify previously controversial topics in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases and prompt the translation of research on precision cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment.

Should We Be Using Upstream Beta-Blocker Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction?

Purpose of Review

Controversy exists whether beta-blockers should be given before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or to defer their administration for up to 24 hours.

Recent Findings

Animal studies, most of them conducted in the 1970s and 1980s, showed evidence that early beta-blocker administration may reduce infarct size. Subsequent human studies had mixed results on infarct size and survival. More specifically, in the current primary PCI era, only four studies evaluated the impact of early intravenous beta-blocker administration after acute myocardial infarction, only two of them before PCI. All studies agree that in hemodynamically stable patients, early intravenous beta-blocker administration is safe and protected against malignant arrhythmias. Nevertheless, results on infarct size and mortality are equivocal.

Summary

Considering the heterogeneity of currently available data, further studies are still needed to assess the benefit of early injection of metoprolol in STEMI patients in a large double-blinded and randomized design versus placebo.

Usefulness of universal beta-blocker therapy in patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction

The use of beta-blockers (BB) in the context of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was a universal practice in the pre-reperfusion era. Since then, evidence of their use for secondary prevention after STEMI is scarce. Our aim is to determine treatment results associated with BB therapy after a STEMI at 1-year follow-up in a contemporary nationwide cohort.A prospective analysis involving 49 national centers, including patients admitted with STEMI, enrolled between October 2010 and September 2019 was conducted. The primary outcome was defined as the composite of all-cause mortality or hospital re-admission for a cardiovascular (CV) cause in the first year after STEMI. The patients were distributed into 2 groups, depending on whether they received therapy with BB at hospital discharge or not (BB and NB group, respectively).A total of 3145 patients were included in the analysis, of which 2526 (80.3%) in the BB group. A total of 12.2% of patients reached the primary outcome. Regarding the univariate Cox regression analysis, the BB group presented lower mortality or re-admission for CV cause at 1-year follow-up [hazard ratio (HR) 0.69, confidence interval (CI) 95% 0.55-0.87, P = .001]. However, after adjustment for significant covariates, this association was lost (HR 0.73, CI 95% 0.51-1.04, P = .081). In patients with preserved (HR 0.73, CI 95% 0.51-1.04, P = .081) and mid-range (HR 1.01, CI 95% 0.64-1.61, P = .959) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the primary outcome was similar between the 2 groups, while in patients with reduced LVEF, the BB group presented a better prognosis, with fewer patients reaching the primary outcome (HR 0.431, CI 95% 0.262-0.703, P = .001).BB universal therapy after STEMI has not proved useful, but it seems to be beneficial in patients with reduced LVEF.

Beta-blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death globally. According to the World Health Organization, 7.4 million people died from ischaemic heart diseases in 2012, constituting 15% of all deaths. Acute myocardial infarction is caused by blockage of the blood supplied to the heart muscle. Beta-blockers are often used in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Previous meta-analyses on the topic have shown conflicting results ranging from harms, neutral effects, to benefits. No previous systematic review using Cochrane methodology has assessed the effects of beta-blockers for acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of beta-blockers compared with placebo or no intervention in people with suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded and BIOSIS Citation Index in June 2019. We also searched the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, Turning Research into Practice, Google Scholar, SciSearch, and the reference lists of included trials and previous reviews in August 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical trials assessing the effects of beta-blockers versus placebo or no intervention in people with suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction. Trials were included irrespective of trial design, setting, blinding, publication status, publication year, language, and reporting of our outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed the Cochrane methodological recommendations. Four review authors independently extracted data. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events according to the International Conference on Harmonization - Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP), and major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of cardiovascular mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction during follow-up). Our secondary outcomes were quality of life, angina, cardiovascular mortality, and myocardial infarction during follow-up. Our primary time point of interest was less than three months after randomisation. We also assessed the outcomes at maximum follow-up beyond three months. Due to risk of multiplicity, we calculated a 97.5% confidence interval (CI) for the primary outcomes and a 98% CI for the secondary outcomes. We assessed the risks of systematic errors through seven bias domains in accordance to the instructions given in the Cochrane Handbook. The quality of the body of evidence was assessed by GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 63 trials randomising a total of 85,550 participants (mean age 57.4 years). Only one trial was at low risk of bias. The remaining trials were at high risk of bias. The quality of the evidence according to GRADE ranged from very low to high. Fifty-six trials commenced beta-blockers during the acute phase of acute myocardial infarction and seven trials during the subacute phase. At our primary time point 'less than three months follow-up', meta-analysis showed that beta-blockers versus placebo or no intervention probably reduce the risk of a reinfarction during follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 98% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 0.91; 67,562 participants; 18 trials; moderate-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 0.5% and a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 196 participants. However, we found little or no effect of beta-blockers when assessing all-cause mortality (RR 0.94, 97.5% CI 0.90 to 1.00; 80,452 participants; 46 trials/47 comparisons; high-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 0.4% and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.08; 45,852 participants; 1 trial; moderate-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 0.4%. Regarding angina, it is uncertain whether beta-blockers have a beneficial or harmful effect (RR 0.70, 98% CI 0.25 to 1.84; 98 participants; 3 trials; very low-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 7.1%. None of the trials specifically assessed nor reported serious adverse events according to ICH-GCP. Only two trials specifically assessed major adverse cardiovascular events, however, no major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in either trial. At maximum follow-up beyond three months, meta-analyses showed that beta-blockers versus placebo or no intervention probably reduce the risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.93, 97.5% CI 0.86 to 0.99; 25,210 participants; 21 trials/22 comparisons; moderate-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 1.1% and a NNTB of 91 participants, and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.90, 98% CI 0.83 to 0.98; 22,457 participants; 14 trials/15 comparisons; moderate-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 1.2% and a NNTB of 83 participants. However, it is uncertain whether beta-blockers have a beneficial or harmful effect when assessing major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0.81, 97.5% CI 0.40 to 1.66; 475 participants; 4 trials; very low-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 1.7%; reinfarction (RR 0.89, 98% CI 0.75 to 1.08; 6825 participants; 14 trials; low-quality evidence) with an absolute risk reduction of 0.9%; and angina (RR 0.64, 98% CI 0.18 to 2.0; 844 participants; 2 trials; very low-quality evidence). None of the trials specifically assessed nor reported serious adverse events according to ICH-GCP. None of the trials assessed quality of life. We identified two ongoing randomised clinical trials investigating the effect of early administration of beta-blockers after percutaneous coronary intervention or thrombolysis to patients with an acute myocardial infarction and one ongoing trial investigating the effect of long-term beta-blocker therapy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our present review indicates that beta-blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction probably reduce the short-term risk of a reinfarction and the long-term risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Nevertheless, it is most likely that beta-blockers have little or no effect on the short-term risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Regarding all remaining outcomes (serious adverse events according to ICH-GCP, major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of cardiovascular mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction during follow-up), the long-term risk of a reinfarction during follow-up, quality of life, and angina), further information is needed to confirm or reject the clinical effects of beta-blockers on these outcomes for people with or suspected of acute myocardial infarction.

Rationale for administering beta-blocker therapy to patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Secondary preventative therapies are essential for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery to optimize perioperative and long-term outcomes. Beta-blockers are commonly used to treat patients with coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure (CHF), but their role for CABG patients remains unclear. The goal of this systematic review was to evaluate the rationale for administering beta-blockers to the CABG population and to assess their efficacy before and after coronary surgical revascularization.

AREAS COVERED

A systematic literature review was performed to retrieve relevant articles from the PubMed database published between 1985 and 2017.

EXPERT OPINION

Outside of the surgical field, strong evidence supports the use of beta-blockers for patients with a history of previous myocardial infarction (MI) or CHF. For the CABG population, studies have suggested that perioperative beta-blocker therapy is beneficial, with an associated reduction in mortality, particularly among those with a history of previous MI or CHF. Beta-blocker administration has also clearly been shown to lower the rate of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation after CABG. Among the different types of beta-blockers, perioperative carvedilol appears to be the most beneficial. In the absence of contraindications, nearly all CABG patients are candidates for perioperative beta-blocker therapy.

Survival among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction treated with atenolol

Metoprolol succinate, carvedilol, and bisoprolol are approved for use in heart failure. Other beta-blockers have been found to be inferior (metoprolol tartrate) or have not been studied (atenolol). The authors compared all-cause mortality following treatment with either atenolol, carvedilol, or metoprolol tartrate for 974 patients with left ventricular function < or =40%. The unadjusted mortality at 6 months was lower with atenolol (3.2%) and carvedilol (4.2%) when compared with metoprolol tartrate (7.5%, P< or =.039). However, patients with atenolol were older but had less prior heart failure. After adjustment for the propensity to be treated with atenolol, patients actually treated with atenolol had a significantly lower risk of death compared with treatment with metoprolol tartrate and comparable outcome to those treated with carvedilol. These results suggest that atenolol may be useful for patients with heart failure treatment and highlight the need for a randomized trial comparing atenolol with established beta-blockers.

The possible role of the ancillary properties of beta adrenoceptor antagonists in the management of angina pectoris

Beta adrenoceptor antagonists are effective in the symptomatic management of angina pectoris. This paper examines critically the possible influence of the ancillary properties of beta 1 selectivity, partial agonism and membrane-stabilizing action on the response in anginal patients. The response is categorized according to experimental, pharmacological and clinical endpoints, placing emphasis on the possible errors which may arise from extrapolation from the former to the latter. It is concluded: That selective beta adrenoceptor antagonism confers limited, but tangible advantages over non-selective antagonists in regard to patients with reversible airways obstruction, and also in the metabolic and haemodynamic response to acute hypoglycaemia. Cardioselectivity does not influence the central haemodynamic response to exercise, but lessens adrenaline-mediated hypertensive responses to smoking and hypoglycaemia. Non-selective partial agonists cause less reduction in resting ventricular function, but their effects on cardiac output during exercise are indistinguishable from full antagonists. Membrane stabilizing properties have a marked influence on the tolerability of these agents in terms of unwanted, nonspecific central nervous system symptoms. Unresolved questions relate to the influence of partial agonism on fatigue, metabolic responses, especially blood lipids and glucose, and the possibility of lesser efficacy in angina compared to full antagonists.

Acute intervention with metoprolol in myocardial infarction

Studies in experimental and clinical myocardial infarction support the idea that sympathetic activity and myocardial noradrenaline release play a significant role in the development of myocardial ischemic damage. Betablockade has been shown to limit infarct size and lower the incidence of ventricular fibrillation in experimental models. Betablockade to patients (pts) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been shown to reduce ischemia reflected as reduction of ischemic chest pain, decrease ST-segment elevation and increase lactate extraction. Whether this treatment in the clinical situation can prevent development of infarction, reduce infarct size and early mortality in man remains to be proven. In Gøteborg a double-blind study on metoprolol and placebo was started four and a half years ago. Inclusion of pts. in the study has been terminated and survival data will be available on May 1, 1981. 1395 pts. were included of whom 800 developed AMI. Metoprolol 15 mg was given IV followed by a total daily dose of 200 mg/day. The tolerance for betablockade was generally good. Analysis of serum enzyme estimations of maximal LD I + II showed a significant reduction by metoprolol when the treatment was given within 12 hours of onset of pain. In a subgroup consisting of 103 pts. with AMI metoprolol had no clearcut effects on the ventricular arrhythmias during the first 24 hours in hospital. The betablockade resulted in a 15% reduction in heart rate. The main objective of this study, the mortality during three months of blind treatment will be published late in 1981.

Changes in heart size during long-term timolol treatment after myocardial infarction

The effect of long-term timolol treatment on heart size after myocardial infarction was evaluated by X-ray in a double-blind study including 241 patients (placebo 126, timolol 115). The follow-up period was 12 months. The timolol-treated patients showed a small but significant increase in heart size from baseline in contrast to a decrease in the placebo group. These differences may be caused by timolol-induced bradycardia and a compensatory increase in end-diastolic volume. The timolol-related increase in heart size was observed only in patients with normal and borderline heart size. In patients with cardiomegaly, the increase in heart size was similar in both groups. After re-infarction, heart size increased in the placebo group and remained unchanged in the timolol group.

Acute intervention studies in patients with myocardial infarction using atenolol, propranolol, oxprenolol and disopyramide phosphate

The value of beta-blockade and of disopyramide phosphate in the immediate treatment of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction was assessed in two placebo controlled trials. In the first study 388 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction were randomly allocated to treatment with propranolol, atenolol, or placebo, and when analysed on an initial intention to treat basis there was no significant difference between the three groups in respect of the mortality at one year. In addition, there was no evidence to suggest that either atenolol, or propranolol reduced the incidence of 'serious' ventricular arrhythmias in the coronary care unit. In the second study 473 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction were randomly allocated to treatment with oxprenolol, disopyramide phosphate, or placebo. Again no significant differences were seen with respect to the mortality at six weeks. There was, however, a significantly increased incidence of heart failure in the group which received disopyramide phosphate. Patients who received this drug also showed a reduced number of dysrhythmic episodes on 24-hour ECG recordings, but this trend did not achieve statistical significance. These results suggest that none of the three beta-blockers tested nor disopyramide phosphate is likely to reduce the mortality from acute myocardial infarction when given prophylactically, although disopyramide phosphate does reduce the incidence of 'serious' ventriicular arrhythmias.

Tolerability to treatment with metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction in relation to age

A double-blind trial with the beta 1-selective blocker metoprolol in suspected acute myocardial infarction and during 3 months' follow-up included 1395 patients, aged 40-74 years, 698 on metoprolol and 697 on placebo. In order to further evaluate the tolerability to beta-blockade in the elderly, the total series was divided into 2 groups according to median age (61 years) and into quartiles, the lowest quartile (40-57 years) being compared with the highest (67-74 years). The decrease in heart rate and systolic blood pressure after intravenous metoprolol in the acute phase was similar in the elderly and the younger patients. Hypotension was observed more often in the metoprolol-treated than in the placebo-treated younger patients, while no difference was observed in the elderly. Bradycardia was observed more often in the metoprolol group in both age groups, while there was no difference regarding the incidence of congestive heart failure in either the younger or in the elderly patients. The effect on mortality, serious ventricular arrhythmias and chest pain seemed to be similar in different age groups. From the present series we conclude that hemodynamic reactions and tolerability to beta-blockade can be expected to be similar in elderly and younger patients.

Beta blockade and the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction

In 1965 Snow reported a clinical trial in which treatment with propranolol significantly reduced mortality following myocardial infarction. Unfortunately the design of this trial was inadequate by modern standards, and the results must be discounted. None of the studies published since then have provided convincing evidence that beta blockers are useful following myocardial infarction. Survival after a myocardial infarction depends principally upon the amount of heart muscle that has been destroyed, and it is probably unreasonable to expect any treatment to reduce mortality by more than 20 or 30%. In patients who survive an infarction for more than 48 hours, the expected fatality rate in the next year is approximately 15%. To detect a reduction of this mortality to 10%, 2300 patients would be needed in the trial. The analysis of several of the published trials has been made difficult by a lack of data, the failure on the part of authors and journal editors to agree on a common method of presenting results, and disagreement as to whether results should be analysed on an "all patients--intention to treat" basis or by considering only "clinical effectiveness" among patients who remained on treatment. Examples of these problems will be given, together with a suggested scheme for data presentation. The 95% confidence intervals of all the randomised and double blind studies of beta blockers after myocardial infarction show that by "intention to treat" analysis, none demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in mortality among treated patients. Only the practolol trial was of a reasonable size, but even here total mortality was not significantly reduced; the result is in any case of only theoretical interest. The trials showing a reduction of mortality in association with alprenolol treatment are not convincing, and the stratified trial design of one of these may have given misleading results because of the relatively small number of patients involved.

A population-based analysis of the class effect of beta-blockers after myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Long-term treatment with beta-blockers reduces mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Whether beta-blockers exert a class effect is unknown.

METHODS

We analyzed mortality after AMI in Canadian patients 65 years or older who were discharged from hospital with a diagnosis of AMI from April 1996 to March 2000. Administrative data from Quebec, Ontario, and British Columbia were merged. We compared patients prescribed with metoprolol, acebutolol, or atenolol within 90 days after discharge.

RESULTS

Among 31576 patients, 67% were prescribed with metoprolol, 24% with atenolol, and 9% with acebutolol. Clinical characteristics and proportion of days covered with a beta-blocker prescription were similar across groups. Although controlling for time-dependent covariates representing current use and dosage, as well as for age, sex, congestive heart failure, and several other comorbidities, patients who filled a prescription for acebutolol (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.81) or atenolol (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.87) had significantly lower mortality in comparison with metoprolol.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher mortality observed in patients receiving metoprolol compared with those receiving atenolol or acebutolol challenges the concept of a class effect of beta-blockers for secondary prevention of AMI.

[Perioperative beta-blockers. Part two: therapeutic indications]

PURPOSE

To review the pharmacologic and pathophysiologic information necessary to prescribe beta-blockers (BB) in perioperative medicine.

DATA SOURCE

Manual retrieval and electronic research of the literature using MEDLINE (key-words: anesthesia and beta- blocker; surgery and beta-blocker).

DATA SYNTHESIS

In non cardiac surgery, the beneficial effects of BB have been demonstrated in hypertensive patients since 1979. In 1996, the beneficial effects of atenolol in patients with coronary artery disease (reduction of postoperative myocardial ischemia and overall reduction in two-year mortality) were demonstrated. In coronary surgery, the interest of preoperative BB treatment has been shown since 1983. Administration of BB has been shown to be beneficial in acute myocardial infarction or chronic cardiac failure (except in NYHA class IV patients).

CONCLUSION

BB have been shown to exert a beneficial effect on postoperative outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors, and their more widespread use in perioperative medicine is encouraged.

Reappraisal of the importance of heart rate as a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality

Heart rate is a key determinant of myocardial oxygen consumption. Several lines of evidence support a consistent association between heart rate and cardiovascular mortality. Increments in heart rate are positively related to cardiovascular and sudden death in patients with hypertension or previous myocardial infarction and in the elderly with heart disease. This relationship is important because a number of commonly used cardiovascular agents, such as beta-blockers and calcium antagonists (CAs), can affect heart rate. Beta-blockers decrease heart rate and reduce morbidity and mortality in post-myocardial infarction patients. The CAs are a structurally diverse group of agents with different physiologic effects. The dihydropyridine CAs are not associated with a reduction in heart rate. In fact, often they can cause reflex tachycardia as a result of potent systemic vasodilator action, which may provoke angina, especially in patients with ischemic heart disease. The nondihydropyridine CAs verapamil and diltiazem reduce heart rate but are associated with negative inotropy. Mibefradil, the first member of a new class of CAs, reduces heart rate and is not associated with negative inotropic effects. This unique pharmacologic profile may be of great value in treating hypertensive patients, particularly those with coexisting ischemic heart disease, and also patients with angina pectoris alone. However, the clinical benefit of pharmacologically reducing heart rate with mibefradil needs to be demonstrated in controlled trials.

Ten year mortality in relation to original size of myocardial infarct: results from the Gothenburg metoprolol study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the relation between the extent of a myocardial infarct, measured according to maximum serum enzyme activity of lactate dehydrogenase, and mortality at 10 years.

PATIENTS

In 759 patients with acute myocardial infarction in whom serum activity of heat stable lactate dehydrogenase had been determined every 12 hours for 108 hours after randomisation in an early intervention trial with metoprolol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Mortality at 10 years in relation to quartile of maximum serum lactate dehydrogenase activity and history of cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

Among all patients mortality at 10 years was 39% in the lowest quartile, 51% in the second quartile, 50% in the third, and 59% in the fourth (p < 0.001 for relation between infarct size and 10 year mortality). Among patients without a history of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension the mortality in each quartile was 29%, 32%, 41%, and 56%, respectively (p < 0.001 for relation between infarct size and 10 year mortality). Among patients with any of these risk indicators the association between the estimated infarct size and mortality at 10 years was weak (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Estimated size of a myocardial infarct and mortality over 10 years seem to be related but mainly in patients without a history of cardiovascular disease.

Pharmacotherapy of unstable angina

All patients with unstable angina should be admitted to a coronary or an intensive care unit. There should be an attempt to classify the patient according to the proposed Braunwald nomenclature. If the patient has a secondary cause for unstable angina (e.g., tachyarrhythmia, heart failure, fever, thyrotoxicosis, severe hypertension, hypoxia, unusual emotional stress, or anemia), this condition should be treated initially with therapy specific for that etiology. If the patient does not have a secondary etiology, therapy should be initiated with nitrates, preferably intravenous nitroglycerin. Heparin should be concomitantly administered. If the patient cannot receive heparin, aspirin should be initiated. All patients should receive beta-blockers. If the patient cannot take a beta-blocker, a calcium antagonist (probably diltiazem) should be initiated. However, if the patient is refractory to beta-blockers, the dihydropyridine nifedipine should be added. Failure to all pharmacologic interventions necessitates a progressive invasive approach dictated by the potential surgical risk of the patient. Long-term aspirin and beta-blockers should be strongly considered.

Around the beta-blockers, one more time

We review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and relative costs of beta-blockers, as well as indications for and therapeutic controversies surrounding their use. It is hoped that this discussion will assist clinicians in making informed decisions when choosing a drug for a hospital formulary or a particular patient. Beta-blockers are indicated for a variety of noncardiovascular and cardiovascular conditions, including hypertension, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmias, and prophylaxis of myocardial infarction (MI). These agents compete with catecholamines at beta-adrenoreceptors. They have different ancillary properties, including intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA), cardioselectivity, and membrane stabilizing-activity, and vary in their duration of action, route of elimination, and lipophilicity. Beta-blocking agents decrease oxygen demand by exerting a negative inotropic and chronotropic effect. They also reduce blood pressure and possess antiarrhythmic effects. Beta-blockers penetrate the central nervous system (CNS) to different degrees and can cause a wide variety of CNS adverse effects. Nonselective beta-blockers have been noted to slightly reduce renal blood flow. Nadolol is an exception in that either no change, or even a small increase in renal blood flow, is observed upon initiation of therapy. Beta-blockers also act on the pulmonary bed by preventing beta 2-mediated bronchodilation, thereby exacerbating bronchospastic disease in some patients. Beta-adrenergic blocking agents can potentiate both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia in diabetic patients. Their effects on total peripheral resistance (TPR) are controversial. Initially it appears that beta-blockade increases TPR. After chronic therapy, however, TPR decreases to or below baseline values. These agents appear to be equally efficacious in the treatment of hypertension, arrhythmias, and ischemic heart disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Heart rate and beta-adrenergic mechanisms in acute myocardial infarction

Increased heart rate is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Elevated heart rate is due to increased sympathetic activity and/or decreased parasympathetic activity. In placebo-controlled trials beta-blockers are known to reduce mortality as well as morbidity and these effects are most evident among patients with elevated heart rate. Studies on circadian variation have demonstrated that there is an increased sympathetic activity in the morning as well as a more frequent onset of ischemic attacked including acute myocardial infarction and sudden death. There seems to be a close relationship between increased sympathetic activity and the onset of ischemic events which can be prevented by prophylactic institution of a beta-blocker.

[Beta blockers and anesthesia]

Beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (BB) demonstrate a competitive antagonism with endogenous catecholamines. Beta-1 receptor blockade mediates the depressive action on contractility, heart rate and atrio-ventricular conduction. Beta-2 receptor blockade mediates vascular, bronchial and uterine smooth muscle constriction. BB with beta-1 selective and intrinsec sympathomimetic activity do not increase systemic vascular resistance. BB are mostly used to treat ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and arrhythmias. Bradycardia, hypotension and bronchospasm are the main hazards in BB treated patients undergoing anaesthesia. However giving BB with premedication to patients taking usely this treatment allows better perioperative haemodynamic stability and avoids rebound effect. Experimentally, oxprenolol reverses regional dysfunction in ischaemic myocardium under halothane anaesthesia. During and after anaesthesia, intravenous (i.v.) BB must be used with caution to treat hypertension associated with tachycardia. In controlled hypotension, i.v. BB potentialise other agents. In phaechromocytoma surgery, alpha-blocking drugs are essential but additional BB can control tachycardia successfully. In coronary artery bypass surgery, giving BB prior to induction decreases cardiac enzymes serum levels. Esmolol, a new ultra-short-acting BB, would control perioperative tachycardia and hypertension without risk of prolonged cardiac depression.

Measurement and cardiovascular relevance of partial agonist activity (PAA) involving beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors

In the normal heart the ratio of beta 1/beta 2-receptors in both atria and ventricles is about 75:25; in the failing heart the ratio is about 60:40. Stimulation of either beta 1- or beta 2-receptors results in a positive chronotropic and inotropic response. In the periphery, with the exception of lipolysis, renin release, control of intraocular pressure and intestinal relaxation, beta 2-related activity predominates. The nature of the beta 2-receptor is being unravelled and it has now been cloned. The beta-receptor antagonist is 'anchored' via disulfide bonding. Subsequent events involve the regulatory protein guanine nucleotide which couples the receptor to adenylate cyclase. beta-receptor density may by up- or down-regulated. beta-stimulation down-regulates (uncouples and internalizes or sequestrates) and beta-antagonism up-regulates beta-receptor numbers, but the functional implications of such changes are not always clear. A partial agonist occupies a receptor site and competitively inhibits the full agonist (e.g. noradrenaline). A partial agonist differs from a full agonist in that maximal response of a tissue is less. When background sympathetic activity is absent or very low a partial agonist will act as an agonist, e.g. increase heart rate, but when background tone is high the partial agonist will behave functionally as an antagonist, e.g. decrease heart rate. In animals partial agonist activity (PAA) can be assessed in many ways. In the catecholamine-depleted (reserpine or syrosingopine), vagotomized or pithed, intact animal beta-activity can be assessed via changes in heart rate, cardiac contractility and atrioventricular conduction. Isolated organs can also be used such as atria, papillary muscle, tracheal, mesenteric artery and uterine preparations. The choice of animal is important as marked species differences in response can occur. In man assessing PAA is difficult due to the presence of an intact sympathetic system: the problem can be overcome by autonomic blockade of constrictor and vagal reflexes with prazosin, clonidine and atropine but leaving the beta-receptor mediated responses unimpaired. beta 1- and beta 2-selective PAA can also be gauged via an increased sleeping heart rate (basal sympathetic tone) in the presence and absence of a beta 1- and beta 2-selective antagonist. beta 1-selective PAA can also cause an increase in resting systolic blood pressure, beta 2-selective PAA may be further assessed by a fall in DBP, increased blood flow, fall in peripheral resistance or increased finger tremor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial salvage after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction

There is a need for a simple clinical measurement that will indicate the extent of myocardial salvage after successful thrombolysis. This study examined whether coronary artery reperfusion reduced the infarct size as assessed electrocardiographically after thrombolytic treatment. The sum of the (sigma) ST segment area in leads showing ST segment elevation in the 12 lead electrocardiogram at presentation was used as an index of potential myocardial injury (initial ischaemic index). The evolved infarct size at 48 h was assessed by a QRS scoring system. Two groups of patients, both admitted with anterior myocardial infarction within 6 h of onset, were studied. Group 1 (n = 35) received analgesia only and group 2 (n = 33) received thrombolytic treatment either by the intracoronary (streptokinase, n = 13) or intravenous route (anistreplase, n = 20). Reperfusion was assessed angiographically. The mean (SD) potential infarct size assessed by the initial ischaemic index was similar in both groups (group 1, sigma ST area = 115 (60) mm2 and group 2 = 126 (77 mm2). The QRS score representing evolved infarct size was significantly lower in the treated group (4.1 (2.5] than in group 1 (7.8 (2.6]. The 95% confidence intervals for QRS scores based on the admission sigma ST area from patients with successful reperfusion were applied to a third set of patients (n = 22) to test the ability of the admission ST area (myocardial injury) to predict the QRS score accurately. While patients with successful reperfusion had significantly lower QRS scores than those who did not (4.5 (3.1) versus 9.3 (3.4)), the wide confidence intervals caused by inter-individual variability precluded an accurate prediction of the QRS score in an individual from the sigma ST area at time of presentation. There was no difference in infarct size in patients treated early (</= 3 h) (QRS score 4.2(2.8)) or later (3-6 h) (4.1(2.1)). This study provides evidence that sequential electrocardiographic changes are reduced in patients with anterior infarction who achieve reperfusion after thrombolytic treatment and that this benefit is shown with treatment given up to six hours after infarct onset. None the less, the relation between the initial ischaemic index and the evolved QRS score has wide confidence intervals, reflecting inter-individual variability, and does not allow the prediction of a QRS score in an individual patient.

Drug treatment of hypertension

There are several first choices for the treatment of mild and moderate hypertension. The selection of a drug may be influenced by concomitant pathology, with positive indications for particular drugs, e.g. coexistent angina, indicating use of a beta-receptor blocking drug or calcium antagonist; fluid retention indicating a diuretic; or contraindication e.g. asthma, and beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs. beta-Adrenoceptor blocking drugs have the advantage of a long history and of possibly being cardioprotective following myocardial infarction, but they have not yet been established as primary preventive agents in hypertensive patients. The alpha-receptor blocking drugs have the advantage of favourably affecting lipid profile and blood pressure. Therefore, there may be advantages in the use of combined alpha- and beta-blockade. The diuretics, which have the advantage of being inexpensive, are widely used but long term metabolic effects, particularly hypokalaemia, cause concern. This is correctable by co-administration of a potassium sparing diuretic and often preventable by using low doses of the diuretic. Diet may be important as hypokalaemia appears to be less of a problem where potassium intake is high. Experience with calcium antagonists is widening but the use of converting enzyme inhibitors is more limited, and some physicians are less ready to use them as first choice in mild hypertension at present. Drugs like methyldopa, clonidine, the adrenergic neurone inhibitory drugs are now used more as reserve agents. More severe cases of hypertension may require drugs from 2 of the 3 major groups: beta-blocking drugs, vasodilators and diuretics. In some cases, drugs from each of these 3 groups will be required.

Possible interaction of platelets and adrenaline in the early phase of myocardial infarction

It is known that in most cases of transmural acute myocardial infarction a platelet clot originates within a coronary artery. In acute myocardial infarction patients increased levels of the plasma catecholamines adrenaline and noradrenaline as well as the platelet release proteins platelet factor 4 and beta-thromboglobulin have been reported. In this study, significantly higher values were found of platelet factor 4 (P less than 0.0001) and beta-thromboglobulin (P less than 0.002) in 17 acute myocardial infarction patients as compared to 17 control patients (on intensive care due to non-cardiac disorders), while the plasma levels of adrenaline and noradrenaline were not different. Positive correlations were obtained between the two catecholamines and the platelet products in the control group and between adrenaline and both platelet factor 4 (r = 0.715, P less than 0.01) and beta-thromboglobulin (r = 0.547, P less than 0.05) in the acute myocardial infarction patients. The data suggest that a stimulation of the platelets by adrenaline may facilitate in vitro activation during sampling in patients with high catecholamine load. On the other hand, a "preactivation" of the platelets by an increase of adrenaline might be of significance for thrombus formation in acute myocardial infarction.

Beneficial effects of timolol on infarct size and late ventricular tachycardia in patients with acute myocardial infarction

This investigation was undertaken to study the effects of beta-adrenergic blockade with timolol on infarct size and on the incidence of late ventricular tachycardia in patients with acute myocardial infarction of less than 6 hr of evolution. Patients were assigned randomly either to a placebo-treated group (98 patients) or to a timolol-treated group (102 patients). The patients were treated with 5.5 mg iv timolol (or matched placebo) as a bolus divided into four doses during the first 2 hr followed by 10 mg orally twice daily for 1 month. Cumulative total creatine kinase (CK) release, which reflects the amount of myocardial necrosis was 1677 +/- 132 IU/liter in the placebo group (n = 83) and 1274 +/- 73 IU/liter in the timolol group (n = 81, p less than .01), a 24% reduction. Cumulative release of CK-MB was 138 +/- 8 IU/liter in the placebo group and 106 +/- 8 IU/liter in the timolol group (p less than .01), a 23% reduction. Twenty-four hour Holter electrocardiograms were obtained on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 after the onset of the acute myocardial infarction in 80 patients in the placebo group and 82 patients in the timolol group. The incidence of ventricular tachycardia was lower in the timolol than in the placebo group (7 vs 16 patients, p = .05). We conclude that early administration of intravenous timolol followed by oral treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction reduces infarct size as assessed by CK and CK-MB serum activity, and decreases the occurrence of late ventricular tachycardia.

Interventions that potentially limit myocardial infarct size: overview of clinical trials

Theoretically, interventions that restore the balance between oxygen supply and demand when given during the early hours of a heart attack may reduce infarct size and prevent fatal arrhythmias and thereby prolong survival. Data on mortality from the available randomized trials of thrombolytic therapy, intravenous beta blockers, hyaluronidase, intravenous nitrates and calcium channel blockers in acute myocardial infarction, are systematically reviewed. Analyses confirm that intravenous streptokinase reduces mortality by about 25% but suggests that measures to prevent reinfarction may be required after thrombolytic therapy. beta blockers reduced mortality by approximately 15%. The pooled data from the existing trials of hyaluronidase and intravenous nitrates are consistent with a 15% to 20% decrease in mortality; ideally this should be confirmed in future large randomized trials. Currently, there is no evidence either from individual studies or the aggregate of all the trials that calcium channel blockers reduce mortality. The collective experience from the trials carried out over the last 2 decades suggests that most interventions in acute myocardial infarction have, at best, only moderate effects with a 10% to 20% reduction in mortality. Current and future trials that assess the effects of cardiovascular treatments on mortality should therefore aim to randomize 10,000 to 20,000 average risk patients or a few thousand high risk patients.

Meta-analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. I: Control of bias and comparison with large co-operative trials

Meta-analysis is an important method of bridging the gap between undersized randomized control trials and the treatment of patients. However, as in any retrospective study, the opportunities for bias to distort the results are widespread. Attempts must be made to introduce the controls found in prospective studies by blinding the selection of papers and extraction of data and making blinded duplicate determinations. Informal and personalized methods of obtaining data are probably more liable to error and bias than employing only published data. Publication bias is a serious problem requiring further research. There also need to be more comparisons of meta-analysed small studies with large co-operative trials.

Increased occurrence of left ventricular thrombi during early treatment with timolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction

To examine whether early intervention with timolol influences the occurrence of left ventricular thrombi in acute anterior myocardial infarction, 40 patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction admitted to hospital within 6 hr of onset of symptoms were randomly assigned to receive intravenous followed by oral timolol maleate or placebo. Five (25%) of 20 patients in the placebo group and 14 (73.7%) of 19 patients with confirmed infarction in the timolol group developed a left ventricular apical thrombus as detected by two-dimensional echocardiography from 2 to 10 days after inclusion (p less than .005). Patients received anticoagulants only after a left ventricular thrombus had been diagnosed. Only one patient with thrombus suffered peripheral embolization (timolol group). The treatment groups were comparable with respect to location of regional left ventricular dysfunction, electrocardiographic changes, and infarct size estimated by creatine kinase release. However, computer-assisted regional wall motion analysis demonstrated significantly reduced apical wall motion in the timolol group compared with the placebo group (p less than .01). Also, the mean heart rate during the first 10 days after the acute infarction was reduced by 13% in the timolol group (p less than .001). The reduction in heart rate and left ventricular apical wall motion caused by timolol in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction may increase the occurrence of left ventricular thrombi.

Infarct size--can it be measured or modified in humans?

Despite more than 15 years of intensive experimental and clinical research in the general area of limiting infarct size, no treatment has been shown to be so efficacious and relatively free of side effects that its routine use can be recommended. In addition, there is no ideal means of measuring infarct size as yet. However, considerable progress has been made in understanding mechanisms responsible for irreversible cellular injury and in identifying factors and anatomic alterations responsible for or contributing to the development of transmural (Q wave) and non-transmural (non-Q wave) myocardial infarcts. Interventions are available that are capable of causing rapid coronary thrombolysis, and techniques are becoming available tht have increasing power to size myocardial infarcts and estimate both segmental and ventricular function. Experimental studies have also suggested a potential benefit from a combination of reperfusion therapy with selected pharmacologic intervention in reducing infarct size and preserving ventricular function. It seems likely that this general area will remain an intensive area of clinical research in the immediate future.

Treatment of acute myocardial infarction with anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex

A controlled trial in 149 patients admitted to a district hospital with probable myocardial infarction tested the effect of 30 units of anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) on indices of infarct size. Patients were grouped prospectively according to whether they entered the trial within two and a half hours (early entry) or between two and a half and four hours (late entry) after onset of the symptoms. Sixty seven of 73 patients in the control group showed increased plasma activity of myocardial creatine kinase isoenzyme that was diagnostic of infarction compared with only 60 of 76 who received APSAC. The difference was significant overall but occurred predominantly in the early entry group. The patients who received APSAC had more early ventricular arrhythmias, compatible with reperfusion, and showed greater preservation of R waves during admission to hospital. Unwanted effects were generally minor and more common in the actively managed group than the control group (26% v 3%). After nine to 12 months of follow up 12 patients in the control group had died compared with seven in the actively managed group. The ease of administration and the apparent efficacy of APSAC suggest that it is suitable for use in a district hospital for patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction.

Intravenous infusion of magnesium sulphate after acute myocardial infarction: effects on arrhythmias and mortality

Two hundred patients with acute myocardial infarction were entered into a randomised double-blind trial where they received either intravenous magnesium sulphate or saline for 24 hours after admission to hospital. The incidence of ventricular arrhythmias necessitating treatment was reduced by more than half in the group receiving magnesium sulphate. There were two deaths in the group receiving magnesium sulphate and seven receiving saline placebo. Total cardiac events were significantly reduced in the magnesium treated group. These reductions cannot be attributed to differences in risk factors or therapy between the two groups, either before or during the period of study. These results suggest that magnesium administration reduces the incidence of serious tachyarrhythmias and death after acute myocardial infarction and that this simple regime warrants further study.

Effect of timolol on mortality and reinfarction after acute myocardial infarction: prognostic importance of heart rate at rest

Long-term timolol treatment after acute myocardial infarction is associated with a significant reduction in mortality and nonfatal reinfarction. To evaluate whether the reduction in mortality and morbidity is exclusively or partly dependent on a reduction in heart rate (HR), cardiac events in the Norwegian Timolol Multicenter Study were analyzed according to resting HR at baseline and at 1 month of follow-up Resting HR at baseline was a significant predictor of total death and all events (total death plus nonfatal reinfarction) both in placebo- and in timolol-treated patients. In the placebo group the median resting HR was unchanged from baseline to 1 month control (72 beats/min), but was reduced from 72 beats/min to 56 beats/min in the timolol group. Resting HR during follow-up remained a significant predictor of total death. Further, mortality at a given HR during treatment was not markedly different whether the HR was spontaneous or caused by timolol. Timolol treatment was related to a significant reduction in mortality, and this study suggests that the major effect of timolol treatment on mortality after acute myocardial infarction may be attributed to the reduction in HR. Timolol treatment was also associated with an overall reduction in nonfatal reinfarction. However, nonfatal reinfarction was inversely related to resting HR during follow-up, indicating that although coronary artery occlusion in low-risk patients may cause nonfatal reinfarction, the outcome in high-risk patients is more likely to be death. When analyzing mortality and nonfatal reinfarction combined, timolol treatment was related to a reduction in cardiac events at any given HR, suggesting that factors in addition to HR reduction are important in the protective effects of timolol.

Infarct size reduction: a review of the clinical trials

The most important finding to emerge from this review of experimental and clinical studies is that the earlier therapy is begun after the onset of symptoms of acute MI, the greater the potential for reduction of infarct size and possibly mortality. It is difficult to define a precise time after which therapy would not have an effect, since the clinical trials for each drug group vary significantly in respect to time of therapy initiation. In experimental studies, major salvage of ischemic myocardium occurs when the drug is given within two hours of coronary artery occlusion. If drug therapy is begun four to six hours postocclusion, then only minor or no reductions in infarct size will occur. The ability of any drug or intervention to reduce infarct size in humans would be optimized if therapy were begun less than four hours of onset of symptoms. With the realization of the wavefront phenomenon and the potential salvage of myocardium at risk with reperfusion, the introduction of reperfusion in the clinical setting with thrombolytic agents or other procedures becomes highly desirable. Clot-selective thrombolytic agents, such as tissue plasminogen activator, diminish the adverse effects and high costs of intracoronary thrombolytic therapy or PTCA. Consequently, it is probable that the initial procedure of choice would be the use of clot-selective thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolytic therapy only lyses thrombi and does not affect the underlying causes of the coronary artery occlusion. Therefore, therapy to reduce the chances of reinfarction and death must also be initiated. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, in selected patients, should reduce the reocclusion rate. Beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents appear to be an excellent therapy for reducing mortality when administered chronically; these agents reduce myocardial oxygen consumption and reverse the imbalance between oxygen supply and oxygen demand caused by activation of the sympathetic nervous system and actions of catecholamines. Since thrombus formation has occurred at least once in patients who survive an MI, it is probable that the conditions for thrombus formation still exist. Therefore, institution of antiplatelet aggregating drugs, such as aspirin, would seem to be an appropriate prophylactic regimen. Beta blockers and possibly nitroglycerin have desirable effects when thrombolysis is unavailable. The efficacy of calcium-channel blocking agents on reduction of infarct size appears to be limited, although in the setting of stable and unstable angina postinfarction, these agents can play an important role.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Epinephrine-induced hypokalemia: the role of beta adrenoceptors

Epinephrine was infused intravenously in 9 normal volunteers to plasma concentrations similar to those found after acute myocardial infarction. This study was undertaken on 3 occasions after 5 days of treatment with placebo or the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, atenolol, which is relatively beta 1 selective, or timolol, which blocks both beta 1 and beta 2 receptors. Epinephrine increased the systolic blood pressure (BP), decreased the diastolic BP and increased the heart rate modestly. These changes were prevented by atenolol. However, after timolol the diastolic BP rose by +19 mm Hg and heart rate fell by -8 beats/min. Epinephrine caused the corrected QT interval to lengthen (0.36 +/- 0.02 to 0.41 +/- 0.06 second). No significant changes were found in the corrected QT interval when subjects were pretreated with atenolol or timolol. The serum potassium decreased from 4.06 to 3.22 mmol/liter after epinephrine. Serum potassium decreased to a lesser extent to 3.67 mmol/liter after atenolol and actually increased to 4.25 mmol/liter after timolol. In a further study with a similar design another nonselective beta blocker propranolol also increased potassium after epinephrine. While atenolol also prevented hypokalemia in this study, it did not block the beta 2-receptor mediated decrease in diastolic BP. Epinephrine-induced hypokalemia results from stimulation of a beta-adrenoceptor linked to membrane sodium/potassium adenosine triphosphatase causing potassium influx. This appears to be predominantly mediated by beta 2 receptors although beta 1 receptors may also play a part.

The influence of early intervention in acute myocardial infarction on long-term mortality and morbidity as assessed in the Göteborg metoprolol trial

The mortality and morbidity were assessed during a 2-year follow-up in an acute intervention trial in suspected acute myocardial infarction with metoprolol (a selective beta 1-blocker). On admission to the trial, the 1395 participating patients were randomly allocated to metoprolol or placebo for 3 months. Thereafter, if there was no contraindication, patients with infarction and/or angina pectoris were continued on metoprolol for 2 years. A lower mortality was observed after 3 months in patients randomised to metoprolol. The difference remained after 2 years. The difference in 2-year mortality rate was restricted to patients randomised early after onset of pain. Late infarction was observed more often in the placebo group during the first 3 months. When the two groups thereafter were treated similarly, the difference successively declined and did not remain after 2 years. A similar incidence of angina pectoris was observed in the two groups at each check up. During the early recovery period, more patients in the metoprolol group returned to work. No such difference was observed later on.

Comparative hypotensive effects of acebutolol and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: a double-blind multicenter evaluation

A double-blind multicenter study compared oral acebutolol (n = 182) with hydrochlorothiazide (n = 178) in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 95 to 114 mm Hg). Both agents produced significant and comparable reductions in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures of 15.9, 14.9, and 15.3 mm Hg on acebutolol, and 15.2, 13.3, and 11.8 mm Hg on hydrochlorothiazide (p = 0.001). Acebutolol induced a significant reduction in resting heart rate of 9.3 bpm (p = 0.001) from baseline. The mean effective doses of acebutolol and hydrochlorothiazide were 757 and 68 mg, respectively. Significantly fewer patients on acebutolol experienced arrhythmia, anorexia, and flatulence, although an equal number of patients (14) in each group discontinued therapy prematurely due to side effects. More hydrochlorothiazide-treated patients developed abnormalities in the levels of serum glucose, uric acid, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum potassium, and chloride. No clinically significant trends in laboratory parameters were seen on acebutolol, although a small number of patients (11 on acebutolol and 3 on hydrochlorothiazide) developed asymptomatic positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) tests of low titer. The data show that acebutolol is as effective as hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of hypertension, is as well tolerated, and produces fewer biochemical abnormalities.

Early use of beta-adrenergic-blocking agents in acute myocardial infarction

Of recent interest is the acute use of beta-adrenergic-blocking agents in patients who have suffered an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Acute use of beta-blockers refers to initiation of therapy within hours following the onset of symptoms suggestive of AMI. The proposed goal of therapy is to alter the infarction process to improve mortality. Because of the hyperadrenergic activity present in patients during an infarction, beta-blockers are theoretically an attractive therapeutic intervention because of their sympatholytic properties. Acute use of beta-blockers has been shown to limit infarct size, as determined by cardiac enzyme activity, and reduce the incidence of major ventricular arrhythmias. Beta-blockers may also prevent infarction in patients with symptoms suggestive of infarction. However, the acute use of beta-adrenergic-blocking agents has not been shown to reduce short-term (less than or equal to 30 d) mortality. In view of this fact, the acute use of beta-adrenergic-blocking agents cannot be recommended.

Differences in haemodynamic response to beta-blocking drugs between stable coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction

Theoretically the increased sympathoadrenal activity following acute myocardial infarction might augment the haemodynamic impact of beta-adrenoceptor blockade. To evaluate this question 32 haemodynamic studies were performed to compare the effects of equivalent beta-blocking doses of propranolol (8 mg i.v.) and pindolol (0.8 mg i.v.) in patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction (A.M.I.) or stable coronary artery disease (and a presumptive low sympathetic state). In stable coronary artery disease there were clear differences between the haemodynamic impact of propranolol and pindolol. Propranolol decreased both heart rate (delta HR -7 beat/min) and cardiac index (delta CI -0.4 l/min/m2), with an increased pulmonary artery occluded pressure (delta PAOP +4 mmHg) and systemic vascular resistance index (delta SVRI +358 dyn X s X cm-5 m2). However an equivalent beta-blocking dose of pindolol increased PAOP (delta PAOP +3 mmHg) leaving other variables unchanged. These differential actions of propranolol and pindolol have previously been ascribed to the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (I.S.A.) of pindolol maintaining cardiac pumping function in a low sympathetic state. In contrast following myocardial infarction, both drugs reduced cardiac index to a significantly greater extent compared with stable coronary artery disease (delta CI propranolol -0.81/min/m2; pindolol -0.4 l/min/m2; p less than 0.05); propranolol also reduced the systemic arterial blood pressure (delta systolic -10 mmHg; delta mean -5 mmHg; p less than 0.05). The haemodynamic relevance of the I.S.A. of pindolol appeared attenuated following A.M.I. These data are compatible with experimental evidence of sympathetic nervous activation following coronary occlusion; the resulting hyperadrenergic state appears to condition an augmented haemodynamic response to beta-blocking drugs irrespective of their ancillary pharmacological properties.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)