Mesalazine during pregnancy

Use of medications during pregnancy and breastfeeding for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis

Introduction: The peak age of diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) occurs during childbearing years, therefore management of IBD during pregnancy is a frequent occurrence. Maintenance of disease remission is crucial to optimize pregnancy outcomes, and potential maternal or fetal toxicity from medications must be balanced against the risks of untreated IBD.Areas covered: This review summarizes the literature on safety and use of medications for IBD during pregnancy and lactation.Expert opinion: 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids and thiopurines are safe for use during pregnancy, while methotrexate and tofacitinib should only be used with extreme caution. Anti-TNF agents (except certolizumab), vedolizumab, ustekinumab and tofacitinib readily traverse the placenta via active transport, therefore theoretically may affect fetal development. Certolizumab only undergoes passive transfer across the placenta, thus has markedly lower cord blood levels making it likely the safest biologic agent for infants. There is reasonable evidence to support the safety of anti-TNF monotherapy and combination therapy during pregnancy and lactation. Vedolizumab and ustekinumab are also thought to be safe in pregnancy and lactation, while tofacitinib is generally avoided due to teratogenic effects in animal studies.

Safety of treatments for inflammatory bowel disease: Clinical practice guidelines of the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD)

Inflammatory bowel diseases are chronic conditions of unknown etiology, showing a growing incidence and prevalence in several countries, including Italy. Although the etiology of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis is unknown, due to the current knowledge regarding their pathogenesis, effective treatment strategies have been developed. Several guidelines are available regarding the efficacy and safety of available drug treatments for inflammatory bowel diseases. Nevertheless, national guidelines provide additional information adapted to local feasibility, costs and legal issues related to the use of the same drugs. These observations prompted the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) to establish Italian guidelines on the safety of currently available treatments for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. These guidelines discuss the use of aminosalicylates, systemic and low bioavailability corticosteroids, antibiotics (metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, rifaximin), thiopurines, methotrexate, cyclosporine A, TNFα antagonists, vedolizumab, and combination therapies. These guidelines are based on current knowledge derived from evidence-based medicine coupled with clinical experience of a national working group.

[Guidelines for the management of Crohn's disease]

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with uncertain etiopathogenesis. CD can involve any site of gastrointestinal tract from the mouth to anus and is associated with serious complications such as bowel strictures, perforations, and fistula formation. The incidence and prevalence rates of CD in Korea are still lower than those of Western countries, but have been rapidly increasing during the past decades. Although there are no definitive curative modalities for CD, various medical and surgical therapies are currently applied for diverse clinical situations of CD. However, a lot of decisions on the management of CD are made depending on the personal experiences and choices of physicians. To suggest preferable approaches to diverse problems of CD and to minimize the variations according to physicians, guidelines for the management of CD are needed. Therefore, IBD Study Group of the Korean Association for the Study of the Intestinal Diseases has set out to develop the guidelines for the management of CD in Korea. These guidelines were developed using the adaptation methods and encompass the treatment of inflammatory disease, stricturing disease, and penetrating disease. The guidelines also cover the indication of surgery, prevention of recurrence after surgery, and CD in pregnancy and lactation. These are the first Korean guidelines for the management of CD and the update with further scientific data and evidences is needed.

Comparative tolerability of therapies for ulcerative colitis

This article reviews the clinical pharmacology, adverse events, and comparative tolerability of the drugs commonly available for treating ulcerative colitis. Synthetic glucocorticoids are the most commonly used conventional corticosteroids in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Corticosteroids can be expected to impact on every organ system and most metabolic activities of the body. Suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is common, but reversible, with conventional corticosteroids, but not with newer topically-acting corticosteroids. A serious complication of corticosteroids in children is growth retardation. The frequent adverse effects associated with the use of corticosteroids have prompted the development of a new group of rectal agents with equivalent efficacy and a more benign adverse event profile such as prednisolone metasulfobenzoate, fluticasone propionate, tixocortol pivalate, beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide. The incidence of adverse effects related to the use of sulfasalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid plus sulfapyridine) is high and is dose related. The most frequently reported adverse effect is intolerance, not allergy, and relates to the sulfapyridine moiety correlating with the acetylator phenotype. Tolerance to 5-aminosalicylic acid by 80 to 90% of those patients allergic to, or intolerant of, sulfasalazine has given further evidence suggesting that the sulfa moiety is responsible for much of the toxicity of sulfasalazine. However, 10 to 20% of patients who are sulfasalazine intolerant have similar reactions to 5-aminosalicylic acid formulations, indicating that the 5-aminosalicylic acid moiety is responsible for adverse events in some patients taking sulfasalazine. Adverse effects resulting from treatment with azathioprine and mercaptopurine can be divided into two categories: allergic-type reactions that appear to be dose-independent and nonallergic-type reactions that are probably dose- and metabolism-dependent. It is well established now that genotype and thiopurine methyltransferase activity have an important impact on the rate of adverse effects during azathioprine or mercaptopurine therapy. Adverse effects resulting from high dose cyclosporin therapy for inflammatory bowel disease include: renal insufficiency, hypertension, opportunistic infections, seizures, paresthesias, tremor, headache, gingival hyperplasia, hypertrichosis, and anaphylaxis with intravenous cyclosporin. In contrast, the incidence of adverse events was relatively low when low-dose oral cyclosporin was used. The incidence of adverse events associated with any of the medications used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis is difficult to assess and it is therefore hard to make a comparative evaluation. The broadening of the drug regimen available to the clinician has advanced our knowledge about the disease, and further development of more effective, less toxic agents can be anticipated in the future.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease During Pregnancy

The management of both male and female patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who wish to have a baby is challenging. For women, the most important factor to bear in mind is that the outcome of pregnancy is largely influenced by disease activity at the time of conception. Women with quiescent disease are likely to have an uncomplicated pregnancy with the delivery of a healthy baby, whereas women with active disease are more likely to have complications such as spontaneous abortions, miscarriages, stillbirths, and exacerbation of the disease. This is more true of patients with Crohn's disease than of patients with ulcerative colitis. Although the safety of medications used during pregnancy is an important issue, the impact of the medications used to treat IBD is less important in comparison to disease activity itself. 5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) products appear to be safe during pregnancy; corticosteroids are probably safe; 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine should be used with caution; and methotrexate is contraindicated. There are inadequate data on the use of infliximab during pregnancy. In regard to men with IBD, the disease itself does not seem to have any negative impact on fertility. However, there is controversy about the effects of using 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine prior to and during fertilization. In view of possible adverse pregnancy outcomes, it would be prudent to withhold 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine therapy in men with IBD for 3 months prior to conception, when feasible. Most IBD medications should be continued before, during, and after pregnancy, with careful attention to the known cautions and exceptions. If IBD in a pregnant patient is in remission, the prognosis for pregnancy is the same as if she did not have IBD. Active disease should therefore be treated aggressively and remission accomplished before pregnancy is attempted. Similarly, a woman who unexpectedly becomes pregnant while her IBD is active should be treated aggressively, as remission remains the greatest investment for a favorable pregnancy outcome.

Pregnancy, fertility, and disease course in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis

Pattern recognition of the long-term disease course before, during, and after pregnancy can provide us with data about the influence of pregnancy on IBD, and vice versa. Determinants that predict an indolent versus an aggressive disease course are currently being sought. Our intention is to analyze the disease course during pregnancy in an EU-IBD inception cohort of 1200 patients diagnosed from 1991 to 1993 and followed up for 10 years. We also attempt to evaluate such factors as smoking and medication and to predict pregnancy course and fertility in IBD as well as in a cross-sectional study of members of the patient organization EFCCA. One of the questions that arose was: what factor is responsible for the observation that pregnancy decreases the incidence of relapses and the development of fibrostenotic lesions? Relaxin and the glycoprotein YKL-40 are validated in the cohort. The protein relaxin, produced by the corpus luteum during pregnancy, increases the laxity of fibrous tissue. Collagen fibers are dissolved and disorganized. As maternal rejection of the fetus does not occur, a protein from the fetal lymphocytes most likely decreases the maternal lymphocyte response. Multiparity may lead to subtle, acquired immune deficits. Glycoprotein YKL-40, which causes fibrosis in RA and cirrhosis, is speculated to be lower in multiparous women than in nonpregnant women due to the fetal lymphocytes that secrete a protein that is a potential immune modulator. Knowledge gained from future EC-IBD studies may result in new legislation (e.g. regarding adoption) that can benefit IBD patients throughout Europe.

Treating inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy: risks and safety of drug therapy

The safety of drug therapy for inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy is an important clinical concern. Current available information is largely derived from animal studies and clinical experience among patients with inflammatory bowel disease and autoimmune disorders and organ transplant recipients. However, these data are confounded by various factors including difficulty projecting the results of animal studies to humans, methodological deficiencies of some studies, insufficient experience with certain agents, difficulty distinguishing the fetal effects of underlying disease from drug therapy and a need to consider the impact of background rates of adverse fetal outcomes which apply to all pregnancies. In inflammatory bowel disease, the effects of active inflammation on the fetus are believed to be more harmful than those of drug treatment, and therapy is often justified to induce or maintain remission during pregnancy. The choice of appropriate treatment is determined by the severity of the disease and the potential for drug toxicity. No causal relationship has been established between exposure to sulfasalazine or other 5-aminosalicylic acid drugs and the development of congenital malformations. These drugs may be used with relative safety during pregnancy and lactation. Considerable experience with corticosteroids have shown them to pose very small risk to the developing fetus. Current evidence indicates that maternal use of azathioprine is not associated with an increased risk of congenital malformations, though impaired fetal immunity, growth retardation or prematurity is occasionally observed. Preliminary evidence derived from patients with inflammatory bowel disease show no significant fetal toxicity following first trimester exposure to mercaptopurine, though its elective use in pregnancy is controversial. Cyclosporin is not teratogenic, but may be associated with growth retardation and prematurity. Pregnancy should be avoided in women treated with methotrexate because of its known abortifacient effects and risk of causing typical malformations. Although treatment with metronidazole or ciprofloxacin for short durations appear to be devoid of adverse fetal reactions, the effect of prolonged exposure as required in Crohn's disease remains unknown.

Foetal outcome in women with inflammatory bowel disease treated during pregnancy with oral mesalazine microgranules

BACKGROUND

Little information is available about the safety of high doses of mesalazine during pregnancy.

AIM

To study the fate of pregnancy and foetal outcome in women taking 1-4 g/day of mesalazine microgranules for inflammatory bowel disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Case reports were collected from the Pharmacovigilance Department of Ferring SA, France, from a survey conducted in three gastroenterology units, and from a teratology information service. The evolution of pregnancy and foetal outcome were assessed by questionnaire.

RESULTS

The study covered a total of 123 pregnancies (126 foetuses). Ninety-six women took mesalazine during the first trimester, 85 during the second and 83 during the third. The mean daily dose was 2.1+/-0.8 g; 86 women received <3 g/day (low-dose group), 37 women received > or =3 g/day (high-dose group). The following abnormalities were observed in the low-dose and high-dose groups, respectively: ectopic pregnancy (1/0), spontaneous abortions (1/1), foetal death (0/1), premature deliveries (3/5, P < 0.05), congenital malformations (3/1) and one case of lethal oxalosis. Abnormalities were not considered to be related to mesalazine.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of oral mesalazine microgranules during pregnancy is safe at doses < or =2 g/day, and probably also at a dose of 3 g/day.

Inflammatory bowel disease and pregnancy

Despite the lack of prospective studies on the relationship between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and pregnancy, the evidence strongly supports the conclusions that fertility is compromised in active Crohn's disease; heredity plays an important role in type and location of disease; fetal outcome is essentially no different than in the general population, except in the presence of active Crohn's disease during pregnancy; and the course of IBD during pregnancy is influenced by disease activity or lack of it before pregnancy. The major influence on outcome of pregnancy, fetal outcome, and course of IBD is the favorable effect of drug therapy on the disease. Most drugs, including sulfasalazine, 5ASA products, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressives, are safe, certainly safer than permitting the disease to be active and allowing for the possibility of surgical intervention during pregnancy. Episiotomy is contraindicated in women with Crohn's disease and perirectal complications. Cesarean section probably is indicated in most patients with Crohn's disease with colonic involvement.