Effects of tamoxifen on uterus

Estrogen receptor agonists/antagonists in breast cancer therapy: A critical review

Estrogens display intriguing tissue selective action that is of great biomedical importance in the development of optimal therapeutics for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer. There are also strong evidences to show that both endogenous and exogenous estrogens are involved in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Tamoxifen has been the only drug of choice for more than 30years to treat patients with estrogen related (ER) positive breast tumors. There is a need therefore, for identifying newer, potential and novel candidates for breast cancer. Keeping this in view, the present review focuses on selective estrogen receptor modulators and estrogen antagonists such as sulfatase and aromatase inhibitors involved in breast cancer therapy. A succinct and critical overview of the structure of estrogen receptors, their signaling and involvement in breast carcinogenesis are herein described.

Oestrogen and selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs): current roles in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis

Post-menopausal oestrogen replacement therapy (HRT) is the agent of choice for restraint of post-menopausal bone loss. In numerous observational, and in a few intervention studies, it has been shown to reduce osteoporotic fractures. However, in order to be effective treatment has to be carried on long term. This is a task not easily achieved due to poor patient adherence. The majority of patients stop treatment after a few months. Fear of breast cancer and refusal to tolerate resumption of cyclic withdrawal bleeding are the principal objections. Newer and more user-friendly forms of treatment are needed. Ideally, these should have an efficacy similar to oestrogen on the central nervous system, cardiovascular system and bone, without adverse effects on the breast and uterus. With this in mind, Selective oestrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) have been developed. In this chapter we review how effective modern pharmacology has been in achieving an improved design of hormonal replacement for the post-menopausal women, and the place that it has obtained today alongside both older and newer forms of treatment.

The Molecular Pharmacology of SERMs

Estrogen-containing medicines have been used successfully for the past 50 years for the treatment of conditions associated with menopause. Although initially considered a reproductive hormone, millions of years of clinical exposure to estrogen(s) have indicated that its influence extends to a variety of target tissues not generally considered to be involved in reproduction. Specifically, estrogen has positive actions in the skeleton, the cardiovascular system and possibly the central nervous system, activities that combine to have a positive impact on mortality and morbidity. However, despite the medical benefits afforded by estrogen replacement therapy, the number of women who initiate or remain on therapy for longer than one year is relatively small. This is due in part to the fear that estrogens increase the risk for breast cancer. Consequently, it was realized several years ago that novel estrogen receptor modulators were needed, which would retain the beneficial effects of estrogens in most target organs but be inactive in the breast. Although the perfect tissue-selective estrogen remains to be identified, progress in this direction has been made. In the past year, for example, we have seen selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) enter into the clinic for the prevention of osteoporosis. Compounds of this class, which function as estrogens in the skeletal system but oppose estrogen action in the breast, are the first step in developing the perfect hormone replacement therapy. This review summarizes the complex pharmacology of the SERMs and illustrates how they differ mechanistically from estradiol, the physiological ligand of the estrogen receptor.

Current and potential future drug treatments for osteoporosis

There has been a major interest in the drug treatment of osteoporosis and an increase in the number of drugs available in most countries. The ideal drug (one which increases or restores bone density and trabecular connectivity) is still not available. However, in patients with relatively preserved trabecular connectivity and moderately reduced bone density, several agents have shown substantial clinical benefit. Oestrogens are still the mainstay of drug treatment, but the risks of breast cancer versus the cardiovascular and skeletal benefits with long term use have to be assessed in the individual. Newer tissue specific oestrogens show some promise in this respect. The bisphosphonates and possibly fluoride are likely to be the major alternatives to oestrogens in the medium term. The newer bisphosphonates, alendronate and in the future risedronate, are likely to supersede etidronate. Calcitriol probably has a limited role, confined to those patients in whom HRT or bisphosphonates are not appropriate. Calcium supplementation, or an increase in dietary intake if deficient, irrespective of which agent is used, is also of benefit. In older patients there is considerable support for using a combination of calcium and vitamin D. Whether combination treatment, for example oestrogens, bisphosphonates, and calcium together, will result in greater efficacy remains to be conclusively shown, but may be an attractive option in younger patients with higher bone turnover. Apart from fluoride, bone formation stimulators are unlikely to have a major role until the next century, although it may be possible to use growth factors as part of an ADFR regimen (A = activate remodelling, D = depress resorption, F = free formation, and R = repeat). This is still an important theoretical approach and needs further work with newer agents to see if increased efficacy can be found. In addition sequential treatment may be necessary in view of the limited time periods over which particular agents, such as intermittent fluoride (four years), have been examined, and this will have to be individually tailored. Other approaches include trying to increase peak bone mineral density, although influencing the young to prevent a disease that may not manifest itself for half a century is daunting.