Treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia in pregnancy

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell donation from healthy female donors during pregnancy and lactation: what do we know?

BACKGROUND Hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) are mostly used as supportive measures to reduce infectious complications associated with neutropenia. Over the past decade, the use of HGFs became a common method for mobilizing human CD34+ stem cells, either for autologous or allogeneic transplantation. However, since their introduction the long-term safety of the procedure has become a major focus of discussion and research. Most information refers to healthy normal donors and data concerning pregnant and lactating women are scarce. The clinical question, which is the core of this review, is whether stem cell donation, preceded by administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for mobilization, is a safe procedure for pregnant donors. METHODS Literature searches were performed in Pubmed for English language articles published before the end of May 2012, focusing on G-CSF administration during pregnancy, lactation and hematopoietic stem cell donation. Searches included animal and human studies. RESULTS Data from animals (n = 15 studies) and women (n = 46 studies) indicate that G-CSF crosses the placenta, stimulates fetal granulopoiesis, improves neonatal survival mostly for very immature infants, promotes trophoblast growth and placental metabolism and has an anti-abortive role. Granulocyte macrophage-CSF is a key cytokine in the maternal immune tolerance towards the implanted embryo and exerts protective long-term programming effects to preimplantation embryos. The available data suggest that probably CSFs should not be administered during the time of most active organogenesis (first trimester), except perhaps for the first week during which implantation takes place. Provided CSF is administered during the second and third trimesters, it appears to be safe, and pregnant women receiving the CSF treatment can become hematopoietic stem cell donors. There are also risks related to the anesthesia, which is required for the bone marrow aspiration. During lactation, there should be a period of at least 3 days to allow for clearance of CSF from milk before resuming breast feeding. With regard to teratogenicity or leukaemogenity, in non-pregnant or non-lactating women reports show that CSF administration is associated with a risk for leukemia; however, this risk is not higher compared with the control population. CONCLUSIONS The information available to date indicates that administration of CSF in general, and G-CSF in particular, is safe and healthy pregnant women can serve as donors of either bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells. However, the clinical experience is rather limited and therefore until more data become available, G-CSF should not be used during pregnancy and lactation when other therapeutic options, instead of stem cell transplantation, are available.

Effect of Pregnancy on the Pharmacokinetics of Paclitaxel: A Case Report

Breast cancer during pregnancy is increasingly common as women delay childbearing until later in life. Safe administration of adjuvant chemotherapy during pregnancy has been reported. Physiologic and metabolic changes during pregnancy could alter the pharmacokinetics of these agents. This is a pilot study to prospectively study the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutic agents during pregnancy. Herein, we report the initial results with paclitaxel in the first patient.

Maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancy complicated with acute leukemia: a single institutional experience with 10 pregnancies at 16 years

The incidence of acute leukemia in pregnancy is low and the management of acute leukemia during pregnancy is difficult. We have observed a total of 10 pregnancies in 8 patients. Six of the patients had acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) and two of them had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Three of the pregnancies were diagnosed when the leukemia was in remission, six at the time of leukemia diagnosis and one at the time of leukemic relapse. Six of the pregnancies were found in first trimester, three in the second and one early in the third. Three pregnancies ended with spontaneous abortion, three with intrauterine death and three with medical termination. One of spontaneous abortions and one intrauterine death developed during combination chemotherapy (daunorubicin, cytarabine). Only 1 healthy baby survived from the 10 pregnancies and this child was the not exposed to chemotherapeutic agents. None of the cases had gynecologic and obstetric complications. Five of eight pregnant women with leukemia died because of the primary disease.

Current Perspectives on the Use of Growth Factors in the Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia; Malignancy

Recombinant haematopoietic growth factors have been available for clinical use for over a decade, however their role in the management of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) has yet to be established. There are several potential roles for the use of growth factors in the management of patients with AML, including reduction in the infective complications associated with the underlying disease and its treatment, use as mobilising agents in stem cell transplantation and as priming agents with chemotherapy. Clinical trials have failed to give clear indications for the use of growth factors following chemotherapy, mainly due to the variability of patient populations, chemotherapy and growth factor schedules used. G-CSF appears to be associated with no negative impact on remission rate or survival but clear benefits in terms of infection-related endpoints were not universally seen. Three studies did show a reduction in duration of hospitalisation, particularly when G-CSF was used following consolidation chemotherapy and economic analyses have also shown financial advantages to the administration of G-CSF. GM-CSF had a variable impact on survival and only two studies demonstrated reduction in serious infections or antimicrobial therapy use. These trials also showed economic benefits for the use of GM-CSF. Clinical studies which have attempted to exploit possible potentiation of chemotherapeutic activity by recruitment of leukaemic cells into the cell cycle have generally been disappointing. Use of growth factors for this purpose, outside the context of randomised clinical trials cannot be recommended. GM-CSF may have a role in modulating the cellular immune response against cancer cells but experimental data on its activity against leukaemia cells is limited. Augmentation of white cell function by G-CSF or GM-CSF may also be of clinical benefit in patients with suspected or confirmed fungal infection and further trials are underway.