Safe mobilization of normal progenitors in advanced chronic myeloid leukemia with intensive chemotherapy and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor

Effect of imatinib mesylate combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on leukaemic blast cells derived from advanced-stage chronic myelogenous leukaemia patients

Neutropenia is a severe adverse effect that can occur when treating patients with imatinib mesylate for advanced-stage chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML). Therefore, we evaluated in vitro the combined effect of imatinib and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on proliferation and apoptosis of Bcr-Abl-expressing leukaemic cells to infer the safety of G-CSF administration. In KU812 and K562 cell lines, G-CSF neither stimulated their proliferation nor abolished the suppressive effect of imatinib. However, it stimulated the proliferation of blast cells in 2 out of the 5 cases with advanced-stage CML. These in vitro studies appear to provide data for the decision of G-CSF administration in combination with imatinib in the treatment of neutropenic patients with advanced-stage CML.

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia

Experimental and clinical evidence for persistence of polyclonal Philadelphia chromosome negative (Ph-) progenitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients has provided the rationale for autologous transplantation. Clinical trials of autologous transplantation suggest that this procedure can induce cytogenetic remissions in a subset of patients and may be associated with longer-than-expected patient survival. Most autologous transplant recipients, however, continue to have evidence of persistent leukemia. Recent reports indicating that it is possible to collect sufficient numbers of Ph- peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation from most patients in complete cytogenetic remission on imatinib treatment have rekindled interest in autologous transplantation in CML. Additional approaches to eliminate residual disease in autografts and to sustain cytogenetic response after transplantation, however, will be required to achieve long-term restoration of Ph- hematopoiesis. Several promising methods to improve purging of the autograft and for more effective elimination of residual leukemia are being explored.

Mobilisation of haemopoietic progenitors in CML: a second course of intensive chemotherapy does not improve Ph-negativity in stem cell harvests

We collected peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in 19 early chronic phase CML patients following each of two consecutive cycles of intensive chemotherapy (CT) to evaluate whether an additional cycle of CT would increase Philadelphia (Ph)-negativity of the PBSC harvest. Autologous SCT (autoSCT) was performed if a major cytogenetic response (MCR) of the PBSC harvest was obtained. CT consisted of cytarabine 200 mg/ m2/day (days 1-7)/idarubicin 12 mg/m2/day (days 1-2) (cycle one) and cytarabine 2000 mg/m2/day (days 1-6)/amsacrine 120 mg/m2/day (days 1-3) (cycle two). One patient died of fungal pneumonia after the first cycle. Stem cells were harvested in 18 patients after cycle one and in 16 patients after cycle two. After the first cycle, all patients showed a cytogenetic response of their graft (MCR in eight patients: three complete, five partial), after cycle two, seven patients obtained an MCR (one complete, six partial). Seven patients became eligible for autoSCT. All patients proceeded with IFNalpha maintenance. Currently, 16 patients are alive. At the latest cytogenetic examination of bone marrow, four patients showed an MCR and four a minor response. In conclusion, although a second cycle of CT may contribute to elimination of leukemia residing in the patient, it appeared to be ineffective in improving the Ph-negativity of the PBSC graft.

Selection and use of chemotherapy with hematopoietic growth factors for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) have become the preferred means of stem cell support for high-dose chemotherapy in recent years. The biology of PBPC mobilization is complex and may be influenced by several variables. Signals from both stromal and hemopoietic cells may induce downregulation of adhesion molecules and upregulate the expression of metalloproteinases. Cytokines alone can mobilize PBPCs but a synergistic effect has been shown when they are used in conjunction with chemotherapy. Disease-specific mobilization strategies appear to have the advantage of less toxicity, greater stem cell yield, and enhanced antitumor activity. Studies have demonstrated that the number of peripheral blood CD34+ cells can be used as a predictor for the timing of apheresis and for estimating PBPC yield. Similarly the CD34+ cell dose is the strongest predictor of hematologic recovery after PBPC transplant. Age, prior radiotherapy, marrow involvement, and prior chemotherapy (especially with alkylating agents) are important factors influencing the yield of stem cells.