Medical therapies for the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions

Surface engineering and the application of laser-based processes to stents - A review of the latest development

Late in-stent thrombus and restenosis still represent two major challenges in stents’ design. Surface treatment of stent is attracting attention due to the increasing importance of stenting intervention for coronary artery diseases. Several surface engineering techniques have been utilised to improve the biological response in vivo on a wide range of biomedical devices. As a tailorable, precise, and ultra-fast process, laser surface engineering offers the potential to treat stent materials and fabricate various 3D textures, including grooves, pillars, nanowires, porous and freeform structures, while also modifying surface chemistry through nitridation, oxidation and coatings. Laser-based processes can reduce the biodegradable materials' degradation rate, offering many advantages to improve stents’ performance, such as increased endothelialisation rate, prohibition of SMC proliferation, reduced platelet adhesion and controlled corrosion and degradation. Nowadays, adequate research has been conducted on laser surface texturing and surface chemistry modification. Laser texturing on commercial stents has been also investigated and a promotion of performance of laser-textured stents has been proved.

In this critical review, the influence of surface texture and surface chemistry on stents performance is firstly reviewed to understand the surface characteristics of stents required to facilitate cellular response. This is followed by the explicit illustration of laser surface engineering of stents and/or related materials. Laser induced periodic surface structure (LIPSS) on stent materials is then explored, and finally the application of laser surface modification techniques on latest generation of stent devices is highlighted to provide future trends and research direction on laser surface engineering of stents.

•

Compared conventional surface engineering with laser-based methods for biomedical devices.

•

Explained the influence of texture geometry and surface chemistry on stents biological response.

•

Reviewed state of the art in laser surface engineering of stents for improved biological response.

•

Reviewed state of the art in laser surface engineering to control degradation of bioresorbable stents.

•

Highlighted novel laser surface engineering designs for improved stents'performance.

The Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Part II

The paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents are currently the only drug-eluting stents approved for use in the United States. These 2 stents differ in terms of mechanism of drug action, the construct of the stent itself, and the drug delivery polymer. Clinical trials have demonstrated superiority of both paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents when compared with bare-metal stents in terms of reducing restenosis and the need for target vessel revascularization. Recently published head-to-head trials have not conclusively shown 1 drug-eluting stent to be superior to the other, but have demonstrated more favorable angiographic results with the sirolimus-eluting stent compared with the paclitaxel-eluting stent; however, no significant difference has been demonstrated in clinical outcomes such as myocardial infarction or death. In terms of economics, the paclitaxel-eluting stent is substantially more expensive than the bare-metal stent. However, by significantly reducing the risk of restenosis and need for repeat revascularization, the higher direct cost of the paclitaxel-eluting stent may in theory be offset by lower overall healthcare costs, although economic analyses have yet to definitively establish that the paclitaxel-eluting stent is truly cost-effective. There is still much to be discovered regarding the paclitaxel-eluting stent, specifically the optimal stent design and drug release mechanism, the relative safety and efficacy of the paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with other drug-eluting stents, the long-term effects of the paclitaxel-eluting stent, the ideal antiplatelet regimen to use in patients with a paclitaxel-eluting stent, the safety and efficacy of the paclitaxel-eluting stent in various high-risk patient groups, and the ultimate cost-effectiveness of this device.

Intracoronary brachytherapy for the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary revascularization

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to review the current literature pertaining to intracoronary brachytherapy for the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCR).

METHODS

English-language articles were identified through a MEDLINE search (January 1984 to January 2003) using the keywords brachytherapy, radioactive stents, and coronary arteries. In addition, pertinent reference citations from relevant articles were reviewed.

RESULTS

Restenosis after PCR is a complex process, thought to be due to a combination of vessel wall remodeling and neointimal proliferation. To date, catheter-based delivery of intracoronary brachytherapy has been found to prevent vessel wall remodeling and causes a reduction in the proliferation of the neointima. Neointimal proliferation, as measured by mean neointimal area, was reduced in all animal studies (range 26%-91%). In contrast, animal studies examining radioactive stents demonstrated an increase in neointimal proliferation, suggesting that they may not be helpful at preventing post-PCR restenosis. All human studies using catheter-based intracoronary brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis have employed either beta (beta) or gamma (gamma) radiation sources with variable doses of radiation (range 7-56 Grays [Gy]). Restenosis occurred in 12% to 40% of patients in nonrandomized studies, and clinical events occurred in 13% to 50% of patients. To date, there have been 7 published randomized trials in humans comparing catheter-based intracoronary brachytherapy to placebo, with a total of 1047 patients. The dose of radiation in the trials ranged from 14 Gy to 30 Gy. During follow-up, 8% to 33% of patients who received brachytherapy had restenosis versus 39% to 64% of patients receiving placebo. Clinical events occurred in 19% to 50% among patients who received brachytherapy versus 29% to 79% among patients receiving placebo. The majority of human studies examining radioactive stents do not demonstrate a reduction in restenosis in patients post-PCR. There are no randomized trials examining radioactive stents in humans.

CONCLUSION

Nonrandomized studies of radioactive stents suggest they are not effective at preventing in-stent restenosis. In contrast, data from animal and human studies suggest that catheter-based intracoronary brachytherapy can prevent in-stent restenosis and reduce clinical events post-PCR.

Nitric oxide synthase gene therapy for cardiovascular disease

Gene therapy refers to the transfer of specific genes to the host tissue to intervene in a disease process, with resultant alleviation of the symptoms of a particular disease. Cardiovascular gene transfer is not only a powerful technique for studying the function of specific genes in cardiovascular biology and pathobiology, but also a novel and promising strategy for treating cardiovascular diseases. Since the mid-1990s, nitric oxide synthase (NOS), the enzyme that catalyzes the formation of nitric oxide (NO) from L-arginine, has received considerable attention as a potential candidate for cardiovascular gene therapy, because NO exerts critical and diverse functions in the cardiovascular system, and abnormalities in NO biology are apparent in a number of cardiovascular disease processes including cerebral vasospasm, atherosclerosis, postangioplasty restenosis, transplant vasculopathy, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, impotence and delayed wound healing. There are three NOS isoforms, i.e., endothelial (eNOS), neuronal (nNOS) and inducible (iNOS). All three NOS isoforms have been used in cardiovascular gene transfer studies with encouraging results. This review will discuss the rationale of NOS gene therapy in different cardiovascular disease settings and summarize the results of experimental NOS gene therapy from various animal models of cardiovascular disease to date.