A system for the study of visuomotor coordination during reaching for moving targets

Getting hold of approaching objects: in search of a common control of hand-closure initiation in catching and grasping

Both in the catching and grasping component of prehension, the hand opens and closes before hand-object contact is made. The initiation of hand closure has to be coordinated with the time course of the decrease of the distance between the hand and the target object, i.e., with the reaching component in prehension or the approach of the target in catching. The authors investigated if this initiation of hand closure could be explained by a common control. For this purpose, they fitted the dynamic timing model to data from the two tasks. In both tasks, participants were asked to get hold of an object approaching along the table top at a constant velocity. In the prehension task, participants could reach out to grasp the object; in the catching task, they were required to keep their hand stationary. In comparison with other accounts, the dynamic timing model performed best in explaining the data. The model proved adequate for the prehension task but not for the current catching task.

Concurrent visuomotor behaviour improves form discrimination in a patient with visual form agnosia

It is now well established that the visual brain is divided into two visual streams, the ventral and the dorsal stream. Milner and Goodale have suggested that the ventral stream is dedicated for processing vision for perception and the dorsal stream vision for action [A.D. Milner & M.A. Goodale (1995) The Visual Brain in Action, Oxford University Press, Oxford]. However, it is possible that ongoing processes in the visuomotor stream will nevertheless have an effect on perceptual processes. This possibility was examined in the present study. We have examined the visual form-discrimination performance of the form-agnosic patient D.F. with and without a concurrent visuomotor task, and found that her performance was significantly improved in the former condition. This suggests that the visuomotor behaviour provides cues that enhance her ability to recognize the form of the target object. In control experiments we have ruled out proprioceptive and efferent cues, and therefore propose that D.F. can, to a significant degree, access the object's visuomotor representation in the dorsal stream. Moreover, we show that the grasping-induced perceptual improvement disappears if the target objects only differ with respect to their shape but not their width. This suggests that shape information per se is not used for this grasping task.

The role of V5/MT+ in the control of catching movements: an rTMS study

Milner and Goodale described a model which distinguishes between two visual streams in the brain. It is claimed that the ventral stream serves object recognition (i.e. vision for perception), and the dorsal streams provides visual information for the guidance of action (i.e. vision for action). This model is supported by evidence from the domain of spatial vision, but it remains unclear how motion vision fits into that model. More specifically, it is unclear how the motion complex V5/MT contributes to vision for perception and vision for action. We addressed this question in an earlier study with the V5-lesioned patient LM. Can a motion-blind patient reach for moving objects? We found that she is not only impaired in perceptual tasks but also in catching, suggesting a role for V5/MT+ in vision for both perception and action. However, LM's lesion goes beyond V5/MT+ into more dorsal regions. It is thus possible, that the catching deficit was not produced by damage to V5/MT+ itself. In this case, one would expect that selective interference with V5/MT+ would have no effect on catching. In the present study we tested this prediction by applying rTMS over V5/MT+ of the left hemisphere while healthy subjects were either performing a catching or a reaching task. We found that V5-TMS reduced the speed of the catching but not the reaching response. These results confirm that V5/MT+ is not only involved in perceptual but also in visuomotor tasks.

Effects of deep brain stimulation on prehensile movements in PD patients are less pronounced when external timing cues are provided

It has been repeatedly demonstrated that the movements of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) are less impaired when external timing cues are provided. This suggests that the basal ganglia, which are impaired in PD, are less involved in the control of externally timed movements. In the present study, we tested this hypothesis by contrasting the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the basal ganglia (more precisely, the internal globus pallidum) on internally versus externally timed movements. Our first movement task was a standard prehensile task involving a reach-to-grasp movement. In the externally-timed condition, the target object was moving rapidly away from the subject; in the internally-timed condition, the target object was stationary. We found, that for most aspects of the prehensile movement the effect of DBS was less pronounced in the externally than in the internally timed condition. A similar reduction of the DBS effects in the externally-timed condition was also found for a second movement task, which required an isolated grasping movement. We conclude that the basal ganglia are significantly less involved in the control of externally timed movements.