Involvement of two different mechanisms in trigeminal ganglion-evoked vasodilatation in the cat lower lip: role of experimental conditions

Occurrence of parasympathetic vasodilator fibers in the lower lip of the guinea-pig

The present study was designed to examine whether there are parasympathetic vasodilator fibers in the lower lip of the guinea-pig. Electrical stimulation of the central cut end of the lingual nerve of guinea-pigs evoked intensity- and frequency-dependent decreases in lower lip blood flow and systemic arterial blood pressure (SABP). Pretreatment with guanethidine, a postganglionic sympathetic nerve blocker and antihypertensive drug (30 mg kg(-1), s.c., 24 h prior to experiments), reduced the magnitude of the decrease in SABP while the intensity- and frequency-dependent increases of the lip blood flow occurred by the lingual nerve stimulation only on the side ipsilateral to stimulation. Increases in the lip blood flow evoked by lingual nerve stimulation in guanethidine pretreated guinea-pigs were reduced by hexamethonium (an autonomic ganglion cholinergic blocker) in a dose-dependent manner. When fluoro-gold (a retrograde neural tracer) was injected into the lower lip, labeled neurons were observed in the ipsilateral otic ganglion. The present study indicates the presence of parasympathetic vasodilator fibers originating from the otic parasympathetic ganglion in the guinea-pig lower lip, similar to those reported previously in rats, cats, rabbits and humans.

Evidence for parasympathetic vasodilator fibres in the rat masseter muscle

The present study was designed to examine (1) whether there are vasodilator fibres in the masseter muscle, and (2) if there are, to establish the neural pathways mediating these responses in urethane-anaesthetized rats. Electrical stimulation of the central cut end of the lingual nerve (LN) elicited intensity- and frequency-dependent increases of the blood flow in the masseter muscle (MBF) and lower lip (LBF). Increases in both the MBF and LBF evoked by the LN stimulation were reduced by hexamethonium in a dose-dependent manner (1-10 mg kg(-1)). Pretreatment with phentolamine or propranolol at a dose of 100 microg kg(-1) had no effect on the increases in either MBF or LBF evoked by LN stimulation. Pretreatment with atropine (100 microg kg(-1)) significantly reduced the MBF increase induced by LN stimulation, but not that in the LBF. The sectioning of the superior cervical sympathetic trunk did not affect the responses. MBF increases occurred with electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion, and these increases were significantly reduced by the administration of hexamethonium and atropine. Lidocaine microinjection into the trigeminal spinal nucleus or salivatory nuclei caused a significant attenuation of the LN-induced MBF increases. When wheat germ agglutinin-horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) was injected into the masseter muscle, labelled neurones were abundantly observed in the otic ganglion. The present study indicates that there are parasympathetic cholinergic and noncholinergic vasodilator fibres originating from cell bodies in the otic ganglion in the rat masseter muscle. The MBF increase evoked by activation of the parasympathetic fibres occurred via the trigeminal mediated reflex, suggesting that the novel parasympathetic vasodilator response may play an important role in the regulation of the haemodynamics of jaw muscles.

Reduction in parasympathetic reflex vasodilatation following stereotaxic ear-bar insertion: importance of reduced afferent input

As in our previous report, when cats were fitted with stereotaxic ear-bars 'type A' animals (26 out of 41) still exhibited a parasympathetic reflex lip blood flow (LBF) increase in response to lingual nerve stimulation, while in 'type B' animals (the remaining 15) it was greatly reduced or abolished. We compared (in both magnitude and in their sensitivity to hexamethonium, 10 mg/kg, i.v.) the LBF responses evoked by electrical stimulation of various sites within the reflex arc (lingual nerve, trigeminal ganglion, spinal trigeminal nucleus (Vsp)) in type A and type B animals to examine where the suppressive effect of ear-bar insertion might be exerted (using artificially ventilated, cervically vago-sympathectomized cats deeply anesthetized with alpha-chloralose and urethane). After ear-bar insertion: (a) in type A animals, stimulation of both lingual nerve and Vsp evoked a similar, hexamethonium-sensitive LBF increase; (b) in type B animals (in which lingual-nerve stimulation evoked no LBF increase), Vsp stimulation evoked a hexamethonium-sensitive LBF increase; (c) in both type A and type B animals, trigeminal ganglion stimulation consistently elicited an LBF increase (abolished by hexamethonium in type A, but reduced by only 50% in type B). These results suggest (i) that abolition of the lingual nerve-induced parasympathetic reflex vasodilatation by ear-bar insertion is due to reduced afferent traffic (in peripheral trigeminal or facial nerves) rather than to a damaged efferent output, and (ii) this effect in type B animals seems somehow to allow an antidromic (hexamethonium-insensitive) vasodilatation to occur on trigeminal ganglion stimulation.