Genetically modified tumour vaccines (GMTV) in melanoma clinical trials

Autologous versus allogeneic cell-based vaccines?

Devitalized tumor cells either autologous or allogeneic have been used as anti-cancer vaccines with the purpose of facilitating the induction of an immune response able to destroy growing tumor cells since the identification of tumor antigens was deemed not to be necessary, particularly in the autologous system. Such vaccines were tested first in animal models and then in the clinics as unmodified tumor cells or after insertion of genes coding for factors known to increase the immune response against tumors. These vaccines were usually given by subcutaneous injections along with different immunological adjuvants. Such immunization approaches were found to be effective in mice when carried out in a tumor preventive setting but significantly less in the therapeutic context, that is, in the presence of an established tumor. By analyzing several clinical trials of vaccination using either autologous or allogeneic unmodified and gene-modified tumor cells published in the last 10 to 15 years, we conclude for a lack of sufficient evidence for efficacy of this strategy in inducing both a strong immune response and a therapeutic response. A potential variant of this strategy is the direct intratumoral injection of immunostimulatory genes delivered by vectors in vivo. But even this approach failed to provide a statistically significant clinical benefit for the cancer patients.We also point out the inherent drawbacks of the tumor cell-based vaccine strategy that include (a) a limited frequency by which human tumor lines can be obtained from clinical samples, (b) the low number of available cells for vaccination, (c) the release of immune-suppressive factors by tumor cells, and (d) the cost and time necessary for standardization and collecting/expanding a number of cells according to the approved regulatory requirements. Thus, taking into consideration the new developments in cancer vaccines, we believe that tumor cell-based vaccines should be dismissed as anti-cancer vaccines unless a clear benefit could be demonstrated by the few ongoing trials of combination with new immunomodulating reagents (eg, anti-CTLA4, PD-1, chemotherapy).

Immunotherapy for melanoma: current status and perspectives

Immunotherapy is an important modality in the therapy of patients with malignant melanoma. As our knowledge about this disease continues to expand, so does the immunotherapeutic armamentarium. Nevertheless, successful preclinical models do not always translate into clinically meaningful results. The authors give a comprehensive analysis of most recent advances in the immune anti-melanoma therapy, including interleukins, interferons, other cytokines, adoptive immunotherapy, biochemotherapy, as well as the use of different vaccines. We also present the fundamental concepts behind various immune enhancement strategies, passive immunotherapy, as well as the use of immune adjuvants. This review brings into discussion the results of newer and older clinical trials, as well as potential limitations and drawbacks seen with the utilization of various immune therapies in malignant melanoma. Development of novel therapeutic approaches, along with optimization of existing therapies, continues to hold a great promise in the field of melanoma therapy research. Use of anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 antibodies, realization of the importance of co-stimulatory signals, which translated into the use of agonist CD40 monoclonal antibodies, as well as activation of innate immunity through enhanced expression of co-stimulatory molecules on the surface of dendritic cells by TLR agonists are only a few items on the list of recent advances in the treatment of melanoma. The need to engineer better immune interactions and to boost positive feedback loops appear crucial for the future of melanoma therapy, which ultimately resides in our understanding of the complexity of immune responses in this disease.

Design of clinical trials for therapeutic cancer vaccines development

Advances in molecular and cellular biology as well as biotechnology led to definition of a group of drugs referred to as medicinal products of advanced technologies. It includes gene therapy products, somatic cell therapeutics and tissue engineering. Therapeutic cancer vaccines including whole cell tumor cells vaccines or gene modified whole cells belong to somatic therapeutics and/or gene therapy products category. The drug development is a multistep complex process. It comprises of two phases: preclinical and clinical. Guidelines on preclinical testing of cell based immunotherapy medicinal products have been defined by regulatory agencies and are available. However, clinical testing of therapeutic cancer vaccines is still under debate. It presents a serious problem since recently clinical efficacy of the number of cancer vaccines has been demonstrated that focused a lot of public attention. In general clinical testing in the current form is very expensive, time consuming and poorly designed what may lead to overlooking of products clinically beneficial for patients. Accordingly regulatory authorities and researches including Cancer Vaccine Clinical Trial Working Group proposed three regulatory solutions to facilitate clinical development of cancer vaccines: cost-recovery program, conditional marketing authorization, and a new development paradigm. Paradigm includes a model in which cancer vaccines are investigated in two types of clinical trials: proof-of-principle and efficacy. The proof-of-principle trial objectives are: safety; dose selection and schedule of vaccination; and demonstration of proof-of-principle. Efficacy trials are randomized clinical trials with objectives of demonstrating clinical benefit either directly or through a surrogate. The clinical end points are still under debate.

Translational research in melanoma

Current treatment of malignant melanoma exemplifies not only the need for translational research but also many of the challenges of moving from bench to bedside. Melanoma remains unique among solid tumors in that its treatment primarily is surgical. Radiation is of limited benefit, and chemotherapy has been disappointing in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings. This leaves clinicians with few options for reducing the chance of recurrence after surgery and for treating unresectable disease. With this in mind, there has been a fervent attempt to identify novel approaches to melanoma therapy and translate them into clinical use.

Clinical trials of active cancer immunotherapy

Active immunotherapy of cancer needs its own clinical trials' methodology. The standard methodology paradigm for clinical trials in oncology was developed for cytotoxic drugs, which differ dramatically from cancer vaccines in their mode of action and toxicity profile. To minimize the risk of overlooking benefits for patients, Mackiewicz and Nawrocki invite to open discussion on vaccine trials' methodology. Our point of view is based on several Phase I and II trials with hundreds of melanoma patients treated with allogenic cellular vaccine genetically modified with cytokine genes. We feel that a simplified two-stage clinical trial design without a separate Phase I is justified. In the first stage, preliminary efficacy together with proof-of-principle and feasibility issues could be addressed. For real efficacy assessment, careful consideration of end points is necessary. Immunologic responses and objective clinical responses are not the best measures of vaccine efficacy for many patients who benefit from treatment. Randomized single institution studies with time-to-event end points are probably well suited for such combined Phase I/II studies. In the second stage trial (Phase III), the final efficacy analysis with comparator arm is needed.

Loss of oncostatin M receptor beta in metastatic melanoma cells

Oncostatin M (OSM) is an interleukin-6 (IL-6) type cytokine originally described by its capacity to inhibit melanoma proliferation in vitro. Here, the mechanisms involved in resistance to growth inhibition by OSM were analysed for the first time on a large panel of metastatic melanoma cell lines. OSM resistance did not strictly correlate with IL-6, interferon-gamma or tumor necrosis factor-alpha resistance. Rather, it correlated with a specific loss of the OSM receptor-beta (OSMRbeta) subunit, in conjunction with a lower level of histone acetylation in the OSMRbeta promoter region. Treatment of various OSM-resistant melanoma cells with the histone deacetylase inhibitor Trichostatin A increased activity and histone acetylation of the OSMRbeta promoter as well as expression of OSMRbeta mRNA and protein, allowing OSM to activate the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and to inhibit proliferation. Other defects associated with OSM resistance were identified at the level of OSMRbeta transcription or protein expression, as well as downstream of or parallel to STAT3 activation. Altogether, our results suggest a role for OSM in the prevention of melanoma progression and that metastatic melanoma cells could escape this growth control by the epigenetic silencing of OSMRbeta.

Necrotic death but not irradiation abolishes costimulation of T-cell effector functions and survival by CD80-expressing tumor cells

Tumor vaccination by the use of gene-modified cancer cells that provide costimulatory signals has been successfully applied in preclinical animal models and is currently evaluated in a variety of clinical settings. In previous work, we demonstrated the efficacy of B7.1/CD80 to promote tumor immunity in syngeneic murine models and to prevent deletion of activated T cells by activation-induced cell death (AICD). In clinical trials, tumor cell vaccines are generally inactivated to avoid transfer of live tumor cells, i.e., additional tumor burden. Previous data indicated, however, that inactivation of tumor cells by lethal ionizing irradiation abrogates tumor vaccination by CD80-expressing cells. Here, we compare living and irradiated allogeneic tumor cells regarding their capacity to induce T-cell effector functions and their propensity to interfere with T-cell deletion by apoptosis. Both lethally irradiated and nonirradiated tumor cells facilitated T-cell proliferation, tumor cell lysis, and interfered with T-cell AICD to a similar extent. In contrast, necrotic tumor cells failed to costimulate T-cell effector functions. Thus, irradiation does not seem to hamper tumor cell-mediated costimulation of T-cell effector functions. In contrast, necrosis of gene-modified tumor cells abrogates costimulation of T cells by CD80-expressing cells.

Adjuvants for vaccines, a quest

Efficient vaccines comprise a specific moiety: the structures presenting the protective antigenic determinants, and a nonspecific moiety: the adjuvant components. Dramatic advances have been reported concerning the specific moiety and new and highly purified immunogens have been defined and prepared. The use of vaccines is no longer restricted to the prevention of infections, they are now considered as therapeutic tools especially in cancer immunotherapy. In contrast, alum is still the only adjuvant suitable for clinical application. The success of the new avenues opened in vaccinology depends on the availability of appropriate immunomodulating preparations. For each given type of vaccine, the optimal profile of activity of the adjuvant moiety has to be defined, according to the response required to provide protection or cure. Thus, it is urgent to design and develop adjuvants active not only on the humoral responses but also on the cellular immune responses. This adjuvant function must have the capacity of turning on the innate responses, which play a decisive and instructive role in emanating the adaptive immune responses. These considerations encourage one to finalize immunomodulating procedures rather than to look only for new adjuvant compounds. Manipulations of dendritic cells (DCs), use of heat-shock proteins (HSPs) as carriers endowed of adjuvant activity or introduction of varying immunostimulating motives in genetic vaccines represent examples illustrating this new rationale.

Efficacy and safety of HLA-B7/beta-2 microglobulin plasmid DNA/lipid complex (Allovectin-7) in patients with metastatic melanoma

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B7/beta-2 microglobulin plasmid DNA/lipid complex, otherwise known as Allovectin-7 (Vical, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), has been developed as a non-viral gene delivery product. After multiple laboratory and human trials, it appears that the concept of gene transfer has established itself as a clinical reality. While the manifestations of the gene transfer have not been as dramatic as one might have hoped, HLA-B7/beta-2 microglobulin plasmid DNA/lipid complex appears to be a promising agent with an extremely safe toxicity profile. Ongoing trials are further investigating potential clinical uses of Allovectin-7.

The role of transsignalling via the agonistic soluble IL-6 receptor in human diseases

The activation of cells that do not express the membrane bound interleukin-6 6 receptor (IL-6R) by IL-6 and the soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R) is termed transsignalling. Transsignalling may be an pathogenetic factor in human diseases as diverse as multiple myeloma (MM), Castleman's disease, prostate carcinoma, Crohn's disease, systemic sclerosis, Still's disease, osteoporosis and cardiovascular diseases. IL-6 and sIL-6R may directly or indirectly enhance their own production on endothelial or bone marrow stromal cells. Positive feedback autocrine loops thus created in affected organs may either cause or maintain disease progression. In autoimmune or vasculitic disease, the ability of the IL-6/sIL-6R complex to inhibit apoptosis of autoreactive T-cells may be central to the development of tissue specific autoimmunity. The anti-apoptotic effect of the IL-6/sIL-6R complex may be involved in tumour genesis and resistance to chemotherapy. Only in rare cases, where counterregulation has failed, there is a notable systemic effect of IL-6/sIL-6R. Appropriate animal models are necessary to establish the pathogenetic role of the IL-6/sIL-6R complex. A specific treatment option for diseases influenced by the sIL-6R could be based on gp130-Fc, a soluble gp130 (sgp130) linked to the Fc-fragment of IgG1. gp130-Fc has shown efficacy in vivo in animal models of Crohn's disease.

Gene-based therapy of malignant melanoma

Melanoma continues to present a major therapeutic challenge to oncologists, oncologic surgeons, and dermatologists. Recent advances in molecular genetics and improvement in our understanding of immune responses to tumors have generated an interest in using gene-based treatment strategies to fight melanoma. Several basic strategies have emerged: (1) strengthening of the immune response against tumors by genetic modification of some target cell populations of the host using immunostimulatory genes such as cytokines and by genetic immunization with the genes coding for melanoma-associated antigens recognized by cytotoxic T cells; (2) interference with signaling cascades; and (3) suicide gene strategies. This article reviews these novel strategies and summarizes the most recent data generated by European groups either in experimental studies or in clinical trials.

Cytokine modified tumor vaccines

The immune system can recognize tumors, but may be actively tolerized to tumors during the tumorigenesis process. The identity of most tumor antigens remains unknown, but the number is growing due to new techniques. Most clinical trials using genetically modified tumor vaccines have shown immunological responses (DTH), but few clinical responses. Certain chemotherapeutic agents may enhance the immune effects of genetically modified tumor vaccines.

The designer cytokine hyper-IL-6 mediates growth inhibition and GM-CSF-dependent rejection of B16 melanoma cells

The low immunogenic B16 melanoma cell line was transfected with a mammalian expression vector containing the complementary DNA for a sIL-6R/IL-6 fusion protein, termed Hyper-IL-6 (H-IL-6), which was shown to have biological activities at 100-1000-fold lower concentrations than IL-6 in combination with sIL-6R. The secreted p84 glycoprotein was detected in the supernatant of transfected cells and was fully active on BAF3/gp130 cells, which respond to IL-6/sIL-6R but not to IL-6 alone. Administration of recombinant H-IL-6 to C57BL/6 mice resulted in a prolonged acute phase protein gene expression indicating long systemic persistence of the fusion protein. Transfected B16 cells (B16/H-IL6 cells) showed morphological alterations in combination with a dramatic growth inhibition in vitro. Subcutaneous injection in C57BL/6 mice resulted in an almost complete rejection of B16/H-IL6 cells. This effect was partially abolished in FVB/BL/6 mice transgenic for a GM-CSF receptor antagonist, indicating a GM-CSF-dependent rejection of H-IL-6 transfected B16 cells. These results demonstrate that the anti-tumor effect of cytokines like IL-6 which are secreted by transfected melanoma cells at least in part depends on GM-CSF activity.