Detection of minimal residual disease in peripheral blood stem cells from two acute myeloid leukemia patients with trisomy 8 predicts early relapse after autologous bone marrow transplantation

Risk Stratification, Measurable Residual Disease, and Outcomes of AML Patients with a Trisomy 8 Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

For most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring a trisomy 8 an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a suitable and recommended consolidation therapy. However, comparative outcome analyses between patients with and without trisomy 8 undergoing allogeneic HSCT have not been performed so far.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical features, outcomes, and measurable residual disease (MRD) of 659 AML (12%, n = 81, with a trisomy 8) patients subjected to allogeneic HSCT as a consolidation therapy.

RESULTS

The presence of a trisomy 8 associated with a trend for higher age at diagnosis, AML of secondary origin, lower white blood cell counts at diagnosis, worse ELN2017 genetic risk, wild-type NPM1, and mutated IDH1/2 and JAK2. Outcomes after allogeneic HSCT in the entire cohort did not differ between patients with a sole trisomy 8, trisomy 8 with additional cytogenetic aberrations or without a trisomy 8. A trisomy 8 did not affect outcomes within the three ELN2017 risk groups. In accordance with findings in unselected patient cohorts, persistent MRD at allogeneic HSCT in patients with a trisomy 8 identified individuals with a higher risk of relapse following allogeneic HSCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of trisomy 8 patients after allogeneic HSCT did not compare unfavorably to that of other AML patients following allogeneic HSCT. Rather than the presence or absence of a trisomy 8, additional genetic aberrations and MRD at HSCT define outcome differences and aid in informed treatment decisions.

Trisomy 8 in acute myeloid leukemia

Introduction: Trisomy 8 is one of the most common cytogenetic alterations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with a frequency between 10% and 15%.Areas covered: The authors summarize the latest research regarding biological, translational and clinical aspects of trisomy 8 in AML.Expert opinion: Trisomy 8 can be found together with other karyotypes, although it also occurs as a sole aberration. The last decade's research has brought attention to molecular genetic alterations as strong contributors of leukemogenesis. AML with trisomy 8 seems to be associated with mutations in DNA methylation genes, spliceosome complex genes, and myeloid transcription factor genes, and these alterations probably have stronger implication for leukemic pathogenesis, treatment and hence prognosis, than the existence of trisomy 8 itself. Especially mutations in the RUNX1 and ASXL1 genes occur in high frequencies, and search for such mutations should be mandatory part of the diagnostic workup. AML with trisomy 8 is classified as intermediate-risk AML after recent European Leukemia Net (ELN) classification, and hence allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) should be consider as consolidation therapy for this patient group.Trisomy 8 is frequently occurring in AML, although future molecular genetic workup should be performed, to optimize the diagnosis and treatment of these patients.

Trisomy 8 in Philadelphia-negative cells during imatinib therapy

Targeted therapy with imatinib selectively suppresses Philadelphia-positive cells in chronic myeloid leukemia cells, with reappearance of apparently normal hemopoiesis in a considerable number of patients. Recently, clonal abnormalities have been observed in Philadelphia-negative cells during imatinib therapy, the biologic and prognostic significance of which is actually unknown. A case of trisomy 8 occurring in Philadelphia-negative cells, which was treated by bone marrow transplantation, is reported. Chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia-negative cells do not seem to herald disease transformation, but the long-term prognosis may be influenced by an increased incidence of myelodysplasia in younger patients.

Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect minimal residual disease in hematopoietic stem cell assays from peripheral blood stem cells of 2 patients with trisomy 8 acute myeloid leukemia

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to analyze peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and stem cell assays (SCA) derived from them in 2 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with trisomy 8 as the sole chromosome abnormality prior to undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. In both cases, the demonstration of cells containing trisomy 8 in the stem cell product led to significant changes in the patients' treatment. In the initial PBSC collections from each patient, trisomy 8 was found in aspirated granulocyte-monocyte (GM) colonies or aspirated GM clusters but not entire cell populations of SCA dish or uncultured PBSC (one patient). FISH analyses for specific cytogenetic abnormalities in hematopoietic stem cell cultures may be a more useful means of assessing the quality of the stem cell product in patients being considered for autologous stem cell transplantation.

Determination of cutoff values to detect small aneuploid clones by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization: the Poisson model is a more appropriate approach. Should single-cell trisomy 8 be considered a clonal defect?

We applied a dual-color interphase in situ fluorescence hybridization (I-FISH) technique using centromeric probes specific to chromosomes 7 and 8 on 20 control samples in order to define the statistical model best suited to determine cutoff values for detection of small abnormal clones. We found that the Poisson model is a more appropriate approach than a Gaussian model. Then, based on the analysis of 91 samples from 80 patients with myelocytic malignant hemopathies and either clonal or nonclonal -7 or +8 as determined with conventional cytogenetics (CC), we compared the respective power of I-FISH and CC for detection of aneuploidy, with special emphasis on the potential contribution of I-FISH as a complement to CC in the case of small abnormal clones. The I-FISH results were positive in samples with clonal -7 or +8 according to CC analysis. Whereas I-FISH was negative in samples with nonclonal -7 according to CC, thus confirming the reliability of the criteria used to define the clonality of -7; the situation was different with nonclonal +8. I-FISH revealed the clonality of +8 in most samples with single-cell +8. In several cases, however, the unquestionable clonal nature of +8, as evidenced during follow-up, could not be established with either CC or I-FISH according to accepted criteria. Our data suggest that, in case of a single metaphase with +8, the general rule should be amended and the single-cell +8 should be considered and reported as potentially clonal.